Theme 3
Editorial workflows
Embedded Files
Presentation 1 / Peter Tugwell
Presentation 1 / Peter Tugwell
Editorial Competencies
Editorial Competencies - Tugwell.pptxPresentation 2 / Jason Roberts
Presentation 2 / Jason Roberts
Changing editorial workflows to improve research reporting
Implementing Reporting Guidelines - Roberts.pptxBreakout structure (60 minutes total)
Breakout structure (60 minutes total)
Split into 3 groups
Appoint rapporteur. They should paste the reporting table from the google document below into MS word for note-taking
Brainstorm interventions for about 20 minutes
For 20 minutes, score from 1-7 (1= not at all, 7= very) interventions based on:
Ease of implementation (identify specific obstacles)
Immediacy of result (short-term, long-term, builds over time, etc.)
Likely effectiveness in assuring high-quality systematic reviews
Choose favourites, report back to plenary top 5 (or more!) interventions
Suggested questions (to get you started)
Suggested questions (to get you started)
Editors: What are you already doing in relation to the theme? Can it be formalised? Is there anything you have thought of doing which could apply?
Is there anything which people outside (or inside) the editorial group could do which would help you as an editor?
Practitioners: What has worked for you in the past, when submitting SRs? (Or what could be improved?)
What jumped out from the presentation? What else could be suggested?
Note for Theme 3: Because this is where a lot of the discussion will come together, we have allowed some extra time in the agenda for this session, if we need it.
Report abuse