THE SANCTITY OF LIFE VS HUMANAE VITAE
BY
A TRADITIONAL BISHOP
The following emails were sent to Mr. S,J. and Mr. J.W. in response to the many articles praising and defending Humanae Vitae, in its 50th year anniversary.
April 2, 2018
Dear Mr. J.,
On this the 50th anniversary year of Humanae Vitae, it seems eminently appropriate that its status in the eyes of God should be clarified.
Most people, like Life Site News, and other Novus Ordo Catholics, even the ones who consider themselves Conservative or Traditional, have bought “THE BIG LIE” as mentioned in 2 Thessalonians 2:10 & 11: “And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error,to believe lying: (THE BIG LIE) that all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity.” This no doubt has reference to Humanae Vitae... THE BIG LIE. Keeping in mind that the Nicene Creed states categorically: “And I believe in the Holy Ghost, the LORD AND GIVER OF LIFE, Who proceeds from the Father and the Son; Who together with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified; Who spoke by the prophets.”
This in turn is directly related to Tobias 6: 16 & 17: “Then the Angel Raphael said to him: Hear me, and I will show thee who they are,over whom the devil can prevail. For they who in such manner receive Matrimony, as to shut out God from themselves, and from their minds, and to give themselves to their lust, as the horse and mule (mules cannot procreate) which have not understanding, over them the devil has power.”
To be perfectly clear in understanding these Scriptures, the mule is significant because of its relationship to the condition of using an artificial form of contraception while accepting Matrimony, (Tobias 6:16&17), “as to shut out God from their minds, and to give themselves to their lust” refers to all means of birth control INCLUDING AND ESPECIALLY NATURAL FAMILY PLANNING! (an absolute act of the will; malice aforethought) Note: Tobias and Sara spent the first three nights in prayer before consummating their marriage. (An absolute act of their will, for God) Tobias 8:1~10.
The usurpation of God's prerogatives as the Creator and the Holy Spirit's prerogative as the LORD AND GIVER OF LIFE are most heinous, as they usurp Divinity from God as man takes on the Divine Privilege of deciding the fecundity of any given act of copulation by the creature.
The Sovereignty of God over HIS creature is appropriated by HIS creature in all the afore alluded to acts AND THEREFORE ARE ALL MORTAL SINS! If this truth is not made known so that Our Lady's children can recognize the Divine Truth in Her statement to Jacinta that more souls go to Hell for sins of the flesh than for any other reason, I pity you and anyone else who keeps it a secret from those children. Its efficacy is incontrovertible.
We here at Fatima Revisited under the auspices of our Bishop/Watchman are sounding the alarm. Ezechiel 33:3,4,5 are now in play: “And he (the watchman) see the sword coming upon the land, and sound the trumpet, and tell the people: THEN HE THAT HEARS THE SOUND OF THE TRUMPET, WHOSOEVER HE BE, AND DOES NOT LOOK TO HIMSELF, IFTHE SWORD COME, AND CUT HIM OFF: HIS BLOOD SHALL BE UPON HIS OWN HEAD. HE HEARD THE SOUND OF THE TRUMPET, AND DID NOT LOOK TO HIMSELF, HIS BLOOD SHALL BE UPON HIM: BUT IF HE LOOK TO HIMSELF, HE SHALL SAVE HIS LIFE.” (ETERNAL LIFE)
There is no more accurate description of the role that you have taken upon yourself than that of WATCHMAN. Therefore verse 6 of Ezechiel 33 refers directly to all of you. “And if the watchman see the sword coming, and sound not the trumpet: and the people look not to themselves, and the sword come, and cut off a soul from among them: he indeed is taken away in his iniquity, BUT I WILL REQUIRE HIS BLOOD AT THE HAND OF THE WATCHMAN!”
LOOK YE TO YOURSELVES, SELF PROCLAIMED WATCHMEN AND DO THE LORD'S BIDDING. THE ONUS IS ON YOU.
The Bishop's Mouthpiece
Note: Almost all of this message is from Scripture, totally unlike Humanae Vitae. Scripture being what it is, “the inerrant Word of God”, validates the message without need of the Bishop's name as God is the One who made the Bishop/Watchman and Who outranks the Bishop.
