sample output

If choose long_prt=T in the macro, the following detail will be printted. By default, long_prt=F. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional Hazards for surrogate variables (80) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 79 The PHREG Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.MAIN80 Dependent Variable eventtime Censoring Variable bc Censoring Value(s) 0 Ties Handling BRESLOW Number of Observations Read 90710 Number of Observations Used 90710 Summary of the Number of Event and Censored Values Percent Total Event Censored Censored 90710 268 90442 99.70 Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Model Fit Statistics Without With Criterion Covariates Covariates -2 LOG L 6117.909 6079.030 AIC 6117.909 6093.030 SBC 6117.909 6118.167 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 38.8797 7 <.0001 Score 37.4504 7 <.0001 Wald 35.5894 7 <.0001 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio ffqsatf 1 -0.00129 0.01740 0.0055 0.9409 0.999 ffqcalor 1 0.0000774 0.0001232 0.3947 0.5299 1.000 ffqalco 1 0.01127 0.00480 5.5167 0.0188 1.011 agecat1 1 0.43405 0.24410 3.1618 0.0754 1.543 agecat2 1 0.87373 0.22482 15.1033 0.0001 2.396 agecat3 1 0.89731 0.22489 15.9194 <.0001 2.453 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional Hazards for surrogate variables (80) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 80 The PHREG Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio agecat4 1 1.03788 0.22808 20.7076 <.0001 2.823 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ********** blinplus 80 ************ 81 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 Main study regression coeffiecients: Uncorrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.00129 0.01740 0.99357 0.83781 1.17829 0.94090 calorie 800.0000 0.00008 0.00012 1.06387 0.87700 1.29056 0.52986 alcohol 25.00000 0.01127 0.00480 1.32544 1.04774 1.67674 0.01884 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.43405 0.24410 1.54349 0.95658 2.49052 0.07538 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.87373 0.22482 2.39584 1.54200 3.72248 0.00010 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.89731 0.22489 2.45299 1.57856 3.81180 0.00007 age 55 + 1.00000 1.03788 0.22808 2.82324 1.80552 4.41461 0.00001 ________ _______________________________________________________________ Main study regression coefficients: Corrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.00386 0.04843 0.98087 0.61022 1.57666 0.93643 calorie 800.0000 0.00041 0.00052 1.38757 0.61540 3.12859 0.42973 alcohol 25.00000 0.01387 0.00845 1.41450 0.93473 2.14052 0.10087 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.45811 0.24872 1.58108 0.97104 2.57437 0.06550 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.91418 0.23796 2.49472 1.56484 3.97717 0.00012 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.93838 0.23805 2.55583 1.60286 4.07537 0.00008 age 55 + 1.00000 1.03858 0.24495 2.82519 1.74801 4.56617 0.00002 ________ _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (82) 82 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 The PHREG Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.MAIN82 Dependent Variable eventtime Censoring Variable bc Censoring Value(s) 0 Ties Handling BRESLOW Number of Observations Read 90442 Number of Observations Used 90442 Summary of the Number of Event and Censored Values Percent Total Event Censored Censored 90442 337 90105 99.63 Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Model Fit Statistics Without With Criterion Covariates Covariates -2 LOG L 7690.802 7652.744 AIC 7690.802 7666.744 SBC 7690.802 7693.485 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 38.0573 7 <.0001 Score 38.0719 7 <.0001 Wald 36.9888 7 <.0001 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (82) 83 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 The PHREG Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio ffqsatf 1 -0.00637 0.01553 0.1681 0.6818 0.994 ffqcalor 1 -0.0001505 0.0001143 1.7332 0.1880 1.000 ffqalco 1 0.01264 0.00431 8.6264 0.0033 1.013 agecat1 1 0.23129 0.20537 1.2683 0.2601 1.260 agecat2 1 0.60124 0.18937 10.0808 0.0015 1.824 agecat3 1 0.71643 0.18643 14.7683 0.0001 2.047 agecat4 1 0.76406 0.19265 15.7300 <.0001 2.147 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ********** blinplus 82 ************ 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 84 Main study regression coeffiecients: Uncorrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.00637 0.01553 0.96866 0.83189 1.12792 0.68180 calorie 800.0000 -0.00015 0.00011 0.88657 0.74108 1.06062 0.18800 alcohol 25.00000 0.01264 0.00431 1.37178 1.11089 1.69394 0.00331 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.23129 0.20537 1.26022 0.84262 1.88477 0.26008 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.60124 0.18937 1.82438 1.25870 2.64427 0.00150 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.71643 0.18643 2.04710 1.42053 2.95004 0.00012 age 55 + 1.00000 0.76406 0.19265 2.14698 1.47178 3.13194 0.00007 ________ _______________________________________________________________ Main study regression coefficients: Corrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.06740 0.05285 0.71392 0.42533 1.19832 0.20220 calorie 800.0000 -0.00049 0.00051 0.67517 0.30350 1.50197 0.33562 alcohol 25.00000 0.02002 0.00692 1.64974 1.17554 2.31523 0.00379 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.12000 0.22760 1.12749 0.72174 1.76137 0.59803 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.47579 0.22631 1.60929 1.03275 2.50770 0.03552 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.59395 0.22877 1.81112 1.15668 2.83585 0.00943 age 55 + 1.00000 0.59510 0.23269 1.81321 1.14916 2.86098 0.01054 ________ _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (84) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 85 The PHREG Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.MAIN84 Dependent Variable eventtime Censoring Variable bc Censoring Value(s) 0 Ties Handling BRESLOW Number of Observations Read 90105 Number of Observations Used 72375 Summary of the Number of Event and Censored Values Percent Total Event Censored Censored 72375 311 72064 99.57 Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Model Fit Statistics Without With Criterion Covariates Covariates -2 LOG L 6958.663 6898.728 AIC 6958.663 6912.728 SBC 6958.663 6938.906 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 59.9352 7 <.0001 Score 61.7690 7 <.0001 Wald 58.1822 7 <.0001 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio ffqsatf 1 -0.04998 0.02290 4.7614 0.0291 0.951 ffqcalor 1 -1.0639E-6 0.0001105 0.0001 0.9923 1.000 ffqalco 1 0.00674 0.00435 2.3979 0.1215 1.007 agecat1 1 0.30816 0.22936 1.8052 0.1791 1.361 agecat2 1 0.63761 0.21365 8.9068 0.0028 1.892 agecat3 1 0.81803 0.20856 15.3840 <.0001 2.266 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (84) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 86 The PHREG Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio agecat4 1 1.18232 0.20516 33.2113 <.0001 3.262 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ********** blinplus 84 ************ 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 87 Main study regression coeffiecients: Uncorrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.04998 0.02290 0.77888 0.62228 0.97489 0.02910 calorie 800.0000 -0.00000 0.00011 0.99915 0.84018 1.18820 0.99232 alcohol 25.00000 0.00674 0.00435 1.18346 0.95623 1.46468 0.12150 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.30816 0.22936 1.36092 0.86816 2.13337 0.17909 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.63761 0.21365 1.89196 1.24466 2.87588 0.00284 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.81803 0.20856 2.26604 1.50569 3.41035 0.00009 age 55 + 1.00000 1.18232 0.20516 3.26195 2.18193 4.87656 0.00000 ________ _______________________________________________________________ Main study regression coefficients: Corrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.10273 0.03990 0.59830 0.40468 0.88455 0.01002 calorie 800.0000 0.00007 0.00055 1.05821 0.44513 2.51570 0.89810 alcohol 25.00000 0.01386 0.00721 1.41409 0.99304 2.01368 0.05470 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.24820 0.24761 1.28172 0.78890 2.08241 0.31615 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.59558 0.24577 1.81408 1.12061 2.93669 0.01538 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.76634 0.24284 2.15188 1.33693 3.46360 0.00160 age 55 + 1.00000 1.05630 0.23319 2.87572 1.82076 4.54192 0.00001 ________ _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (86) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 88 The PHREG Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.MAIN86 Dependent Variable eventtime Censoring Variable bc Censoring Value(s) 0 Ties Handling BRESLOW Number of Observations Read 89705 Number of Observations