ACP30

Working Groups

ACP30 Working Group Assignments


Introduction

Each of the six workgroups have been formed around a critical AV issue identified by the Committee in January 2020. The workgroups will provide input to the development of a triennial strategic plan (TSP) to help guide Committee activities during this time. These activities may include the development of research needs statements, calls for papers, workshops, webinars, and conference sessions.

Objectives

The workgroups are charged with:

1. Identifying a limited number of key research topics that will assist policymakers, regulators, road owner/operators, or other key transportation constituencies in making well-informed AV choices.

2. Gathering sufficient supporting material that establishes the importance of the proposed research topic(s).

3. Developing a 3-year proposal to the Committee to support this research topic(s). With a 3-year horizon, what can this TRB committee and its workgroups accomplish towards addressing this research need(s)?

The research topics should serve the overarching goal of achieving safe, seamless integration of AVs onto public roads to improve personal mobility and access and environmental sustainability.

Schedule

The workgroups have until the end of March to develop their proposals. Once complete, the Chair and a small group of volunteers will develop the TSP. The draft TSP will go out to members for comment at the end of April.

It’s recommended that the workgroup leaders establish dates for the series of meetings that will be required to complete the TSP proposal.

Guide

You may choose to use these questions as a guide to the development of your proposal. Proposals should be only as long as needed to make the case.

1. Describe the issue(s) that the research seeks to address. Be clear and be brief.

2. What do we know about the problem from current research? In the first draft it’s okay to summarize, but for the final proposal, it’s best to cite publications, if available.

3. Who are the transportation decision-makers who will use the results of the research? These decision-makers may be public or private sector, at any level of government, regulators, investors, or operators. What types of decisions will be informed by this work?

4. What are the best ways to move this research forward? Be strategic. Think about the activities that are within TRB’s scope, within the capabilities and interests of committee volunteers.

Working Groups

At our last meeting in January 2020 we identified six topics that were voted by members and friends as both the most interesting to the committee and critical challenges/opportunities for safe, efficient, equitable, and sustainable road-vehicle automation.


Work Group Shared Folder Space


1. AV testing & data - Fabrizio Minarini, EC Joint Research Centre (23 votes)

o fabrizio.minarini@ec.europa.eu

o Jia Hu, Tongji University - hujia@tongji.edu.cn

o Jiaqi Ma, UCLA - jiaqima@ucla.edu (also willing to lead)

o Guoyuan Wu, UC Riverside - gywu@cert.ucr.edu

o Taylor Lochrane, FHWA - taylor.lochrane@dot.gov



2. Traffic management measures - Claudio Roncoli, Aalto University (22 votes)

o Claudio.roncoli@aalto.fi

o Biagio Ciuffo, EC Joint Research Centre - Biagio.ciuffo@ec.europa.eu

o Ioannis Papamichail, TU Crete - ipapa@dssl.tuc.gr

o Jia Hu, Tongji University - hujia@tongji.edu.cn

o Rashed Islam, HDR - rashed.islam@hdrinc.com

o Sam Mahdavian, University of Central Florida - amirsaman@knights.ucf.edu



3. Traffic performance impacts - Meng Wang, TUDelft (18 votes)

o m.wang@tudelft.nl

o Simon Hu, Zhejiang University - simonhu@zju.edu.cn

o Shaw Li, University of South Florida - xiaopengli@usf.edu

o Jiaqi Ma, UCLA - jiaqi.ma@ucla.edu

o Jia Hu, Tongji University - hujia@tongji.edu.cn

o Hao Liu, UC Berkeley - liuhao@berkeley.edu

o David Kan, Florida Atlantic University - kanx@fau.edu

o Biagio Ciuffo, EC JRC - biagio.cuiffo@ec.europa.eu



4. Safety assurance metrics - Laura Fraade-Blanar, RAND (16 votes)

o lblanar@rand.org

o Jack Weast, Intel - jack.weast@intel.com (also willing to lead)

o Jessica Uguccioni, UK Law Commission - jessica.uguccione@lawcommission.gov.uk

o Fabrizio Minarini, EC JRC - fabrizio.minarini@ec.europa.eu

o Julie Evans, RS&H - julie.evans@rsandh.com



5. Digital infrastructure impacts - Sam Mahdavian, UCF (15 votes)

o amirsaman@knights.ucf.edu

o Jianming Ma, TXDOT - jianming.ma@txdot.gov

o Meng Wang, TU Delft - m.wang@tudelft.nl

o Shane McKenzie, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet - shane.mckenzie@ky.gov

o cynthia.jones@drive.ohio.gov

o Vivenzo Punzo, University of Naples - vinpunzo@unina.it



6. Data exchange between public and private - Jeff Kupko, Michael Baker International (14 votes)

o Jeff Kupko, jeffrey.kupko@mbakerintl.com

o Daniel Fagnant, GM - daniel.fagnant@gm.com

o Rem Dekker, Waymo - remdekker@waymo.com

o Mahsa Ettefagh, BAH - ettefagh_mahsa@bah.com

o Daniela Bremmer, WSDOT - bremmed@wsdot.wa.gov

o Robert Heilman, USDOT - rrobert.heilman@dot.gov