********
April 3, 2018
Dear Mr. J.,
In 1884, Pope St. Leo XIII was given by God to over hear Satan challenging Our Lord for His Church as he had challenged Him for Job. The time period granted by God was 100 years. Since there is no time in eternity we can easily consider that the starter's gun was fired by Our Lady at Fatima in 1917. This 100 year time period was the same as Noah was given to build the Ark; the same as Our Lord gave the French Kings through St. Margaret Mary Alacoque to consecrate France to His Sacred Heart; and the same 100 year time period that He has now given modern man to eradicate sins of the flesh and to consecrate himself in the form of Russia to Our Lady's Immaculate Heart … which also has expired. All with disastrous effects due to non-compliance!
The 1960's saw anti-pope Roncalli elected, Vatican II which Pius XII had eschewed (deliberately avoided); a new Rite of Baptism without exorcisms, a new Rite of Priestly Ordinations leaving out the Minor Orders, most notable of which was the Order of Exorcist, which coincided with no exorcisms in the Baptismal rite; a new Universal Rite of Mass without making the old one void which came to include Communion in the hand and subsequently Particles of Transubstantiated Hosts strewn all over the Church, (no paten under each communicant's chin), female readers/lectors, female leaders of song, and female servers in the Sanctuary where none were previously allowed.
As if this implosion of our faith and its rituals wasn't enough, Satan was also able in this frenzy for change and for ecumenism to slip in on Holy Mother Church's unsuspecting children the real poison pill of them all, HUMANAE VITAE, which absolutely took procreation completely out of God's Hands (making it recreation). There were no formal guidelines issued, there were no Scriptural underpinnings, no requirement to consult a priest or confessor. In essence, the hierarchy of the Church put what had been the biggest bane of the clergy in dealing with the faithful right into the laps of the faithful, and like Pilate, washed their hands of all responsibility.
Can we in any way hide from ourselves that this was a carefully laid out and executed crescendo to Satan’s “masterful” take over of our Church? We call it a poison pill because, like an abortifacient pill, it does all its work unseen. The woman thinks that the pill keeps her from getting pregnant, but in actuality, it keeps the fertilized egg from being able to implant itself in the wall of the life giving uterus. The woman never sees the first sign that anything has happened in her body. In fact, these pills are used to regulate the woman's monthly cycle. The Church does formally recognize this process as murder and mortal sin. Natural Family Planning has exactly the same result, no fertilized egg, no evidence of copulation, NO CHILD.
The other mutilations of eternal life giving rituals given earlier have similar results giving Jesus no spiritual children. The mortal sin that has been covered up by Humanae Vitae causes the Holy Spirit to flee that couple and darkens their intellects, and causes every sacrament they receive to be sacrilege, and therefore puts an armed guard against Jesus at the door of their home and their hearts. Remember, they have deliberately cut God out of the picture to give free reign to their lust. (See Tobias 6:16 & 17.)
The gravestone that marks the spot where the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church once stood has these words on it:
HUMANAE VITAE
MORTAL SIN, MORTAL SIN, MORTAL SIN
THE UNHOLY TRINITY
The Spiritual Son of
The Watchman
********
April 6, 2018
Dear Mr. J.,
In regards to our two previous emails, April 2 and April 3, 2018, please see today's article, April 6, 2018, by B. G.. Please take a special note of special sections quoting from HV 14 and also special notes from CCC 2370 and CCC 2399 as printed in the article.
In reading this it should become apparent that Humanae Vitae in so far as it allows for Natural Family Planning is not only in direct contradiction to itself, but also to the Catechism of the Catholic Church which calls it “intrinsically evil”.
In our previous email dated April 2, 2018, we mentioned that Our Lady would not be pleased if this truth was not made known. The quotes from today's mentioned email from Humanae Vitae and the Catechism of the Catholic Church validates the incontrovertibility of our statements concerning “THE BIG LIE”. Please, do please Our Lady by making this truth known.
Since Mr. W. is on the committee to uphold the constant teachings of the Catholic Church, he should be copied on our emails. He certainly seems to have some backtracking to do along with the committee as concerns Humanae Vitae.
The Bishop's Mouthpiece
********
April 14, 2018
Dear Mr. J. and Mr. W.,
In the first materials that we here at Fatima Revisited sent to you, we used Our Lady of La Salette and Her mandate given to Melanie to introduce ourselves. We do our very best by Our Lady's command to live small and unnoticed and only come forward when God in His infinite Wisdom and Love for His creature gives us no other choice.
