We quote from John De Marchi's book, FATIMA from the beginning, John Paul II Chapter LI, pg. 243: “MARY'S APPEAL IS NOT FOR JUST ONCE”.
“Pope John Paul II was in Portugal from the 12th to the 15th of May, 1982.”
“He came especially as a pilgrim to Fatima, in thanksgiving.”
“From his homily to the vast assembly during the Eucharistic concelebration of May 13, we quote:
“And so I come here today because on this very day last year, in St. Peter's Square in Rome, the attempt on the Pope's life was made, in mysterious coincidence with the anniversary of the first apparition at Fatima, which occurred on the 13th of May 1917.
“I seemed to recognize in the coincidence of the dates a special call to come to this place. And so, today I am here. I have come in order to thank Divine Providence in this place which the Mother of God seems to have chosen in a particular way...I repeat once more with the people: through God's Mercy we were spared. …
“In the name of these sufferings and with awareness of the evil that is spreading throughout the world and menacing the individual human being, the nations, and mankind as a whole, Peter's successor presents himself here with greater faith in the redemption of the world, in the saving Love that is always stronger, always more powerful than any evil.
“My heart is oppressed when I see the sin of the world and the whole range of menaces gathering like a dark cloud over mankind, but it also rejoices with hope as I once more do what has been done by my Predecessors: namely, I entrust the world to the Heart of the Mother, I entrust especially to that Heart those people which need particularly to be entrusted. By doing this, I am entrusting the world to Him who is infinite Holiness. This Holiness means redemption. It means a love more powerful than evil. No sin of the world can ever overcome this Love.
“Once more this act is being done. MARY'S APPEAL IS NOT FOR JUST ONCE. HER APPEAL MUST BE TAKEN UP BY GENERATION AFTER GENERATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EVER NEW SIGNS OF THE TIMES. IT MUST BE UNCEASINGLY RETURNED TO. IT MUST EVER BE TAKEN UP ANEW. ”
AND THUS, WE ARE THE SEED OF OUR LADY OF
APOCALYPSE 12, WHO WE FIND IN OUR LADY OF FATIMA.
*******
THE FINAL BATTLE
The following are five Treatises under the title of "BLOOD MOONS OVER FATIMA". Please read them, copy them, share them. We very much appreciate your feedback.
BLOOD MOONS OVER FATIMA TREATISES I-V:
BMOF-I: Blood Moons Over Fatima From a Traditional/Marian Perspective; Biblical Portents Through Scriptural Apologetics; False Doctrine From the Protestant Sects Exposed; Third Secret.
BMOF-II:(Click here) As Pertains to the Trumpet Judgments and the Shemita; Discussion of the Phenomenon of the Blood Moons Tetrad and Exposition of the Meaning of the Trumpet Judgements, the Shemita, and Jubilee; 1917 was a Jubilee Year.
BMOF-III:(Click here) As Pertains to the Witnesses of Apocalypse 11; A Sermon by Pope John Paul II Explaining His Papacy; Explanation of the Mission Statement of the Witnesses Given the Current Status of the Church.
BMOF-IV:(Click here) Mary Most Holy - The Woman; The Original Sin, No One Wants to Talk About It; An Exposition of the Root Cause of Sins of the Flesh and How it Even Effects the Marriage Bed; Statement of Our Lady's Mission at Fatima.
BMOF-V:(Click here) More on the Witnesses of Apocalypse 11; Who Will Be the Witnesses and Why; A Biblical Explanation of Global Warming; Daniel 9:27 Explained; Exposition of the Protestant Lie Concerning Daniel 9:27; Yom Kippur.
BMOF-VI: BMOF-VII: To Be Announced.
THE WITNESS IN WAITING (CLICK HERE)
THE SANCTITY OF LIFE VS HUMANAE VITAE (CLICK HERE) By A Traditional Bishop
CONTACT US AT: fatimarevisited@gmail.com
BLOOD MOONS OVER FATIMA I
From A Traditional Catholic/Marian Perspective
“And it shall come to pass after this, that I will pour out My Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy: your old men shall dream dreams, and your young men shall see visions. Moreover upon My servants and handmaids in those days I will pour forth My Spirit. And I will show wonders in heaven; and in earth, blood, and fire, and vapour of smoke. The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood: before the great and dreadful day of the Lord doth come.”(Joel 2:28~31) St. Peter, in Acts 2: 18~ 20, quotes this very scripture! In Genesis 41: 32, Joseph tells us through Pharoah: “And for that thou didst see the second time a dream pertaining to the same thing: it is a token of the certainty, and that the Word of God cometh to pass, and is fulfilled speedily.” This same portent/prophesy, or words similar to it, appears many times in the Old Testament and in the New Testament. Of what is already in the past, St. Peter was last, and so we can know that it is yet to come to pass.
Are you aware of all the excitement/furor that is sweeping the Protestant world concerning the coming “tetrad” of “blood moons” (bi-sected by a total eclipse of the sun) beginning on April 15, 2014? For them, this has a connection to their doctrine of the Rapture of all of the Christians before the 7 years tribulation period, after which they will return to rule and reign with Christ for a thousand years; Apocalypse 20:6 “Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection. In these the second death hath no power; but they shall be priests of God and of Christ; and shall reign with Him a thousand years”. They totally ignore the fact that Apocalypse 20 absolutely refers in verse 4 to these people as: “...the souls of them that were beheaded for the testimony of Jesus, and for the word of God, and who had not adored the beast nor his image, nor received his character on their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.”