Used 67915 Summary of the Number of Event and Censored Values Percent Total Event Censored Censored 67915 397 67518 99.42 Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Model Fit Statistics Without With Criterion Covariates Covariates -2 LOG L 8831.832 8790.403 AIC 8831.832 8804.403 SBC 8831.832 8832.290 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 41.4291 7 <.0001 Score 40.9897 7 <.0001 Wald 39.4531 7 <.0001 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio ffqsatf 1 -0.02079 0.02005 1.0760 0.2996 0.979 ffqcalor 1 0.0000377 0.0000973 0.1497 0.6988 1.000 ffqalco 1 0.00791 0.00406 3.8071 0.0510 1.008 agecat1 1 0.43165 0.19122 5.0955 0.0240 1.540 agecat2 1 0.64802 0.18236 12.6280 0.0004 1.912 agecat3 1 0.65109 0.18306 12.6505 0.0004 1.918 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (86) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 89 The PHREG Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio agecat4 1 0.96044 0.18104 28.1447 <.0001 2.613 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ********** blinplus 86 ************ 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 90 Main study regression coeffiecients: Uncorrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.02079 0.02005 0.90126 0.74051 1.09689 0.29960 calorie 800.0000 0.00004 0.00010 1.03059 0.88470 1.20054 0.69885 alcohol 25.00000 0.00791 0.00406 1.21879 0.99911 1.48677 0.05103 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.43165 0.19122 1.53980 1.05850 2.23994 0.02399 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.64802 0.18236 1.91175 1.33723 2.73309 0.00038 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.65109 0.18306 1.91764 1.33950 2.74529 0.00038 age 55 + 1.00000 0.96044 0.18104 2.61285 1.83236 3.72578 0.00000 ________ _______________________________________________________________ Main study regression coefficients: Corrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.05892 0.05061 0.74483 0.45358 1.22310 0.24436 calorie 800.0000 0.00036 0.00070 1.32879 0.44285 3.98706 0.61211 alcohol 25.00000 0.00997 0.00683 1.28292 0.91784 1.79323 0.14478 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.42930 0.19725 1.53618 1.04362 2.26121 0.02952 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.59759 0.20179 1.81774 1.22395 2.69959 0.00306 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.60691 0.19909 1.83476 1.24196 2.71049 0.00230 age 55 + 1.00000 0.89977 0.19616 2.45904 1.67415 3.61192 0.00000 ________ _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (88) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 91 The PHREG Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.MAIN88 Dependent Variable eventtime Censoring Variable bc Censoring Value(s) 0 Ties Handling BRESLOW Number of Observations Read 89207 Number of Observations Used 67518 Summary of the Number of Event and Censored Values Percent Total Event Censored Censored 67518 398 67120 99.41 Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Model Fit Statistics Without With Criterion Covariates Covariates -2 LOG L 8849.391 8816.217 AIC 8849.391 8830.217 SBC 8849.391 8858.122 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 33.1745 7 <.0001 Score 31.9339 7 <.0001 Wald 30.8263 7 <.0001 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio ffqsatf 1 -0.00944 0.01989 0.2252 0.6351 0.991 ffqcalor 1 0.0000895 0.0000964 0.8612 0.3534 1.000 ffqalco 1 0.00321 0.00439 0.5362 0.4640 1.003 agecat1 1 0.39973 0.18873 4.4861 0.0342 1.491 agecat2 1 0.60047 0.18039 11.0803 0.0009 1.823 agecat3 1 0.69366 0.17853 15.0959 0.0001 2.001 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (88) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 92 The PHREG Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio agecat4 1 0.89111 0.17988 24.5422 <.0001 2.438 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ********** blinplus 88 ************ 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 93 Main study regression coeffiecients: Uncorrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.00944 0.01989 0.95390 0.78498 1.15918 0.63509 calorie 800.0000 0.00009 0.00010 1.07419 0.92350 1.24948 0.35340 alcohol 25.00000 0.00321 0.00439 1.08368 0.87394 1.34376 0.46400 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.39973 0.18873 1.49142 1.03028 2.15897 0.03417 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.60047 0.18039 1.82297 1.28005 2.59617 0.00087 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.69366 