S.1 The curriculum provides for the development of the following professional competencies:
The program through its competency-based education (CBE) approach and integrated experiential learning creates a significant impact on the holistic development of its clientele. This isn't just about listing skills; it's about actively designing the learning journey to ensure students can do what's required or necessary to meet global standards. It also underscores the unwavering commitment to graduating special education professionals who are not only knowledgeable but profoundly capable of making a tangible difference in the lives of learners with diverse needs.
S.1.1. acquisition of knowledge and theories based on the field of specialization/discipline;
The program ensures robust knowledge acquisition through rigorous foundational courses and a highly qualified faculty. Dedicated courses cover various exceptionalities, specialized educational psychology, and core inclusive education theories. Faculty members, often practitioners themselves, enrich learning with current research and real-world insights from Western Visayas, such as local early intervention strategies. This approach fosters a deep, contextually relevant theoretical understanding, moving beyond mere procedural training. Consequently, graduates emerge as critical thinkers and problem-solvers, fully equipped to adapt to the diverse and evolving needs in special education.
S.1.2. application of the theories to real problems in the field
A cornerstone of the program, the practical application of theory is achieved through extensive case study analyses, problem-based learning (PBL), and community projects. Students consistently tackle scenarios drawn from actual special education settings in Talisay City and surrounding areas. For instance, they develop Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) for hypothetical students, considering available resources in local Negros Occidental schools. Faculty frequently invite local special education teachers to share real-world challenges, complementing student observations in regional inclusive classrooms. This active learning approach cultivates critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and innovation, preparing graduates to be "day-one ready" for the complexities of special needs education in Western Visayas.
S.1.3. demonstration of skills in applying different strategies in the actual work setting.
The program culminates in robust practicum and student teaching experiences, serving as the ultimate validation of student competency. Students immerse themselves in extensive fieldwork within partner schools and special education centers across Western Visayas, including areas like Silay City, Talisay City and Bacolod City. During these crucial placements, they receive close supervision and real-time feedback from experienced cooperating teachers and university faculty on various pedagogical skills. This hands-on learning requires students to plan lessons, manage inclusive classrooms, conduct assessments, and apply diverse strategies from behavior management to assistive technology. Ultimately, this direct, supervised application ensures graduates possess the practical skills and confidence needed to effectively implement inclusive practices and significantly enhance the quality of special education in the region.
S.2 There is a system of validation of subjects taken from other schools.
Accessible process for transferees and returning students. This involves a thorough review by the College of Education Dean and department heads, who evaluate official transcripts and course syllabi from previous institutions. A dedicated panel meticulously compares the content and learning outcomes of prior subjects against CHMSU's curriculum, recommending supplementary learning or bridging courses if gaps exist. This systematic validation is a best practice that significantly enhances student mobility and maximizes the recognition of prior learning. Ultimately, this commitment to fairness and efficiency attracts a wider pool of students while consistently upholding the program's academic rigor and quality standards.
S.3 The curriculum reflects the local, regional and national development goals as well as the institution's vision and mission.
The curriculum of the program is deeply embedded in its context through design, community engagement, and faculty development. It integrates modules on specific special education challenges and opportunities within Western Visayas, including local disability prevalence and cultural nuances. Faculty-led research and regional practicum placements further expose students to the realities and resource limitations of local special education. Nationally, the curriculum strictly adheres to CHED and DepEd standards, incorporating policies like the K to 12 Program and the Magna Carta for Persons with Disability. Crucially, it embodies CHMSU's vision of being a "Green University" fostering innovation and service, preparing graduates to be advocates, change catalysts, and builders of a truly inclusive society.
FIGURE 1. PROSPECTUS OF BACHELOR OF SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION
I.1.1 BEED
I.1.1.1. General Education - 63 units
I.1.1.2. Professional Education- 54 units
I.1.1.3. Specialization - 57 units
The BSNEd curriculum is meticulously designed to fully comply with the policies and standards set forth by the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), specifically referencing CMO #30, s. 2024. This ensures that the program aligns with national guidelines for teacher education. The total number of units for the BSNEd program is carefully calculated to be either equivalent to or judiciously exceed the 174 units prescribed for Bachelor of Elementary Education (BEEd) and Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSEd) programs. This ensures comprehensive coverage of foundational, professional, and specialized courses essential for special education, while also allowing for potential enrichment or in-depth study in specific areas of special needs education, demonstrating a commitment to thorough preparation beyond minimum requirements. (See figure 1)
I.2 The subjects are logically sequenced and prerequisite courses are identified.
The program is structured with a clear and logical progression of subjects. This means that courses are arranged in a sequential manner, building upon foundational knowledge and skills. Prerequisite courses are explicitly identified and strictly enforced. For example, foundational courses in child psychology or educational principles must be completed before students can enroll in specialized courses on specific disabilities or inclusive education strategies. This logical sequencing ensures that students acquire necessary foundational knowledge and skills before moving on to more complex topics, facilitating deeper understanding and effective learning. (See Figure 1)
1.3. The curricular content is responsive to the needs of the country and recent development in the profession.
The curriculum is dynamic and regularly reviewed to ensure its responsiveness to the evolving needs of the Philippines and the latest developments in the field of special needs education. This includes integrating current research on various disabilities, best practices in inclusive education, and emerging technologies that support learners with special needs. For instance, the curriculum incorporates content related to assistive technology, individualized education programs (IEPs) in the Philippine context, and culturally sensitive approaches to special education, reflecting both national priorities and global trends in the profession. (See Figure 1)
1.4. The curricular content covers the extent of the professional and technical preparation required of its graduates.
Graduates become competent and effective special needs education teachers, encompasses a broad range of topics, including:
Foundational theories of special education: Understanding various disabilities, their characteristics, and impact on learning.
Assessment and intervention strategies: Skills in identifying learning needs, conducting assessments, and designing appropriate interventions.
Curriculum adaptation and differentiation: Techniques for modifying general education curricula to meet the diverse needs of learners with disabilities.
Classroom management in inclusive settings: Strategies for creating supportive and effective learning environments for all students.
Collaboration with stakeholders: Skills in working with parents, other professionals, and the community.
Ethical considerations and legal frameworks: Understanding relevant laws and ethical guidelines in special needs education in the Philippines.
(See Figure 1)
I.5. The curriculum integrates values, reflective of national customs, culture and tradition in cases where applicable.
The curriculum recognizes the importance of integrating Filipino values, customs, culture, and traditions into the teaching and learning process, especially where relevant to special needs education. This includes promoting values such as pakikipagkapwa-tao (fellowship/humanity), bayanihan (communal unity and cooperation), empathy, and respect for diversity. For example, case studies and scenarios used in the curriculum might reflect Philippine family structures and community dynamics, ensuring that future special needs education professionals are culturally sensitive and responsive in their practice. (See Figure 1)
I.6. Opportunities for participation in hand-on activities, such as immersion/practical training and field study are maintained in the curriculum.
Distinguishing the crucial role of practical experience, the curriculum provides ample opportunities for hands-on activities. This includes:
Immersion/Practical Training (Practicum/Internship): Extensive supervised teaching experiences in various special education settings (e.g., SPED centers, inclusive classrooms, rehabilitation centers). This allows students to apply theoretical knowledge, develop teaching skills, and gain real-world experience under the guidance of experienced mentors.
Field Study: Structured observations and engagements in diverse educational environments, providing insights into the realities of teaching learners with special needs.
These practical components are strategically embedded throughout the curriculum, allowing for a gradual progression from observation to active participation and independent teaching.
I.7. The following activities are undertaken to ensure quality in the process of curriculum development as follows:
I.7.1. Participative planning and designing of the curriculum by the following stakeholders:
1.7.1.1 administration
1.7.1.2 faculty
1.7.1.3 students
1.7.1.4 alumni
1.7.1.5 representatives from the industry sector
To maintain the quality and relevance of the curriculum, a systematic development process is followed. This includes regular reviews with input from faculty, alumni, students, and external stakeholders to ensure alignment with national and international standards. The program actively consults parents, SPED professionals, government agencies, and industry partners to gather diverse feedback. Benchmarking against leading local and international institutions helps identify best practices and areas for improvement. Faculty are supported through ongoing professional development, and both formal and informal feedback mechanisms are in place to inform continual curriculum updates.
1.7.2 Periodic review, assessment, updating and approval of the curriculum by the Academic Council; and
Ensuring the curriculum's sustained quality, CHMSU implements a rigorous process of periodic review and assessment. The College of Education faculty regularly evaluates course outlines, learning outcomes, and assessment methods to ensure currency and effectiveness. Proposed updates and revisions stemming from these reviews are then meticulously discussed and assessed by the Academic Council. This body, composed of key academic leaders, rigorously scrutinizes all changes to ensure their coherence and adherence to educational standards. Finally, the Academic Council provides its official approval, formalizing the updated curriculum for implementation.
I.7.3 confirmation of the curriculum by the Board of Regents/Trustees (BOR/BOT)
Following approval by the Academic Council, the BSNEd curriculum undergoes a final and crucial step: confirmation by the CHMSU Board of Trustees. This high-level confirmation signifies the university's official endorsement and commitment to the program's structure and content. The Board's review ensures that the curriculum aligns with the university's overarching mission, vision, and strategic directions. Their confirmation provides the necessary institutional authority and legitimacy for the curriculum to be fully implemented and offered to students. This final approval underscores the comprehensive quality assurance embedded within the university's academic processes.
I.8. The program of the study allows the accommodation of students with special needs and assists them to finish the degree.
The program is designed with inclusivity at its core, actively accommodating students with special needs who aspire to become special education professionals. This involves providing necessary academic adjustments, such as extended time for exams, alternative formats for learning materials, or accessible classroom arrangements. The university also offers various student support services, including disability support offices and counseling, to address their unique academic and personal needs. Faculty members are encouraged to employ differentiated instruction and universal design for learning principles to ensure equitable access to the curriculum. Through these comprehensive accommodations and assistance, CHMSU is committed to empowering students with special needs to successfully complete their degree and contribute to the field of special education.
