Was Covid-19 intentionally released from a Chinese lab and used by American government bureaucrats to cause panic, shut down the economy, and alter an election in 2020?
Dr. Anthony Fauci, a leader of the National Institute of Health, was the chief health bureaucrat largely controlling the US government COVID-19 response.
Fauci is alleged to have:
Funded the Covid-19 virus development in a Chinese lab in Wuhan. Then funded "vaccines" for the virus.
Owned partial royalties for Remdesivir and the mRNA Covid "vaccines" giving him personal financial incentive to disregard cheaper inexpensive treatments.
Led the way in shutting down the US economy, Many small businesses and churches were closed. But large retail stores and alcohol retailers were allowed to open.
Used the Covid-19 pandemic to assist in bringing down the Trump Presidency, as the pandemic was used as an excuse for large scale mail-in balloting, which is known to carry large risks of fraud and ballot stuffing. (Biden received a record 81 million votes.)
Declassified Intelligence Files Implicate Dr. Fauci
Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, Releases documents proving Dr. Fauci funded the Covid virus in China's Wuhan lab, and lied to Congress and the American people about the Covid virus and treatments for it. June 19, 2026
Fauci funded risky coronavirus research linked to big pharma and the pursuit of “universal vaccines” worth trillions of dollars. (That benefitted Fauci)
Fauci was the behind-the-scenes advisor who, with his hand-picked experts, pushed the IC to endorse a natural, animal origin to hide his dangerous research.
Fauci became the nation’s pandemic “pundit” and publicly pushed lies, disinformation, and censorship.
Fauci lied to Congress
Fauci retaliated against whistleblowers seeking to expose his lies.
Fauci suppressed safe treatments that could have treated Covid.
"Dr. Fauci eventually admitted that there was no science behind any of what he was saying."
"We know that the side effects from COVID vaccinations far exceeded anything else in the last 30 years combined."
Dr. Ben Carson is a retired brain neuro-surgeon, author, and former Secretary of HUD.
Why did government health bureaucrats dismiss, and block treatments
that many Frontline Doctors found Successful?
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, a Stanford-trained otolaryngologist, chronicles her contentious battle against medical institutions and her passionate advocacy for early COVID-19 treatments and healthcare transparency.
Dr. Bowden stood up against the medical establishment during the pandemic. From her private practice in Houston, she kept over 6000 Covid patients out of hospitals and became a fierce advocate of early treatment protocols, including drugs like ivermectin. When she began posting her patient outcomes on social media, she faced intense opposition and professional consequences.
https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Dangerous-Misinformation/Mary-Talley-Bowden/9798895654651
Covid Vaccine Adverse Effects and Deaths
Dec. 7, 2022
Sen. Ron Johnson (WI) hosted a discussion with experts and medical professionals. The following chart shows worldwide data from FDA and CDC data including data from the FDA FAERS System (FDA Adverse Event Reporting System) the CDC VAERS system (Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting System)
Note DEATHS from usage. The treatments (Covid Shots and Remdisivir) promoted by government health agencies had much higher death rates.
https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/issues/vaccines-side-effects-and-mandates/
2021: Why did the FDA claim Ivermectin is only an animal dewormer? It was a Noble prize (2015) winning Drug for use on humans.
Jane M. Orient, M.D. Executive Director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, AAPS: When the FDA learned that doctors were writing 88,000 prescriptions a week for ivermectin, mostly for COVID-19, it objected. Except the FDA has no authority to dictate or deny medical treatment. Once FDA approves a drug for safety for any indication, it does not have the legal right to tell physicians how they can use the drug.
Most of the American media piled on, eagerly parroting the FDA: Media mock users of COVID drug (Ivermectin) with bogus 'horse paste' claim. In fact, Ivermectin, touted as a "wonder drug" in the Journal of Antibiotics, was shown in studies to have strong antiviral as well as antiparasitic properties, long before the COVID-19 pandemic.
September, 2021
The Biden administration, following the advice of US health agencies, implemented sweeping federal Covid-19 "vaccine" mandates, affecting approximately 100 million Americans, including federal workers, healthcare staff, and employees at private companies with over 100 workers. "Vaccination" or weekly testing was required.
Note: The Biden Administration imported 20-25 million unvaccinated illegals into the nation over 4 years. Why were vaccine mandates NOT applied to illegals, many caught and released (or even flown in)?
The CDC changed the definition of "vaccine" in 2021, to allow the Covid-19 shot to be labeled as a vaccine. The public is familiar with "vaccines".
Reporter Sharyl Attkisson (former 60 Minutes) said the CDC has carefully "evolved" the definition of vaccination "to meet the declining ability" of the COVID-19 vaccines.
August 2021
CDC Director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky admitted that the Covid-19 vaccines neither prevent catching COVID nor stop spreading it.
March 2021
CDC Director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky claimed Covid vaccinated individuals "do not carry the virus, they do not get sick" and could not transmit the disease.
