Reflective Project

Introduction

The Reflective Project is one of the four compulsory components of the IB Career-related Programme (CP) core.  The Reflective Project is an in-depth work produced over an extended period and submitted in year 2 of the Career-related Programme. Students identify, analyze, discuss and evaluate an ethical dilemma associated with an issue from their career-related studies.  The Reflective Project focuses on an ethical dilemma of an issue directly linked to the student’s career-related study. 

Aims

The Reflective Project aims to give students the opportunity to:

Requirements


Criteria for the Project

Assessment

ASSESSMENT

Summative assessment principles are used to assess the project.

The following are criterion for the RP 

AO1: Focus and method

AO2: Knowledge and understanding in context

AO3: Critical thinking

AO4: Communication

AO5: Engagement and reflections on planning and progress

Students will be assessed on the following:

The descriptors are a measure of performance and should not be considered as marks, although the descriptor levels are ultimately added together to obtain a total. The school will assess all reflective projects. A sample will then be selected by the IB and sent to an external moderator for confirmation of the school’s marks. The maximum score for the reflective project is 36. Any student awarded a grade of E for the reflective project will not be awarded the IBCP Certificate.

Advice from examiners

A list of things to do:

Recommended: things to do:

- read the assessment criteria

- read previous essays to identify strengths and possible pitfalls

- spend time working out the research question (imagine the finished essay)

- work out a structure for the essay

- start work early and stick to deadlines

- maintain a good working relationship with their supervisor

- construct an argument that relates to the research question

- use the library and consult librarians for advice

- record sources as they go along (rather than trying to reconstruct a list at the end)

- choose a new topic and a research question that can be answered if there is a problem

with the original

- use the appropriate language for the subject

- let your interest and enthusiasm show

- write the abstract

- check and proofread the final version carefully

A list of things to avoid:

Students should not work with a research question that is too broad or too vague, too narrow, too difficult or inappropriate. A good research question is one that asks something worth asking and that is answerable within 40 hours/750-3,000 words. It should be clear what would count as evidence in relation to the question, and it must be possible to acquire such evidence in the course of the investigation. If a student does not know what evidence is needed, or cannot collect such evidence, it will not be possible to answer the research question. In addition, students should not:

One further piece of advice is as follows: the more background a student has in the subject, the better the chance he or she has of completing a high-quality Reflective Project. Choosing to write the Reflective Project in a subject that is not being studied as part of the career-related path often leads to lower marks.

adapted from South Island School

Planning and Reflective Writing

Initial Planning

These questions will help you refine your research area, and help you to focus more narrowly on a certain topic. In turn, this will guide you to a perfect research question :)

It can be useful to prompt the description of the subject matter of reflection in terms of a question such as:

 

Questions to facilitate reflection

 

Questions that are likely to be helpful in prompting more profound reflection

Material developed by Jenny Moon


Steps to Successful Research

7 Steps to Successful Research

 

 

 3. Determine your search strategy

4.   Execute your search—just do it!

 

5.   Evaluate the information you gather

 

6.   Start the process over again (if necessary)

 

7.   Write (and revise) your essay

Mindmap

A mind map is a graphical way to represent ideas and concepts. It is a visual thinking tool that helps structuring information, helping you to better analyze, comprehend, synthesize, recall and generate new ideas. Just as in every great idea, its power lies in its simplicity. Check for more great ideas here! https://litemind.com/what-is-mind-mapping/ 

Here are some great online Mind Mapping websites:


Sample Reflective Project Papers

RP template

Template

Title page

Table of Contents

I. Introduction

The introduction should start on a new page.

Consider including the following in your introduction:

II. The Issue in Context

Consider including the following information in this section:

III. The Ethical Dilemma

The next section of your paper should discuss the ethical dilemma from different stakeholders' perspectives. This should be separated into two or three sections, depending on how many stakeholders/sides to the issue there are. 

A. Stakeholder 1 perspective paragraph

B. Stakeholder 2 perspective paragraph

C. Stakeholder 3 perspective paragraph

In each stakeholder paragraph discuss their perspective on the ethical dilemma and give several specific examples from your sources. 

At the end of each stakeholder paragraph, reflect on that stakeholder's viewpoint and validity.

Make sure that you have a balanced paper by giving equal time to each stakeholder's perspective and showing both sides of the ethical dilemma equally.

IV Bias in Sources

You can also write a paragraph pointing out bias in any of the source material you have used.

Does the author gain personally or financially from the publication?

Other biased factors? 

V Cultural Implications

Explore social and cultural differences based on cultural identity and how these differences may lead to different perspectives.

Look for differences related to, for example:

Not all of these elements of culture will be relevant to your ethical dilemma, but try to relate at least two of them to your issue.

VI Conclusion

Consider including the following information in your conclusion:

References