O.1 The curriculum is responsive and relevant to the demands of the times.
This outcome serves as the cornerstone for continually evolving the BSNEd curriculum, ensuring its alignment with contemporary special education needs. It mandates that program content incorporates the latest research, evidence-based practices, and national policies in inclusive education. Furthermore, the curriculum is dynamically updated to reflect the diverse learning profiles and technological advancements relevant to supporting individuals with special needs. By staying current, this prepares graduates who are highly adaptable and equipped to address the complex challenges within today's educational landscape. This responsiveness guarantees that future special education professionals from CHMSU possess the cutting-edge skills required by the modern workforce.
O.2 There is a passing average performance in the Licensure Examination of Teachers (LET).
This outcome directly measures the program's effectiveness in preparing graduates for professional licensure, a critical benchmark for quality assurance. The curriculum is meticulously designed to cover all competencies and subject areas assessed by the LET, ensuring comprehensive student preparation. Consistent achievement of a passing average signifies that the instructional methods and faculty expertise within the program are highly effective. This success in the LET not only validates the program's academic rigor but also enhances the employability and professional standing of CHMSU's special education graduates. Ultimately, a strong LET performance underscores the program's commitment to producing competent and licensed educators ready to serve diverse learners.
S.1 There is an institutional outcomes-based standard format in the preparation of course syllabi.
All BSNEd course syllabi adhere to a mandatory outcomes-based format. This format ensures that learning objectives are clearly stated, and all content and activities are designed to achieve these specific student outcomes. This standard promotes consistent, purposeful instruction across the program. Evidence includes the existence of a university-approved syllabus template with dedicated Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) or Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) sections. Furthermore, faculty training records on Outcome-based Education (OBE) principles and actual syllabi consistently following this structure demonstrate its practical implementation.
S.2 The syllabus includes a list of suggested readings and references of print and electronic resources within the last ten (10) years.
The syllabi are required to list current and relevant readings and references. These resources, whether print or electronic, must largely have publication dates within the last decade. This ensures students engage with the latest research and best practices in Special Needs Education. Evidence lies in auditing BSNEd syllabi, which consistently show up-to-date references. Additionally, CHMSU Library's acquisition records for College of Education resources reflect a prioritization of recent publications.
S.3 Copies of all course syllabi during the term are available at the Dean's office or in any other appropriate repository.
Current BSNEd course syllabi are made readily accessible for transparency and easy reference. They are centrally available at the College of Education Dean's office or a designated digital platform. This practice ensures students, faculty, and administrators can easily consult course outlines for the ongoing term. Evidence includes a documented policy requiring syllabus submission to the Dean's office. Physical or digital archives containing all current BSNEd syllabi confirm their availability and organized storage.
S.4 Copies of all course syllabi in previous terms are filed for reference purposes.
The program, specifically the chairperson and all faculty of BSNEd maintains a systematic archive of BSNEd course syllabi from past academic terms. This practice supports historical review, curriculum development, and long-term reference. The archived syllabi serve as valuable institutional memory for program evolution and accreditation purposes. Evidence includes a formal records management policy outlining syllabus retention periods. The existence of an organized physical or digital repository containing historical BSNEd syllabi demonstrates this ongoing practice.
S.5 There is provision for remedial measures to strengthen the basic skills in Mathematics, English, and other "tool" subjects.
Given the high academic standing of students in the BSNEd program at Carlos Hilado Memorial State University, remedial classes for basic skills in Mathematics, English, and other "tool" subjects are largely unnecessary. The consistent quality of student performance demonstrates that entrants already possess the foundational prerequisites needed for specialized coursework. This strong academic baseline means resources can be focused directly on advanced Special Needs Education content. Evidence of this quality standing is reflected in students' consistent performance metrics and their readiness to excel in complex program demands.
S.6. There is a mechanism to facilitate the teaching-learning process.
The program implements structured mechanisms to actively enhance the teaching and learning experience. This involves continuous professional development for faculty and leveraging educational technologies. The goal is to foster an effective and dynamic instructional environment for all students. Evidence includes records of regular faculty workshops on pedagogy and instructional technology. The active utilization of a Learning Management System (LMS) and the operational activities of the Curriculum and Instructional Material Development (CIMD) unit further support this.
I.1 The Dean or official concerned approves the updated syllabus for each subject.
There is a formal, documented process where the College of Education Dean, or a designated official, reviews and approves all BSNEd course syllabi. This ensures adherence to university standards and program objectives before implementation. Evidence of this practice includes the presence of a signature block on all official syllabi, indicating the Dean's approval date. Additionally, departmental records or meeting minutes would reflect the submission and approval of updated syllabi. This consistent approval process guarantees quality control and alignment across all BSNEd subjects.
I.2 The faculty prepares syllabi with comprehensive contents.
BSNEd faculty members are committed to preparing syllabi that are robust and comprehensive in their content. Each syllabus provides a detailed overview, including clear course outcomes, specific topics to be covered, required readings, assessment methods, and grading criteria. This thoroughness ensures students have all necessary information to understand course expectations and learning pathways. Evidence lies in the uniform comprehensiveness observed across a sample of BSNEd syllabi, which consistently include all essential components. Faculty training on syllabus development further reinforces this practice of preparing detailed instructional guides.
I.3 The faculty revise and enhances the syllabi preferably every two (2) years and as needed.
BSNEd faculty proactively revise and enhance their course syllabi on a regular basis, ideally every two years or whenever necessary due to curriculum updates or feedback. This practice ensures that course content remains current, relevant, and responsive to evolving educational standards in Special Needs Education. Evidence includes dated versions of syllabi showing periodic revisions and improvements over time. Faculty development records related to curriculum review and enhancement also demonstrate this commitment to ongoing refinement. Curriculum Instructions Materials and Development (CIMD) adheres in the CHEd memorandum regarding on the changes in the course offering.
I.4 The faculty distributes a copy of the syllabus to each student.
It is a standard practice for BSNEd faculty to distribute a copy of the course syllabus to every student at the beginning of each term. This ensures all students are fully informed about course expectations, policies, schedules, and learning resources from day one. This promotes transparency and empowers students to effectively plan their learning journey. Evidence of this includes announcements on course Learning Management System (LMS) pages indicating syllabus availability for download. Student acknowledgments or initial class activities referencing the syllabus further confirm its regular distribution.
I.5 Teaching strategies stimulate the development of the students' higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) such as critical thinking, analytical thinking, creative thinking and problem solving.
BSNEd faculty actively employ diverse teaching strategies designed to cultivate students' higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). These methodologies include problem-based learning, case studies, collaborative projects, and reflective discussions that challenge students to think critically and analytically. This approach encourages students to apply knowledge creatively and develop strong problem-solving abilities crucial for special education practice. Evidence can be found in lesson plans detailing activities that require analysis, synthesis, and evaluation rather than rote memorization. Student work samples from assignments, such as research papers or intervention plans, consistently demonstrate the application of these advanced cognitive skills.
I.6 Classroom instruction is enriched through the use of the following strategies:
1.6.1.
symposia, seminars, workshops, professional lectures;
The BSNEd program regularly organizes or encourages students to attend symposia, seminars, workshops, and professional lectures to expose them to current trends, research, and expert insights in special needs education. These activities provide a crucial platform for students to learn about new methodologies, assistive technologies, and policy developments directly from leading practitioners and researchers. For instance, CHMSU has been noted to conduct seminar-workshops on topics like Education for Sustainable Development, indicating a commitment to continuous professional development that can be adapted to various programs including BSNEd.
1.6.2.
educational tours/learning visits/other co-curricular activities;
The program incorporates educational tours, learning visits, and other co-curricular activities to provide students with authentic exposure to various special education settings and related services, however, due to the imposition of moratorium on field trips and other similar activities covered under the CHEd Memorandum Order No 17, series of 2012 and review of the policy to strengthen mechanism that safeguard all students at all levels and faculty members in activities included in the curricular, research and extension programs of higher education institutions, activities were limited due to the rigorous process unless deemed essential.
1.6.3.
peer teaching/cooperative learning; and
Peer teaching and cooperative learning are integral strategies within the BSNEd program to cultivate collaborative skills and reinforce learning among students. In courses, students frequently engage in group projects, case studies, and micro-teaching sessions where they apply learned concepts by teaching their peers or collaboratively solving problems related to special needs education. This approach allows students to practice differentiating instruction, adapting materials, and providing constructive feedback, all crucial skills for future special education teachers.
1.6.4.
computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and computer-assisted learning (CAL).
The BSNEd program leverages computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and computer-assisted learning (CAL) to equip students with the skills to utilize technology effectively in teaching learners with special needs. This involves training students on various educational software, assistive technologies, and digital resources that can aid in assessment, instruction, and communication for diverse learners. For example, students might learn to use specialized apps for communication (AAC devices), interactive learning platforms, or tools for creating accessible educational materials.
I.7 At least three (3) of the following course requirements are used:
I.7.1. GROUP / INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS
The BSNEd program extensively utilizes both group and individual projects to cultivate independent work and collaborative skills among students. These projects, often culminating in presentations or detailed reports, require students to independently research, analyze, and synthesize information related to diverse special needs topics or the development of inclusive educational materials. For group projects, while collaborative, each member is typically assigned specific independent tasks, with their contributions monitored through peer evaluations and clear division of labor outlined from the start. Faculty provide structured guidelines and regular check-ins, allowing students to work autonomously while receiving necessary support and feedback on their progress. This approach fosters critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-management, preparing BSNEd graduates to independently design and implement effective interventions in various educational settings.
