Found a great resource? Share it!
π― Conclusion is assessed in Criterion C β Critical Thinking
π IB rubric :
βConclusions are well developed, fully supported by the evidence presented, and consistent with the arguments in the essay.β
πͺ A strong conclusion:
Clearly answers the research question
Is consistent with the evidence and reasoning throughout the essay
Evaluates the implications, limitations, or significance of the findings
βΌοΈ Weak conclusions: are vague, repetitive, or not evidence-based and will drag the Criterion C score down.
If the conclusion introduces off-topic points, or strays from the research question, it can suggest poor focus or weak method which may affect Criterion A.
ποΈ A Strong EE Conclusion Should Have:
β A direct and specific answer to the research question
β A summary of key findings, tightly linked to analysis
β An evaluation of limitations (of method, scope, or evidence)
β A final thought or insight: not a clichΓ©, but a reflection on why the findings matter
π A Conclusion Should Not:
β Introduce new arguments or evidence
β Rely on generalisations like βin conclusion, this is a big issueβ
β Be vague or emotionally biased
β Contradict the main body without explanation
π Ask Yourself: βIf the examiner only read my conclusion, would they understand the full argument and its significance?β
π World Studies EE β Model Conclusion
Topic: The intersection of fast fashion and water scarcity in Bangladesh
In conclusion, the fast fashion industry has had a measurable and detrimental impact on freshwater availability in Bangladesh. This interdisciplinary investigation β combining environmental science, economics, and global development β has shown that textile production consumes vast water resources, often in regions already experiencing scarcity. Economic incentives and weak environmental governance further exacerbate the problem.
While the investigation was limited to publicly available NGO and UN data, and did not include primary interviews or hydrological measurements, it successfully illustrates the interconnectedness of consumption, environmental degradation, and economic globalization.
The study underscores the need for more sustainable production practices and ethical consumer awareness, reflecting the urgency of rethinking resource use in an increasingly interconnected world.
Why it works:Β
β Synthesizes interdisciplinary insight
β Returns to both the global and local aspects of the issue
β Addresses data limitations transparently
β Encourages real-world reflection and action
β Aligns beautifully with the World Studies mission β interconnected thinking
π°οΈ History EE β Model Conclusion
Topic: Appeasement and WWII)
In conclusion, the policy of appeasement played a decisive role in emboldening Nazi Germany's territorial ambitions.
Through the analysis of British foreign policy between 1936 and 1939, it is evident that the lack of immediate resistance to Hitlerβs early aggression β especially the remilitarization of the Rhineland and the Munich Agreement β directly contributed to the outbreak of World War II.
While some historians argue appeasement was a necessary strategy due to Britainβs post-war fatigue, this essay has shown that it ultimately failed to contain fascist expansion.
The limitations of this investigation lie in its Eurocentric focus, which excludes broader international responses.
Nonetheless, the evidence strongly supports the conclusion that appeasement, though rooted in rational political concerns, critically undermined European stability in the late 1930s.
Why it works:Β
β Directly answers the research question with confidence and clarity
β Summarizes key findings without repeating everything
β Weighs contrasting interpretations (mentions opposing historians)
β Acknowledges limitations (Eurocentric scope)
β Offers final insight into why this matters historically
π¬ Biology EE β Model Conclusion
Topic: The effect of pH on the activity of catalase in Solanum tuberosum
In conclusion, the investigation confirms that catalase activity in Solanum tuberosum is highly pH-dependent, with peak efficiency observed at pH 7. Deviations on either side of this neutral value significantly reduced the rate of oxygen production, indicating enzyme denaturation. These results support existing biochemical theories on enzyme-substrate interactions and the sensitivity of tertiary protein structures to environmental changes.
While the experiment was controlled and replicable, its limitations include reliance on a single enzyme source and room-temperature conditions. Further research could compare catalase activity across plant species or under varying temperature profiles to simulate environmental variation. Ultimately, this study reinforces the importance of pH homeostasis in biological systems and models how minor chemical shifts can have macroscopic physiological impacts.
Why it works:Β
β Answers the RQ clearly with data-backed insight
β Connects findings to biological theory
β Acknowledges experimental limitations
β Suggests next steps in research
β Reflects on the wider biological implications
π§ Psychology EE β Model Conclusion
Topic: The effect of sleep deprivation on short-term memory
To conclude, the literature reviewed provides consistent evidence that sleep deprivation impairs short-term memory performance. Across multiple cognitive domains β including working memory, recall, and attentional focus β individuals subjected to sleep loss showed measurable decline. The synthesis of experimental studies supports the hypothesis that sleep is essential for optimal memory consolidation and retrieval.
Nonetheless, the research examined had limitations, including small sample sizes and reliance on laboratory settings that may not reflect real-world complexity. Future studies could focus on longitudinal effects or cross-cultural differences. Despite these gaps, the conclusion remains that sleep plays a critical role in sustaining short-term memory, with meaningful implications for academic, occupational, and clinical settings.
Why it works: β Synthesizes and confirms the RQ with clear evidence
β Evaluates the scope and context of the findings
β Addresses research limitations
β Suggests future directions
β Applies findings to real-world settings β personal and societal relevance
π Conclusion Checklist:
π€ Have I directly answered the research question?
π€ Is the conclusion consistent with the evidence and argument in my essay?
π€ Have I included discipline-specific insight or reflection?
π€ Did I mention any limitations or scope constraints?
π€ Have I avoided introducing new arguments or data?
π€ Do I offer meaningful final insight, something beyond summary?
π€ Is the tone formal, reflective, and academic?