At His insistent promptings (quite painful) we sent you an email on April 2, 2018 with a followup on April 3, 2018 on the subject of “The Big Lie/Humanae Vitae”. It would seem that Our Lord and Our Lady have taken major offense at your reply.
Not only did you ignore our warnings on Their behalf, but you slapped them both in the face with your article by J. S. who is not a theologian which you very slyly implied that she was, but rather a philosopher. This does not give her any credentials to interpret Humanae Vitae. You hid behind her rather than facing the charges that God brought against you and the warnings that were in our emails.
We read at Their/Our Lord and Our Lady's promptings as our Scriptures for today 1 Kings 13 & 15. It seems that both of you and Paul VI have something in common with Saul. (See chapters 13 & 15 in 1 Kings.)
Genesis 3:16,17: “To the woman also He said: I will multiply thy sorrows, and thy conceptions: in sorrow shalt thou bring forth children, and thou shalt be under thy husband's power, and he shall have dominion over thee. And to Adam He said: because thou hast harkened to the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldst not eat, cursed is the earth in thy work; with labor and toil shalt thou eat thereof all the days of thy life.”
If you have read what we sent you, “Blood Moons Over Fatima – The Witnesses Are Coming!” then you certainly MUST recognize the above as the consequence of the original sin which generated the birth of Cain, and subsequently the forewarned consequence of partaking of the forbidden fruit in the murder/death of Abel by Cain. In toto this is Humanae Vitae in a nutshell.
Genesis 4:7: “...If thou do well, shalt thou not receive? But if ill, shall not sin forthwith be present at the door? But the LUST thereof shall be under thee, and thou shalt have dominion over it.” SINCE GOD OBVIOUSLY MADE KNOWN TO CAIN AND THEREFORE ALL MANKIND THAT HE WAS GIVING THE GRACE FOR HIM TO OVERCOME LUST, DOES MAN NEED HUMANAE VITAE? DOES MAN NEED NATURAL FAMILY PLANNING? IS NOT THE LUST SPOKEN OF THE “REAL” EXIGENCY AND CAUSE FOR ALL THE OTHER EXIGENCIES SPOKEN OF IN HUMANAE VITAE?! AND DOESN'T NATURAL FAMILY PLANNING HELP THEM TO SATISFY THAT LUST WITHOUT RUNNING AFOUL OF THE CURSE IN GENESIS 3:16? “...I WILL MUTIPLY THY SORROWS, AND THY CONCEPTIONS: IN SORROW SHALT THOU BRING FORTH CHILDREN, AND THOU SHALT BE UNDER THY HUSBAND'S POWER, (HIS LUST?) AND HE SHALL HAVE DOMINION OVER THEE.”
“More people go to Hell for sins of the flesh than for any other reason”, so said our Immaculate Queen at Fatima. Are not sins of the flesh all generated by lust? Is not lust conquered by Grace as mentioned in Genesis 4:7? And by staying away from all the people, places and things that bring on lust? You continuously hammer on the efficacy of Humanae Vitae as something “super holy” when in fact it truly represents the nails in Jesus' Hands and Feet on the Cross. After all, Pope St. John Paul II did not exhort Paul VI to propagate Humanae Vitae but rather almost begged him to at least keep the prohibition against artificial birth control.
Be aware Messrs. J. and W.. In 1 Kings 13, Saul was forewarned that his disobedience to God through Samuel (God's Priest) was going to cause him to lose his kingdom. And in 1 Kings 15, God took his kingdom away from him, all based upon Saul's disobediences.
We keep you in prayer that you will see and come to the Light of the Truth and be obedient.
Sincerely Yours,
God's Priest and Siblings at
Fatima Revisited
* The following was not a part of the original text, but is eminently germane to this and any pursuit of God's Will.
Theology as the word implies, is the study of God. He, God, has revealed Himself to mankind in two irrefutable ways in a single form. That form is embodied in His Word Jesus Christ and His very own Holy Spirit in The Bible. If someone purports to be explaining God but does not back their explanation up with His Word, then the Truth is not in it. For example, compare Veritatis Splendor with Humanae Vitae. Veritatis Splendor has Scripture at its very heart and through and through it (written by Pope John Paul II). Humanae Vitae, on the other hand, is written by a committee consisting of mostly lay people, and based around the alleviation of the consequences of the original sin, which, as seen above, is a curse from Almighty God. (Imagine man trying to excuse himself from the curse that God put on him!) The only Scripture directly appertaining to Humanae Vitae is diametrically opposed to what Humanae Vitae's remedy is. Please read Tobias 3:16~18; 6:17 & 18; and 8:4~9. Then please read Humanae Vitae. If you are intellectually and spiritually honest, you can't help but recognize the difference between what God has given and what man has given.