1.7.6 PORTFOLIO
The BSNEd program extensively utilizes portfolios as a comprehensive assessment tool to document students' growth and competence throughout their studies. Students are required to compile a collection of their best works, including lesson plans adapted for diverse learners, individualized education plans (IEPs), teaching materials, reflection journals, and evidence of field experiences. This practice allows students to demonstrate their evolving pedagogical skills, understanding of special education principles, and ability to apply theoretical knowledge to practical scenarios. The portfolio serves as a tangible representation of their learning journey and readiness for the teaching profession, often culminating in a capstone portfolio for their teaching internship.
1.7.7 LEARNING MODULES
Learning modules are a cornerstone of instruction in the BSNEd program, providing structured and self-paced learning opportunities for students. These modules are carefully designed to cover specific competencies in special needs education, offering a blend of theoretical content, practical activities, and self-assessments. They allow for flexible learning, which is particularly beneficial in a university setting, and ensure that all students have access to consistent and comprehensive learning resources. CHMSU's adoption of Adaptive and Flexible Learning Experience (AFLEx) and the rigorous review of instructional materials, including modules, by an Instructional Materials Review Committee (IMRC), underscores their commitment to quality and accessibility in their educational offerings.
1.7.8 RESEARCH STUDY
The BSNEd program emphasizes the importance of research studies to foster critical thinking, evidence-based practice, and a deeper understanding of current issues in special needs education. Students are often required to conduct small-scale research projects or participate in faculty-led research initiatives, exploring topics such as inclusive education practices, effective interventions for specific disabilities, or the impact of assistive technologies. This engagement in research cultivates their analytical skills, allows them to contribute to the knowledge base of the field, and prepares them to critically evaluate and apply research findings in their future practice. CHMSU's overall commitment to research, as evidenced by its research agenda and participation in quality awards, suggests that BSNEd students would be encouraged to engage in such scholarly endeavors.
I.8 Instruction is enriched through the use of at least ten (10) of the following techniques/strategies:
1.8.3 GROUP DYNAMICS
Group dynamics are frequently utilized in the BSNEd program to foster collaboration, communication, and problem-solving skills among students, mimicking the interdisciplinary nature of special education. Students regularly work in small groups on projects, case analyses, and lesson plan development, encouraging peer learning and the sharing of diverse perspectives on addressing student needs. This approach helps students practice effective teamwork and develop strategies for group facilitation, which are critical for future collaboration with parents, therapists, and other educators. The collaborative spirit is also evident in CHMSU's emphasis on student participation in various activities, suggesting a culture that supports group work.
1.8.4 CASE STUDY
Group dynamics are frequently utilized in the BSNEd program to foster collaboration, communication, and problem-solving skills among students, mimicking the interdisciplinary nature of special education. Students regularly work in small groups on projects, case analyses, and lesson plan development, encouraging peer learning and the sharing of diverse perspectives on addressing student needs. This approach helps students practice effective teamwork and develop strategies for group facilitation, which are critical for future collaboration with parents, therapists, and other educators. The collaborative spirit is also evident in CHMSU's emphasis on student participation in various activities, suggesting a culture that supports group work.
1.8.5 WORKSHOPS
Workshops are a common instructional technique in the BSNEd program, offering hands-on training and skill development relevant to special needs education. These workshops may focus on topics such as developing adapted materials, using assistive technology, implementing behavior management techniques, or conducting specific assessments. CHMSU's consistent engagement in seminar-workshops across various fields, as seen in their public information, indicates a strong likelihood of integrating such practical sessions into the BSNEd curriculum. These immersive experiences allow students to practice and refine essential competencies under guided supervision, bridging the gap between theory and practice.
1.8.6 SIMULATIONS
Simulations play a vital role in preparing BSNEd students for real-world special education challenges by providing a safe environment to practice critical skills. This could involve simulating parent-teacher conferences, IEP meetings, or classroom scenarios with diverse student needs. Through simulations, students can experiment with different communication strategies, de-escalation techniques, and instructional modifications without the pressure of actual student impact. These controlled experiences build confidence and refine their professional conduct before entering fieldwork.
1.8.8 BRAINSTORMING
Brainstorming is regularly employed in BSNEd classes to encourage creative problem-solving and the generation of innovative ideas for addressing complex issues in special education. Students participate in brainstorming sessions to develop strategies for differentiation, identify accommodations and modifications, or design inclusive classroom environments. This technique fosters divergent thinking and allows students to explore a wide range of solutions before converging on the most effective ones. It also promotes an open and collaborative learning atmosphere where all ideas are valued.
1.8.16 PEER TEACHING
Peer teaching is an integrated strategy where BSNEd students take turns instructing their classmates on specific topics or skills related to special needs education. This method strengthens their understanding of the content, enhances their ability to explain complex concepts clearly, and provides valuable practice in instructional delivery. As both teachers and learners, students develop a deeper appreciation for diverse learning styles and gain experience in providing constructive feedback, which are essential attributes for special education professionals.
1.8.17 MULTIMEDIA / COURSEWARE / TECHWARE
The BSNEd program utilizes multi-media resources, courseware, and teachware extensively to enhance instructional delivery and provide diverse learning opportunities. This includes using educational videos illustrating different disabilities or intervention techniques, interactive software for skill development, and specialized digital courseware designed for special education. CHMSU's push for "Adaptive and Flexible Learning Experience (AFLEx)" and the rigorous review of "instructional materials, which are modules and PowerPoint presentations," strongly suggest a robust integration of digital learning tools. These technologies make complex information more accessible and engaging, preparing students to leverage technology effectively in their future classrooms.
1.8.19 PROBLEM SOLVING
Problem-solving is a core pedagogical approach in the BSNEd program, where students are continuously presented with authentic challenges related to special needs education that require critical analysis and resolution. These problems might involve designing an intervention for a student with specific learning difficulties, resolving behavioral issues, or adapting curriculum for inclusive settings. Students work individually or collaboratively to analyze the problem, generate possible solutions, and justify their chosen approaches based on evidence and best practices. This cultivates their analytical and decision-making skills, preparing them for the complex nature of the profession.
1.8.21 REPORTING
Student reporting is a common practice in the BSNEd program, providing students with opportunities to research, synthesize information, and present their findings on various topics in special needs education. This technique enhances their communication skills, particularly in articulating complex ideas clearly and concisely, which is vital for communicating with parents, colleagues, and other stakeholders. Whether individual or group reports, it encourages in-depth study and the development of presentation skills, contributing to their overall professional readiness.
1.8.22 PANEL DISCUSSION
Panel discussions are employed in the BSNEd program to expose students to multiple perspectives on critical issues in special needs education and to foster nuanced understanding. These discussions may involve experts, practitioners, or even individuals with disabilities and their families, providing diverse insights into real-world challenges and solutions. Students participate by posing questions, engaging in critical analysis of different viewpoints, and forming their own informed opinions. This technique promotes active listening, respectful discourse, and a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted nature of special education.
I.10. Instruction is enhanced through the following:
1.10.1. submission of approved and updated syllabus for every subject/course;
The BSNEd program mandates the regular submission of approved and updated syllabi for each course, serving as a foundational practice for consistent and quality instruction. This ensures that course objectives, learning outcomes, content, assessment methods, and required readings are clearly articulated and aligned with current special education standards and CHED guidelines. CHMSU's systematic review process for syllabi, as evidenced by their "Committee on Review and Revision of Syllabus (CRRS)" which checks for "correctness of content and constructive alignment," indicates a robust mechanism to maintain updated and relevant course outlines. This practice provides students with a clear roadmap for their learning journey and allows faculty to deliver well-structured and purposeful instruction.
I.10.2. regular classroom observation/supervision;
Regular classroom observation and supervision are integral to enhancing instruction within the BSNEd program, providing constructive feedback and ensuring pedagogical effectiveness. Department heads or senior faculty members observe teaching sessions to assess lesson, content, teaching methods, classroom management, and questioning skills, offering guidance for improvement. CHMSU documents "Record of Class Observations" as part of its curriculum and instruction evidence, indicating this is a formal and ongoing process. This continuous monitoring and feedback loop help faculty refine their teaching strategies, especially those tailored for special needs education, and maintain high standards of instructional delivery.
1.10.3. regular faculty meetings with the College/Academic Dean/Department Chair;
Regular faculty meetings with the College of Education Dean and Department Head are a crucial practice for fostering collaboration, aligning instructional goals, and addressing academic and administrative concerns within the BSNEd program. These meetings facilitate discussions on curriculum updates, student progress, faculty development needs, and the implementation of new teaching strategies relevant to special needs education. Such consistent dialogue ensures that the program's instructional objectives are collectively understood and pursued, contributing to a cohesive and responsive academic environment.
1.10.4. regular faculty performance evaluation;
The BSNEd program implements regular faculty performance evaluations to ensure accountability and promote continuous professional growth among its educators. These evaluations assess teaching effectiveness, research engagement, extension activities, and adherence to institutional policies. CHMSU utilizes faculty evaluation instruments, with data often provided by the Human Resource and Development Office, to determine teaching performance, reinforcing a culture of quality and improvement within the College of Education. This systematic assessment helps identify areas for faculty development and acknowledges exemplary teaching practices in special needs education.
The BSNEd program has embraced the adoption of alternative instructional delivery modes, including modular instruction, e-learning, and online study, to provide flexible and accessible learning opportunities for its students. CHMSU's "Adaptive and Flexible Learning Experience (AFLEx)" is a prime example of this, involving the "tweaking of the syllabus into a course blueprint for flexibility" and the "creation of modules, course guides, course schedule and assessment guides." This diversification of delivery modes is particularly relevant for preparing special education teachers, as it exposes them to various learning formats they might encounter or utilize in their own teaching careers, especially when addressing diverse student needs and learning environments.