June, 2021
Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA technology that's used in the COVID vaccine: "The government is not being transparent about the risks." People should not be forced to take experimental COVID vaccines because risks aren't known; those under 18 and those who’ve had virus shouldn’t take it.
February, 2021
Lab test for Covid-19 virus inaccurately diagnosed many people as sick that were not.
Thomas T. Siler, Jr., MD: "PCR tests are being run at cycle rates of 37-40. PCR tests using these high cycle rates are not picking up live virus, but only minute virus particles. This creates false positives and more "cases" that are not real cases. " ... The probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is false positive is 97%". Having a falsely high COVID-19 case count due to false positives can affect people’s perception of the dangers of infection and policy decisions.
This may explain why in May of 2020, samples taken from a goat, a sheep, and fruit all came back as positive for COVID-19 in lab testing.
December, 2020
The FDA granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for
Covid-19 "vaccines"
EUA is a temporary legal mechanism that allows the FDA to authorize unapproved medical products (lack of safety testing) during a declared public health emergency. It is issued when there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives and the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh its known and potential risks.
The FDA ignored HQC (Hydroxychloroquine) treatment success reported by some doctors and refused to give that protocol EUA use.
(See Below)
Published July 2, 2021
Early Days of Covid-19 (The China Flu)
Was the Covid-19 Wuhan (China) Flu exploited by government to artificially create a pandemic environment?
The first SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) occurred in 2002-3. SARS-COV caused flu-like symptoms (fever, cough, body aches and pains). Globally, over 8,000 people were sickened and 774 people died. SARS originated in China.
In early 2020, SARS-CoV-2 (the virus causing COVID-19 symptoms) originated in Wuhan China (a city containing a virology research lab).
Government policymakers used unproven computer models to estimate 2.2 million people in the US would die from Covid. Doctors Fauci and Birx championed this assessment and the media heavily publicized it. Governments responded by imposing unprecedented mandates and lockdowns to “Stop the Spread” of this highly contagious deadly disease.
Except the computer models were dramatically WRONG.
This was quickly shown by analyzing a real-world Covid experiment conducted on the Diamond Princess cruise ship. Its a worst case example, of the consequences of widespread prolonged exposure to the virus.
There were 3711 people on board. They all had constant, heavy exposure to the virus. The population skewed far older than the general population. [But likely had few sick, infirm people at the start of the cruise.]
ONLY 20% OF PEOPLE GOT INFECTED. [Showing detectable symptoms]
Out of the 20% who got infected, only 1/2 had any [serious, reportable] symptoms
A very small percent became seriously ill.
10 people died. (Only 0.27% of the population of the ship)
Once real world data like this is observed, a competent scientist would adjust the computer models to reflect the REAL data regarding deaths and death rates. The Covid computer models were not adjusted.
The entire rationale for the nationwide COVID mandates/lockdowns was proved false.
In May 2020, the CDC confirmed a Covid mortality rate of 0.26%, 8 to 15 times lower than the model estimates of 2.0-4.0% .
Further analysis shows the mortality rate is hugely dependent on age. The death risk is miniscule for those under 50 years of age, larger for those over 70.
Mortality Rate by Age Group
0-19 years old = 0.003 %
20-49 years old = 0.02 %
50-69 years old = 0.5 %
70 years old or older = 5.4 %
Even these death rates are likely overstated. The CDC altered the death reporting guidelines to inflate the death count. As a result:
Deaths unrelated to the coronavirus like motorcycle accidents and gun shot wounds are reported as COVID-19 related deaths.
Deaths where the China coronavirus is assumed to be related are counted as COVID-19 deaths, even though no formal evidence is obtained.
Dr. Scott Jensen confirmed that with the new CDC guidelines, a patient who died after being hit by a bus could be listed as a coronavirus death regardless of damage caused by the bus accident, if the patient tested positive for coronavirus before or after death. With this standard, George Floyd (BLM riots) could have been listed as a coronavirus death.
The government also created a financial incentive to diagnose Covid patients. Medicare paid $13,000 for a COVID-19 hospital admission. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, hospitals get $39,000.
“Nobody can tell me, after 35 years in the world of medicine, that sometimes those kinds of things [have] impact on what we do.” stated Dr. Jensen.
Wuhan Covid Treatment
The previously mentioned Covid death rates are largely with the use of the government treatment protocols. Most doctors followed government guidance. Unfortunately, the CDC and NIH protocols did very little to cure people or prevent unnecessary covid deaths.
Dr. Gold points out that it is standard to treat disease early to have the most success. The government guidelines waited until covid was advanced, and in many cases the patient was placed on a breathing tube, before treatment started.
Dr. Simone Gold @drsimonegold – Oct 22, 2020 Tweet
WOW: Dr. Fauci’s NIH recommends against all forms of treatment in COVID-19 patients if they do not require supplemental oxygen. The new guidelines recommend to only treat a patient in the very late stages of the illness where mortality is the highest.