Let's take a closer look at this picture. If you are raptured at the first signs of tribulation, i.e. the beginning of the 7 years time period mentioned in Daniel 9:27, what opportunity do you have to heroically refuse to put yourself in the clutches of the beast by not adoring him or taking his mark? Secondly, what opportunity do you have to receive the crown of martyrdom for “resisting onto death”? So, are you “caught up in the air”, or down where the action is performing heroic acts of faith like the untold martyrs of the first three centuries of the Church? What of the 'learned ones of Daniel 11:33~35 and 12:3? It seems that they are God's and chosen to help their brethren both to hang in there and to come to salvation. Do they miss out on the rapture and suffer the tribulation instead to do God's work? Isn't the whole idea to become more Christ-like? Can we do that by ducking out on His trademark activity – suffering?
This is typical of Protestant dogma/doctrine. Lets look at their 'faith alone' doctrine. Jesus, Himself, in St Matthew 25:31~46 talks of the end of the world when He will separate the sheep from the goats (actually, He will whistle and His faithful sheep dog, Satan will do the separating), He uses as His measuring stick the 'spiritual' and 'corporal' WORKS of mercy. Those who perform them do so unto Him and get to be in the “Kingdom prepared for them by His Father from the foundation of the world”. Those who don't perform them neglect Jesus, Himself, not His 'least' ones and “these shall go into everlasting punishment”. v.46. In the letter of St. James, he says in chapter 2:19,20 “Thou believest that there is one God. Thou dost well: the devils also believe and tremble. But wilt thou know, O vain man that faith without works is dead”? Look again at Apocalypse 20, but verses 12 and 13 and see what God will use in the last judgment to judge! “And I saw the dead, great and small, standing in the presence of the throne, and the books were opened; and another book was opened which is the book of life; and the dead were judged by those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and hell gave up their dead that were in them; and they were judged every one according to their works.”
Now let's examine 'once saved, always saved a.k.a. 'fundamental option', in Jesuit talk. The usual process for eligibility for this guaranteed salvation is to recite a prayer accepting Christ's atoning death so that all of their sins, past, present and future are washed away and now they are on their way to Heaven. This in spite of John 3: 5 where “Jesus answered: Amen, amen I say unto thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God”. Any future sins will put them into a 'backslidden” state, but they will still be on their way to Heaven ie., they cannot lose their salvation. In Jesuitese, as long as your 'fundamental option' is for God, you will go to Heaven, regardless of how many mortal sins you commit, or how unrepentant you are. The Protestants simply ignore 1John 5:16,17 “He that knoweth his brother to sin a sin which is not unto death, (venial sin), let him ask, and life shall be given to him, who sinneth not to death. There is a sin unto death: (mortal sin) for that I say not that any man ask. All iniquity is sin. And there is a sin unto death.” Any one familiar with the Old Testament didn't want to be laughed at and ridiculed for asking such a stupid question as; is there such a thing as a sin unto death?. The Law, written as well as unwritten, was perfectly clear on what offenses were mortal...those that the punishment for which was death! In terms of the New Testament, this means eternal death for those who die unrepentant in this state. If you will read Ezechiel 18 and 33 with this definition in mind, you will see clearly the Traditional Catholic teaching that you cannot be sure of your salvation until you stand in front of Jesus and hear those oh so beautiful words “Come on in My good and faithful servant”. YES!!!
Let us also remember that even though many Protestant denominations do offer 'water baptism', water is only the 'outward sign' it does not wash away the original sin or any other sin. St. John the baptist 's baptism could not bring in the Holy Spirit, even though Jesus, Himself, said of St. John: “Amen I say onto you, there hath not risen among them that are born of women a greater than John the Baptist...” (St. Matt. 11:11). The power for the 5 exorcisms done during the Traditional Baptismal rite and the Power to bring in the Holy Spirit was given specifically to the Apostles and the disciples who were ordained as Priests, or Bishops ex. St Timothy (1Tim4:14). The power to forgive sins was specifically given to the same group in John 20: 21~23. The power to transubstantiate bread and wine into Christs Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, became the exclusive right of these same Priests and Bishops (“Do this in remembrance of Me”) through the laying on of hands in the Apostolic Succession as prescribed to Moses direct from God in Exodus 29.
Most don't want a Pope or a Bishop or even a Priest to be in authority over them. Martin Luther even called obeying the commandments 'works' in his 'faith alone' dogma. They, like the Jews in the desert don't even want God and His Word in authority over them. The One, Holy, Catholic (Universal), and Apostolic Church founded by Jesus Christ on His and the Father's Rock – Peter (St. Matthew 16:17,18 “...Blessed art thou Simon Bar-Jonas: because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but My Father Who is in Heaven. And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; (Cephas – Hebrew for rock) and upon this rock (Cephas) I will build My Church, and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it”) has been rejected by both the Novus Ordo and Protestant faiths. Catholic – Universal, does not denote that It is the only Church, making the Protestants the sign of It's disunity, but it simply means that, the Apostles through the Apostles Creed and later through the Nicene Creed taught “One body and one Spirit; as you are called in one hope of your calling. One Lord, one Faith, one baptism. One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in us all” (Eph. 4:5). Until the Novus Ordo Mass, you got the same Mass – the Latin Tridentine – in whatever Western Catholic Church you entered no matter where you were in the world. No matter where you were in the world, YOU WERE HOME! When you are “kicking against the goad”, of course, you want any assurance that you can dream up, IE once saved, always saved, saved by faith alone, and when all else fails, you can count on being raptured – all with just saying one little prayer or exercising your 'fundamental option'!
