Influence Has a New Meaning
Influence Has a New Meaning
the safety and utility of internet use
Language and Influence
should be maximized
The ending word starts the next sentence.
and a lot of "text." Which you "read."
UARDULL - Invective
We insult you (you are dull) when we use air quotes to imply you never read. Did you notice that?
a shift in an unfinished sentence from one syntactic construction to another
We think rhetorical devices are pretty simple when they are pointed out. And please don't get the impression we think they are manipulative or anything. Far from it. Rhetoric was seen as the highest and most noble of educations during some of the highest and most noble periods of history. It just happens to be foundational to understanding the not-so-noble practices of manipulation and coercive persuasion. While we're on the topic, the word propaganda didn't always have a negative connotation. That changed, for some reason, after Stalin Great Purge and when it was shown to be the essential component in achieving popular compliance with the slaughter of millions of innocents. Go figure.
The skill of identifying rhetorical devices involves practice. Not necessarily the "Did you practice the piano today?" kind of practice, more like the "I have a Medical practice" kind of practice. After 'getting it, it becomes a part of you - a life skill - riding a bike. In contrast, some more concrete subjects we'll address are specific to the internet but might motivate learning the the soft skills... if the implications previously implied don't grab your interest... for some reason. Concrete things like; how to tweak your computers to protect your private information, how private information profiles are created, how The Advertising Industrial Complex fabricates a 'YOU' (your mini-me in the cloud), how Artificial Intelligence monsters twizzle your mini-me to infer even more information about you, predict your behavior, and shape a special version of internet reality - just for you. The AIC sucks enough money off your mini-me to keep the whole 'free' thing going. Actually the new economy is now based on MINI-MEs. These topics are interesting but the three soft skills? Fascinating. And fun to learn. Maybe even important.
Toolkit for Internet Survival - Part I rhetoric bias logic
One thing about traditional websites, they want very badly for you to spend more time with them. Why? More time, more eyeballs. More eyeballs, more impressions. More impressions, more click-throughs. More click-throughs, more conversions. More conversions, more money. Yes, they say that... 'eyeballs.' That's how the Advertising Industrial Complex refers to you - the real you - in 'meat-space.' Endearing words are saved for the valuable virtual-mini-me-YOU in the cloud. Until you 'convert' (your wallet gets involved) you are "eyeballs." Or a you are a 'target' if the AI has determined that YOU have been selected for a 'campaign.'
One way to keep the real you on THIS site is to provide reference material within THIS site. Like a traditional website, we don't want you following a link to God knows where, wandering off, getting sucked in by a lingerie ad and forgetting to come back. We searched for the word 'lingerie." (So we could spell it right). I can't show you what popped up - but it occurred to me (when my mind began to have thoughts again) that there is probably a reason that the word 'lingerie' contains the word 'linger.' DON'T DO IT! Just sayin.
Now you know why the Reveal The Rhetoric portion of our show references examples of rhetoric in the text on this site- HERE. It's also why we used a collapsing box thing. You can get it out of the way to see the example text. Or maybe you find boxes boring, we don't want clutter things up. We want you to stay! God knows why.
Engaging Story - Influence, manipulation, or propaganda?
Columbo
When I was a kid there was a detective show called Columbo. It was about a detective named Columbo. Columbo was a master manipulator. One of his favorite tricks was to casually ask a suspect some softball questions. A lot of softball questions. Too many. The number of questions Columbo asked would tax the patience of anyone - even a Columbo fan. Anyhow - two thing would happen in the scene. The irritated suspect couldn't wait to be rid of Columbo - they wanted to get on with life - plan a crime, go food shopping - whatever people did in the seventies. The other thing that happened was that, finally, the perp knew he was gonna get away with it. All those idiotic softball questions made it clear that Columbo was a bumbling fool who hadn't combed his hair in years and didn't have the sense to take his raincoat off after living 30 years in Los Angeles. The perp was ecstatic with this turn of events. Inside of course. Columbo finally departs. The perp begins to do the happy dance. Then, after the appropriate moment has passed. Columbo peeks around the corner... "Ahhh, excuse me... ahhh One More Thing, I don't mean to bother you but, you see... there's just One Thing I don't understand about what you said Bob..." The damning observation is conveyed. SMACK! No way out. You're done Bob... you've been Columbo-ed.
So, there was this one episode where a student/victim was given some really salty caviar before taking his seat in the theater. From a podium on the far side of the stage the professor/murderer critiqued the movie as it ran. At some point, he started a pre-recorded tape of his lecture and slipped off the dark stage unseen. The student stood at that same exact time, left the theater, got a drink at the water fountain where he was promptly murdered. The evil professor snuck back to the podium, turned off the tape and continued his lecture. Perfect alibi. But why did the student leave to quench his thirst at the precise moment in time the murderer wanted to kill him? Of course the professor had given him the salty caviar and had previously spliced a few frames into the film at the critical time.