To do justice to God and His Word and His Spirit, a true theologian MUST use God's Self Revelation as the basis for any conclusion that he should come to. 1 Timothy 2:11 & 12: “...Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor use authority over the man: but to be silent.” (Of course this does not apply to her children as they are growing up.) Therefore if you are looking for Truth, the Priest who is to be alter Christus is most likely the theologian that you should look to after ascertaining that he truly is trying to be alter Christus. God in His Sovereignty has given us either Himself or through His Church guidance as to where He and Truth are to be found. Our Heavenly Mother and Queen, according to “the Mystical City of God” by Mary of Agreda, spent the thirty years of Jesus' hidden life with Him in preparatory prayer and suffering for His redeeming death on the Cross. Jesus taught Her everything He was going to teach His Apostles and yet She never presumed to teach St. Peter or any of the other Apostles or Disciples anything. She left all such matters to The Holy Spirit to teach them, the Priests and Bishops of the newborn Church. We would do well to do likewise in all but extenuating circumstances. If we truly want to know the Mind of God, we should first start with asking Him in prayer through His inerrant Word in the Scriptures before accepting anything else.
********
April 18, 2018
Dear Mr. J. and Mr. W.,
Genesis 38:8~10: “...Juda therefore said to Onan his son: go in to thy brother's wife and marry her that thou mayest raise seed to thy brother. He knowing that the children should not be his, when he went to his brother's wife, spilled his seed upon the ground, lest children should be born in his brother's name. AND THEREFORE THE LORD SLEW HIM, BECAUSE HE DID A DETESTABLE THING.”
Does the above irrefutably delineate what the right end of marriage is in God's Eyes? Was not GOD JUST IN HIS ANGER IN THE KILLING OF ONAN FOR THWARTING THE VERY PURPOSE OF HIS MARIAGE (MORTAL SIN?) AS COMMANDED BY HIS FATHER (AND GOD HIS FATHER), AND IS THE VERY SAME DETESTABLE ACT COMMITTED WHEN A COUPLE AVOID CONJUGAL ACTS BECAUSE THE WIFE IS KNOWN TO BE OVULATING?! IS THIS ANY DIFFERENT IN PURPOSE FROM ONAN SPILLING HIS SEED (THE SEED OF LIFE) ON THE GROUND?!
NATURAL FAMILY PLANNING ESSENTIALLY TELLS GOD THAT HE WAS WRONG IN PUNISHING ONAN FOR SPILLING HIS SEED ON THE GROUND TO AVOID CHILDREN. The Merriam-Webster definition of contraception is: DELIBERATE PREVENTION OF CONCEPTION OR IMPREGNATION! (NO mention of natural or artificial)
By contrast Onan's father, Juda, Patriarch of the tribe of Juda, from which Jesus came … Genesis 38:15~18: “When Juda saw her (Thamar whom Onan refused to impregnate), he thought she was a harlot: for she had covered her face, lest she should be known. And going to her he said: suffer me to lie with thee for he knew her not to be his daughter-in-law. And she answered: what wilt thou give me to enjoy my company? He said: I will send thee a kid out of the flock. And when she said again: I will suffer what thou wilt if thou give a pledge till thou send what thou promiseth. Juda said: what wilt thou have for a pledge? She answered: thy ring and thy bracelet, and thy staff which thou holdest in thy hand. (For the exigencies of her time, just in case?) THE WOMAN THEREFORE AT ONE COPULATION CONCEIVED.” (AND JUDA'S LUST WAS SATED.)
Is the above God's way of telling us from way back in Genesis 38 how a woman plays the harlot and/or the husband turns his wife into a harlot with sex that has no intention to have children as pointed out by Tobias 6:17: “For they who in such manner receive matrimony as to shut out God (the Creator, the Author and Giver of life) from themselves and from their mind and to give themselves to their lust, as the horse and the mule, which have not understanding, OVER THEM THE DEVIL HAS POWER.”
