Concerning the letter grading system

There is an ongoing debate in the U.S. education system on whether or not to abolish the letter grading system and replace it with the alternative or standards-based approach. Freelance writer and education expert Victor Restis weighs in on the matter, as both sides of the debate are yet to reach a consensus on the matter. The letter grading system is more than a hundred years old, says Victor Restis. But in spite of this, its precision to measure a student’s ability is put in question, which critics believe the alternative approach will fix. For instance, a low grade in the traditional system, does not accurately measure a student’s comprehension of the subject matter, whereas in the standards-based grading, focus is given on measuring the student’s ability to demonstrate mastery of skills.

On the other hand, many parents fear that students may lose a sense of accountability and personal responsibility if the letter-grading system is eliminated. Victor Restis adds that some parents are also concerned that their sons and daughters who consistently do well in class may lose the same recognition once the alternative grading is applied. Moreover, some are saying that colleges may not adopt the standards-based grading, which is bad enough for some students when they apply.

Victor Restis reveals a ‘third force’ that is advocating for a no-zero policy, which is proposing to make 50% as the lowest grade to be given. This is, however, controversial to say the least. What if a student submits no work?

There has to be a compromise anytime soon, says Victor Restis. Otherwise, students will be put in a quandary just because there are two grading systems that cannot seem to agree. Those who prefer the old letter-grading system may have to be more open to a system that shows the true capability of a student. And those who advocate for its abolition, may have to look deeper on what made the old system endure for over a century.