Our first meeting was on June 1, 2017. We met for a half day to review our project goals and our budget. All of our team members were there as well as our principal - Keith Walsh, our resource teacher - Denise Hilts, our instructional coach - Eric Frampton and our French Consultant - Samantha Pitre. We shared what we had already done in our classrooms with inquiry-based learning so that we could get a sense of where we were all starting from. Teachers also completed a questionnaire "Getting Started with Inquiry Learning in French Immersion". Click here to see our survey and results.
All of our teachers had experimented with some form of Inquiry-based learning in their classroom some examples included: inquiry in conjunction with their Science and Social Studies units, Passion Projects, and Inquiry learning during French Language time (incorporating listening, speaking and writing). All teachers noted that students were highly engaged with this type of learning. Students were learning how to use new tools, they were learning more about technology and they were learning more about who they were as learners. One teacher noted that "Students learned about learning just by formulating their question!" Teachers found that inquiry-based learning fostered a culture of creativity and collaboration in their classrooms.
There were a number of challenges that teachers faced when implementing inquiry-based learning in their French immersion classrooms. Many students had difficulty learning how to ask questions. Accessing French resources that were at the appropriate level was a challenge, especially during free inquiry. Teachers questioned whether French language expectations were being met and wondered "Am I taking time away from something else to play?" Some teachers felt that there was a lack of French being used in the classroom and that they were becoming the "French police" as students were not communicating with each other in French. One teacher noted that "the most challenging part was assisting students with the structures and support they require for their inquiry to ensure they reached their learning goal/answer the question of their inquiry." Another teacher found it challenging to ensure that the technology being used was a being used as a purposeful tool to help with students' learning and not slowing it down.
Check out Lindsay Wright's blog about her experiences with Passion Projects in her grade 2/3 French immersion class.
We read Chapter 5: “Inquiry-based learning - cultivating curiosity in French” from My FSL Learning Environment - The Key to Success! by Pamela Marshall Grey. The chapter outlines the inquiry based learning approach where "students' questions, wonderings, ideas, observations and thinking are at the centre of the learning." In engaging in this process students learn skills related to life long learning: critical thinking, problem-solving, communicating and expressing thinking and collaborating.
In the inquiry cycle students:
This cycle is a "cyclical and fluid" process where students can reflect on their learning and adjust their learning path based on their findings as well as classmates' and teacher input.
In French immersion we must keep students' language proficiency in mind. We may need to teach explicit phrases or responses to enable student communication. Some examples include:
Much of our discussion after reading this article centred on the challenge of implementing inquiry-based learning in a second language. Besides helping students learn new vocabulary and expressions, there is the challenge of finding reading /audio / video materials that are at the students' level of French proficiency. This will be one of the main goals of our project and will be an area that we will revisit throughout the year.
We decided that we would use the following tools to measure our growth as well as our students' growth during our TLLP project:
At the end of our meeting we reviewed our budget and teachers had time to look for resources that they would like to purchase for their classes for September. We purchased the book "Dive into Inquiry" by Trevor Mackenzie and we plan to start discussing the book in the fall.
After two months away from the classroom we are recharged and ready to get started! We welcomed two new members to our TLLP team. Amy Shute is teaching part time in the French immersion kindergarten classroom and Alana Mastroianni is a first year teacher teaching in the grade 5/6 class.
After reviewing our blog and parent information letter (see below) we took some time to look at a resource from the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board: "French as a Second Language Curriculum Mapping Guide, French immersion, Grades 1 - 8". This is an excellent resource for exploring what the progression of expectations for French immersion looks like from grades 1 - 8. The wording of the expectations are very similar from grades 1 to 8 with only qualifiers changing. See the example below:
Seeing the continuum of expectations for each grade makes it easier to for teachers to plan for students who are working at various grade levels in their classes.
This resource also includes links to the CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference), strategies to try as well as suggestions for assessment and evaluation.
We read Chapter 2: “The classroom environment - environment as the Third Teacher” from My FSL Learning Environment - The Key to Success! by Pamela Marshall Grey. This chapter outlines how to construct a positive space to encourage learners. This takes into account the physical space as well as the social environment. It encourages FLS teachers to consider:
We had a chance to review the Coding Resource that was created by the Trillium Lakelands District School board:
https://sites.google.com/a/tldsb.net/tldsb-coding/
This site is a "resource to provide support and coding challenges and at the same time help connect coding to thinking, creativity, and curriculum."
This resource may be useful to teachers hoping to explore coding as a part of the inquiry journey.