Joel 2: 31, Isaias 13:9-10, St Matthew 24:29, and Acts 2:19-20 all speak of the sun being darkened and the moon turning to blood before the great and terrible day of the Lord. There is an actual Biblical precedent for blood moons! The protestants, however, insist that the ramifications of what they call this new “teaching” all have to do with the present day nation of Israel. NASA has issued a report on past blood moons which occur during total lunar eclipses (the suns rays bend around the earth and strike the moon as the morning or evening red sky, and have dubbed them therefore, “blood moons”). This same report gives the dates of future blood moons, of which the protestants say that those which fall on Jewish feast days are the most significant. The next ones will form what NASA has called a tetrad, two this year in April(15) and October(08) and two next year in April(04) and September(28), the two April ones falling on Passover, and the two in October and September on the feast of Tabernacles. Incidentally, there will be a total solar eclipse between the first two and the last two(on March 20, the Jewish New Year), thus we will have both conditions of these Scriptures! i.e. the 'great and terrible day of the Lord'. The Protestants do not talk about this aspect as it would spoil their dream of being raptured and escaping the Tribulation simply because they are believers. In addition, they seem only to count the blood moons that can be seen from Jerusalem, and count only the ones that fall on Jewish feasts. What about Catholic Feasts?! I don't know how many blood moons that they discount for not meeting these criteria in their myopic quest to remove the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic, pre-Vatican II Church, from their Christian genealogy. It was bad enough that they divorced themselves from the One True Faith, but now they seem to want to tie their quest for Gods favor to the Jews, by going back to Genesis 12:3,which is speaking to Abram(Abraham) ... “And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse them that curse thee, and in thee shall all the kindred of the earth be blessed”. Are we Catholics/Christians not descendants of Abraham through Jesus? They are hitching their star to the Jews who are still under the condemnation of the Law for not accepting the “acceptable time“ of their visitation (Luke 19: 41~44)-as the Protestants, themselves, have also done in taking themselves out of the “line of Grace” by leaving the One True Church.
The Scriptures, right from the very beginning – Genesis 3:15 – are about the Co-Redeemers, Jesus and Mary. The threads of their role in Salvation History run parallel throughout the Bible from Genesis to Apocalypse; the New Adam and the New Eve. The simile that the Church of the New Testament has used is Jesus as the Sun generating His own Light, and His Blessed Mother as the Moon reflecting His Light. All one needs is to be cognizant of the darkness that pervades the Novus Ordo church especially under Francis I, to see the significance of the “sun turning to darkness and the Moon turning to blood”! It therefore seems totally impossible for their roles to have been usurped by a people who cowed Pontius Pilate into crucifying the Redeemer of the World, and who now claim that that same God has helped them to retake the land that He, Himself predicted would have its temple so completely destroyed as to not leave a “stone upon a stone”. Jesus also warned: “Therefore I say to you, that the Kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and shall be given to a nation yielding the fruits thereof. And whosoever shall fall on this stone, shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it shall grind him to powder. And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard His parables, they knew that He spoke of them.”(St. Matt. 21:43~45) We, for sure, need to love them as our neighbors, and pray for their salvation, but we need not bury our heads in the sand! We Catholics and Christians, are what the New Testament is all about.
These blood moons, therefore, MUST have to do with Jesus and Mary, and not with Israel. Jesus will only send His Wrath between now and His second coming, and it seems that we have to look to His true Vicar to know what His immediate future role will be (remember, they are blood moons). We then can look to the unfulfilled prophecies of Fatima to know Our Lady's immediate future role. Just like the total Solar eclipse that seems to join the two sets of blood moons, there is a direct connection between Fatima and the role of the Vicar of Christ as recounted in the visions of Lucy and Jacinta. Anyone who has seen the miraculous picture of Our Lady hugging and comforting Her 'totus Tuus' Vicar, John Paul II can easily understand this connection with the true Vicar of Christ. This concerns the “Bishop dressed in White” and his martyrdom, who no doubt is the same “Successor” that St. Pius X saw in his vision “dieing a cruel death” which he said was the “beginning of sorrows which must take place before the end of the world”. (The great and dreadful 'Day of the Lord'? Blood Moons = cruel death?)
Jacinta also had a vision that only she saw, in which she saw a future Pope which she reported thus: 'I see the Holy Father in a very large house, on his knees before a table, with his hands over his face, crying. In front of the house there are many people, and some are throwing stones at him, others are cursing him and saying very foul words to him. Poor little holy father! We must pray a lot for him.” In the book “Windswept House” by Fr. Malachi Martin (page 455), Fr. Martin describes a dream that the Slavic Pope has during an operation for a medical problem in which he sees”Faces pressed in on him. Why could they not hear? Why could no one anywhere, hear those words? White and black faces. Yellow and red and brown faces. Bloodstained faces. Smiling faces. Angry, scowling faces. Starving faces. Faces he recognized and faces he could give no name to. Faces that stifled his every effort... These jeering crowds in Amsterdam, flinging excrement at his pope-mobile and burning him in effigy … why could they not hear?” There is quite a resemblance between these two dreams/visions.