1.11. Instructional materials (IMs) are reviewed and recommended by an Instructional Materials Committee (IMC).
The BSNEd program emphasizes the importance of research studies to foster critical thinking, evidence-based practice, and a deeper understanding of current issues in special needs education. Students are often required to conduct small-scale research projects or participate in faculty-led research initiatives, exploring topics such as inclusive education practices, effective interventions for specific disabilities, or the impact of assistive technologies. This engagement in research cultivates their analytical skills, allows them to contribute to the knowledge base of the field, and prepares them to critically evaluate and apply research findings in their future practice. CHMSU's overall commitment to research, as evidenced by its research agenda and participation in quality awards, suggests that BSNEd students would be encouraged to engage in such scholarly endeavors.
1.12. Varied, multi-sensory materials and computer programs are utilized.
The BSNEd program champions the utilization of varied, multi-sensory materials and computer programs to cater to diverse learning styles and to model best practices for teaching learners with special needs. This involves the integration of visual aids, manipulatives, auditory resources, tactile experiences, and specialized educational software and apps. Research cited for CHMSU indicates that "multisensory learning strategies can more closely replicate real-world situations and are therefore superior for learning," and that "incorporating multiple sensory modalities into instructional materials can enhance student learning." By exposing students to and requiring them to use such materials, the program prepares them to create inclusive and engaging learning environments for future students with varying sensory and cognitive needs.
1.13. The College/Academic Unit maintains consortia and linkages with other learning institutions for academic exchange of instructional materials.
The College of Education, through the BSNEd program, actively maintains consortia and linkages with other learning institutions to facilitate the academic exchange of instructional materials and best practices. These partnerships enable the sharing of innovative curricula, specialized resources, and research findings in special needs education. While specific examples for instructional material exchange are not directly detailed in public information, CHMSU's emphasis on "internationalization" and "linkages and partnerships" for "continuous improvements of our curriculum, instruction, research" strongly suggests that such exchanges are an integral part of their broader strategy to enrich their programs, including BSNEd. This collaboration enhances the program's resources and exposes students to a wider array of pedagogical approaches and materials.
1.14. The faculty are encouraged to produce their own instructional materials such as modules, software, visual aids, manuals and textbooks.
Faculty members in the BSNEd program are strongly encouraged to produce their own instructional materials, including modules, software, visual aids, manuals, and textbooks, to personalize and enrich the learning experience. This practice leverages the specialized expertise of the faculty in various areas of special needs education, allowing them to create highly relevant and context-specific resources. CHMSU's "Intellectual Property (IP) Policy" which aims to "guide any activities related to the generation, ownership, protection, and utilization of intellectual properties," provides a framework that supports faculty in developing and sharing their original works. This initiative not only enhances the quality and uniqueness of the program's resources but also promotes scholarly productivity among the faculty.
OUTCOME/S
0.1. Course syllabi are updated and approved by concerned authorities.
The BSNEd program at CHMSU regularly conducts a rigorous review process for all course syllabi. This includes faculty presenting their updated syllabi to the Department Chair, followed by a review by the College Curriculum Committee, and finally, approval by the Dean of the College of Education. This multi-level approval ensures alignment with the latest CHED (Commission on Higher Education) guidelines, university standards, and the evolving needs of special education. The university also emphasizes linking course outcomes to program outcomes, as evidenced in their public documents.
0.2. Varied teaching strategies are efficiently and effectively used.
Faculty in the BSNEd program demonstrate the use of diverse teaching strategies, such as differentiated instruction, collaborative learning, case-based scenarios, and technology-enhanced learning (e.g., simulations for teaching students with specific disabilities). They regularly attend professional development workshops on innovative pedagogical approaches for special needs education, and student evaluations and peer observations confirm the effective implementation of these varied strategies. Furthermore, the program outcomes highlight the use of "evidence-based instructional strategies to maximize learning opportunities for students with additional needs."
0.3. Instructional Materials produced by the faculty are copyrighted/patented.
The College of Education at CHMSU encourages and supports faculty in protecting their intellectual property. Faculty members who develop original instructional materials, such as specialized modules for teaching students with autism spectrum disorder or adapted assessment tools for learners with intellectual disabilities, are guided through the university's intellectual property rights (IPR) policies. Evidence of this includes documented applications for copyright with the National Library of the Philippines or patents with the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines, and presentations of these copyrighted/patented materials during faculty research forums.
SYSTEM - INPUTS AND PROCESSES
S.1. The program of studies has a system of evaluating student performance through a combination of the following:
The BSNEd program regularly utilizes formative tests like quizzes and unit tests to monitor student understanding throughout a course. These assessments provide immediate feedback to both students and instructors, allowing for timely adjustments in teaching strategies and student learning approaches. For example, after covering a unit on "Learners with Developmental Disabilities" (SNED201), students might take a quiz to identify areas where further clarification or review is needed. This practice helps to ensure that foundational concepts are firmly grasped before moving on to more complex topics.
The BSNEd program incorporates projects and term papers to foster higher-order thinking skills, research abilities, and practical application of theories. These assignments allow students to delve deeper into specific topics, synthesize information, and demonstrate their understanding through original work. A student might be required to develop an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) as a project in SNED212, showcasing their ability to apply theoretical knowledge to a practical case, or research and present a term paper on evidence-based instructional strategies for specific disabilities.
Mid-term and final examinations are integral summative assessments in the BSNEd program, serving to evaluate students' overall comprehension and retention of course material. These comprehensive exams, often covering multiple units, assess the accumulated knowledge and skills acquired over a significant period. For instance, a final examination in "Educational Assessment of Students with Additional Needs" (SNED206) would cover all assessment tools and strategies discussed throughout the semester, demonstrating the students' mastery of the subject for decision-making regarding special needs students.
Given the practical nature of special needs education, practicum and performance tests are crucial components of the evaluation system. These assessments provide opportunities for students to demonstrate their teaching competencies, classroom management skills, and ability to adapt instruction for diverse learners in real-world settings. Student teachers in their practicum, for instance, are rated on their lesson planning, presentation of lessons, and evaluation of student performance, directly assessing their readiness to teach.
S.2. The summative tests have the following descriptions:
Summative tests in the BSNEd program are designed to be comprehensive, ensuring they assess a wide range of cognitive skills from basic recall to higher-order thinking like analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Exams for courses like "Curriculum and Pedagogy in Inclusive Education" (SNED205) would include questions that require students not just to define concepts but also to analyze case scenarios, evaluate different pedagogical approaches, and synthesize strategies for inclusive settings. This ensures a deep understanding of the subject matter, going beyond mere memorization.
A fundamental practice in the BSNEd program is the development of summative tests based on a well-designed Table of Specifications (TOS). The TOS ensures that examinations align with the course learning outcomes, content coverage, and the desired distribution of cognitive levels (e.g., remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, creating). For example, before a final exam in "Behavior Management and Modification" (SNED207), a TOS would clearly outline the topics to be covered, the number of items for each topic, and the cognitive level each item is intended to assess, ensuring a balanced and valid evaluation.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1 Varied evaluation measures are used, such as:
1.1.1. portfolio;
The BSNEd program actively utilizes portfolios as a dynamic assessment tool, allowing students to curate a collection of their best work over a semester or course. For instance, in "Educational Assessment of Students with Additional Needs" (SNED206), students might compile a portfolio containing sample assessment reports, adapted test items, and reflections on their assessment practices. This method provides a holistic view of student learning and skill development, showcasing their progress and mastery of various competencies in a tangible format.
1.1.2. rubric assessment;
Rubric assessment is a common and transparent practice in the BSNEd program, particularly for subjective assignments and performance-based tasks. Faculty consistently employ rubrics for evaluating projects like individualized education plans (IEPs), lesson plans, and teaching demonstrations. These rubrics clearly define the criteria for success, allowing students to understand expectations and self-assess their work, and providing consistent and fair grading by instructors.
1.1.3. skills demonstration;
Skills demonstrations are integral to assessing the practical competencies of BSNEd students, given the hands-on nature of special needs education. In courses such as "Behavior Management and Modification" (SNED207) or during practicum experiences, students are required to demonstrate specific skills like implementing positive behavior interventions or adapting instructional materials. These direct observations of practical application ensure that students can translate theoretical knowledge into effective practice, which is crucial for their future roles.
1.1.4. paper and pencil tests;
While varied assessment methods are used, traditional paper and pencil tests remain a foundational evaluation measure in the BSNEd program for assessing factual knowledge, comprehension, and application of concepts. These tests, ranging from multiple-choice to essay questions, are utilized across various courses to gauge students' understanding of foundational theories, historical contexts, and specialized terminology within special needs education. They provide a standardized way to assess a broad range of content knowledge efficiently.
1.1.5. oral examinations;
Oral examinations are employed in the BSNEd program, particularly for assessing deeper understanding, critical thinking, and communication skills. These assessments might involve students defending their research proposals, explaining their rationale for specific interventions, or discussing complex case studies. Oral exams provide an opportunity for faculty to probe students' thinking processes and clarify misconceptions in real-time, fostering a more interactive and in-depth evaluation.
1.1.6. group/Individual reports;
Both group and individual reports are commonly assigned in the BSNEd program to foster research skills, analytical thinking, and the ability to synthesize information. Group reports encourage collaborative learning and teamwork, while individual reports assess personal research capabilities and independent critical analysis. For example, students might collaborate on a report about inclusive classroom strategies or individually research and present on a specific type of disability.
1.1.7. group/individual projects; and
The BSNEd program encourages and assesses engagement in both group and individual study as part of its commitment to active learning and knowledge acquisition. While not always directly graded as a "test," participation in study groups, independent research for assignments, and preparation for discussions contribute to overall academic performance. Faculty often observe and encourage these study habits, recognizing their importance in fostering lifelong learning and deeper understanding of complex topics in special needs education.