In light of the above, is there ANY way that you two and/or the Archbishop C. can honestly and sincerely promote Natural Family Planning as coming from God?! Or, do the three of you wish to castigate God and tell Him that He has no right to stand up for Himself as regards HIS laws concerning HIS creation... CREATOR to creature?
Again, the pressures of the secular world concerning population control and making sure that the collection plate is full should never cause God's Church to pander to man's lust. And absolutely, a group that calls themselves Life Site on 4 Family Life Lane should never be in a position of being accused of such.
Please be sure to send Archbishop C. a copy of this email, as his pitch through you to the whole world certainly does not present him as an Alter Christus or a servant of God and most assuredly not as someone who upholds God's Word in the Scriptures i.e. GOD'S CONSTANT TEACHING TO HIS CREATURE AND TO HIS CHURCH! YOUR OWN INSISTENCE THAT YOU YOURSELVES FOLLOW THE CONSTANT TEACHINGS OF GOD'S ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC AND APOSTOLIC CHURCH AS FOUND IN THE SCRIPTURES IS ALSO SUSPECT AT BEST. It would do you well to be more circumspect of what you print coming from the men with the white collars in that “CRAZY MIXED UP CHURCH”.
We once again implore you in the name of our Triune Godhead and our Heavenly Mother and Queen, DO NOT CONTINUE TO MOCK GOD AND HIS WORD. DO NOT CONTINUE TO USE YOUR PULPIT AS A BULLY PULPIT TO BRING PUBLIC OPINION AGAINST HIS WORD ON THIS SUBJECT.
WE REMIND YOU OF GENESIS 3:4&5: ...”AND THE SERPENT SAID TO THE WOMAN: NO, YOU SHALL NOT DIE THE DEATH FOR GOD DOES KNOW THAT IN WHAT DAY SOEVER YOU SHALL EAT THEREOF YOUR EYES SHALL BE OPENED:
AND YOU SHALL BE AS GODS,
KNOWING GOOD AND EVIL.”
Your continuous show of total support of ALL of Humanae Vitae puts you in the same camp as the Serpent. Is that where you want to be? Do you really want to come down on the Serpent's side of the fence when you go to meet your Maker?
We love God and therefore all whom He loves and we want everyone to whom He has shown His special Love by adopting them into His Church through the Sacrament of Baptism to be at the Family Reunion when this is all over … and so we pray.
********
June 11, 2018
Tobias 6:16&17: “The Angel Raphael said to him (Tobias): Hear me, and I will shew thee who they are, over whom the devil can prevail. For they who in such manner receive matrimony, as to shut out God from themselves, and from their mind, and to give themselves to their lust, as the horse and mule, which have not understanding, over them the devil has power.”
The allegory in the beginning of this chapter shows Tobias being attacked by a man-size fish which Tobias subdues by way of the instruction of the Archangel Raphael (the Angel of Healing). St. Raphael then instructs him to dismember the fish and which parts to keep and verse 8 says: “...and the Angel, answering, said to him: if thou put a little piece of its heart upon coals, the smoke thereof drives away all kinds of DEVILS, either from man or from woman, so that they come no more to them.”
After the Archangel Raphael's instruction as to over who the DEVIL can prevail, he instructed Tobias on what he and his new bride, Sara, should do on the first three days of their married life, thusly: Vs. 18: “...but thou when thou shalt take her, go into the chamber, and for three days keep thyself CONTINENT from her, and give thyself to nothing else but to prayers with her. Vs. 19: And on that night lay the liver of the fish on the fire, and the DEVIL shall be driven away.” (The devil had already killed 7 prospective husbands of Sara.) (6:14) Vs. 20: “But the second night thou shalt be admitted into the society of the holy Patriarchs. Vs. 21: And the third night thou shalt obtain a blessing that sound children may be born of you. Vs. 22: And when the third night is past, thou shalt take the virgin WITH THE FEAR OF THE LORD, MOVED RATHER FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN THAN FOR LUST, THAT IN THE SEED OF ABRAHAM THOU MAYEST OBTAIN A BLESSING IN CHILDREN.”
