This toolkit and guide to scaling up peacebuilding and nonviolence work is the culmination of the Topol Peace Data Initiative, which was funded by Sidney Topol during the period from 2014-2019. The purpose of the project was to explore how peacebuilding and grassroots social change initiatives can scale and broaden their impact, starting with the development of a conceptual model of scaling and including a series of empirical case studies. The content of the toolkit was informed by the perspectives of nearly 60 social movement activists and civil society practitioners who were interviewed as part of the empirical case studies.
The substance of this toolkit is drawn from interviews conducted with social movement activists and grassroots civil society practitioners in Israel, Northern Ireland, and in the United States. Between June 2017 and December 2018, interviews were carried out as part of four case studies in scaling up peacebuilding and nonviolent social change movements (a full list of interviewees/organizations can be found in Appendix 1):
We conducted interviews with grassroots leaders of local Black Lives Matter groups in the United States and Europe, with a focus on understanding how these groups use social media to build coalitions and broaden their impact.
In Israel, we conducted interviews with the board and staff members of Sadaka Reut, a Jewish-Palestinian social movement organization focused on education and sociopolitical engagement. These interviews were primarily focused on understanding how the organization promotes binational Jewish-Palestinian partnership internally and how it builds partnerships that enable it to work with mainstream NGOs and with educational institutions in Israeli society.
For a case study on the role of women and women’s organizations in scaling up, we conducted interviews with civil society leaders and grassroots practitioners in Northern Ireland and with both Jewish and Palestinian activists in Israel. These interviews addressed the role of gender as a civil society issue in need of further attention as well as the way that a gender lens shapes possibilities for scaling civil society and grassroots social change initiatives.
Finally, we conducted interviews with grassroots practitioners and civil society leaders in Northern Ireland in order to explore the scaling of support for peacebuilding and reconciliation prior to and in the wake of the Good Friday Agreement.
In addition to the different areas of focus in each of these case studies, they differ in their methodological approach. The first two case studies focus on a specific movement/network (Black Lives Matter) and organization (Sadaka Reut), respectively. Each provides deep insights into different aspects of scaling up nonviolent social change as applicable to these specific groups. The third and fourth case studies, on the other hand, focus on broad civil society issues. Because of this, they include practitioners and activists from a wide range of movement organizations and civil society initiatives in Israel and in Northern Ireland.
The range of actors and issues addressed in these case studies are the foundation for the tools presented here. Our team carefully reviewed transcripts of each interview and compiled a set of key themes that emerged in terms of actions taken or suggestions made for scaling social change work. These themes are presented as tools that illustrate how different groups and actors have negotiated aspects of scaling their work.
The purpose of this toolkit is to provide practitioners and grassroots social change activists with guidance on how to broaden the scale and impact of their work. It is meant to provide a comprehensive set of tools but, in keeping with our assumptions about scaling, it is not a linear framework. Instead, the tools are framed according to key categories that emerged from empirical and conceptual research.
The toolkit draws on a set of assumptions about scaling up developed out of the conceptual and empirical work of the Topol Peace Data Initiative. These assumptions include the following:
Scaling is not only about growth but is also a process of creating a strong foundation for expansion;
Scaling is a process of broadening impact in ways that include both expected and unexpected outcomes;
The process of scaling includes the need to develop ways of engaging with government actors and other societal institutions; and
Scaling is not a linear phenomenon but is a multidimensional and iterative process.