1.2 Evaluation tools/instruments are reviewed and revised periodically.
The CHMSU College of Education ensures that evaluation tools and instruments for the BSNEd program are periodically reviewed and revised to maintain their validity, reliability, and alignment with current educational standards and program outcomes. This systematic review process involves faculty discussions, feedback from students, and consideration of best practices in special education assessment. For instance, after a semester, faculty may convene to discuss the effectiveness of a particular rubric or the clarity of test questions, leading to refinements for future iterations.
1.3 The faculty are trained how to assess student performance properly.
The College of Education prioritizes training its faculty on proper student performance assessment techniques, including the development of effective rubrics, construction of valid test items, and interpretation of assessment data. This ongoing professional development ensures that instructors possess the necessary skills to accurately and fairly evaluate diverse learning outcomes in the BSNEd program. Workshops on authentic assessment methods or norm-referenced vs. criterion-referenced grading are examples of this commitment to faculty development.
1.4 The College/Academic unit encourages and supports assessment of multiple intellegences.
The CHMSU College of Education, through the BSNEd program, actively encourages and supports the assessment of multiple intelligences, recognizing that students demonstrate their learning in various ways. This is evident in the diverse evaluation measures employed, which go beyond traditional paper-and-pencil tests to include performance-based tasks, artistic expressions, and practical demonstrations. This inclusive approach ensures that students with different strengths and learning styles have opportunities to showcase their understanding effectively.
1.5 Course and test requirements are returned to students after results are checked, recorded and analyzed.
A consistent practice in the BSNEd program is the prompt return of graded course and test requirements to students, along with recorded results and analysis. This timely feedback loop is crucial for student learning, allowing them to understand their strengths and weaknesses, learn from their mistakes, and track their academic progress. For example, after a unit test, students receive their graded papers with comments, and sometimes a class discussion on common errors is facilitated to reinforce learning.
1.6 The system of student evaluation and grading is defined, understood, and disseminated to:
1.6.1. students;
The BSNEd program ensures that the system of student evaluation and grading is clearly defined, understood, and effectively disseminated to all students. This includes providing detailed syllabi at the beginning of each course that outline grading criteria, weight of assessments, and academic integrity policies. Regular discussions in class and accessible online resources reinforce this information, empowering students to take ownership of their academic journey.
1.6.2. faculty;
The system of student evaluation and grading is well-defined and understood by all faculty members in the BSNEd program, ensuring consistency and fairness across courses and instructors. Departmental meetings and faculty handbooks regularly review and reinforce these policies, promoting a shared understanding of grading principles and assessment best practices. This standardized approach maintains the academic integrity of the program.
1.6.3. academic administrators; and
The academic administration of the College of Education has a clear understanding of the student evaluation and grading system within the BSNEd program. This knowledge allows the administration to oversee the implementation of policies, address any concerns, and ensure that the assessment practices align with the university's academic standards and accreditation requirements. Regular reports and reviews of grading patterns are part of this administrative oversight.
1.6.4. parents/guardians.
While direct dissemination to parents/guardians might be less frequent for university students, the CHMSU College of Education recognizes the importance of transparency regarding the student evaluation and grading system. Information can be accessed through university handbooks or, when necessary, through direct communication for specific student concerns, particularly during practicum placements where parental consent or awareness might be required. This ensures that relevant stakeholders, when appropriate, are informed about the academic assessment framework of the program.
OUTCOME/S
O.1 The student's academic performance is commendable.
The commendable academic performance of students in the BSNEd program is evidenced by their consistently high passing rates in major courses and successful completion of demanding projects and practicum experiences. For instance, data from departmental records reveal a significant percentage of students achieving academic distinctions and qualifying for Dean's List honors each semester. Furthermore, graduates of the program often report high levels of confidence and preparedness in their post-graduation roles, directly attributing it to the rigorous academic training received. The faculty's commitment to providing individualized support and timely feedback also plays a crucial role in fostering this high level of academic achievement. This sustained pattern of strong academic performance underscores the program's effectiveness in equipping students with the necessary knowledge and skills in special needs education.
O.2 Retention rate of students is on the average.
The BSNEd program at CHMSU strives for a healthy student retention rate, indicating that a significant portion of enrolled students successfully progress through and complete the program. While the term "average" can be relative, the program monitors its retention rates against national and institutional benchmarks, demonstrating a consistent effort to keep students enrolled and on track. Practices such as robust academic advising, peer mentoring initiatives, and early intervention for struggling students contribute significantly to maintaining this retention. Furthermore, the supportive learning environment and the clear career pathways offered by a degree in Special Needs Education act as strong motivators for students to remain in the program until graduation. This consistent retention rate signifies the program's ability to engage students and provide the necessary support for their academic journey.
SYSTEM - INPUTS AND PROCESSES
S.1 There are policies on management of learning which includes the following:
S.1.1. student's attendance in class and other academic activities;
The program maintains a clear attendance policy across its academic programs. Students are generally required to attend a minimum percentage of classes as prescribed and reflected in the student handbook, to be eligible for a passing grade, and exceeding a certain number of absences can lead to being dropped from the class. Faculty members meticulously record attendance for both face-to-face and flexible learning modalities, with clear guidelines on excused absences for legitimate reasons like illness or official university activities. The Student Handbook, a comprehensive document provided to all enrolled students, details these attendance regulations and the corresponding disciplinary actions for non-compliance. Furthermore, program coordinators and advisors actively monitor student attendance to identify those at risk and provide necessary support or intervention.
S.1.2. schedule of classes;
The College of Education, in coordination with the University Registrar's Office, implements a systematic process for class scheduling to ensure efficient utilization of resources and optimal student learning. This includes careful consideration of the BSNEd curriculum's sequential nature, prerequisite courses, and the availability of specialized facilities or faculty for special needs education. Schedules are typically released well in advance of each semester's enrollment period, allowing students to plan their academic load and avoid conflicts. The university also utilizes an online system or a centralized platform for students to access their individual class schedules and any updates, promoting transparency and accessibility. Adjustments to schedules, though rare, are communicated promptly through official channels to minimize disruption to students' learning.
S.1.3. student's discipline; and
CHMSU upholds a comprehensive student code of conduct outlined in its Student Handbook, which applies to all students, including those in the BSNEd program. This code clearly defines expected behaviors within and outside the classroom, covering academic integrity, respect for faculty and peers, and responsible use of university resources. Disciplinary actions for infractions, ranging from minor offenses like tardiness to serious violations like cheating or harassment, are clearly stipulated and follow a progressive system. The Office of the Student Affairs (OSA) is primarily responsible for addressing student disciplinary matters, ensuring fair hearings and appropriate interventions. Furthermore, faculty members are empowered to manage classroom behavior and address minor disciplinary issues, fostering a respectful and conducive learning environment.
S.1.4. maintenance of cleanliness and orderliness.
The university strongly promotes cleanliness and orderliness across all its campuses, a practice especially crucial for the Bachelor of Special Needs Education (BSNEd) program. Initiatives like "Greening CHMSU" directly benefit BSNEd learning spaces by emphasizing proper waste management and environmental stewardship. Within the College of Education, dedicated waste segregation bins are available, and regular clean-up drives involve BSNEd students and faculty. The faculty consistently reinforce the importance of a tidy learning environment, fostering discipline and respect, which directly helps create predictable and accessible spaces for diverse learners. This meticulous attention to order is vital for the BSNEd program, as a well-organized environment significantly enhances engagement, focus, and the overall learning experience for students with various needs, including those with sensory sensitivities.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1 The policies on management of learning are enforced.
CHMSU's College of Education, through its BSNEd program faculty and administration, actively enforces all established policies on student attendance, class schedules, and discipline. Evidence of this enforcement includes regular attendance checks, consistent application of grading policies related to participation, and the meticulous adherence to university-wide guidelines regarding academic integrity. Program coordinators routinely monitor compliance with these policies, ensuring a standardized approach across all BSNEd courses. Furthermore, any infractions are addressed promptly and fairly, following the procedures outlined in the university's Student Handbook. This consistent enforcement creates a predictable and equitable learning environment, essential for the diverse needs of BSNEd students.
I.2 Student activities are well-planned and implemented.
BSNEd student activities, both academic and co-curricular, are meticulously planned and executed to enrich their learning experience and practical skills. This includes well-structured lesson plans that incorporate differentiated instruction, group activities, and experiential learning relevant to special education settings. Evidence is seen in detailed course syllabi outlining expected activities, rubrics for group projects, and clear guidelines for field observations and community engagements. Faculty members ensure timely implementation of these activities, providing necessary resources and supervision. Feedback mechanisms are often in place, allowing for continuous improvement in the design and delivery of student activities within the BSNEd program.
1.3. Assignments are designed to reinforce teaching which result in student's maximum learning.
Assignments in the BSNEd program are thoughtfully designed to reinforce theoretical concepts and develop practical competencies crucial for special education professionals. Evidence includes assignments requiring students to create individualized education programs (IEPs), develop adaptive teaching materials, or conduct case analyses of diverse learners. These assignments often integrate real-world scenarios, prompting students to apply learned principles to complex special education challenges. Faculty provide constructive feedback on these assignments, guiding students towards deeper understanding and skill mastery. The progression of assignments throughout the curriculum ensures a cumulative learning experience, leading to enhanced comprehension and application of special education principles.
1.4. The maximum class size of 50 for undergraduate courses is enforced.
The College of Education strictly adheres to the university policy of a maximum class size of 40 for undergraduate courses, which is particularly beneficial for the BSNEd program's interactive and hands-on nature. This enforcement is evident in the official class lists generated by the Registrar's Office, where student enrollment per section is regularly monitored. Maintaining this class size allows BSNEd faculty to provide more individualized attention, facilitate deeper discussions, and effectively manage practical activities such as demonstrations of assistive technologies or inclusive teaching strategies. This manageable ratio ensures that each BSNEd student receives adequate support and opportunities for participation, which is vital in a specialized field like special education.
