S.1 The required number of faculty possess graduate degrees appropriate and relevant to the program or any of the allied fields.
S.1.4. Faculty members teaching the professional education courses must have the following:
S.2. Other qualifications such as the following are considered:
S.3 Faculty handling OJT/practicum courses have had at least three (3) years of teaching and industry-based experience in the field if applicable.
S.4 At least 50% of the faculty are Graduate degree holders.
I.1 The faculty demonstrate professional competence and are engage in any or a combination of the following:
I.2 Faculty pursue graduate studies related to the program and/or allied fields from reputable institutions (with at least Level II accreditation status or World/Asian rank).
O.1 The institution has qualified and competent faculty.
S.1 There is an institutional Human Resource Development Plan/Program designed for faculty recruitment.
I.1 Recruitment and selection of faculty is processed by the Faculty Selection Board using the following criteria:
I.2 The hiring system adopts an open competitive selection based on the CSC-approved Merit System and Promotion Plan of the Institution, published and well-disseminated through various means of communication:
I.3 A Screening Committee selects and recommends the best and most qualified applicants.
I.4 Measures to avoid professional in-breeding are observed.
I.5 The institution conducts orientation for newly-hired faculty on its vision and mission; CSC, PRC, DBM, and administration policies on their duties, responsibilities, benefits, and other academic concerns.
O.1 The most qualified faculty are selected.
S.1 Faculty-student ratio is in accordance with the program requirements and standards as follows:
S.1.1 lecture (a1:35-50)
S.1.2 laboratory (specific to the discipline)
S.2 There is a provision for incentives of overload teaching in accordance with the CMO of the program and/or institutional guidelines.
S.3 There are full-time faculty classified by rank, subject/specialization.
S.4 Faculty schedule has time for preparation of lessons, scoring of test papers, record-keeping, class evaluation and other instruction-related activities.
S.5 Workload Guidelines contain sufficient time for teaching and/or research extension, production and other assigned tasks.
S.6 There is equitable, measurable and fair distribution of teaching load and other assignments.
I.1 The maximum total load is assigned to regular full-time faculty in accordance to the CMO of the Program and institutional guidelines.
I.2 A Faculty Manual is published formalizing faculty policies, standards and guidelines.
I.3 Professional subjects are handled by specialists in the discipline/program.
I.4 The faculty are assigned to teach their major/minor fields of specialization, for a maximum of four (4) different subject preparations within a semester.
I.5 Administrative arrangements are adopted when vacancies/leaves of absence occur during the term.
I.6 No less than 60% of the professional subjects offered in the program are handled by full-time faculty.
I.7 Teaching schedule does not allow more than six (6) hours of continuous teaching.
I.8 Administrative, research and/or professional assignment outside of regular teaching are given credits.
Administrative, research, and professional assignments outside of regular teaching duties are formally recognized and credited as part of the faculty workload. Such assignments may include significant administrative responsibilities, academic advisement, leadership roles, or engagement in peer-reviewed research and service activities, each of which can be assigned teaching load credits or workload units equivalent to a portion of regular teaching hours. This system ensures that faculty members receive appropriate credit for their contributions beyond classroom instruction, reflecting the complexity and effort involved in these roles and allowing for workload adjustments or compensation as approved by the relevant academic authorities. This approach promotes a balanced and fair evaluation of faculty efforts across all their academic and professional responsibilities
I.9 Consultation, tutorial, remedial classes, expert services and other instruction-related activities are given credits in consonance with faculty workload guidelines.
Consultation, tutorial sessions, remedial classes, expert services, and other instruction-related activities are duly recognized and credited in accordance with established faculty workload guidelines. These activities, which extend beyond regular classroom teaching, play a vital role in supporting student learning and academic success. By assigning appropriate credits to these efforts, the institution acknowledges the additional time and expertise faculty members invest in providing personalized guidance, addressing learning gaps, and offering specialized knowledge. This practice ensures a fair and comprehensive evaluation of faculty workload, encourages active engagement in diverse instructional responsibilities, and ultimately enhances the quality of education delivered to students.
I.10 Workload assignments and number of preparations follow existing workload guidelines.
O.1 The faculty are efficient and effective, with sufficient time for instruction, research, extension, production and other assigned tasks.
