The Scooper UPper

Problem Statement

Elderly dog owners need a way to pick up waste that accommodates low dexterity, doesn’t require bending, and limits the amount of extra items they carry in order to aid and alleviate them in the maintenance of their dogs.

User & Purchaser

We would be catering to elders with dogs and sell our product to retailers for pet related products.

State of the Art

Jaw Scoop 

Cons:

Swivel Bin & Long Handle Rake 

Cons:


Portable Dog Poop Scooper 

Cons:

 “likely to become intimate with pet’s waste when learning to master this device”



Specifications

Prototype & Evolution

We first started off by designing and sketching the ways in which we envisioned our device to look like.

We played around with numerous version of claws as well as mechanisms in order to figure out which configurations would be most suitable for our final prototype.

We then settled on a design for our claws, base, and handle in Solid Works.

From there we continued to test and experiment with different dimensions and fix minimal details for our final working prototype.

Testing


For our testing we measured how the Scooper UPper performed relative to 6 other mothods of picking up dog waste (images below) and against our specifications. We tested the different methods with users of varying heights and on different surfaces: concrete and tall grass. 

Our most important specifications were the amount of user bending, force applied, and time to operate the devices and pick up waste. Charts of the three most important specifications and how each method performed are down below. We further tested the force of our device using the equation Fs=kx. For the Scooper UPer that ended up being 2.65lbf = k(0.43in)(15°) so k =0.41. For the bulldozer that ended up being 12.38lbf = k(0.35in)(35°) so k =1.01. A lower k value concluded that the Scooper UPper requires less force applied than the bulldozer.


Our first prototype did not pass size to carry as it was too long and bulky. It also didn't pass the time requirement as it was very time consuming to get the back through without a hole for fingers. It also didn't always pick up waste as the jaws didn't open very wide. Our second prototype and final device passed all of our specifications except size to carry. In the future we will improve our device by slimming it down, sharpening the teeth, and having jaws that open wider. 

Ethics and Sustainability


The choking hazard associated with dog waste scoopers is relatively low, but it is still important to exercise caution and use them properly to prevent any potential incidents. The dog bags can also be a choking hazard, so it is best to keep this device away from small children

3D printing with plastic, particularly PLA (polylactic acid), can raise concerns about sustainability. PLA is often considered more environmentally friendly than traditional plastics derived from fossil fuels. However, its disposal can still contribute to landfill waste if not properly managed.

Using aluminum as an alternative material for 3D-printed jaws can offer advantages in terms of sustainability. Aluminum is a lightweight metal as it has better recyclability properties. Its ability to be recycled means aluminum products can be repurposed, reducing the need for new aluminum extraction and minimizing the associated environmental impact. 


Business Plan

Economics

When we calculated variable costs, we assumed a rate of $12/hr for labor. Processing the aluminum tube would only take about 10 minutes which includes drilling a hole and sawing. Assembly would take about half an hour.