Fr. Martin made no bones about the thin veil that he put on the characters and the situations that he wrote the book about...possibly even being killed for his efforts! The Slavic Pope was obviously Pope John Paul II, also known as the Fatima Pope. What was the message that he, in his dream, wanted so desperately to proclaim? Is this another connection of the Vicar of Christ with the Fatima Secrets? In 1967, Emmett Culligan published a booklet called “Fatima SECRET; A Layman's Recall To The Age of Faith” in which he printed what he considered to be the “essential points of the original text” of the Third Secret of Fatima. It starts with the Blessed Mother's words “Don't worry, dear child, I am the Mother of God speaking to you and begging you to PROCLAIM IN MY NAME THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE WORLD... In doing this, you will meet with great hostility. But be steadfast in the faith and you will overcome this hostility. Listen and remember well what I say to you: MEN MUST BECOME BETTER. They must implore the remission of the sins which they have committed and will continue to commit. You ask Me for a MIRACULOUS SIGN so that all may understand the words in which, through you I address mankind. This miracle you have just seen WAS THE GREAT MIRACLE OF THE SUN! Everyone has seen it – believers, and unbelievers, country and city dwellers, scholars and journalists, laymen and priests. And now, in My name, it is proclaimed: A GREAT PUNISHMENT SHALL COME TO ALL MANKIND, …
God is Omniscient! He already knew that Roncalli (John XXIII) would refuse to reveal the Secret in 1960! Did He give the Secret to Our Lady with this in mind? Will this 'successor' to Pius X, 'poor little Holy Father' (Pope John Paul II) come out of his disguise at the end of his 'short retirement' and be a 'Fatima' Pope and do what his predecessor refused to do?...and then go to his cruel death along with “the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions? After all, in Apocalypse 12:2, “And being with child, She cried travailing in birth, and was in pain to be delivered” we can get a preview of what Our Lady has been going through in giving birth to Her Remnant Church since Roncalli blasphemed Her by not revealing Her third secret. She is, after all 'Holy Mother Church'. We must thank Messrs. Ratzinger, Bertone, and Sodano for their bumbling attempt to 'debunk' Fatima `a la Roncalli, in which they gave us this invaluable information link! In that bumbling attempt, there was never any participation by or reference to Pope John Paul II! Get yourself a copy of the issue of Newsweek or Time pictorials after his supposed death and see if all of those pictures could possibly be of the same man...a man with a wine mark on his face? One who was at least 6'3” and 250 lbs, another at 5'4” and 110lbs. I have all three of these pictures dated 2003!!!
In case you missed it, this is the printed text published by the above three cardinals as the full text of the third secret of Fatima: “I write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy Mother and mine:
After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out on contact with the splendor that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand; pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: 'Penance, Penance, Penance'! And we saw in an immense light that is God; something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it, a Bishop dressed in White, we had the impression that it was the Holy Father. Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins (Rome?) and half trembling with a halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.”
A quick scan of the accounts of the 'purpose' of these 'signs in the Sun and Moon' put out by the Protestants forces us to realize that they simply don't know what they portend. (I borrowed a friends smart phone for a few minutes) They only pretend to know that they have to do with Israel. Case in point: The tetrad that occurred in 1493-4 had to do with the Jews getting kicked out of Spain in 1492.(The Moors were also extirpated from Spain in the same year! And they had spent years building mosques and palaces etc. into what they considered to be their kingdom. A very serious military threat to the nationhood of Spain, unlike the Jews.) This explanation was obviously chosen because it had to do with the Jews, as opposed to the World changing event of Columbus setting sail for the new world with Catholic Priests on board bringing the true Faith to America BEFORE the Reformation! Again they chose the event that leaves Christ and Our Lady out of the picture – Pinta, Nina, Santa Maria. They chose something with only a parochial significance rather than something with a worldwide and timeless significance. How sad! Have they gone retrograde and are going to accept the messiah of the Jews (the Antichrist) as Jesus' second coming, leaving out the new era spoken of by Daniel in chapter 12 v. 1 and Apocalypse 20 when it refers to Ezechial 38 and 39? Don't they realize that they and the Jews are under the anathema that Saint Paul speaks of in Galatians 1: 8, “But though we, or an Angel from Heaven preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema”. Or in 2Thessalonians 2: 9,10,11 “Whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power, and signs and lying wonders, and in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying: that all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity”. INIQUITY = ANTICHRIST!!!!!