0.17853 2.00103 1.41021 2.83937 0.00010 age 55 + 1.00000 0.89111 0.17988 2.43784 1.71353 3.46833 0.00000 ________ _______________________________________________________________ Main study regression coefficients: Corrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.04085 0.05060 0.81525 0.49654 1.33853 0.41942 calorie 800.0000 0.00065 0.00070 1.68433 0.56263 5.04233 0.35136 alcohol 25.00000 0.00159 0.00720 1.04062 0.73115 1.48107 0.82502 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.41129 0.19566 1.50877 1.02818 2.21399 0.03555 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.61866 0.20114 1.85643 1.25161 2.75352 0.00210 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.70082 0.19589 2.01540 1.37284 2.95871 0.00035 age 55 + 1.00000 0.86269 0.19613 2.36952 1.61328 3.48025 0.00001 ________ _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (90) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 94 The PHREG Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.MAIN90 Dependent Variable eventtime Censoring Variable bc Censoring Value(s) 0 Ties Handling BRESLOW Number of Observations Read 88692 Number of Observations Used 67634 Summary of the Number of Event and Censored Values Percent Total Event Censored Censored 67634 445 67189 99.34 Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Model Fit Statistics Without With Criterion Covariates Covariates -2 LOG L 9895.656 9859.810 AIC 9895.656 9873.810 SBC 9895.656 9902.497 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 35.8457 7 <.0001 Score 36.1850 7 <.0001 Wald 35.2783 7 <.0001 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio ffqsatf 1 -0.00543 0.01908 0.0810 0.7759 0.995 ffqcalor 1 -0.0001514 0.0000961 2.4822 0.1151 1.000 ffqalco 1 0.00162 0.00490 0.1096 0.7406 1.002 agecat1 1 0.08802 0.17318 0.2583 0.6113 1.092 agecat2 1 0.31994 0.16373 3.8182 0.0507 1.377 agecat3 1 0.69365 0.15374 20.3575 <.0001 2.001 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (90) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 95 The PHREG Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio agecat4 1 0.57166 0.16505 11.9960 0.0005 1.771 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ********** blinplus 90 ************ 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 96 Main study regression coeffiecients: Uncorrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.00543 0.01908 0.97321 0.80724 1.17332 0.77595 calorie 800.0000 -0.00015 0.00010 0.88591 0.76197 1.03001 0.11514 alcohol 25.00000 0.00162 0.00490 1.04136 0.81924 1.32369 0.74057 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.08802 0.17318 1.09201 0.77771 1.53333 0.61127 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.31994 0.16373 1.37704 0.99902 1.89810 0.05070 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.69365 0.15374 2.00101 1.48042 2.70467 0.00001 age 55 + 1.00000 0.57166 0.16505 1.77121 1.28167 2.44774 0.00053 ________ _______________________________________________________________ Main study regression coefficients: Corrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 0.01567 0.04948 1.08150 0.66595 1.75633 0.75148 calorie 800.0000 -0.00095 0.00069 0.46740 0.15806 1.38216 0.16916 alcohol 25.00000 0.00677 0.00677 1.18437 0.84999 1.65028 0.31744 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.06073 0.18621 1.06261 0.73769 1.53065 0.74432 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.22774 0.19110 1.25576 0.86345 1.82632 0.23338 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.62689 0.17913 1.87179 1.31758 2.65911 0.00047 age 55 + 1.00000 0.56007 0.18858 1.75079 1.20980 2.53371 0.00298 ________ _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (92) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 97 The PHREG Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.MAIN92 Dependent Variable eventtime Censoring Variable bc Censoring Value(s) 0 Ties Handling BRESLOW Number of Observations Read 88141 Number of Observations Used 67189 Summary of the Number of Event and Censored Values Percent Total Event Censored Censored 67189 442 66747 99.34 Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Model Fit Statistics Without With Criterion Covariates Covariates -2 LOG L 9823.106 9806.191 AIC 9823.106 9820.191 SBC 9823.106 9848.830 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 16.9148 7 0.0180 Score 17.2096 7 0.0161 Wald 17.0955 7 0.0168 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio ffqsatf 1 0.03925 0.01858 4.4631 0.0346 1.040 ffqcalor 1 -0.0000594 0.0000948 0.3928 0.5308 1.000 ffqalco 1 -0.0002455 0.00515 0.0023 0.9619 1.000 agecat1 1 0.08560 0.16198 0.2793 0.5972 1.089 agecat2 1 0.33579 0.15298 4.8180 0.0282 1.399 agecat3 1 0.26260 0.15669 2.8086 0.0938 1.300 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (92) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 98 The PHREG Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio agecat4 1 0.52031 0.15727 10.9458 0.0009 1.683 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ********** blinplus 92 ************ 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 99 Main study regression coeffiecients: Uncorrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 0.03925 0.01858 1.21683 1.01428 1.45984 0.03464 calorie 800.0000 -0.00006 0.00009 0.95358 0.82187 1.10639 0.53081 alcohol 25.00000 -0.00025 0.00515 0.99388 0.77240 1.27887 0.96194 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.08560 0.16198 1.08937 0.79304 1.49644 0.59718 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.33579 0.15298 1.39904 1.03660 1.88820 0.02816 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.26260 0.15669 1.30031 0.95646 1.76777 0.09376 age 55 + 1.00000 0.52031 0.15727 1.68255 1.23623 2.29001 0.00094 ________ _______________________________________________________________ Main study regression coefficients: Corrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 0.09280 0.04638 1.59042 1.00952 2.50558 0.04541 calorie 800.0000 -0.00055 0.00066 0.64352 0.22939 1.80536 0.40229 alcohol 25.00000 0.00062 0.00667 1.01554 0.73258 1.40778 0.92628 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.06577 0.17077 1.06798 0.76420 1.49253 0.70013 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.34017 0.17548 1.40519 0.99625 1.98200 0.05255 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.29622 0.17525 1.34476 0.95382 1.89594 0.09099 age 55 + 1.00000 0.58897 0.17478 1.80213 1.27941 2.53842 0.00075 ________ _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (94) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 100 The PHREG Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.MAIN94 Dependent Variable eventtime Censoring Variable bc Censoring Value(s) 0 Ties Handling BRESLOW Number of Observations Read 87601 Number of Observations Used 69572 Summary of the Number of Event and Censored Values Percent Total Event Censored Censored 69572 497 69075 99.29 Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Model Fit Statistics Without With Criterion Covariates Covariates -2 LOG L 11079.821 11060.345 AIC 11079.821 11074.345 SBC 11079.821 11103.805 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 19.4763 7 0.0068 Score 19.3356 7 0.0072 Wald 19.0089 7 0.0082 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio ffqsatf 1 -0.00693 0.01632 0.1805 0.6710 0.993 ffqcalor 1 -9.3223E-6 0.0000889 0.0110 0.9165 1.000 ffqalco 1 0.00402 0.00463 0.7538 0.3853 1.004 agecat1 1 0.29594 0.15224 3.7786 0.0519 1.344 agecat2 1 0.34672 0.14991 5.3495 0.0207 1.414 agecat3 1 0.59479 0.14392 17.0805 <.0001 1.813 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (94) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 101 The PHREG Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio agecat4 1 0.36196 0.16107 5.0501 0.0246 1.436 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ********** blinplus 94 ************ 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 102 Main study regression coeffiecients: Uncorrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.00693 0.01632 0.96592 0.82312 1.13350 0.67097 calorie 800.0000 -0.00001 0.00009 0.99257 0.86341 1.14105 0.91649 alcohol 25.00000 0.00402 0.00463 1.10577 0.88123 1.38753 0.38528 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.29594 0.15224 1.34439 0.99755 1.81183 0.05191 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.34672 0.14991 1.41442 1.05433 1.89750 0.02073 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.59479 0.14392 1.81265 1.36713 2.40335 0.00004 age 55 + 1.00000 0.36196 0.16107 1.43614 1.04735 1.96925 0.02462 ________ _______________________________________________________________ Main study regression coefficients: Corrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.01642 0.04481 0.92117 0.59379 1.42906 0.71401 calorie 800.0000 -0.00002 0.00059 0.98123 0.38960 2.47127 0.96793 alcohol 25.00000 0.00416 0.00543 