Tanya Attebery - Back to School Parental Rights Resources

In the landmark case of Kennedy v Bremerton School District in 2022, the Supreme Court threw out the Lemon Test and replaced it with a History and Tradition Test. There is no document in American history, save the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, that has the history or tradition of the 10 Commandments. Based on this new test, we are confident these laws in various states allowing for display of the 10 Commandments are constitutional and will ultimately be upheld by the Supreme Court.

FTCFTC: Workshop on Exploring Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices in "Gender-Affirming Care" for Minors

https://restoreamericanschools.com/

https://americanjourneyexperience.com/

H.R. 15 Equality Act

Say No! Email Your Representatives today

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the so-called “Equality Act of 2025,” a deeply troubling piece of legislation that threatens to erode both religious liberty and women’s rights in America.

This bill would:

Override local and state laws that protect the privacy and safety of women and girls by allowing biological men into women’s restrooms, locker rooms, and showers.

Invalidate obscenity laws, clearing the way for sexually explicit drag performances to be legally presented to children in public spaces.

Explicitly revoke Section 1107 of the Civil Rights Act and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, removing vital protections for religious individuals, ministries, and institutions.

Force churches, religious schools, and faith-based organizations to hire individuals who openly contradict their core beliefs—including those promoting transgender or other "queer" ideologies.

Compel all individuals and businesses, regardless of conscience or religious conviction, to comply with an agenda that undermines their deeply held moral and spiritual values.

This legislation poses an alarming threat to anyone who seeks to live out their faith in public life. It targets the rights of Christian business owners, landlords, foster parents, educators, and others by criminalizing their beliefs and pushing them out of the public square. It also opens the door to serious safety concerns for women and children by forcing the sharing of intimate spaces and activities with biological males.

While presented as a measure of fairness, this bill effectively destroys true equality by trampling on the very freedoms that protect conscience, family, and faith. It weaponizes civil rights law to punish disagreement, rather than protect diversity of belief.

I strongly urge you to oppose and work to stop the Equality Act of 2025. America’s foundational principles of liberty, privacy, and religious freedom are at stake. Please defend the rights of all citizens to live and work in accordance with their faith.

Supreme Court Points: "The state does not raise children; parents do."

-provided parents in Democratic controlled states a get your kids out of woke indoctrination hall pass.

-ends the abuse of power

-upheld what the Constitution has always protected: the right of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children, free from government interference

-empowers families to reclaim their rightful place in their children's education

-opens curriculum transparency

-opens parental notification laws

-"requiring schools to disclose instructional materials, protect religious liberty in classrooms and create meaningful opt-out provision for families" (AFPI).

-constitutional check on the top-down governance that puts ideology before innocence and politics before parental authority

-education should not be used as a took for social engineering

-educations original purpose if educating not indoctrination

-no parent should be force to choose between their values and their children's safety at school

-no parent/guardian should be kept in the dark about what their children are being taught

Written by Karen England, Capital Resource Institute

Today the Supreme Court issued its

decision in the case of Mahmoud v. Taylor.

Tamer Mahmoud is having a very good day. He is one of the lead petitioners in the case against the Montgomery County School Board and Thomas Taylor, the Superintendent of Montgomery County Schools.

And he just found out that he won this monumental case.

Along with other parents in Maryland, Mahmoud sued after the district refused to allow parents to opt their children out of gender ideology and sexuality coursework. The school insisted that administering an opt-out would be too much of a burden on the school, even though they offer opt-outs for many other reasons.

Mahmoud and his fellow petitioners maintain that their first amendment religious rights were violated and today, the court agreed.

Why this is and isn’t simple.

There was a time when anything related to sex and sexuality were only presented to children in “Health” or “Sex Ed” class. It was simple for parents to identify which topics they wanted to protect their children from with an opt-out.

Today, sex, sexuality, gender identity, and more sensitive topics are sprinkled into every subject in school including English, math, history, and science. Ultimately, astute parents will realize they have to opt their children out of school altogether.

If schools want to keep their funding, which is in part tied to enrollment numbers, they will be forced to get back to basics. Time will tell if they will double down on indoctrination, or move back to traditional education.

In any case, today’s massive win for parental and religious rights sends a clear message - we’re not going to accept the sexualizing of our children in this country.

Page updated

Google Sites

Report abuse