The faculty demonstrate a high level of efficiency and effectiveness in fulfilling their diverse responsibilities, skillfully balancing their time among instruction, research, extension, production, and other assigned tasks. Their commitment to excellence ensures that each area receives adequate attention, fostering a dynamic academic environment where teaching quality is maintained, innovative research thrives, community extension programs are actively supported, and production activities contribute to institutional goals. This well-rounded dedication not only enhances the overall performance of the faculty but also significantly benefits students, the institution, and the broader community.
S.1 The institution has a system of promotion in rank and tenure based on official issuances.
S.2 The institution has a policy on probationary status of employment.
S.3 At least 50% of the full-time faculty teaching the professional courses are under permanent/regular status.
I.1 The institution implements the system of promotion in rank and salary based on existing policies and issuances (e.g NBC 461).
I.2 Retirement, separation or termination benefits are implemented in accordance with the institutional and government policies and guidelines.
I.3 The faculty are officially informed of their rank and tenure after the evaluation of the credentials and performance.
I.4 The faculty concerned is officially informed of the extension, renewal, or termination of their appointments.
I.5 The institution implements a CSC-approved Strategic Performance Management System (SPMS) which emphasizes quality teaching performance, research, creative work, extension, and production services.
I.6 The probationary period or temporary status required before the grant of permanent status to the faculty is in accordance with Civil Service and institutional policies and guidelines.
O.1 The faculty are satisfied with their rank and employment status.
S.1 The institution has an approved and sustainable Faculty Development Program (FDP)
S.2 There are policies on faculty academic recognition and grant of scholarships/fellowships and awards.
S.3 Every faculty member has at least one active membership in professional/scientific organization or honor society relevant to his/her assignment and field of specialization.
S.4 The budget allocation for faculty development is adequate.
I.1 The institution implements a sustainable Faculty Development Program (FDP) based on identified priorities/needs.
I.1.1 upgraded educational qualifications (graduate studies)
I.1.2 attendance to seminars, symposia and conferences for continuing education;
I.1.3 conduct of research activities and publication of research output, and
I.1.4 giving lectures and presentation of papers in national/international conferences, symposia and seminars.
I.2 The institution supports the professional growth of the faculty through attendance in educational lectures, symposia, seminars, conferences and other forms of training.
I.3 The institution conducts in-service training regularly at least once per term.
I.4 Selection of deserving faculty to be granted scholarship, fellowships, seminars, conferences, and/or training grants is done objectively.
CHMSU prides itself on offering a competitive compensation package designed to attract and retain top-tier faculty, featuring a merit-based salary structure that rewards experience and performance, as well as an extensive array of fringe benefits. These include generous maternity and paternity leave with full pay, ample sick and vacation leave to promote work-life balance, and study leave with options for paid or unpaid sabbaticals, deloading opportunities, and thesis/dissertation aid to support advanced degree pursuits. The university also provides significant tuition fee discounts for faculty and their dependents, a clothing or uniform allowance, annual performance-based and anniversary bonuses, and honoraria for research and scholarly work, all of which underscore its commitment to academic excellence. Additional benefits such as optional housing privileges and compensatory leave credits further ensure that faculty members’ dedication and extra efforts are duly recognized, making CHMSU’s benefits package both robust and attractive.
I.5 The budget for faculty development is adequately allocated.
I.6 The budget for faculty development is wisely utilized.
I.7 The Faculty Development Program is implemented with the following provisions:
I.7.1 adequate and qualified supervision of faculty.
I.7.2 scholarships, sabbatical leaves and research grants;
I.7.3 financial support for active membership in professional organizations;
I.7.4 deloading to finish the faculty's thesis/dissertation;
I.7.5 attendance in continuing professional education (CPE) programs such as seminars, workshops and conferences or some in-service training courses;
I.7.6 conducting research activities related to the program;
I.7.7 publishing scholarly articles and research outputs; and
I.7.8 production of instructional materials (IMs)
I.8 Opportunities for the faculty to attend/participate in capability-building and enhanced activities are fairly distributed.
I.9 Tuition fee privilege and other forms of assistance are utilized for faculty pursuing advanced (master's and/or doctoral) degrees.
I.10 Faculty are given incentives for book writing, manuals, handbooks, compilations and instructional materials to keep up with new knowledge and techniques in the field of specialization.
O.1 The faculty are well-trained and competent to serve the institution.
O.2 The faculty are committed to serve and support the programs and projects of the institution.
