IF.455K:why tap stabilize the IF Amp
@6/18 2012
At the pass weekend, I fight with the oscillation in the I.F. amplifier. there is the rule:What oscillator does not and amplifier will, that oscillating. ( IF BJT 2 Stage with AGC )
Fig.1
At first glance, it look like old traditional 455 khz I.F. amplifier, but there is several different.
1. T1, T2 are not taped, I pick up my favorite IF transformer and start to use it, which without tap in the primary.
2. AC signal at Q1, Q2's emitter is not totally bypass to GND ( i want to do that but it ruining into oscillating )
3. other differences is minor, ignore them while we talking the stability of tuned I.F amplifier.
The story of debugging
Initially, i want to built a amplifier present in the Fig 2. The emitter is AC bypass directly to the Ground.
Fig 2 typical IF amplifier
But, I haven't an IF CAN with taped, and I paid for this, despite some I.F. amplifier did use IF CANS with no Tap,
but you should read carefully about that transformer's turns ratio: Pri:Sec. a typical yellow IF cans Pry:Sec is around 22:1~12:1 . and my project use yellow slug IF cans for both T1, and T2 in the Fig1. Pri:Sec = 12:1 (the following cute yellow cans is what I'm talk of.)
But every time i Adding bypass cap C1,C4 in Fig1, the I.F amplifier go to oscillation or just very noisy. and the band pass like middle line in the following Fig. which indicate the amplifier is not stable or is oscillating.
I try everything: add resistor in base or collector, reduce Q value by parallel primary with resistor, shield, low beta transistor. the best result i've got is a noisy amplifier with bypass emitter to ground. i not try neutralisation, because the transistor 9018 Ft is high and Ccb is low, according most articles i can get, NPN like this should work stable without neutralisation( with considerable gain). but i STILL FAILED to get it to work.
After talking with guys on forum, http://www.crystalradio.cn, some one suggest me to try a taped version IF coils(the following green slug IFT), and finally, i come to the only way left , a taped Coil, which 160uH in the primary, Primary: secondary= 36:1, tap:primary= 5.5:1 . the result surprise me so much, it stop oscillate and very stable , make it free to adjust bias current, off-course emitter is AC bypassed to ground. i never got a IF amplifier so quiet and many stations indoor with loop antenna.
But Why?
--------------------------------------
refer to Mouse IF cans data:
Why tuned IF amplifier oscillating
Fig.6 show the AC path of the tuned amplifier's( include input transformer). At low frequency compare to the resonate frequency , LC tank impedance is inductive. Plus Ccb, it's almost a Hartley oscillator.
Fig.6
So when GAIN is high enough, it's start oscillate. there is a important way to prevent the oscillation, the neutralisation. neutralisation is the (only?) way to prevent oscillation not by decrease the overall gain. Here is a key point to understand it: the GAIN is what the BJT (collector) seen, not the overall gain to next stage. Fig.8, the BJT seen Gain on load of L1-2, not the gain delivering to R1 by L4-5.
Fig .8
How much Gain a BJT could Get?
Refer to <<Principles of T ransistor Circuits>> by S. W. Amos,BSc, CEng, MIEE , M. R. James, BSc, CEng, MIEE
Fig.9
where Rb and Rc are the resistances effectively in parallel with the base and collector circuits . and c is the internal base-collector capacitance(Cob).
Why taped primary transformer look like easily to get a stable Amplifier?
Fig 7, primary taped amplifer
Fig 10 none taped amplifer
the taped transformer make it stable but, why?
the key point is : taped IF.T ( IF transformer) present the BJT collection a fairly lower Impedance, then gm*2*pi*f*c*Rb*Rc would be less than 2 compered to non-taped IFT in the same circuit.
fig 10
version with non-taped primary use the yellow IF.T. fig.10:
Primary:402 [slug position 1] uH
Seconday:2.45uH
Pri:Sec ~=12.8:1
IF frequncy: 490khz
T1: primary: 350uH[slug position 2], 300pF, primary 6.3ohm Q ~=150 [calculated, not by testing]
p:s = 12.8:1
Rt=XL*Q = 2 * pi * f * L*Q =2*3.1415926*490*10^3*350*10^-6*150 ~=165k
L,4-5 load: the AM detector, input dependence about 500R (simulation by LTSpice)
Load present to Collector of BJT:
[Ro: Hybrid-pi model output impedance of BJT, 9018 typical 70k@ 1mA , IF-B1: Design and Practical ]
Rc= Rt || (500*12.8*12.8) || Ro ~= 30k, so Big, definitely oscillation!!!
fig 7
version with taped primary use the green IFT, Fig.7
primary:
primary: 134.21 uH [slug position 1]
primary tap-top: 89.447uH
primary tap-bottom:: 4.39uH
seconday: 0.1020H
Pri:Sec = sqrt(134.21/0.1020) ~= 36:1
Tap:primary= sqrt(134.21/4.39) ~= 5.5:1
IF frequncy: 490khz
T2: primary 680pF, 150uH [slug position 2], 3ohm, Q~=140
P:S= 36:1
tap = 5.5:1
Rt=Xl*Q = 2 * pi * f * L*Q= 2*3.1415926*490*10^3*150*10^-6*140 ~=64k
total load present to Collector of BJT:
[Ro: Hybrid-pi model output impedance of BJT, 9018 typical 70k@ 1mA , IF-B1: Design and Practical ]
Rc= (Rt/5.5/5.5) || (500*36*36/(5.5*5.5)) || Ro ~= 1.87, decreased so much, stable enough!!
Final Conclusion (@7/2 2002)
my green slug IFT given a very low Rt, it's the major reason make my circuit stable. but tapped transformer still make it stable by decrease so much the collection Load of BJT. while Rc decrease to 1/n*n and Gain decrease to 1/n.
Suppose my Yellow IFT also have a primary tap with tap ratio 4:1 in secondary stage(most of tapped IFT use around this ratio.)
following section updated @12/11 2012
Q ~=90 , Rt=90k
Pri:Sec ~=12.8:1
Tap:primary = 4:1
Rb= (first stage Rt)/(12.8/12.8) || BJT-Rin~= 600R || (100*26/0.5) = 0.6k
Rc= (90k/4/4)||(300*12.8*12.8/4/4) ~= 2K
if Ie use 2.7mA as first designed
Rb*Rc*Ie = 2×0.6x2.7 =3.24, stable factor(10/3.24~= 2.5), now it's stable enough!!!
now gain is: 20*log(2000*2.7/26*4/12.8) = 36dB, increased, compare to non-tap version.
NOTE:
if no-tap version tuned to stable, Ie <0.5, the max gain is:
20*log(30000*0.5/26/12.8) = 33dB ( stable factor just reach to oscillation)