This myth refers to how President Bukele and his supporters have used various tactics to further the belief that opposition media is deceptive and harmful.
Under Bukele's administration, control over the media has grown steadily. While the government promotes its own narrative through official channels, independent journalists and media that publish critical investigations often face retaliation or pressure to self-censor.
The government's communication strategy centers on maintaining Bukele's image as a reformer and protector, even when reports from NGOS and independent outlets suggest otherwise. As a result, many citizens are led to believe a simplified, favorable version of the Bukele administration without access to the full reality of what is actually happening.
Comments under CNN YouTube video: "Bukele goes after free journalism, says El Faro journalist"
Following the start of anti-Bukele investigations by El Faro, one of El Salvador's most respected independent news outlets, the Bukele government launched Diario El Salvador, a state-run media platform that publishes government-friendly stories, in 2020. Notably, Diario El Salvador often omits mentions of abuses or mass detentions in the nation, presenting a misleading image of safety.
Examples of online news articles from Diario El Salvador:
Facebook post from Diario El Salvador:
Translation:
"A Nation Reborn
In El Salvador, people live in peace and breathe tranquility.
Thousands of people enjoy the Christmas atmosphere and the large-scale end-of-year festivities."
Bukele on Social Media
Bukele stays very active on social media, where he promotes the government’s narrative and signals which sources the public should rely on. By taking control of the conversation online, he undermines independent reporters and feeds the idea that critics are lying.
Examples:
Bukele's October 2024 post defends against an El País investigation alleging his family acquired $9.2 million in properties and expanded company assets from $2,500 to $6.8 million since 2019, questioning the funding sources amid El Salvador's economic policies.
Bukele's 2022 post rebuts a Bloomberg investigation labeling El Salvador's Bitcoin adoption a failure.
According to Asociación de Periodistas de El Salvador (APES), a Salvadoran press freedom organization, recorded instances of hostile behaviour towards journalists increased from 77 cases in 2019, when Bukele was first elected, to 125 cases in 2020. That number then jumped to 220 cases in 2021.
Legal Threats
In 2022, a criminal law amendment (Article 345‑C, Código Penal) criminalized reporting on gangs or sharing content that even "alludes to" gangs.
This meant media outlets and journalists could face 10-15 years in prison if their reporting was interpreted as violating the law.
Laws like these increased self-censorship pressure, as independent journalists risked long prison sentences for covering public-interest issues.
The law was repealed in 2023, but the damage was already done. It showed that the government was willing to use criminal law to intimidate the press. And even after the repeal, its impact is still visible, especially in the rise of arbitrary arrests that continue to reinforce the message that independent reporting can carry serious risks if opposing Bukele.
Physical and Psychological Threats
Journalists have been detained and intimidated without charges under the state of emergency.
Víctor Barahona (Detained Community Journalist)
Arrested on June 7, 2022, under the state of emergency
Held for 11 months without formal charges
Reported physical and psychological torture and inhuman prison conditions
Released on May 19, 2023, with no formal documentation
Lost media job
Cases submitted to the Special Rapporteur on human rights defenders by APES
Digital Threats and Online Harassment
Digital tools to monitor and intimidate journalists further threaten the freedom of the press.
At least 35 journalists, mostly from El Faro, were targeted with Pegasus spyware in 2020-2021, allegedly by the government.
Pegasus allowed operators to secretly access messages, calls, location data, etc., without the journalist ever knowing.
The timing of the hacks aligned with a major investigation into Bukele's administration, especially stories about corruption and secret negotiations with gangs, suggesting that surveillance was not random but targeted at journalists.
The Knights First Amendment Institute, a legal and research center affiliated with Columbia University, helped El Faro journalists file a lawsuit (Dada v. NSO Group) in a U.S. federal court.
Although these findings remain allegations, the pattern of targeted hacks highlights how digital tools can be weaponized to intimidate or constrain independent journalism.
Citizens use social media and online networks to support one another and counter the official narrative.
In some cases, platforms like Facebook provide "emotional and legal support to help families navigate the penal system and advocate for the survival of their loved ones" (Grimaldi & Lopez, 2025).
Social media helps monitor political and prison conditions, spotlights abuses, and organizes resistance efforts.
Online activism offers alternative channels of information when traditional media is controlled or journalists are intimidated.
This demonstrates that even under repression, communities find ways to share truth and hold the government accountable.
Sources:
Bishop, Sarah C. "An Illusion of Control: How El Salvador’s President Rhetorically Inflates His Ability to Quell Violence." Journalism and Media 4, no. 1 (2022): 16-29.
Grazzia Grimaldi & Yanci López (2025) “Prison Bars Will Not Silence the Truth”, NACLA Report on the Americas, 57:2, 150-156, DOI: 10.1080/10714839.2025.2507996
Nochez, Maria Luz. "Popularity beats facts: influencers framing of El Salvador's rebirth" in the era of Nayib Bukele." (2025).
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1172304361745485&set=pb.100068977966985.-2207520000&type=3