It shouldn't take a theologian to recognize what demon these Scriptures are talking about. It is obviously Amadeus, the demon of lust. As verse 17 clearly states this demon is responsible for all the evil that Mr. W. speaks of in his talk. The footnote regarding the command to being fruitful and multiplying in the Douay-Rheims version, the original Catholic Bible in English, faithfully translated from the Latin-Vulgate says: “This is not a precept (command), as some Protestant controvertists would have it, but a blessing, rendering them fruitful; for God had said the same words to the fishes, and birds, who are incapable of receiving a precept.”
That being made clear by the Bible itself, then the overriding commandment from God on this subject of marital continence is more accurately defined as the pre-Vatican II Church consistently defined it that every conjugal act must be open for a child, and not done with any other motive than to have children. As the Archangel Raphael, speaking for God, tells us in 6:17: “For they who in such manner receive matrimony, as to shut out God from themselves, and from their mind, AND TO GIVE THEMSELVES TO THEIR LUST, as the horse and mule, which have not understanding, OVER THEM THE DEVIL HAS POWER.”
St. Paul in 1 Corinthians 7:1~7, further elucidates on this subject: “Now concerning the things whereof you wrote me: IT IS GOOD FOR A MAN NOT TO TOUCH A WOMAN. But for fear of fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband. The wife has not power over her own body, but the husband. And in like manner the husband has not power of his own body, but the wife. Defraud not one another, except perhaps, by consent, for a time, that you may give yourselves to prayer; and return again, lest Satan tempt you for your incontinency. BUT I SPEAK THIS BY INDULGENCE, NOT BY COMMANDMENT. For I would that all men were even as myself: but everyone has his proper gift from God; one after this manner, and another after that.” Tobias 6:18~22 is in complete agreement with 1 Corinthians 7:1~7.
Tobias was an only child. Isaac, the son of Abraham, was an only child. Isaac had only two children, Jacob and Esau. Obed, the son of Booz and Ruth was an only child. The Blessed Virgin Mary was an only child. Jesus was an only child. John the Baptist was an only child. God does not tell us in His Scriptures to be lusty monkeys and to copulate as often as possible, to have as many children as possible. Nor did God sanction the practice of multiple wives. In fact, God ratified to Abraham that he was to harken to the voice of Sara in Genesis 21:10, when she told him: “Cast out this bond woman (Agar), and her son (Ismael): for the son of the bond woman shall not be heir with my son Isaac.” There is only one that can be a true wife. Holy Mother Church has consistently through the ages, evidenced by St. Paul in 1 Corinthians 7:7, extolled the virtue of virginity. Are we as God's Children, baptised into the Catholic Faith incapable of doing the math and recognize as in the case of Our Lady's parents and Jesus' parents that one virgin plus one virgin does not need to result in 8, 10, 12, 18 children if we pay heed to what St. Raphael said. Why can we not see that being fruitful and multiplying is governed by holy purity and not by the occasion of lust. As St. Paul says again in 1 Corinthians 7:8,9: “But I say to the unmarried, and to the widows: it is good for them if they so continue, even as I. BUT IF THEY DO NOT CONTAIN THEMSELVES, LET THEM MARRY. FOR IT IS BETTER TO MARRY THAN TO BE BURNT” (forever in Hell). This is excellent advice in conforming ourselves to our Christ both INSIDE and outside of marriage. After all, is that not how God the Father is going to judge what kind of Christian we are?
I find it very interesting, from the above mentioned article, that the Anglicans first approved contraception at the Lambeth Conference in 1930 which is the same year that condoms became available. Is this an effort on their part to keep parishioners from committing mortal sin by using the condom? It is of equal note that Humanae Vitae was promulgated in 1968 when the abortifacient pills received FDA approval in 1960. Is this to keep Catholics from committing the DOUBLE mortal sin of artificial birth control and killing an unborn child before it can attach itself to the womb? NFP is the lesser of the two evils because it's only one mortal sin, that of: “Intercourse even with one's legitimate wife is unlawful and wicked where the conception of the offspring is prevented.” (As in NFP which uses the monthly cycle to keep a conception from happening!) “Onan, the son of Juda, did this and the Lord killed him for it, as noted by St. Augustine.” It is also worthy of note that much of Humanae Vitae verbiage is, as for the exigencies of our times, very similar to the Lambeth Conference rationales and that subsequently there became “two” right ends of marriage which the homosexuals jumped on to claim their right to be married.