Apocalypse 12:15 reads: “And the serpent cast out of his mouth after the Woman, water as it were a river; that he might cause Her to be carried away by the river.” There are TV evangelists who insist this woman is the nation of Israel!?? Now, in St. John 4:22 Jesus tells the Samaritan woman at the well that; “for salvation is of the Jews”, and the Protestants therefore are preaching that different Gospel that St. Paul speaks of in Galatians 1:8 with which they bring down anathema upon themselves. Saint Peter tells us in Acts 4:10~12 “...Be it known to you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified, whom God hath raised from the dead, even by him this man standeth here before you whole. This is the stone which was rejected by the builders, which is become the head of the corner. Neither is there salvation in any other. For there is no other name under Heaven given to men whereby we must be saved.” Jesus was of the Hebrew race, and therefore was a Jew. In this aspect, salvation did come from the Jews! There is even one such evangelist who uses a picture of The Immaculate Heart, complete with the flaming Heart surrounded by a crown of thorns, to depict this Lady Israel...can you believe it? At the foot of His cross, Jesus using St. John to represent all generations whom She, Herself, said in the Magnificat would call Her Blessed, gave Her and therefore His Church, His own Mother to be ours. One thing that we must all take into account, is that the Catholic Church was the only christian Church in existence until the Protestant revolt where they turned with a vengeance away from 'Popery'. In turning their back on the Truth and preaching another gospel they took on the 'Operation of Error' to believe the lie and the aformentioned anathema. Without the True Faith as the lens through which they see Scripture, they will always be in general error with their interpretation of that Scripture. They even truncated the true Scriptures by removing six books and incurred the anathema in Apocalypse 22:19. Don't fall into that trap!
In St. Paul's letter to the Hebrews, ch. 9, v. 10, he mentions a 'time of correction'. At this time, the Jews believe that the time of their messiah is imminent. (One of their chief Hasidic Rabbis, `a la Daniel assiduously assailed the gates of Heaven to learn the name of the messiah. He posthumously, through a letter that he asked his son to read after his death, revealed that he was answered by Heaven that His name was Jesus..Jeshua!). The Muslims are anxiously awaiting the arrival of the 12th Mahdi, the source of much infighting between the Sunni and Shiite factions as to which will be the group from which he will emerge. The Protestants are awaiting their free ticket out of the tribulation and look forward to the rapture. The Novus Ordo Catholics are acting like the unfaithful servant and shedding the commandments as quickly as possible through their 'Bishop of Rome', Francis. Doesn't Apocalypse 13: 11~18 talk of the second Beast as doing the same as the first Beast in his sight? Ratzinger was the guiding force 'periti' to the Cardinals and Bishops of the Rhine Valley in the derailing of Vatican II, later proclaimed by Paul VI as the 'church of man' (“When The Rhine Flows Into The Tiber”). As Pope, he fell victim to the resignation protocol mentioned so forcefully in Windswept House; he failed to follow the lead of Pope John Paul II in ordering the Bishops and Archbishops of the US to pull pedophile priests out of ministry and turn them over to the police for their sin and their crime and not to simply slap them on the wrist and send them to a shrink! He did nothing, even during his own papacy and so was forced out as a delaying tactic to the UN so that the Roman Phalanx, servitors of Satan according to Windswept House, can stonewall for more time to prepare for the 'prevailing' time (the time of Satan's rule instead of God's). Now Francis has taken over the job of the wreckovation of the Church and has named his own committee to study the issue and make recommendations. Ratzinger is still in Rome, and so Francis is still in his sight. Are these blood moons the result of the wounds in the Sacred and Immaculate hearts? !!!
In the aforementioned 3rd Secret published by Mr. Culligan, Our Lady goes on to say: “There is no order in anything. Even in the highest positions, it is Satan who governs and decides how affairs are to be conducted. He will even know how to find his way to the highest positions in the Church. He will succeed in sowing confusion in the minds of great scholars who INVENT ARMS WITH WHICH HALF OF MANKIND CAN BE DESTROYED IN A FEW MINUTES. He will bring the mighty ones under his thumb and make them manufacture armament in bulk. (Is the current situation in the Ukraine the direct result of the consecration not being made? Is Putin the 4th beast mentioned in Daniel chapter 7, and described in Apocalypse 13: 1~2? Is he the Antichrist come from the tribe of Dan? Is that why he is protecting Syria from the USA?) If mankind does not refrain, I SHALL BE FORCED TO LET FALL MY SON'S ARM. If those at the top in the world and in the Church do not oppose these acts, IT IS I WHO SHALL DO SO, AND I SHALL PRAY GOD MY FATHER TO VISIT HIS JUSTICE ON MEN!!! THEN IT IS THAT GOD WILL PUNISH MEN, MORE HARSHLY AND MORE SEVERELY THAN HE PUNISHED THEM BY THE FLOOD... IN ROME, THERE WILL BE BIG CHANGES. WHAT IS ROTTEN WILL FALL, AND WHAT WILL FALL MUST NOT BE MAINTAINED.
Can there be any doubt what the blood moons portend??? Is any more research going to make it any plainer? There is no such thing as a rapture. Christ tried His bride in the first three centuries of the Church in the crucible of martyrdom! Is He now, when, as He Himself predicted things are worse than in the days of Noah, with a Church that is full of nominal and self centered Christians mired in spiritual sloth, is He now going to tell those early martyrs that their trial was really unnecessary? Is he going to cheapen their crowns of martyrdom by letting us skate on through without a scratch? The greatest reward that a Christian can achieve is Heaven, it therefore should be worth anything that Jesus and Mary ask!!!!