1.5. Classroom discipline is maintained in accordance with democratic practices.
Classroom discipline in the BSNEd program is maintained through a framework that emphasizes democratic practices, fostering a respectful and inclusive learning environment. This is evident through the establishment of mutually agreed-upon classroom rules and expectations, often developed collaboratively between faculty and students at the beginning of the semester. Faculty members encourage open communication and provide opportunities for students to voice concerns or offer suggestions regarding classroom dynamics. Disciplinary issues are addressed through constructive dialogue and restorative practices, rather than solely punitive measures, promoting accountability and self-regulation. This approach prepares BSNEd students to manage diverse classrooms with empathy and fairness, mirroring the inclusive principles of special education.
1.6.The class officers and assigned students assist in maintaining cleanliness of classroom, laboratories, corridors and the school campus.
BSNEd students, through their elected class officers and assigned duties, actively participate in maintaining the cleanliness and orderliness of their learning environments. This practice is evident through daily or weekly assignments for specific student groups to oversee classroom tidiness, proper waste disposal, and arrangement of furniture. In laboratories and resource rooms utilized by the BSNEd program, students are encouraged to ensure equipment is properly stored and areas are clean after use. This collective responsibility extends to corridors and designated campus areas, promoting a sense of ownership and community. This hands-on involvement reinforces the importance of a well-maintained environment, reflecting the organized and supportive spaces essential for individuals with special needs.
1.7. Independent work and performance are encouraged and monitored in the following activities:
Independent work and performance are actively encouraged and meticulously monitored across key BSNEd activities to develop students' self-reliance and specialized skills.
BSNEd students regularly undertake independent case studies, analyzing scenarios involving diverse learners and proposing appropriate interventions. Evidence lies in the detailed rubrics for these reports, which assess critical thinking, research, and the application of special education principles. Faculty provides individualized feedback on these independent analyses, guiding students in their diagnostic and problem-solving skills. The independent nature of these case studies prepares future educators to independently assess and support individual students with special needs.
Independent field practice is a cornerstone of the BSNEd program, where students observe and assist in actual special education settings. Evidence includes detailed observation guides, journals documenting independent reflections, and supervisors' evaluations of students' autonomous engagement with the environment. Students are expected to independently apply theoretical knowledge to real-world situations, fostering self-reliance and practical experience. This independent exposure is crucial for understanding the nuances of special education in various contexts.
Practice teaching is a highly independent component, where BSNEd students assume the role of an educator, planning and delivering lessons to diverse learners. The rigorous monitoring involves cooperating teachers' evaluations, university supervisors' observations, and self-reflection journals that document independent decision-making and problem-solving. Students independently manage classroom dynamics, adapt instructional strategies, and assess student progress, showcasing their readiness to function as independent special education teachers. This culminating independent experience is critical for professional development.
BSNEd students engage in independent OJT in various special education centers or inclusive schools, applying their skills in a professional environment. Evidence includes comprehensive OJT manuals outlining expected tasks, daily logs of independent work performed, and supervisors' performance appraisals focusing on autonomy and initiative. Students independently manage responsibilities, interact with diverse clients, and contribute to the daily operations of the institution. This independent immersion provides invaluable practical experience and professional exposure.
The BSNEd thesis component demands significant independent research, critical analysis, and scholarly writing from students. Evidence includes detailed research proposals, regular consultations with thesis advisors to monitor independent progress, and the final written thesis demonstrating original thought and methodology. Students independently formulate research questions, collect and analyze data, and synthesize findings, culminating in a significant academic contribution. This independent scholarly endeavor showcases the students' ability to contribute new knowledge to the field of special education.
1.8. In practicum courses, (field study, OJT, practice teaching, etc.) the number of trainees supervised by each coordinator does not exceed 50.
The BSNEd program strictly adheres to the policy that the number of trainees for each coordinator in practicum courses (field study, OJT, practice teaching) does not exceed 50. This is consistently reflected in the assignments of the internship program coordinator and cooperating teachers to student cohorts for these vital experiential learning components. This manageable ratio ensures that each BSNEd trainee receives adequate individualized guidance, constructive feedback, and close monitoring of their progress in diverse settings. The low coordinator-to-trainee ratio allows for more frequent site visits, in-depth discussions on challenges encountered, and personalized mentorship, which are crucial for the development of competent special education professionals. This adherence guarantees the quality and effectiveness of the practicum experience, directly impacting the readiness of BSNEd graduates for their future roles. Thus, the program demonstrates strong practices in the implementation of its curriculum and instruction, particularly in the management of learning.
OUTCOME/S
O.1 Learning is efficiently and effectively managed.
The efficient and effective management of learning in the BSNEd program is primarily evidenced by the consistent academic performance of its students, reflected in their successful completion of coursework and practicum requirements. A significant indicator is the program's track record in the Licensure Examination for Professional Teachers (LEPT), where CHMSU's College of Education frequently achieves above-national-average passing rates and sometimes secures top-performing school rankings, encompassing teacher education programs like BSNEd. Furthermore, the positive feedback received from partner schools and special education centers during student teaching and on-the-job training placements highlights the BSNEd graduates' practical competence and readiness for the field. The employment rate of BSNEd alumni in relevant educational settings also serves as a direct outcome, showcasing their preparedness and the program's effective training in special needs education. Lastly, ongoing curriculum reviews and program accreditations, like those from AACCUP, regularly affirm that the learning environment is well-managed and producing desired outcomes for future special education professionals.
SYSTEM - INPUTS AND PROCESSES
S.1 There is a policy on graduation requirements.
The College of Education at Carlos Hilado Memorial State University (CHMSU) for its Bachelor of Special Needs Education (BSNEd) program adheres to a clear set of graduation requirements, primarily guided by Commission on Higher Education (CHED) memoranda and institutional policies. These policies are communicated to students upon admission through student handbooks and program orientations, ensuring full transparency regarding academic expectations. The BSNEd curriculum itself, outlining specific courses, credit units, and sequencing, serves as a direct reflection of these graduation requirements. Regular academic advising sessions are conducted by faculty members to monitor student progress, address any academic challenges, and ensure they are on track to fulfill all requirements, including coursework, internships, and any culminating activities like comprehensive exams or research projects. The university also has formal procedures for clearance and graduation application, which students must complete to verify their eligibility, encompassing all academic and administrative obligations. These practices collectively demonstrate a well-defined and consistently implemented policy on graduation requirements for the BSNEd program.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1 The students are regularly informed of the academic requirements of their respective courses.
Upon enrollment, BSNEd students receive a comprehensive student handbook detailing academic policies, course outlines, and grading systems for all subjects. Each course syllabus, distributed at the beginning of the semester, clearly outlines learning objectives, required readings, assessment methods, and expected outputs, ensuring students understand what is required. Faculty members consistently reiterate academic requirements and expectations during the first few meetings of each class and are available for consultations to clarify any uncertainties. The college also utilizes official communication channels, such as bulletin boards and the university's online learning management system, to post important announcements regarding academic deadlines and requirements. Regular academic advising sessions are also conducted, where faculty advisors review student progress and address any concerns regarding their academic standing and course requirements.
I.2 The College/Academic Unit Implements the system for student returnees and transferees to meet the residence and other graduation requirements.
The College of Education has a well-defined process for evaluating the academic records of BSNEd returnees and transferees to ensure proper credit transfer and equivalency. Upon application, returning or transferring students undergo an advising session with the department head or a designated faculty member to assess their previous coursework against the BSNEd curriculum. A personalized academic plan is then developed for each student, outlining the remaining courses needed, the timeline for completion, and specific residence requirements to be met. The college actively monitors the progress of these students, providing academic support and guidance to facilitate their seamless reintegration and timely completion of their degrees. This system ensures that all BSNEd graduates, regardless of their entry point, fully comply with CHED and institutional graduation policies.
I.3 Graduating students conduct research and/or undergo practicum/OJT or other activities prescribed in their respective curricula.
A core component of the BSNEd program is the mandatory practicum/On-the-Job Training (OJT), where graduating students gain invaluable hands-on experience in special education settings. Students are meticulously placed in partner Special Education (SPED) centers or inclusive schools, allowing them to apply theoretical knowledge to real-world teaching scenarios under supervision. Additionally, BSNEd graduating students are required to undertake a capstone project or research study, culminating in a written thesis or paper that addresses relevant issues in special education. These activities are carefully monitored and evaluated by faculty advisors, ensuring that students meet the rigorous academic and practical standards of the program. The successful completion of both the practicum/OJT and the research component is a non-negotiable prerequisite for graduation, demonstrating their readiness for the professional field.
I.4 The College/Academic Unit assist the graduating students with academic deficiencies, disciplinary cases, and other problems which hinder issuance of clearances.
The College of Education's Department of Undergraduate Teacher Education, which oversees the BSNEd program, provides comprehensive support to graduating students facing academic deficiencies. Faculty advisors regularly track student performance and proactively reach out to those with low grades, offering tutoring, remedial classes, or advising on course retake options. For disciplinary cases, the college adheres to university policies and provides due process, offering guidance and support to students to resolve issues and fulfill any required sanctions. The department also assists students with other potential hindrances to clearance, such as missing documents or administrative concerns, by guiding them through the university's established procedures. This proactive and supportive approach ensures that graduating students have every opportunity to resolve outstanding issues and successfully obtain their clearances. The college aims to clear pathways for graduation, rather than creating unnecessary barriers.
I.5 A clearance from academic and financial accountabilities and responsibilities is required before graduation.
The university strictly implements a comprehensive clearance process that graduating BSNEd students must complete before their degrees are conferred. This process involves obtaining signatures and approvals from various university offices, including the Registrar's Office, Library, Student Affairs Office, and most importantly, the Finance Office. Students are required to settle all outstanding financial obligations, such as departmental obligation including, internship uniform, contributions or etc when deemed necessary and any library fines, ensuring a clean financial slate. Academically, the Registrar's Office verifies that all required courses have been successfully completed and grades officially submitted and recorded. The college itself conducts a final review of the student's academic record to confirm fulfillment of all program-specific requirements, including the successful completion of practicum and research. This rigorous clearance system serves as the final confirmation that a BSNEd graduate has met all institutional and program-specific requirements, both academic and financial, before receiving their diploma.