Upon my first reading some 20 years ago of Humanae Vitae, I predicted to my confreres that it would lead to same-sex marriage. History has obviously proven that prophecy accurate. The devil very seldom comes at us in a big way that we can recognize. He took Humanae Vitae step by step, closer and closer, to the mess that we have today with Amoris Laetitia and same-sex marriage, etc., all the while being cheered on and aided and abetted by Catholics … Priests, Bishops, Cardinals, Popes, as well as multitudes of the laity.
I HAVE TO WONDER WITH FEAR AND TREPIDATION FOR THE SALVATION OF THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN AND ARE THE PROPONENTS OF THIS OBVIOUS DEFILEMENT OF OUR CHURCH AND ITS TEACHINGS. You are in my prayers and my Masses.
A Traditional Bishop of
Fatima Revisited
P.S.: We shouldn't have to wait for the Witnesses to correct and conform ourselves to Christ, especially when the Scriptures are so plain.
********************************************
All Scripture quotes are from the Douay-Rheims Bible
Imprimatur: James Cardinal Gibbons
Archbishop of Baltimore
September 1, 1899
TAN Books and Publishers
********
July 3, 2018
Fr. B.,
Please tell me how it is that a couple can honestly say to God that they are willing to accept any children that He gives them when they are deliberately avoiding the fertile time of the month?
Did Onan not say the same thing to God in Genesis 38:9&10: “He knowing the children should not be his, when he went to his brother's wife, spilled his seed, upon the ground, lest children should be born in his brother's name. And therefore the Lord slew him, because he did a detestable thing”?
Are they not really saying to God: “Catch me if you can.”?
Fr. B., are there not three heinous crimes against God, THE CREATOR in NFP? The first being, the fulfillment of Genesis 3:4&5: “And the serpent said to the woman: you shall not die the death. For God doth know that in what day soever you shall eat thereof, your eyes shall be opened: AND YOU SHALL BE AS GODS, knowing good and evil.” Does the couple that you and Paul VI envision, obviously for canonization, because they can control themselves for three days out of the month during the “fertile period” to avoid pregnancy, during the rest of the month violate Tobias 6:16&17: “Then the Angel Raphael said to him: hear me, and I will shew thee who they are, over whom the devil can prevail. FOR THEY WHO IN SUCH MANNER RECEIVE MATRIMONY, AS TO SHUT OUT GOD FROM THEMSELVES, AND FROM THEIR MIND, AND TO GIVE THEMSELVES TO THEIR LUST, AS THE HORSE AND MULE, WHICH HAVE NOT UNDERSTANDING, OVER THEM THE DEVIL HAS POWER.”? Secondly, they also violate Tobias 8:9 which reads: “And now, Lord, Thou knowest, that not for fleshly lust do I take my sister to wife, but only for the love of posterity, IN WHICH THY NAME MAY BE BLESSED FOR EVER AND EVER.” Thirdly, they also violate Genesis 38:9&10 by deliberately restricting their intercourse to the infertile time of the month. Is that not tantamount to spilling his seed on the ground so as not to have children?
As supposedly an Alter Christus, Father, which of these blasphemous sins against the Eternal Father, THE CREATOR would you be so bold/callous as to recommend to these two “saints”? And, where will you spend eternity for giving such sage advice and leading this couple “into temptation”? Is that your idea of what the priesthood is all about? Are you supposed to be standing up for your Eternal Father or the carnality of the creature? It's not hard to envision you and all who stand behind your “priestly advice” spending eternity in everlasting flames, where “the worm never dies”. There's no amount of whitewash to cover all that you are doing, you or Paul VI. As an Alter Christus, myself, I pray God for you and for all who so skillfully forget all the sin that Humanae Vitae opens the door to and frames it as a single issue encyclical regarding artificial contraception while using only the term contraception. Contraception with NFP is exactly that, contraception. Is there any way that you can perceive of God, the God of all creation, giving His Blessing to any form of contraception which thwarts His purpose (children), except abstinence? See 1Corinthians 7:5&6. In case you were not taught, Father, Scripture is the inerrant Word of God, and your argument is void of God's Word – just like Humanae Vitae – and therefore, anti-Christ. We are to be following God's Word, not man's!
Please read all of the enclosed and then give God HIS due.
Fr. J. P. of
Fatima Revisited
Contact:
fatimarevisited@yahoo.com