The frames pictured tall sweating umbrella drinks...
and sometimes a water fountain.
Sometimes influence goes that way. Smart, subtle, silent... and sneaky.
SMACK!
Weeks ago, the professor purchases the extra salty caviar
flashit Analepsis |interruption of the chronological sequence of events : flashback
--rhetoric---------------------------------------------
Yanimal - Reification - Dehumanize opponent
"You're an animal."
-----------------------------------------------
Inosay - Apophasis Denying these are your words / your position:
"I not gonna be the one to say this , but..."
--fallacy---------------------------------------------
Imawackia ad baculum. Threaten violence:
"You will believe I'm right and do what I tell you or else I'm going to hit you."
"You disagree? Wanna be carried out on a stretcher?"
-----------------------------------------------
Yurasnake- Ad hominem. Attacking opponents reputation:
Your wrong because you're... a liar.
----bias-------------------------------------------
Everything comes at a cost. A tried and true principle.
But what about the World Wide Web? A modest monthly charge from your Internet Service Provider seems insignificant compared with anything 'World Wide.' So there's a disconnect with the tried and tested 'cost' principle. Barring a few subscription services, information on the web is provided without cost. Or is it?
The principle costs are not obvious. They involve:
1) collecting valuable information from you that might be called 'private'
2) depositing valued information for you that might be called 'propaganda'
Interestingly, these costs have significant similarities.
Active Passivity and Privacy
Payments of personhood are usually active, performed explicitly for clear gain. The state collects Personally Identifiable Information (PII) for the privilege to drive a vehicle, receive economic aid. Likewise financial institutions, medical providers, and employers. There is give and take, quid pro quo. In contrast, the activities of the Advertising Industrial Complex are shadows in the back of the mind, passively accepted if recognized at all. This cost conjures an image of the pickpocket. However, what is picked leaves the mind - or the heart - not the pocket.
*(The opt-out cookie banners are a nuisance indistinguishable from pop up ads using the same screen real estate. Something to be dispensed with as quickly as possible. You need to move ahead... where is the "X." Am I right? Or is it just me?)
Active Passivity and Propaganda
Deposits of Propaganda. More disturbing, perhaps, are something put into the mind - or the heart. Web sites, especially news organizations which are becoming indistinguishable from anything else. Of course - in the case of both privacy and propaganda - dollars, euros, bitcoin, freedom or votes will eventually exit, but these economics are not completely predictable. After all, hearts and minds are involved. Whether they know it or not.
Mindlessness
The characteristic of unknowing suggests a second similarity of the costs. Personal profiling and exposure to propaganda are (if not immediately, down the line) issues of influence. You will buy. You will believe. Influence lives on a fuzzy continuum that begins with sharing information and ends with coercive persuasion. Traveling down the well of that continuum, awareness is dimmed like the once thirst quenching water slowly warms ... the crab's new home in your newsteamer. The continuum is a major focus for the rest of the site. While we're on the topic, you might wonder... 'what is THIS site costing me?'
With respect to personal information... there are no cookies, there is no tracking, there are no advertisements. We have no idea who you are or how long you will be here. You come and go unnoticed. The material on the site is free. Your cost? Effort and attention. There are few easily digested videos and a lot of "text." Which you "read." There is, however, an occasional lame attempt at humor but that might keep your attention. Everything comes at a cost.
With respect to propaganda.... we're not aware of hidden agendas but we recognize our biases and they are clearly presented as opinion. You can ignore them. Or not. In fact, we hope you don't ignore anything! Why not ignore opinion? Skills required to optimize internet usage without turmoil - to thrive in peace - involve protecting yourself from unwanted influence. Here, we encourage the identification of three aspects. The main thing to recognize is Rhetoric. Rhetoric's foundations are, cognitive bias and logical fallacy. The subjects are very cool but have the most un-cool names ever named. That's probably why they are mostly ignored. All gradations of influence - whether benign or manipulative - whether found in text, image, or video - depend on these three things. They are ignored at our peril.
Skill to identify the trappings of influence helps the mind to be at peace - to be undistracted - to reduce costs - to focus on the task at hand. Honing this skill - like said - is a major focus for the rest of the site. To finish addressing our propaganda... every attempt is made to be non-partisan, but you never know. Better to pay attention.
With respect to personal information... there are no cookies, there is no tracking, there are no advertisements. We have no idea who you are or how long you will be here. You come and go unnoticed. The material on the site is free. Your cost? Effort and attention. There are few easily digested videos and a lot of "text." Which you "read." There is, however, an occasional lame attempt at humor but that might keep your attention. Everything comes at a cost.
No cookies here. Your cost? Effort and attention. There are few easily digested videos and a lot of "text." Which you "read." There is, however, an occasional lame attempt at humor but that might keep your attention. Everything comes at a cost.