Letter to with our the scope of our project share with parents
We started off our meeting by sharing how teachers have been using the environment as a third teacher in their classrooms. We had taken pictures in all of our classrooms which show evidence of different learning zones, posted learning goals and success criteria, students’ written and oral language, growth mindset, and how we maximize spoken French in our classroom environment. Click here to see photos of what we’ve been doing already! We then discussed areas for future growth.
We shared what we have been doing in our classrooms in regards to implementing inquiry-based learning in our classrooms. What we shared relates closely to the discussion question from our book study. Click here to see our responses. Teachers are all keen to delve into inquiry with their students. When asked which supports they needed to move forward with inquiry in their classrooms, most teachers indicated the need for extra planning time and/or extra pd opportunities. Teachers were able to access these supports with our funding through our TLLP.
We then were introduced to our board's new writing assessment tool by Lindsay Wright, Eric Frampton and Samantha Pitre who are members of our board's French immersion steering committee. TLLP teachers had chance to review the document that we will be piloting with our students. Our next meeting will give us a chance to moderate some student writing together using this tool.
After our break teachers completed the beginning of project tech survey. Results of this survey will be shared at our next meeting. Teachers also completed an exit ticket commenting on what went well with our session, what tricky and which supports they need moving forward. Finally teachers completed a planning sheet to set goals for how they would continue to implement inquiry-based learning in their classrooms.
Today's meeting was an opportunity to see what we have been doing in our classrooms, share our learning from the BIT17 conference and further explore the our board’s new writing assessment tool.
To see some examples of what teachers have been doing in their classrooms check out our "Classroom Projects" page on this blog.
Alana, Richard, Philippa and Eric (our instructional coach) shared their learning from the Bring IT Together 2017 conference held in Niagra Falls on November 9th and 10th. This conference provided us all with many ideas to bring back to our classrooms. Here are a couple of links to the presentations that we attended:
We had the opportunity to moderate a piece of writing together from a grade 3 student using our board’s new writing assessment tool: "The Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) Writing Assessment for French Immersion Classrooms". Going through the process together helped us to gain a better understanding of how to use the tool and each of its components. We were also able to brainstorm some ideas on how to assess the critical thinking component of the assessment. At our next meeting we will each use the assessment tool to assess a piece of our writing from our own students.
This meeting had a different format. Instead of meeting as a whole group the TLLP lead, our instructional coach and our curriculum leadership consultant spent time with each teacher individually to help a develop a plan for their classroom moving forward. Each teacher is at different place with inquiry in their classroom and each teacher is trying a different approach to inquiry. Meeting with teachers individually gave the opportunity for classroom teachers to plan for their own classroom’s needs. Click here to see the interview format that was used with each teacher.
During these sessions we took a closer look at the "Action Oriented Task Planning Sheet" developed by CEFR Barrie Region CEFR Project to help guide our planning. Click here for a link to this planning sheet. The AOT Planning Sheet helps teachers to identify:
Based feedback after our January meetings, we decided to use the same format for our March meetings. The TLLP lead, our instructional coach and our curriculum leadership consultant spent time with each teacher individually to help a develop a plan for implementing inquiry-based learning in their classroom moving forward. (See Meeting #6 to find links to interview format and planning sheets). Teachers felt that this offered more time to focus on their own classroom's needs. One teacher summed it up by saying that they appreciated the "one on one conversation, lots of great feedback and confidence going into next stage of inquiry, comfortable sharing my ideas and working out the kinks".
Here is what each of the classes have been up to:
KIndergarten - In the kindergarten classroom they had completed an structured inquiry on the Winter Olympics.
Grade 2/3 - The grade 2/3 classroom had completed a controlled inquiry on plants. Click here to see how Mme. Wright carried this our with her class. They also continue to work on Passion Projects (Free Inquiry). Here is what Mme. Wright wrote in her blog post about her Free Inquiry Time:
Grade 3/4 - The grade 3/4 class completed a guided inquiry on Animal Habitats, based on the Grade 4 Science curriculum. Click here to see how Mme. Miller implemented this project. They now starting to work on a guided inquiry on Stable Structures based on the Grade 3 Science curriculum.
This class was also starting to work on passion projects. Students are given one or two periods a week to work on a project that is of interest to them. These projects are usually STEAM/Maker based projects using the maker space that is in their classroom.
Grade 5/6 - The grade 5/6 students were working on a guided inquiry about careers they may have in the future. Click here to see project outline Mme. M presented to her students.
CEFR Inspired Writing Assessment Tool: During these meetings we also took some time to further explore our board's new writing assessment tool: "The Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) Inspired Writing Assessment for French Immersion Classrooms - French Immersion Grades 1-8)". We all found this assessment tool to be an efficient and effective way to assess our student's writing.
Our team took some time to meet as a whole group again for two half days at the end of our project. We used this time to: