Best Practices: Give Prompt Feedback

What Are Key Research/Scholarship Starting Points?

What is It?

Structured and regular opportunities for constructive feedback to students is a key element to the learning process. As Chickering & Gamson originally stated:

Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance.  by Grant WigginsJossey-Bass (1998)Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers.

by Angelo & Cross,

Jossey-Bass (1993)

What are Potential Issues/Downsides to Be Prepared For?

Examples How This Might Be Implemented in a Distance - Online/Hybrid/Video Conferencing Courses

"Knowing what you know and don't know focuses learning. Students need appropriate feedback on performance to benefit from courses. When getting started, students need help in assessing existing knowledge and competence. In classes, students need frequent opportunities to perform and receive suggestions for improvement. At various points during college, and at the end, students need chances to reflect on what they have learned, what they still need to know, and how to assess themselves."

 - Chickering & Gamson's "Seven Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education" 

This means going beyond the default of a midterm and a final as the assessment data. Fink (2003) goes so far as to say that

"the widespread practice of giving feedback only in the form of two midterms and a final is simply insufficiently frequent for high-quality learning." 

Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to College Course Design, pg 96

Angelo & Cross (1993) offer a concise case of the need for ongoing assessment:

"By the time faculty notice ... gaps in knowledge or understanding, it is frequently too late to remedy the problems. To avoid such unhappy surprises, faculty and students need better ways to monitor learning throughout the semester. Specifically, teachers need a continuous flow of accurate information on student learning."

- Angelo & Cross, Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. Jossey-Bass (1993) , pg 3

Different forms of  Assessment

Wiggins (1998) made a key distinction in the literature of assessment, differentiating between AUDITATIVE vs. EDUCATIVE assessments:

"I use the term auditing and audit test to describe checking up on activities after they are over, as accountants audit a business's books... schools too often focus on the equivalent: we focus on teaching students to pass simplistic, often multiple-choice tests composed of 'items' that neither assess what we value nor provide useful feedback about how to teach and how to learn....  Many folks are finally coming to understand that assessment is of no value unless it is is educative - that is instructive to students, teachers and school clients and overseers.... once assessment is designed to be educative, it is no longer separate from instruction; it is a major, essential and integrated part of teaching and learning..."

- Wiggins, Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. Jossey-Bass (1998)

How Do you Address This/Use It?

Fink (2003) recommends developing a "FIDELity" assessment strategy that contains the following elements  

Angelo and Cross (1993) offer up a collection of Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs) that are aimed at being "context-sensitive... flexible... likely to make a difference... mutually beneficial... easy to administer.... easy to respond to.... and educationally valid" (pgs 26-27)

Longer List of CATs

For more specific ideas, see OLN's collection of links.