CXO: Low distortion  oscillator

2011/8/2

both <<EMRFD>> and <<ARRL hand book 2006>> emphasis  one crystal oscillator which get signal direct from the crystal.  it's worth to try.   i setup a following circuit with  NO L1, R1=10k, C1=220pF, C2=470pF. Q1=2sc9018, cystal 7.47Mhz, NO buffer Q2.

http://www.techlib.com/files/xtalosc.pdf

Fig1

Fig2 : my bug style build:

then we get a prety good output from crystal, at first glance. after very carefully exam, by align the peak to Y axis, move wave up and down, check the  distance between 2  X axis cross point to the zero point, there are about 1ns different between the raise edge and  falling edge.

Fig3 crystal output:  20ns/Div, .1V/Div

Such asymmetric due to the even order harmonics. there's another very good experiment done by Jane, http://www.qrp.pops.net/crystal-osc-2010.asp   Jane point out if the harmonics more than -50dBc, there are visible asymmetric on Oscope.

another wave, the emitter output is very distortion(below):


Fig4 20ns/Div, .1V/Div

fist of all, check the biasing. Fig1's basing method is not very predicable, with Q1, the 2SC9018. base get only about 1V. so i re-biasing  it  ( Fig 5. )


Fig5  another  populous  circuit, good bias

Just change bias didn't change anything. another noticeable configuration in Fig5 is the feed back caps, C1=2.2nF, C1=390pF.  use  such big C1/C2 value  dramatically  reduce the positive feedback,  get close to unity gain, easy to get more clean signal. I finally use C1=2200pF, C2=56pF to get a pretty good emitter output , Fig 6.

Fig.6 emitter out at  C1=2200pF, C2=56pF

What about the Crystal output now? , still not see any observable change, 1nS distortion still there. Call for a SA.  low pass filter is mandatory to get more clean clear sine wave.

Fig.7 final Crystal output at  C1=2200pF, C2=56pF