Theme 2
Preventing mistakes before they happen
Embedded Files
Presentation / David Mellor
Presentation / David Mellor
Peer-review and publication of research plans as a means for encouraging good research practices and high-quality outputs
Registered Reports and SRs - Mellor.pptxResources
Resources
Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
Mandrioli, D. et al. WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: Protocol for systematic reviews of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres and of the effect of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres on pneumoconiosis. Environment International 119, 174-185 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.005
Breakout structure (60 minutes total)
Breakout structure (60 minutes total)
Split into 3 groups
Appoint rapporteur. They should paste the reporting table from the google document below into MS word for note-taking
Brainstorm interventions for about 20 minutes
For 20 minutes, score from 1-7 (1= not at all, 7= very) interventions based on:
Ease of implementation (identify specific obstacles)
Immediacy of result (short-term, long-term, builds over time, etc.)
Likely effectiveness in assuring high-quality systematic reviews
Choose favourites, report back to plenary top 5 (or more!) interventions
Suggested questions (to get you started)
Suggested questions (to get you started)
Editors: What are you already doing in relation to the theme? Can it be formalised? Is there anything you have thought of doing which could apply?
Is there anything which people outside (or inside) the editorial group could do which would help you as an editor?
Practitioners: What has worked for you in the past, when submitting SRs? (Or what could be improved?)
What jumped out from the presentation? What else could be suggested?
Report abuse