This has been the history of public health—of immunization, the wearing of seat belts and now the attempt to change various life-style characteristics. Of enormous potential importance to the population as a whole, these measures offer very little—particularly in the short term—to each individual; and thus there is poor motivation of the subject. We should not be surprised that health education tends to be relatively ineffective for individuals and in the short term. Mostly people act for substantial and immediate rewards, and the medical motivation for health education is inherently weak. Their health next year is not likely to be much better if they accept our advice or if they reject it. Much more powerful as motivators for health education are the social rewards of enhanced self-esteem and social approval.
T
W
O
kinds of intervention
The restoration of biological normality by the removal of an abnormal exposure (e.g. stopping smoking, controlling air pollution, moderating diet)
leaves the underlying causes of poor health outcomes intact; seeking instead to interpose some new, supposedly protective intervention (e.g. immunization, drugs, exercise).
adriennemareeebrown.net
relationshipsproject.org
blackspace.org