The following plants are considered uncommon/conservative and are going to be destroyed:
Missouri sedge (carex missourensis)
Short-awned foxtail (Alopercurus aequalis)
Green Dragon (Arisaema draconium)
Star sedge (Carex radiata)
Marsh spike-rush (Eleocharis palustris)
Yellow fruit sedge (Carex annectans)
Water willow (Justicia americana)
Shoreline sedge (Carex hyalinolepsis)
We're not 100% sure how much on-site wetland will be impacted, as the developer is intentionally using language downplaying the impacts and leaving out key information. The development site has identified in total 12.6 acres of wetlands. At first the developer was impacting 5.64 acres of wetland which was later to roughly 3 acres. However, in the press release Landplan stated they only "disturb" 1.48 acres of wetlands and 1.17 acres of stream corridor. This is not an accurate picture. This number can only be generated by using a legal technicality that distinguishes "isolated" and "jurisdictional" wetlands. There is no significant ecological difference between these wetlands, it is only a legal designation in regards to what the federal government has jurisdiction over in regards to permitting. 1.48 acres is the amount of wetlands being completely filled and graded for building development. This number doesn't count the additional ~1.3 acres that will be destroyed to install "stormwater wetlands" or bioswales. We have asked for clarification on this matter, the development team has yet to respond.
The location of the project in proximity to the Haskell-Baker wetland complex is startling. A single 2-lane road separates the project site from the western portion of the Baker wetlands, and a stream that bisects the project site feeds runoff directly into the Baker wetland's basins. Wetlands are one of the most endangered habitats in the United States and wetland destruction has only increased in the past 10 years due to agriculture and development. Wetlands provide critical habitat for many endangered animals and plants. For this development specifically, 7 threatened or endangered species are thought to be potentially impacted by development: the northern long eared bat, the tricolored bat, the pallid sturgeon, the western prairie fringed orchid, the monarch butterfly, the western regal fritillary, and Mead's milkweed. To the left we have also compiled a short list of known species on site that are going to be destroyed.
Beyond the destruction of wetlands on the actual property, we have massive concerns about New Boston Crossing affecting the current Haskell-Baker wetland complex. We still have no concrete understanding of how the Haskell-Baker wetlands was altered due to the completion of the SLT, much less how this fragile and complex ecosystem will be altered due to rapid development in the region. Haskell and Baker land stewards have been hard at work the past few years trying to right mismanagement/neglect of the land and understand how the landscape can recover after the creation of the SLT. Creating a development right next to this fragile complex can destroy years of careful love and labor in a short 6 months. We have little to no information from the developer for mitigation plans, for long term conservation plans, or even how they're collaborating with Baker (the same entity that tried to sell their wet meadow for development) to mitigate harm to the Haskell-Baker wetland complex. You can read the developer's noncommittal responses to questions presented at the public meeting on 10/29 here.
Wetlands have always been important cultural sites, both for the First Peoples and for those of us here now. By destroying and degrading wetlands, we remove the ability of our children and future generations to experience the job of interacting with the complex web of life found in a wetland. We remove the ability to experience outside recreation in natural spaces, the joys of observing migratory creatures, of learning about plants and their roles in our culture.