1.10970 0.85060 1.44772 0.44294 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.29071 0.15391 1.33737 0.98911 1.80826 0.05891 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.31573 0.16280 1.37127 0.99664 1.88670 0.05246 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.56838 0.15540 1.76540 1.30185 2.39400 0.00025 age 55 + 1.00000 0.33558 0.17094 1.39875 1.00053 1.95545 0.04963 ________ _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (96) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 103 The PHREG Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.MAIN96 Dependent Variable eventtime Censoring Variable bc Censoring Value(s) 0 Ties Handling BRESLOW Number of Observations Read 87035 Number of Observations Used 69075 Summary of the Number of Event and Censored Values Percent Total Event Censored Censored 69075 553 68522 99.20 Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Model Fit Statistics Without With Criterion Covariates Covariates -2 LOG L 12319.857 12297.143 AIC 12319.857 12311.143 SBC 12319.857 12341.351 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 22.7138 7 0.0019 Score 22.1938 7 0.0024 Wald 21.8001 7 0.0027 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio ffqsatf 1 -0.01265 0.01551 0.6651 0.4148 0.987 ffqcalor 1 -4.4334E-7 0.0000842 0.0000 0.9958 1.000 ffqalco 1 0.0006449 0.00462 0.0195 0.8889 1.001 agecat1 1 0.23741 0.14675 2.6170 0.1057 1.268 agecat2 1 0.37127 0.14195 6.8413 0.0089 1.450 agecat3 1 0.49773 0.13946 12.7373 0.0004 1.645 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (96) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 104 The PHREG Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio agecat4 1 0.58413 0.14558 16.0995 <.0001 1.793 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ********** blinplus 96 ************ 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 105 Main study regression coeffiecients: Uncorrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.01265 0.01551 0.93872 0.80638 1.09279 0.41475 calorie 800.0000 -0.00000 0.00008 0.99965 0.87605 1.14068 0.99580 alcohol 25.00000 0.00064 0.00462 1.01625 0.81046 1.27431 0.88893 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.23741 0.14675 1.26796 0.95101 1.69054 0.10572 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.37127 0.14195 1.44958 1.09753 1.91456 0.00891 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.49773 0.13946 1.64499 1.25156 2.16211 0.00036 age 55 + 1.00000 0.58413 0.14558 1.79343 1.34823 2.38563 0.00006 ________ _______________________________________________________________ Main study regression coefficients: Corrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.03141 0.04262 0.85465 0.56285 1.29774 0.46111 calorie 800.0000 0.00005 0.00056 1.04345 0.43478 2.50420 0.92414 alcohol 25.00000 0.00091 0.00531 1.02302 0.78874 1.32688 0.86384 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.23733 0.14844 1.26785 0.94779 1.69600 0.10987 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.34976 0.15442 1.41872 1.04822 1.92019 0.02352 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.46830 0.15038 1.59728 1.18953 2.14481 0.00185 age 55 + 1.00000 0.54805 0.15563 1.72988 1.27510 2.34686 0.00043 ________ _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (98) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 106 The PHREG Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.MAIN98 Dependent Variable eventtime Censoring Variable bc Censoring Value(s) 0 Ties Handling BRESLOW Number of Observations Read 86393 Number of Observations Used 65754 Summary of the Number of Event and Censored Values Percent Total Event Censored Censored 65754 1191 64563 98.19 Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Model Fit Statistics Without With Criterion Covariates Covariates -2 LOG L 26403.903 26367.665 AIC 26403.903 26381.665 SBC 26403.903 26417.243 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 36.2376 7 <.0001 Score 40.1039 7 <.0001 Wald 39.8987 7 <.0001 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio ffqsatf 1 -0.00873 0.01080 0.6534 0.4189 0.991 ffqcalor 1 -6.5965E-6 0.0000561 0.0138 0.9064 1.000 ffqalco 1 0.01365 0.00262 27.1408 <.0001 1.014 agecat1 1 0.07086 0.09261 0.5855 0.4442 1.073 agecat2 1 0.14085 0.09075 2.4087 0.1207 1.151 agecat3 1 0.23408 0.09097 6.6207 0.0101 1.264 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cox proportional hazards for surrogate variables (98) 