SYSTEM - INPUTS - PROCESSES
S.1 The institution has a system of evaluating the faculty on the following:
S.1.1 professional performance; and
S.1.2 scholarly works.
IMPLEMENTATION
THE FACULTY
I.1 demonstrate skills and competencies in all of the following:
I.1.1 knowledge of the program objectives/outcome(s);
I.1.2 reflecting the program outcomes clearly in the course objectives;
I.1.3 knowledge/mastery of the content, issues and methodologies in the discipline;
I.1.4 proficiency in the use of language of instruction;
I.1.5 the use of higher order thinking skills such as analytical, critical, creative, innovative and problem solving;
I.1.6 innovativeness and resourcefulness in the different instructional processes; and
I.1.7 integration of values and work ethics in the teaching-learning process; and
I.1.8 integration of Gender and Development (GAD) Activities.
CHMSU began its Recruitment, Selection, and Orientation with the clear objective of recruiting educators who could not only impart knowledge but also inspire future leaders, ensuring graduates are well-equipped for a dynamic global landscape. The recruitment committee meticulously screened applications, seeking candidates whose Curriculum Vitaes demonstrated a deep understanding of the program's intended outcomes, particularly their experience in nurturing critical thinking and problem-solving skills. During the rigorous selection process, candidates underwent interviews and teaching demonstrations that critically assessed their mastery of content, awareness of current disciplinary issues, diverse methodologies, and proficiency in English, the university’s medium of instruction. Those who advanced showcased impressive abilities to integrate higher-order thinking skills into their pedagogical approaches, with lesson plans designed to challenge students analytically and creatively. Their innovative use of instructional technologies and interactive strategies transformed traditional lectures into engaging learning experiences. The orientation phase was pivotal in familiarizing new faculty with university policies and reinforcing the integration of values and strong work ethics into teaching and learning. Additionally, a dedicated session on Gender and Development activities ensured educators understood their role in fostering an inclusive and equitable environment. This comprehensive process ensured that only faculty truly aligned with the university’s vision for holistic student development were brought on board, ready to shape the minds of tomorrow.
I.2 promptly submit required reports and academic outputs.
I.3 update lecture notes through an interface of relevant research findings and new knowledge.
I.4 serve as resource person/lecturer/consultant in the program/field of specialization.
I.5 present papers in local, regional/national and/or international fora.
I.6 publish papers in regional/national and international magazines and journals.
I.7 conduct research and publish outputs in refereed journals of national and international circulation
I.8 conduct extension and outreach activities.
I.9 regularly update respective course syllabi.
I.10 utilize ICT and other resources in the enhancement of the teaching- learning process; and
I.11 produce instructional materials, e.g. workbooks, manuals, modules, audio-visual aids, etc. to facilitate teaching and learning.
OUTCOME/S
O.1 The faculty performance is generally satisfactory.
O.2 The scholarly works of the faculty are commendable.
A tangible practice supporting faculty satisfaction with compensation and rewards in the Bachelor of Special Needs Education (BSNED) Program would be the existence of a clear and accessible university-wide compensation and benefits manual or policy document. This document, readily available to all faculty, would detail provisions such as maternity/paternity leave, sick leave, study leave options (with or without pay), and tuition fee discounts for faculty and dependents, which are generally offered in CHMSU. Furthermore, the implementation of a performance-based bonus (PBB) system and the regular disbursement of anniversary bonuses and honoraria for scholarly works (research, publications) would serve as strong indicators of a comprehensive rewards system. Evidence could also include formal feedback mechanisms like anonymous surveys specifically gauging faculty satisfaction with their compensation package, and ideally, the results of such surveys demonstrating a high percentage of positive responses from BSNED faculty. Finally, the university's consistent allocation of budget for these benefits and incentives, as reflected in annual financial reports, would underscore their commitment to faculty well-being and satisfaction.
SYSTEM - INPUT - PROCESSES
S.1 The institution has a system of compensation and rewards to its faculty and staff.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1 The following fringe benefits are granted:
I.1.1 maternity leave/paternity leave with pay;
1.1.2. sick leave;
1.1.3. study leave (with or without pay);
1.1.4. vacation leave;
1.1.5. tuition fee discount for faculty and their dependents;
1.1.6. clothing/uniform allowance;
1.1.7. performance based bonus (PBB);
1.1.8. anniversary bonus;
1.1.9. honoraria/ incentive for conducting research or for the production of scholarly works;
1.1.10. housing privilege (optional);
1.1.11. sabbatical leave;
1.1.12. compensatory leave credit;
1.1.13. deloading to finish thesis/dissertation;
1.1.14. thesis/dissertation aid
I.2 Policies on salaries/benefits and other privileges are disseminated to the faculty
I.3 Salaries are paid regularly and promptly.
