Criteria C

Criterion C: Processing and evaluating

Maximum: 8

At the end of year 5, students should be able to:

i. present collected and transformed data

ii. interpret data and explain results using scientific reasoning

iii. evaluate the validity of a hypothesis based on the outcome of the scientific investigation

iv. evaluate the validity of the method

v. explain improvements or extensions to the method.

Achievement level and Level descriptor

The student does not reach a standard identified by any of the descriptors below.

1–2

The student is able to:

i. collect and present data in numerical and/or visual forms

ii. interpret data

iii. state the validity of a hypothesis based on the outcome of a scientific investigation

iv. state the validity of the method based on the outcome of a scientific investigation

v. state improvements or extensions to the method.

3–4

The student is able to:

i. correctly collect and present data in numerical and/or visual forms

ii. accurately interpret data and explain results

iii. outline the validity of a hypothesis based on the outcome of a scientific investigation

iv. outline the validity of the method based on the outcome of a scientific investigation

v. outline improvements or extensions to the method that would benefit the scientific investigation

5–6

The student is able to:

i. correctly collect, organize and present data in numerical and/or visual forms

ii. accurately interpret data and explain results using scientific reasoning

iii. discuss the validity of a hypothesis based on the outcome of a scientific investigation

iv. discuss the validity of the method based on the outcome of a scientific investigation

v. describe improvements or extensions to the method that would benefit the scientific investigation.

7–8

The student is able to:

i. correctly collect, organize, transform and present data in numerical and/ or visual forms

ii. accurately interpret data and explain results using correct scientific reasoning

iii. evaluate the validity of a hypothesis based on the outcome of a scientific investigation

iv. evaluate the validity of the method based on the outcome of a scientific investigation

v. explain improvements or extensions to the method that would benefit the scientific investigation.