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 107 The PHREG Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio agecat4 1 0.26459 0.09860 7.2018 0.0073 1.303 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ********** blinplus 98 ************ 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 108 Main study regression coeffiecients: Uncorrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.00873 0.01080 0.95728 0.86113 1.06418 0.41891 calorie 800.0000 -0.00001 0.00006 0.99474 0.91097 1.08621 0.90640 alcohol 25.00000 0.01365 0.00262 1.40657 1.23714 1.59921 0.00000 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.07086 0.09261 1.07343 0.89525 1.28708 0.44417 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.14085 0.09075 1.15125 0.96365 1.37537 0.12067 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.23408 0.09097 1.26375 1.05736 1.51043 0.01008 age 55 + 1.00000 0.26459 0.09860 1.30290 1.07395 1.58066 0.00728 ________ _______________________________________________________________ Main study regression coefficients: Corrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.02103 0.03109 0.90018 0.66378 1.22079 0.49871 calorie 800.0000 0.00002 0.00041 1.01218 0.53046 1.93135 0.97071 alcohol 25.00000 0.01272 0.00349 1.37446 1.15846 1.63074 0.00027 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.05423 0.09913 1.05573 0.86931 1.28213 0.58433 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.07005 0.10597 1.07256 0.87141 1.32015 0.50858 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.18538 0.10434 1.20367 0.98105 1.47682 0.07563 age 55 + 1.00000 0.21369 0.11154 1.23824 0.99508 1.54082 0.05539 ________ _______________________________________________________________ If short_prt=T and long_prt=F, the following summary will be printed. By default, short_prt=T. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 110 The PHREG Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.NEW Dependent Variable eventtime Censoring Variable bc Censoring Value(s) 0 Ties Handling BRESLOW Number of Observations Read 90710 Number of Observations Used 90710 Summary of the Number of Event and Censored Values Percent Total Event Censored Censored 90710 4839 85871 94.67 Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Model Fit Statistics Without With Criterion Covariates Covariates -2 LOG L 107970.94 107722.94 AIC 107970.94 107736.94 SBC 107970.94 107782.34 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 247.9951 7 <.0001 Score 246.9085 7 <.0001 Wald 242.9639 7 <.0001 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 111 The PHREG Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard 95% Hazard Ratio Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Ratio Confidence Limits ffqsatf 1 -0.00756 0.00522 2.0958 0.1477 0.992 0.982 1.003 ffqcalor 1 -0.0000112 0.0000283 0.1574 0.6916 1.000 1.000 1.000 ffqalco 1 0.00752 0.00130 33.1982 <.0001 1.008 1.005 1.010 agecat1 1 0.20227 0.05034 16.1412 <.0001 1.224 1.109 1.351 agecat2 1 0.38556 0.04814 64.1474 <.0001 1.470 1.338 1.616 agecat3 1 0.50768 0.04745 114.4962 <.0001 1.661 1.514 1.823 agecat4 1 0.59947 0.04929 147.9425 <.0001 1.821 1.653 2.006 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 112 Combined simple updated Uncorrected WT B SE HR Low Upp Pvalue satfat 5.00000 -0.00756 0.00522 0.96291 0.91487 1.01347 0.14770 calorie 800.0000 -0.00001 0.00003 0.99106 0.94807 1.03601 0.69158 alcohol 25.00000 0.00752 0.00130 1.20680 1.13205 1.28648 0.00000 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.20227 0.05034 1.22417 1.10915 1.35113 0.00006 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.38556 0.04814 1.47044 1.33804 1.61594 0.00000 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.50768 0.04745 1.66144 1.51390 1.82335 0.00000 age 55 + 1.00000 0.59947 0.04929 1.82115 1.65346 2.00585 0.00000 ________ _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Combined simple updated Corrected 10:29 Wednesday, February 17, 2010 113 RESMAT WT beta se HR low upp pval satfat 5.00000 -0.02456 0.01392 0.88444 0.77169 1.01366 0.07756 calorie 800.0000 -0.00004 0.00018 0.97079 0.73383 1.28428 0.83553 alcohol 25.00000 0.00858 0.00185 1.23923 1.13193 1.35671 0.00000 age 40 - 44 1.00000 0.19135 0.05281 1.21088 1.09181 1.34293 0.00029 age 45 - 49 1.00000 0.34811 0.05471 1.41639 1.27237 1.57671 0.00000 age 50 - 54 1.00000 0.47686 0.05354 1.61100 1.45051 1.78925 0.00000 age 55 + 1.00000 0.55879 0.05544 1.74856 1.56853 1.94926 0.00000