In August 1936, at Rianjo, Spain, Jesus gave a very important reprimand and prophesy of punishment to Sr. Lucy for the Catholic Bishops because they had not yet obeyed His command given by Our Lady, that they solemnly and publicly consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary – still not done! Unfortunately Fr. Gruner's efforts were always at least 42 years late! He didn't even begin until 1978. Isn't it interesting that Heaven brought the Fatima Pope and the Fatima priest along in the same year! Just think, Pope John Paul II could have been Father Gruner's Bishop if he had asked for incardination in the Diocese of Rome. Things could have been so different!!! Here is what Jesus said to Sr. Lucy: “Make it known to My ministers, given that they follow the example of the King of France in delaying the execution of My command, like him, they will follow him into misfortune”.
What is the reference to the King of France? The King of France had been commanded by Jesus to consecrate France to His Sacred Heart. And the Kings of France, for one hundred years, had refused to do this. The command was given by the Sacred Heart to Saint Margaret Mary Alocoque and passed on to the King. It was given on the 17th of June 1689. For one hundred years to the day the kings refused to obey. On June 17th 1789, one hundred years to the day! The King of France was stripped of his power by the 'Third Estate', and four years later was publicly executed by guillotine! It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that the only thing left was the 'proviso' that Our Lady had given...”the consecration will be done, but it will be too late”.
NOTE: In our quest to get this warning to Our Heavenly Mother's children to warn them and to mobilize them for their neighbors we contacted all of the people who are the movers and shakers in the name of Tradition when it comes to publishing or Fatima. These were Fr Gruner; twice, John Venarri of CFN; twice, Robert Ritchie of America Needs Fatima; twice, and we made five attempts by phone and by e-mail with absolutely no reply to the Remnant newspaper! We were absolutely turned down by all, even though they purport to be 'the' right hand men of Our Lady of Fatima. They would not support us in any way, financially, by paid advertisement, by allowing us a spot in their Google account or seed money to get us going on our own Google account!
This is the vision Pope Pius X had concerning one of his successors:
“I saw one of my successors taking flight over the bodies of his brethren. He will take refuge in disguise somewhere; and after a short retirement he will die a cruel death. (On a hill, beside a cork-wood cross by arrows, overlooking the half-ruined city of Rome, referred to by St. Peter in 1Peter 5: 13 as Babylon) The present wickedness of the world is only the beginning of the sorrows which must take place before the end of the world” (St. Pius X, Deceased in 1914)
If we add one hundred years to October 13, 1917 we get October 13, 2017. If we consider Our Lord's words in St Matthew ch. 24: 21,22, “For there shall be then great tribulation, such as hath not been from the beginning of the world until now, neither shall be. And unless those days had been shortened, no flesh should be saved: but for the sake of the elect those days shall be shortened.”, then the year 2015 is pretty much on the money. Our Lady came to Fatima in 1917 to tell us that God was so angry with us that we were in the middle of World War I, and “if we didn't improve, there would be another war and a worse war”. 12 Million people died in WWI, and 52 million in WWII, and this doesn't count the 17 million Catholics killed by Lenin and Stalin!!! How much worse would it need to be for us to get the message? Can we afford not to look seriously at this new warning that Almighty God in His infinite Mercy has given to us through NASA? We wouldn't listen to Our Lady and be obedient...we wouldn't listen to Our Lord and be repentant, and He still finds yet another way to warn us!!! Dare we put Him off again? If the Church won't/can't do what is right, should we follow them into HELL? To my way of thinking, we have already lost our Head with our current Pope. I Pray to God, that He does have Pope John Paul II in 'retirement' waiting for the 'fullness of time'
But, what should we do? In the almost 2000 yrs since the Church began, and even in the 4000 yrs of the Old Testament God has taught us all that we need to know to lead a good Catholic/Christian life. Holy Mother Church teaches us that there is no further revelation necessary for Salvation since the death of Saint John the Evangelist/Apostle. Our salvation doesn't count on who is on the Papal throne in Rome, or on the Episcopal throne in any particular diocese. With a Douay-Rheims Bible in one hand, utilizing the alphabetical listings of the basic tenets of our Faith in the back of the book, and a Baltimore Catechism in the other hand, the only other thing we need is a validly ordained Traditional priest to hear our confessions and confect the Sacraments for us and a pre-1962 Missal. Christ made no provision for politics in His teachings, and neither should we.
Let us further look at what Our Lady told Jacinta, the youngest and no doubt the purest of the three seers on this matter. “More people go to Hell for sins of the flesh than for any other reason“. “There will be fashions that will be designed in Hell”. From the Scriptures we hear directly from Jesus “You have heard that it was said to them of old: Thou shalt not commit adultery. But I say to you, that whosoever shall look on a woman to lust after her, hath already committed adultery with her in his heart.” This sin can also be committed by a woman with a man or woman, and by a man with a man! (St. Matt. 5:27,28) Also from Jesus: “And I say to you, that whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and he that shall marry her that is put away, committeth adultery”.(St. Matt. 19:9) Again, it goes both ways! Among the sins that both St. Paul and St. John enumerate as there being no room in Heaven for the transgressors thereof, are adultery and fornication and homosexuality.(Romans 1:31,32 and Apocalypse. 22:14,15) Closely tied to these three is the sin of masturbation. In Genesis 38:9~18 we find a man that God 'slew' for doing a detestable thing when he spilled his seed on the ground. In this same scenario, we find incest, adultery, prostitution, and a woman using her clothing to sexually attract a man; And this was all revolving around the family of Juda, Jesus' ancestor and the head of the tribe of Juda! Did Our Lady lie, or exaggerate?
