Flint water crisis: The effects on Flint residents based on differing incomes
The data and research collected will help people to understand- What are the long-term and short-term effects that the Flint water crisis had on the Flint residents based on their differing incomes?
Flint water crisis
The Flint water crisis began in 2014, after the City of Flint decided to switch the city's water system from the Detroit Water System to the Flint River.
The city of Flint had dealt with poverty before the crisis occured. In Flint sixty percent of residents are Black and Latinx, and the median household income is less than $30,000 a year, which is half of nearby White communities at similar educational levels (Oshio & Kupperman, 2021).
The City of Flint switched their water source hoping to save more money. However, this made poverty and living conditions worse for the Flint residents.
There are three main effects we will be looking further into that were caused by the Flint water crisis. Flint residents experienced physical health effects, mental health effects, and it affected their living conditions.
Physical health effects
Many of the Flint residents used tap water in their everyday lives for cooking, drinking, and cleaning. Since the tap water was unsafe due to the elevated lead levels many people became ill.
The contaminated water caused health issues such as rashes, reproductive health issues, diseases, developmental and biological processing issues, and more in residents that consumed or used the water.
The health effects were seen in both adults and children, but the impacts were much greater for the children in Flint, particularly low-income and minority children. There is lots of data showing children in Flint with very high levels of elevated blood lead level, going from 4.0% before the crisis to 10.6% after (Hanna-Attisha et al., 2016).
Lead is toxic to the brain and can contribute to lifelong health issues and other disorders developing later in life. Other health concerns seen were hair loss, nausea, and intestinal issues.
Research and data collected showed that the residents with lower incomes were also facing more physical health issues in Flint. With rashes, hair loss, and nausea being higher among minority groups in lower-income communities (Ezell & Chase, 2021).
Mental health effects
The Flint water crisis was a very stressful situation for everyone affected by it. This caused people to develop or increase certain mental health issues.
Residents with lower incomes and living in more poverty-stricken areas of Flint, ultimately faced more mental health issues due to the actual water and the side effects of the crisis.
There were many factors that impacted residents’ mental health since the crisis, such as health, home condition, aggression or violence, fear, divorce, and more (Sobeck, Smith-Darden, Hicks, et al., 2020).
Data on mental health of the residents was taken using self-report tests, researchers found that things such as resilience, total coping, and personal coping were correlated with mental health ratings (Sobeck et al., 2020).
Based on income levels we see that most of the lower-income residents are predominantly minority groups. Mental health increased in the minority groups, this is in part due from stressors associated with public health issues in the already struggling community.
Living condition effects
Although Flint residents received aid from many different programs during the crisis, not everyone was able to acquire these resources. There were numerous reasons of why some residents could not receive the resources donated to them.
Reasons including, too long of lines, inconvenient hours, lack of transportation, and more got in the way of residents gaining free resources. Residents were also required to show identification at water PODs which caused undocumented residents to not go out of fear of being detained or deported (Carrera & Key, 2021).
This also caused distrust in the local and federal government. Data collected from the CASPER assessment in 2016 showed that widespread distrust and high rates of distress were collected across the Flint population (Sneed, Dotson, Brewer, et al., 2020).
Residents faced worse living conditions during the crisis due in part from having to spend more money and time obtaining safe and clean water for themselves and their families.
People who were low-income suffered worse living conditions than residents of higher incomes. This is due in part because of not being able to afford bottled water, having to work and not being able to receive water PODs, or not being able to work and not receiving new water service line pipes.
Parents also reported changes in their children’s health since the crisis and due to this over a fifth of participants reported their ability to attend work or school because of the effects of the crisis (Heard-Garris, Roche, Carter, et al., 2017).
Theoretical Framework
This article provides readers with a better understanding of the Flint Water Crisis and uses concepts from the environmental justice theory. This theoretical framework adds context to the study of the effects on Flint residents based on their differing incomes. The environmental justice theory is about everyone in a community obtaining fair and safe environmental rights regardless of race, income, origin, or other characteristics (Takahashi et al., 2020). However, in Flint, the crisis caused many environmental injustices. There are three core elements of the framework, these include recognition, procedure, and distribution. Within these three core elements, there are interlinked characteristics to each, which include perceptions, institutions, and infrastructure (Langemeyer & Connolly, 2020). First, distribution is interlinked with infrastructure, which can be measured as the availability and accessibility of resources for individuals or groups. With lower income groups in Flint people who worked long hours or lived too far from the donation areas and had no transportation could not obtain the public benefits causing an issue with the infrastructure of Flint. Next, the procedure is interlinked with institutions, which can be measured as the government or agencies. In the article above it is shown that the procedure and the institutions had issues involving the Flint water switch. Decisions and discussions on the switch were not made clear to the residents of Flint by the government. The process of the switch was not a decision which was made inclusive and fair throughout Flint, this caused distrust among residents and the government. Lastly, recognition is interlinked with perceptions, which is acknowledging people’s distinct identities and histories and can be measured as individuals' benefits and burdens or values.
References
Carrera, J. S., & Key, K. (2021). Troubling heroes: Reframing the environmental justice contributions of the Flint water crisis. WIRES Water, 8(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1524
Davis, K.M. (2021). Tainted tap: Flint’s journey from crisis to recovery. The University of North Carolina Press.
Ezell, J. M., & Chase, E. C. (2021). A population-based assessment of physical symptoms and mental health outcomes among adults following the flint water crisis. Journal of Urban Health. 98, 642-653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-021-00525-2
Ezell, J. M., Olson, B., Ghosh, A., & Chase, E. C. (2022). Theorizing on neo public assistance: How do race and class impact resource uptake and behavior following disaster? Social Science and Medicine, 314, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115464
Hanna-Attisha, M., LaChance, J., Sadler, R. C., & Schnepp, A. C. (2016). Elevated blood lead levels in children associated with the flint drinking water crisis: A spatial analysis of risk and public health response. American Journal of Public Health. 106(2), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.303003
Langemeyer, J., & Connolly, J. J. T. (2020, April 24). Weaving notions of justice into urban ecosystem services research and practice. Environmental Science & Policy. 109, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.021
Heard-Garris, N.J., Roche, J., Carter, P. Abir, M., Walton, M., Zimmerman, M., Cunningham, R. (2017). Voices from flint: Community perceptions of the flint water crisis. Journal of Urban Health 94, 776–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524- 017-0152-3
Oshio, T., & Kupperman, J. (2021). The problem behind the problem: Applying human-centered design to child care in flint. Early Childhood Educ. 50, 1373-1382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01263-5
Parmet, W. E. (2020). The flint settlement: The exception that proved the rule. Health Affairs Blog. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20200831.452812/
Sneed, R.S., Dotson, K., Brewer, A., Pugh, P., Johnson-Lawrence, V. (2020). Behavioral health concerns during the flint water crisis, 2016–2018. Community Mental Health Journal 56, 793–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019- 00520-7
Sobeck, J., Smith-Darden, J., Hicks, M., Kernsmith, P., Kilgore, P. E., Treemore-Spears, L., & McElmurry, S. (2020). Stress, coping, resilience, and trust during the flint water crisis. Behavioral Medicine, 46(3-4), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2020.1729085