Not sure how to begin a blank document? Check these notes below
"The Giver" raises ethical questions about euthanasia and the value of human life. Argue whether the society's practices are morally justifiable.
"The Giver" explores the concept of censorship and the suppression of information. Argue whether censorship is morally justifiable.
“The Giver” discusses the idea of genetic engineering and selective evolution. Argue whether their methods are morally justifiable.
“The Giver” argues that productivity is more valuable to a community than individual happiness. Argue for or against this point.
I would recommend perusing each article, finding out which may be the most interesting to you! You may also think of another idea not on the list, but make sure to run it by me for approval!
Answer four questions first:
Who is your audience? Do you need to adjust your writing or thinking to consider them?
What is your Topic Choice
What is your Opinion or Stance regarding that topic?
List Three reasons why you believe in your stance
Put all these answers above, rewritten all in one sentence
Example: I am writing to the Superintendent to ask for change regarding the options of Sports Teams. I would like to add a volleyball team to the school because it would benefit the kids by adding teamwork, dedication, and exercise to their daily lives.
When you begin research, Hook the reader with a cool fact from research related to your claim!
Explain your topic (does the audience know what your topic is? Do you need to explain any background on it?)
Note the Article URL you will use it later for citations!:
Article Title:
Article Author:
Is this author an expert of anything?:
Main Idea of the article in one sentence or two
Facts found that support your side . Its good to have 2-3 strong facts.
Why does this fact help prove your point?
Starters to a research body paragraph
Begin with an anecdote!
anecdotes are small stories or observations.
ex) I witness the need for recess every time the day hits about 7th period. Students have already been in school for hours. Personally, either I am too sleepy to focus or too energetic to sit still! I would greatly benefit from the fresh air to keep my energy balanced to continue on with my academics for the rest of the day.
Begin with a "SET THE SCENE" method
creating a setting really helps the reader imagine what it is like to be there
"Picture this: the alarm blares, but you felt like you just went to bed two seconds ago! You did everything in your power to put your phone away at nine, and to turn the lights off, and-- NOTHING. It feels like your eyes are glued open, and your mind races with the best ideas you've had all day. But yet, now, apparently you must "try" to sleep. To only become unsuccessful at it the next day. You walk into period one math a brief while later. And whats the first thing you do? Drool over the pop quiz. This is the average night of a middle schooler. It seems like moving the start time to school would be most beneficial to academics.
Not everyone is going to agree with your opinion or claim. Many people stand on opposing opinions for very clear reasons. What will benefit one, may not benefit all. Who are all the stakeholders to your claim? Who may think differently about your claim? Why? Is there anyone doing any valid research against your claim?
Opposing Viewpoints can be gathered from
a new article
the same article as the one supporting you
your own thoughts
This being said, in order to double down on your stance/claim, you need to be able to rebuttal anyone else's opposing views. Your rebuttal should address the opposing side, and refute their points or opinions, and clearly state why your side is still the better side to agree with.
Some people believe/argue/feel/think that…
It is true that…
Opposing views claim…
One common concern about (the issue) is…
Supporters of….
However…
What this argument overlooks…
This view seems convincing/plausible/persuasive at first, but…
While this position is popular, it is not supported by the facts…
Although part of this claim is valid, it suffers from a flaw…
all things considered
clearly
given these points
I feel we have no choice but to conclude
in drawing to a close
in general
in light of this information
in my opinion
in summary
in the final analysis
nevertheless
now that you know
overall
the logical conclusion seems to be
to summarize
to sum up
ultimately
upon considering all the facts
upon exploring the situation from multiple perspectives
what else can we conclude but that
what other conclusion can we draw from
when considered from the perspective of
when faced with the question of
with all this in mind
See the example and directions below