Tobias 6:16,17 “Then the Angel Raphael said to him(Tobias): Hear me, and I will shew thee who they are, over whom the devil can prevail. For they who in such manner receive matrimony, as to shut out God from themselves, and from their mind, and to give themselves to their lust, as the horse and the mule(male mules cannot reproduce), which have not understanding, over them the devil has power”. Is there any 'birth control' method that does not have this end in mind??? This was before Tobias married the virgin Sara whose first seven suitors were all killed by the demon of lust even before they could consummate the marriage. In pre-Vatican II theology, if it was known beforehand that either of the marriage partners were sterile, the priest would have to get a special dispensation for them to marry since they could not have children. Again, pre-Vatican II theology taught that the 'right end' of marriage was to have children, and that each conjugal act must be open for a child. Therefore, those who have had vasectomies, or hysterectomies, or irreversible tubal ligations are ineligible for marriage, and are not entitled to the sex act in any form if they are incapable of having children through such means. This also applies to those who deliberately render themselves sterile, albeit temporarily, by some means of birth control. In the case of the abortifacient pill or the morning after pill, or RU486, there is a double consequence since technically, these are abortions and therefore mortal sin. If these events take place after marriage, and render the person permanently sterile, they no longer have a right to the conjugal act in any form and must seek to live together as brother and sister.
Chapters 6,7,and 8 of Tobias should be the core teaching at any Pre-Cana conference or Marriage encounter. Couples who tempt each other with looks, clothes, gestures, movies, CDs, promises of later or tomorrow, mutual bathroom use, etc. or in any way open themselves or each other to sinning in their hearts with their partner, or any random member of the opposite sex, or with themselves are already committing adultery. We can understand why Pope John Paul II taught that a married couple can commit adultery with each other; viewing or reading pornography, or pseudo pornography i.e. romance novels or any other material to cause arousal, causes the partners to have sex with the fantasy and not each other. To dress in a certain way to arouse your spouse and then go out in public and be unconcerned with your effect on those other than your spouse causes you to share in the sin that you may arouse in that total stranger...how and when will you be able to confess or even think to confess what sin you partake in by causing it in others, through your own fault! Tobias 8:9,10 puts the crowning touch on this teaching: Thou madest Adam of the slime of the earth, and gavest him Eve for a helper. And now, Lord, Thou knowest, that not for fleshly lust do I take my sister to wife,(Sara was his cousin, and in old Hebrew there was no word for cousin, such relatives were all known as brother or sister) but only for the love of posterity, in which Thy Name may be blessed for ever and ever. You can see by these chapters and verses why “Humanae Vitae” is at the very least suspect in its theology. Anything that contradicts Scripture cannot be validly from the Holy Spirit, as He would be telling a lie on Himself as the Author of the Scriptures. How many sins of the flesh has this false encyclical caused? How many people are burning in Hell because of it? Married sex under the effects of any birth control method is nothing but thinly veiled masturbation for both parties! The seed might as well be spilled on the ground. Needless to say, any of this happening outside of the married state is even more reprehensible.
Anyone in this state of soul, who wants to enthrone the Sacred or Immaculate Heart in their home commits blasphemy. Any one who claims to be in good standing with Holy Mother Church is telling themselves and God and others a complete falsehood. Anyone who approaches the communion rail in this state is committing sacrilege! Apocalypse. 21:27 “There shall not enter into it(the Holy City) anything defiled or that worketh abomination or maketh a lie...”. Example; Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind, because it is an abomination.”(Leviticus 18:22). The book of Leviticus, especially chapters 18~21 describes many of the things that Our Lady is too pure to ever mention. They are intrinsically, that is in and of themselves, mortal sins – abominations. If you need to have a picture of what mortal sins are, just read the Old Testament, especially the Pentateuch – the first five books – and note each time God instructs that the perpetrators of certain actions are to be stoned or that He, Himself, takes or kills someone for what they have done, and you will have a fairly complete list. They are so heinous in the eyes of God that the person died a horrible death for committing them, a harbinger of what they would suffer in Hell, and a horror for those who had to throw the stones as well. They, those who were caused by their consciences to fulfill the Law of stoning, most likely would be like God in that they would do it without malice, just in obedience.
A modern day example of the abuse of the wrong people touching sacred things and receiving the death penalty from God, Himself, can be seen in 1Kings 6:19 “But He slew of the men of Bethsames because they had seen the ark of the Lord: and He slew of the people seventy men(Princes), and fifty thousand of the common people. And the people lamented, because the Lord had smitten the people with a great slaughter”. In the footnote, it gives the explanation that they had curiously looked into the ark which only Levites were allowed to touch. What does this bode for the 'Eucharistic ministers' and/or for those who receive in the hand and usurp what Pope John Paul II called the “privilege of the ordained”? The only ones allowed to touch the sacred vessels or the sacred species(emergencies excepted) is the only one with hands specially consecrated to the task – THE PRIEST! And what about all of the women who are in the sacristy, the Holies, from which God has excluded women from the time of Moses, let alone those women who open the ark(Tabernacle) and touch the sacred species as Eucharistic ministers? God is super serious about that which He claims as His...including we humans and even the Angels. There are punishments that He metes out while we are still here on earth, and if they fail through our stubbornness to correct us, He has no choice but to put us in Hell for all eternity. We took our opportunity to reciprocate His Love and show Him that we want to be with Him in Heaven and showed Him, instead, that we could never get along with Him or His Saints and Angels for all eternity in Heaven. As Lucifer said, “Non-Servium”!(I will not serve!), and look where he is now. See Isaias 14: 9~15 for a metaphorical description of his fall using King Nebuchodneser as a human example.