I.4 Teaching assignments beyond the regular load are compensated (e.g., overload pay, service credits, etc.)
I.5 Faculty who are actually involved in the production of scholarly materials are given credits for their work.
I.6 Faculty with outstanding performance are given recognition/awards and incentives.
OUTCOMES
O.1 The faculty are satisfied with their compensation and rewards.
A tangible practice supporting faculty satisfaction with compensation and rewards in the Bachelor of Special Needs Education (BSNED) Program would be the existence of a clear and accessible university-wide compensation and benefits manual or policy document. This document, readily available to all faculty, would detail provisions such as maternity/paternity leave, sick leave, study leave options (with or without pay), and tuition fee discounts for faculty and dependents, which are generally offered in CHMSU. Furthermore, the implementation of a performance-based bonus (PBB) system and the regular disbursement of anniversary bonuses and honoraria for scholarly works (research, publications) would serve as strong indicators of a comprehensive rewards system. Evidence could also include formal feedback mechanisms like anonymous surveys specifically gauging faculty satisfaction with their compensation package, and ideally, the results of such surveys demonstrating a high percentage of positive responses from BSNED faculty. Finally, the university's consistent allocation of budget for these benefits and incentives, as reflected in annual financial reports, would underscore their commitment to faculty well-being and satisfaction.
S.1 There are approved SUC Code and SUC Faculty Manual that defines the policies, guidelines, rules and regulations affecting the faculty.
I.1 responsibly observe the following:
I.1.1 regular and prompt attendance in classes;
I.1.2 participation in faculty meetings and university/college activities;
I.1.3 completion of assigned tasks on time;
I.1.4 submission of all required reports promptly; and
I.1.5 decorum at all times.
I.2 follow the Code of Ethics of the Profession and the Code of Ethical Standards for Government Officials and Employees (RA 6713).
Professionalism of faculty is firmly anchored in adherence to both their specific Code of Ethics for their profession and the Code of Ethical Standards for Government Officials and Employees (RA 6713). This dual commitment means faculty members are expected to embody integrity, honesty, and transparency in all their academic and administrative duties. They are held to high standards of conduct, avoiding conflicts of interest and ensuring fairness in grading, research, and interactions with students and colleagues. Implementation involves regular reminders of these ethical guidelines, often through workshops and policy reviews, ensuring faculty are well-versed in their responsibilities. Ultimately, this robust ethical framework guarantees that faculty professionalism contributes to a trustworthy and equitable learning environment, upholding public trust in the institution.
I.3 Exercise academic freedom judiciously.
At CHMSU professionalism among faculty is paramount, particularly in the judicious exercise of academic freedom. This means that while faculty are empowered to explore and discuss diverse ideas in their teaching and research, they do so with a profound sense of responsibility. Discussions, even on controversial topics, are always grounded in scholarly rigor and factual accuracy, avoiding personal biases or the promotion of unsubstantiated claims. Faculty ensure their pedagogical methods and research endeavors uphold the university's mission for intellectual growth and the pursuit of truth, refraining from using their position to proselytize or engage in harassment. They understand that academic freedom is not an absolute license, but a privilege tied to the ethical conduct of their profession, fostering an environment of respectful inquiry and open dialogue for all members of the academic community.
I.4 show commitment and loyalty to the institution as evidenced by:
I.4.1 observance of official time;
I.4.2 productive use of official time;
I.4.3 performance of other tasks and assignments, with or without compensation; and
I.4.4 compliance with terms of agreement/contracts (e.g., scholarship and training).
I.5 maintain harmonious interpersonal relations with superiors, peers, students, parents and the community.
I.6 demonstrate knowledge of recent educational trends/issues/resources in the program under survey.
I.7 show evidence of professional growth through further and continuing studies.
I.8 Engage in practices which enable the faculty to demonstrate harmonious interpersonal relations with students, faculty and the community.
O.1 The corps of faculty manifests a commendable level of professionalism.