Contents
Crystal Structures
Space Group: Pbn21 NOTE: see discussion of crystal structures
Point Group: C2v
Lattice constants:
Note: we use the a>b>c choice discussed in the section "Crystal Structures". In the references, a and b are interchanged.
Wyckoff positions: from [6]
Alternative crystal structures
Ref. [2] studied the relative stability of the chalcopyrite structure vs. the orthorhombic Pbn21.
They obtain a= 4.073 Å, c=8.164 Å for this tetratogonal phase. They find this phase to be higher in energy than the Pbn21 by about 25 meV. They also report calculations for a phase which they label as fcc or zincblende. However, they did not explain how the cations were arranged in this phase, which has a calculated energy of formation higher by 0.1 eV. These numbers are extracted from their fig. 1. The enthalpies of formation in their table 1 do not match up with this calculation and it is also unclear whether these calculations were done in LDA or GGA.
Synthesis and growth methods
Eckerlin [4] reports the first synthesis by a powder ceramic method:
using ball milling to mix Si3N4 and Be3N2 powders in CCl4 with SiO2, then heating to 1700 oC in N2 to produce the solid state reaction:
Be3N2 + Si3N4 → 3BeSiN2
This procedure resulted in crystallites of micron size.
See also Ref.[5] pgs 52-54
Single crystals of about 1mm by 0.1 mm were obtained by a sublimation method at 1900 oC from the previous micron sized powders
as reported in [1] and were used for the X-ray diffraction studies that allowed observation of the weak superlattice peaks, evidencing the ordering of the cations. Prior work with powder X-ray diffraction spectra had determined the structure to be wurtzitic.
Electronic band structure
The FLAPW calculations of [2] give an indirect band gap for BeSiN2. The valence band maximum (VBM) occurs at Γ but the conduction band minimum (CBM) occurs along Γ-Y with a slightly higher minimum along Γ-Z. This Y corresponds to their choice of b axis, which is interchanged with our a axis, so their Y would be labeled X in the convention that we have followed for other compounds. The paper gives only the Γ-Z and Γ-Γ gaps. The lowest, indirect gap (from the valence band Γ point to the Γ-Y minimum in the conduction band) is estimated from the figure. The CASTEP plane wave pseudopotential calculations of [3] give almost the same CBM near Z, T and X. The direct gap is about 0.5 eV higher. The authors do not mention which density functional they used.
Recently quasiparticle self-consistent QS-GW band structures were presented by Sai Lyu et al. [6] at both LDA and GGA lattice constants. The latter are assumed to be more accurate. The paper also explains why the CBM occurs at 2/3 Γ-X by comparison to wurtzite BN.
Band Gaps:
Figure 1: Band structure of BeSiN2 calculated by the FLAPW
method with GGA. [2]
Figure 2: Band structure of BeSiN2 calculated by GW@GGA. [6]
Vibrational Properties
Phonon frequencies at Γ in cm-1 [7]
Raman and Infrared spectra can be found in [7] for different scattering geometries and polarizatons
Phonon dispersion curbes and DOS can also be found in [7]
Born effective charges can be found in [7]
Elastic Properties
Bulk modulus B and its pressure derivative B':
Optical Properties
Dielectric Constants (at high frequency, electronic screening only, from DFT calculations)
εxx = 4.72 εyy = 4.77 εzz = 4.90 [3] LDA
εxx = 4.42 εyy = 4.46 εzz = 4.61 [7] LDA
Index of refraction
nx=2.10 ny=2.11 nz=2.15
Figure:
Figure 2: Real (ε1) and imaginary (ε2) parts of the dielectric function versus photon energy of BeSiN2 for different light polarizations, calculated by FLAPW with GGA.
Second order nonlinear optical coefficients, in pm/V [3]:
εxx = 8.51 εyy = 8.81 εzz = 8.72 [7] LDA
χ zzz = −17.09 χ xzx = χ zxx = 1.66 χ yzy = χ zyy = 1.12
Calculated optical dielectric functions ε2(ω;) and ε1(ω) are reported in [2] for each crystallographic direction, based on GGA calcs.,
and shown in Fig. 2.
Dielectric Properties
Static Dielectric Constants below phonon frequencies
References
[1] P. Eckerlin, Zeitschrift für anorgische und allgemeine Chemie, 353, 225-336 (1967).
[3]. Jung Y Huang,L.C Tang and M.H Lee, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13, 10417-0431 (2001).
[4]. P. Eckerlin, A. Rabenau, H. Normann, Z. anorg. allg. Chem. 353, 113 (1967)
[6] Sai Lyu and Walter R. L. Lambrecht, J. Phys. Condensed Matter 31,335501 (2019).
[7] Sai Lyu, Yuheng Liu and Walter R. L. Lambrecht, J. Phys. D 52, 285106 (2019)