To put all of this in its proper perspective, let us examine the crux of Our Lady's reason for coming to the Earth, to Fatima. A lot has been made of John XXIII's refusal to be obedient to Our Lady,s request(Our Lord's command) to read the message of the third secret publicly to the Church at least by 1960, and Roncalli's determination that She didn't know what She was asking by declaring “Questo non `e per I nostri tempi” “This is not for our times”. The Mother of Our Saviour, The Queen of Heaven was ignorant, he knew more than She! Are we in 2014 going to declare Her too Heavenly bound to be any earthly good? That we of the 21st century are so far advanced in our holiness that we too know more than Our Lady as Roncalli did? How much of what is contained in this teaching paper that you are reading is 'news' to you? Does Malachias 3: 5~7 ring a bell with you? “And I will come to you in Judgment, and will be a speedy witness against sorcerers, and adulterers, and false swearers, and them that oppress the hireling in his wages, the widows, and the fatherless: and oppress the stranger, and have not feared Me, saith the Lord of hosts. For I AM the Lord, and I change not: and you the sons of Jacob are not consumed. (His Judgment Awaits our death – we still can repent, confess, and amend our lives before it is too late!)
Fortunately for us, the knowledge of what the third secret has to say is not nearly as important as to discern what She, Our Lady, meant by what She said to Jacinta. Just a cursory look at your current surroundings – maybe even in the mirror – will tell you why Our Lady's concerns are legitimate. How much bare cleavage do you see? How much bare skin do you see, period. How tight is your shirt/blouse, your jean/slacks, your skirt? How do you dress your children – as modestly as the Blessed Virgin dresses; and your own dress? What do you watch on TV? Do you use cuss words, sexual innuendo, winks and knowing looks? How often do you go to confession, Mass, Communion. Do you use a Traditional examination of conscience to prepare? Do you decide for yourself whether or not the 'Church' has a right to call something a mortal sin? Do you know more than God how to define His Commandments? Do you use such exclamations as 'Lordy Lordy', As god as my witness, or OMG? Do you tell off-color jokes, especially around children? Do you monitor your children's friends, entertainment, vocabulary, dress? The word 'Christian or 'Catholic' denotes someone who is a follower of Christ. Do you follow/imitate Him as He has revealed Himself in the Scriptures, or is He 'a big boy', 'He'll get over it', or 'He understands how I am', or 'we, Jesus and me, have come to an understanding', etc. where you have created God in YOUR image and likeness. All of these self deceptions can lead you right where Mary, Our Queen Mother, was warning us not to go, even showing the children a gruesome vision of Hell before the warning so that we could literally 'get the picture'.
Read this last section carefully, and then read it again asking yourself, honestly, how much of this pertains to me? What is the true condition of my soul? How much sin have I caused in others, including anger or rage, my own or theirs? If I died today where would Jesus be forced by my sins to put me? If I were arrested for being a Catholic/Christian would there be enough evidence to convict me? Do I care about the state of soul of my children as Mary does, as Our Heavenly Father does? It is sheer folly to wait until the chastisement that has to be coming since mankind hasn't gotten better – WWII did come, Korea did come, the 'sexual revolution' did come, Viet Nam did come, Iraq did come, Afghanistan did come etc. 2017 may well be too late to stop and try to get off from the wrong track and onto the right one. We are creatures of habit, and there will not be enough time to change, let alone figure out what needs to change. How many more will be living with their 'significant other' without the benefit of marriage? How many will be living in adultery with their 'neighbor's wife' after divorcing and remarrying multiple times due to contrived annulments? (Catholic Divorce!) Remember, St. Matt. 19:9 only allows divorce for fornication! Remarriage while he/she is still alive is still counted as adultery! 70% of the children born in our country today are born out of wedlock! How to correct this in a few hours, a few days? How, where will you be able to find a good priest who will not just give you blanket absolution or tell you that you have not sinned when you know you have? How many will be caught in a same-sex marriage because Francis 'cannot judge them' or because Dolan has absolved them 'because they love each other too'? And am I complicit because I agree with them so that I can have the courage to go on with my own sin? The deeper that we sink into the quicksand of complacency/rationalization, the less chance there will be that we will see the need to grab the rope that God is dangling in front of us to save us, the more obdurate we will be in our sins.
All quotes used in this writing are from the original and only authentic Catholic Bible translated directly from the 72 book Latin Vulgate Bible which was the result of the canon defined by the Council of Carthage in AD 396, and was the only English version until 1611. The translation from the original languages and texts was completed in the year 400 AD, some 1200 years before the King James Version. Since Latin was at that time both the common language throughout the former Roman Empire, and a dead language – that is no longer in common use, it essentially 'froze' the existing word use meanings for all time. This means that it was 1200 years closer to the true meaning of the words and terms in use at the time of Our Lord than the KJV.