OUTCOME/S
0.1. At least 60% of the students enrolled in the program are able to graduate within the regular time frame.
There is an active monitoring of students’ progress in the BSNEd program to ensure a high graduation rate within the prescribed four-year timeframe. Data on student enrollment, retention, and graduation rates are regularly compiled and analyzed by the college. This analysis helps identify potential bottlenecks or areas where students might struggle, allowing for timely interventions such as academic counseling, tutoring services (if necessary), or adjustments to course scheduling. The proactive academic advising system, where faculty regularly meets with students to review their academic standing and course load, significantly contributes to keeping students on track. Furthermore, the mandatory practicum and research components are strategically integrated into the curriculum, ensuring students complete these crucial requirements without delaying their graduation. These combined practices demonstrate a concerted effort to support BSNEd students in successfully completing their degrees within the expected duration, aiming to meet or exceed the 60% graduation rate target.
SYSTEM - INPUTS AND PROCESSES
S.1. The institution has policies on:
S.1.1 Substitution or Special arrangements whenever a faculty is on leave or absent
The institution has clear policies regarding faculty leave, including vacation leave, sick leave, study leave, maternity leave, and paternity leave, as outlined in their Faculty Development guidelines. In practice, the BSNEd program ensures continuity of instruction by assigning substitute faculty members, often from the pool of qualified part-time instructors or other faculty within the college with relevant expertise, to cover classes when a regular faculty member is on approved leave. For unforeseen absences, the program chair or department head coordinates immediate special arrangements, such as providing module-based learning or assigning tasks for students to complete independently, minimizing disruption to the learning process for students with special needs. This proactive approach ensures that the unique learning requirements of BSNEd students are consistently met, even in the absence of their regular instructors. The university's commitment to flexible learning, as evidenced by its Adaptive and Flexible Learning Experience (AFLEx) adoption, further supports these arrangements by providing established frameworks for remote and module-based instruction.
CHMSU, as a state university, has mechanisms for recognizing excellence among its faculty and students, as indicated by its general policies on awards and distinctions. For the BSNEd program, this translates into practice through departmental recognition of faculty who demonstrate innovative teaching strategies for special needs education or publish research in the field. Students in the BSNEd program are also encouraged and recognized for their academic achievements, successful participation in special education-related competitions, or impactful community engagement projects involving individuals with special needs. This system of recognition fosters a culture of excellence and motivates both faculty and students to strive for higher standards in the demanding field of special needs education. Such awards are often highlighted during college events or published in university newsletters, serving as inspiration for the entire academic community.
Carlos Hilado Memorial State University has a structured system for the supervision, monitoring, and evaluation of faculty performance, which applies to the College of Education and its BSNEd program. Faculty performance is regularly assessed through student evaluations, peer observations, and administrative assessments, contributing to a comprehensive performance review. These evaluations often focus on teaching effectiveness, adherence to curriculum, and the integration of specialized pedagogical approaches relevant to special needs education. The results of these evaluations are utilized for professional development planning, identifying areas where faculty may require additional training or support to enhance their instruction for diverse learners in the BSNEd program. This ongoing process ensures that the quality of teaching in the BSNEd program remains high and responsive to the evolving needs of special education.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1 The institution implements rules on the attendance of the faculty in their respective classes and other academic related activities.
The program rigorously implements its faculty attendance policy, which is clearly stipulated in the Faculty Manual and disseminated during departmental orientations. Daily attendance logs are meticulously maintained by the Human Resource Management Office and regularly reviewed by the program coordinator to ensure compliance. Furthermore, faculty members are required to submit leave applications for approval, providing justification and arranging for substitute instruction to minimize disruption to student learning. This strict adherence to attendance rules is regularly emphasized in faculty meetings, promoting a culture of punctuality and commitment to academic responsibilities. Sanctions for unexcused absences are consistently applied, reinforcing the importance of faculty presence in fostering a conducive learning environment for Special Needs Education students.
I.2 Dialogues are regularly conducted by the administration with the:
The university administration prioritizes open communication through regular dialogues with both faculty and students. For faculty, monthly departmental meetings serve as a primary platform for discussing curriculum updates, pedagogical strategies, student concerns, and administrative directives, fostering a collaborative environment. Dedicated "Faculty Assembly" sessions are also scheduled annually, allowing faculty members to raise specific issues or suggestions directly with the Dean for prompt resolution.
Student dialogues are facilitated through various channels, including regular class representative meetings with the program coordinator and the Dean, allowing for direct feedback on instructional quality and student support services. Additionally, suggestion boxes are strategically placed, and an online feedback portal is available, also “President’s Dialogue” contribute to providing accessible avenues for students to voice their concerns and contribute to program improvement. These consistent dialogues ensure that both faculty and student perspectives are considered in decision-making, leading to more responsive and effective administrative support for the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program.
1.3 Quality instruction is assured through the following strategies:
1.3.1 conducting seminars/workshop on syllabi making;
The College of Education regularly organizes and conducts comprehensive seminar-workshops specifically focused on effective syllabi making for its faculty, including those in the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program. These workshops, often held at the beginning of each academic year or semester, cover essential components such as learning outcomes alignment, appropriate assessment methods for diverse learners, and integration of inclusive pedagogical approaches. Faculty members are guided through practical exercises to develop well-structured and student-centered syllabi that clearly communicate course expectations and learning pathways. Resource materials, including templates and exemplars, are provided to ensure consistency and quality across all courses. The outputs of these workshops are peer-reviewed and receive feedback from program coordinators, ensuring that syllabi effectively guide both instruction and student learning in the specialized field of special needs education.
1.3.2 holding workshops on test construction and the corresponding table of specifications;
The College of Education conducts specialized workshops on test construction and the development of Tables of Specifications (TOS) to enhance the assessment skills of faculty in the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program. These workshops emphasize the principles of valid and reliable assessment, focusing on creating assessments that accurately measure student learning outcomes, particularly for students with diverse learning needs. Faculty members of the program learn to construct various types of test items, develop clear rubrics, and align assessments with the curriculum through the systematic creation of TOS. Practical sessions involve critiquing existing tests and collaboratively designing new ones, with expert facilitators providing guidance on item analysis and fairness in assessment. The regular offering of these workshops ensures that faculty members are equipped with the necessary skills to design effective and equitable assessments that inform instructional practices in special education.
1.3.3 conducting competency assessment;
The program implements regular competency assessments for its faculty members, particularly focusing on their pedagogical skills and subject matter expertise. These assessments may include peer observations, student evaluations of teaching effectiveness, and self-reflection reports, all designed to identify areas for professional development. The results of these assessments are utilized to tailor individualized training programs and provide constructive feedback to faculty members. With these, specific attention is given to competencies in differentiated instruction, assistive technology integration, and individualized education program (IEP) development. This continuous competency assessment process ensures that faculty maintain and enhance the specialized skills required to effectively teach and support students aspiring to work in special education.
1.3.4 conducting supervisory visit of classes and providing assistance if necessary;
The administration of the College of Education conducts regular supervisory visits to faculty classes within the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program, demonstrating a proactive approach to instructional quality. These visits, conducted by the Dean or program coordinator, are designed to observe teaching methodologies, classroom management, and student engagement in a non-threatening and supportive manner. Following each visit, constructive feedback sessions are held with the observed faculty member, identifying strengths and suggesting areas for improvement. When needed, direct assistance is provided, which could include mentoring, sharing of best practices, or facilitating access to relevant resources and training opportunities. This consistent supervisory presence and immediate support mechanism ensure that faculty members are continuously honing their instructional skills and addressing any challenges in their teaching practice.
1.3.5 holding of regular faculty meetings;
Regular faculty meetings are a cornerstone of administrative support for effective instruction in the College of Education, particularly for the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program. These meetings are scheduled at least once a month, providing a consistent forum for communication, collaboration, and decision-making among faculty and administration. Agendas typically include discussions on curriculum enhancements, student progress, pedagogical innovations, departmental policies, and professional development opportunities. Important updates from the university administration are also disseminated, ensuring faculty are well-informed. These meetings foster a sense of community, allow for collective problem-solving, and provide a vital platform for faculty input on matters directly impacting the quality of instruction and student learning in special education.
1.3.6 requiring consultations between students and faculty;
The College of Education actively promotes and requires regular consultations between students and faculty members in the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program. Faculty members are mandated to set specific consultation hours outside of class time, with these schedules prominently displayed in their offices and shared with students. During these consultations, students can seek clarification on course materials, discuss academic challenges, receive individualized feedback on assignments, or explore career pathways in special education. The program also encourages faculty to dedicate time to advise students on their academic progression and potential research interests. This structured approach to consultations ensures that students have ample opportunities for personalized academic support and mentorship, contributing significantly to their learning and overall success in the program.
1.3.7 conducting studies on academic performance of students; and
The program regularly conducts studies on the academic performance of students enrolled in the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program. These studies involve the analysis of various data points, including course grades, retention rates, graduation rates, and performance in examinations or practicum evaluations. The findings from these studies are systematically reviewed by the faculty and administration to identify trends, pinpoint areas where students may be struggling, and evaluate the effectiveness of current teaching strategies and curriculum design. For instance, if a particular subject shows consistently low pass rates, the curriculum and instructional approaches for that subject are re-evaluated. This data-driven approach allows the program to make informed decisions for continuous improvement, ensuring that the curriculum and instruction effectively support student learning outcomes in Special Needs Education.
1.3.8 providing opportunities for the participation of the faculty in in-service training activities.
The College of Education demonstrates strong administrative support by consistently providing diverse opportunities for faculty participation in in-service training activities, especially for those teaching in the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program. These opportunities include sponsoring faculty attendance at local and national on special education, facilitating workshops on emerging pedagogical technologies, and offering seminars on inclusive practices and differentiated instruction. The university also encourages faculty to pursue higher education and research by providing incentives and flexible scheduling. Furthermore, internal training sessions are regularly organized by subject matter experts within the college to share best practices and address specific instructional needs. This continuous investment in faculty professional development ensures that instructors remain updated with the latest trends and research in special education, directly enhancing the quality of instruction delivered to students.
1.4 Periodic faculty performance evaluation on teaching and in other functions is done by at least three of the following:
1.4.2 dean/academic head/department chair
1.4.2 the students
1.4.3 faculty members
1.5 The results of the performance evaluation are used to improve the performance/competencies of the faculty.
The results derived from the multi-faceted faculty performance evaluations are actively utilized by the College of Education to directly inform and enhance the performance and competencies of faculty members, particularly those involved in the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program. Following each evaluation cycle, individual faculty members receive a comprehensive report summarizing feedback from students, peers, self-assessment, and the Dean/Department Chair. These reports serve as a basis for one-on-one consultation sessions with the Dean or Department Chair, where specific strengths are acknowledged and areas for development are identified. Action plans are then collaboratively developed, which might include recommendations for attending specific workshops, engaging in mentorship programs, or undertaking further studies to address identified competency gaps. This systematic approach ensures that evaluation is not merely a formality but a powerful tool for continuous professional growth and improved instructional delivery in special needs education.
1.6 Students are given recognition for exemplary academic and non- academic performances.
The College of Education robustly acknowledges and celebrates the exemplary academic and non-academic performances of students within the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program, fostering a culture of excellence and motivation. Annually, academic achievements are recognized through Dean's List awards, publicized within the college and during university-wide ceremonies. For non-academic accomplishments, students are commended for leadership roles in student organizations, successful participation in community outreach programs for individuals with special needs, and achievements in inter-university competitions or intramural activities. These recognitions are often highlighted during college assemblies, published in newsletters, and featured on the college's social media platforms, providing positive reinforcement and inspiring other students. This comprehensive recognition system not only validates student effort but also encourages well-rounded development, preparing future Special Needs Education professionals who excel both academically and in their contributions to society.
1.7 Outstanding achievement of students is recognized and encouraged through the following:
1.7.1 inclusion in the honor roll, Dean's list, etc.;
The College of Education consistently recognizes academic excellence within the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program by formally including deserving students in the Honor Roll and Dean's List each semester. These lists are prominently displayed on college bulletin boards and published in official university communications, providing public acknowledgment of their hard work and dedication. Eligibility criteria, based on specific grade point averages, are transparently communicated to all students at the start of each academic year. This consistent practice not only celebrates individual achievements but also motivates other students to strive for higher academic performance. The inclusion in these prestigious lists serves as a tangible symbol of academic success, reinforcing the value of diligent study in the challenging field of special needs education.
1.7.2 grant of tuition scholarships;
The university actively encourages outstanding academic performance in the Bachelor of Special Needs Education. Through Republic Act 11336, the university is a public state-owned university, thus, no grant of tuition scholarships from the university is given and offered among students. Nonetheless, there are existing accredited scholarship grants that support students' financial assistance to mitigate monetary issues. To name them, please refer to the photo above.
1.7.3 award of honor medals and merit certificates;
At Carlos Hilado Memorial State University, exemplary academic achievements of Bachelor of Special Needs Education students are formally recognized through the prestigious award of honor medals and merit certificates during annual recognition ceremonies. These tangible symbols of excellence are bestowed upon graduating students who have maintained exceptional academic records throughout their program, often categorized as Cum Laude, Magna Cum Laude, and Summa Cum Laude. Merit certificates are also awarded for specific achievements, such as consistently maintaining high grades in particular specialized courses within the Special Needs Education curriculum. These awards provide a visible and lasting testament to a student's dedication and intellectual prowess, serving as a significant source of pride and encouraging a commitment to lifelong learning in the field. The public presentation of these honors reinforces the university's commitment to acknowledging and celebrating academic distinction.
The Bachelor of Special Needs Education program fosters and recognizes academic distinction through opportunities for membership in honor societies such as the Sped Society Organization. Students who consistently achieve high academic marks and demonstrate leadership potential are invited to join relevant university or college-level honor societies, which often provide networking opportunities and engagement in academic events. While specific "honor classes" might not be universally applied across all courses, faculty members often identify high-achieving students within their classes and provide them with advanced readings or opportunities for deeper engagement. This practice cultivates an environment where intellectual curiosity and academic rigor are celebrated, providing a supportive community for the most dedicated students in special needs education to thrive. Membership in such groups recognizes past achievements and encourages continued academic excellence and professional development.
Outstanding Bachelor of Special Needs Education students are granted special privileges as a form of recognition, fostering their holistic development beyond just academic grades. These privileges often include preferential opportunities for leadership roles within student organizations, where they can organize events related to special education awareness or community outreach. High-achieving students may also be recommended for representational roles in college or university-level committees, allowing their voices to contribute to institutional policies. Furthermore, they are often given priority in accessing specialized resources, mentorship programs, or research assistantships with faculty members. These privileges are designed to empower students, develop their leadership skills, and provide enriching experiences that complement their academic journey, preparing them to be well-rounded and influential professionals in the field of special needs education.
The administration actively grants specific awards and recognition for outstanding academic accomplishments beyond general honors, particularly within the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program. For instance, a "Best Thesis" award is given annually to the student or group whose research in special education demonstrates exceptional originality, rigor, and practical relevance. Similarly, a "Student Researcher of the Year" award may be conferred upon a student who has made significant contributions to research through projects, presentations, or publications in the field of special needs. These targeted awards involve a rigorous selection process, often including faculty nominations and presentations, to ensure the highest standards are recognized. Such specific accolades not only celebrate individual scholarly excellence but also stimulate a culture of research and innovation among students, encouraging them to contribute meaningfully to the body of knowledge in special needs education.
1.8 Indicators on performance of graduates are studied such as:
1.8.1 analysis of performance of graduates in the Licensure Examination; if applicable
The College of Education rigorously conducts an annual analysis of the performance of its Bachelor of Special Needs Education graduates in the Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET). This involves meticulously reviewing the LET results, disaggregating data by subject area and specific competencies, to identify strengths and weaknesses in the program's curriculum and instruction. For instance, if graduates consistently score lower in a particular area, such as assessment for learners with special needs, the curriculum committee will initiate a review of relevant courses and teaching methodologies. The findings from this analysis are regularly presented to the faculty during departmental meetings to inform targeted interventions and curriculum enhancements. This continuous feedback loop ensures that the program remains responsive to the demands of the licensure examination and produces highly competent special education professionals.
1.8.2 employability of graduates; and
The College of Education actively monitors and studies the employability of its Bachelor of Special Needs Education graduates to assess the program's effectiveness in preparing students for the workforce. This is primarily done through annual graduate tracer studies, which survey alumni on their employment status, job roles, and how well their education prepared them for their current positions. The university's Career and Job Placement Office collaborates with the College to track employment rates and gather information on the types of institutions (e.g., special education centers, inclusive schools, rehabilitation clinics) that hire CHMSU graduates. Data collected on employability rates and the relevance of their skills to their jobs are then analyzed to identify in-demand competencies and inform curriculum adjustments. This systematic approach ensures the program produces graduates who are not only qualified but also highly sought after in the diverse field of special needs education.
1.8.3 feedback from employers regarding performance of graduates.
The College of Education systematically gathers feedback from employers regarding the performance of its Bachelor of Special Needs Education graduates as a crucial indicator of program quality and effectiveness. This is achieved through formal employer surveys distributed to schools, special education centers, and other organizations that employ CHMSU alumni. These surveys typically inquire about graduates' competencies in areas such as instructional planning, classroom management for diverse learners, collaboration with parents and professionals, and adherence to ethical standards in special education. Furthermore, the college occasionally convenes employer focus group discussions to gain deeper insights into the strengths and areas for improvement of its graduates. The insights derived from this employer feedback are invaluable for curriculum review and development, ensuring that the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program consistently produces highly competent and practice-ready professionals.
OUTCOME/S
O.1 The faculty and students have commendable performance as a result of administrative support.
The commendable performance of both faculty members and students in the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program directly reflects the robust administrative support provided by the College of Education. For faculty, this is evidenced by their consistent participation in professional development activities, leading to updated pedagogical approaches and increased research output in special education, often supported by administrative grants or flexible scheduling. Student performance is demonstrably high through consistently strong passing rates in the Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET) and their active engagement in community-based special education initiatives, often facilitated by logistical and financial backing from the administration. Furthermore, the number of faculty members presenting at local and national conferences, coupled with the increasing number of students receiving academic honors and scholarships, collectively underscores the positive impact of administrative backing. The cohesive relationship between administrative provisions and academic outcomes illustrates a direct correlation between strong support and a flourishing academic environment for special needs education.
O.2 The graduates of the program are employable.
The high employability of graduates from the Bachelor of Special Needs Education program is a direct outcome of the comprehensive administrative support for effective instruction and career preparation. Our annual graduate tracer studies consistently show a high percentage of alumni securing relevant employment within six months of graduation, working as special education teachers, inclusion specialists, or therapists in various educational settings. This strong employment rate is further corroborated by positive feedback gathered from employers, who frequently commend our graduates for their readiness, specialized skills in differentiated instruction, and collaborative abilities. The College's proactive linkages with schools, special education centers, and NGOs for practicum placements and job referrals also significantly contribute to this outcome. Therefore, the consistent absorption of our graduates into the special education workforce serves as definitive evidence of the program's effectiveness and the strong administrative foundation that underpins its curriculum and practical training.