Since when in medicine do we allow a patients illness to progress to the point where they need a ventilator to breathe to finally treat them? The answer is never. The NIH’s new “guidelines” is reckless, dangerous, and a violation of the Hippocratic oath.
Meanwhile the CDC and NIH guidelines ignore a treatment that multiple doctors have used to cure covid with no serious side effects and little chance of death.
In March 2020, the covid government mandates were issued. Decisions were made to cancel sports and shut down huge swaths of the economy. However, within weeks a covid treatment had been discovered and proven effective where tried: A hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) drug cocktail. HCQ had been used to treat or prevent malaria for decades. It is sold OTC in many countries.
Also in March 2020, a French study was completed that administered hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to 80 patients. Improvement was recorded in EVERY CASE except for a very sick 86-year-old with an advanced form of coronavirus infection.
A Texas nursing home in April 2020 revealed further evidence of success. 56 residents and 33 staff members tested COVID-19 positive.
“If we didn’t make the decision quickly then we could potentially lose 15 to 20% of the residents which was not an option,” said the Doctor.
The treatment approach was to begin administering Hydroxychloroquine, a Zpac and Zinc just as soon as a resident first started showing symptoms. All residents and staff treated early survived covid.
This was huge as nursing homes is where many of the 70+ years old deaths occurred.
By July, 2020: “Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, MD has treated 2,200 Covid-19 patients. He’s had a success rate of 100% for low-risk patients…and a success rate of 99.3% for high-risk patients from using Hydroxychloroquine, zinc sulfate, plus Z Pak antibiotic. He has named it “the Zelenko Protocol.” It’s the synergy that works. Without zinc and Z Pak, the drug hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work as effectively.
The other key to success is to use this 3-part protocol within five days of symptoms appearing. It has to be used early, before the patient winds up in the ICU. That’s why several studies of Hydroxychloroquine have failed. They never used zinc sulfate and they started the protocol too late.”
The treatment data indicated that for those people in relatively good health, and treated with the HCQ cocktail early, covid ceased to be a deadly threat. There was no longer any reason for people to be afraid of death and for the nation to be shut down.
There continue to be doctors recommending this treatment and stating their success with it. Some of the most well known were the Frontline Doctors. Their main message was Covid was not a death sentence and could be successfully treated. They reported which states banned HCQ and where patients could get it. They even held two press conferences on the Supreme Court steps to try to spread the word.
Dr. Gold, the face of Frontline Doctors, posted about the HCQ cocktail in Oct 2020 (Tweet links to an One America News clip)
Most doctors continue to use the ineffective government protocols. But some do follow the data. Here is a list of some doctors who will follow effective treatments. DOCTORS WHO WILL PRESCRIBE IVERMECTIN, HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE FOR COVID-19 (USA) (Ivermectin was also reported to be a highly effective treatment after HCQ was found to work.)
For those seeking more information, here is a site that summarizes the covid testing to date. The claimed effective treatment protocol is HCQ + an antibiotic (+ zinc). Many of the failures in these studies are HCQ stand alone (NOT THE CLAIMED CURE) or HCQ given in doses TOO LARGE (that can cause health issues / side effects).
Database of all HCQ COVID-19 studies. 296 studies, 220 peer reviewed, 246 comparing treatment and control groups. HCQ is not effective when used very late with high dosages over a long period (RECOVERY/SOLIDARITY), effectiveness improves with earlier usage and improved dosing. – Summary posted June, 2021.
It appears that a number of these experiments in the database were done to discredit HCQ rather that to verify that the HCQ cocktail worked as claimed.
Covid Vaccines are experimental and have safety issues.
Immunizations, or vaccines as they’re also known, safely and effectively use a small amount of a weakened or killed virus or bacteria or bits of lab-made protein that imitate the virus in order to prevent infection by that same virus or bacteria. When injected, your body’s immune response is triggered, causing it to either produce antibodies to that particular ailment or induce other processes that enhance immunity.
With the Covid vaccines, the safety is a prime concern. These vaccines were rushed into service, skipping the rigorous testing required for FDA approval. They are only authorized for emergency usage.
All of the COVID-19 mRNA injections (Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna) or vaccines (Johnson & Johnson and Astra Zeneca) have received only EAU authorization and not full FDA approval.
IF one uses the death rates produced by the CDC/NIH treatment guidelines, an emergency does exist for those over 70 years of age. However, the death rate using the HCQ cocktail eliminates the emergency. There is NO Rationale for an EAU vaccine. A safe covid treatment with no side effects exists with the cocktail.
There are MAJOR safety issues with the covid vaccines. There are more US deaths related to vaccines in 2021 (through mid June) in less than 5 months than there were the entire past decade. Approaching 6000 deaths were reported. Almost 20,000 hospitalizations. Many more urgent care and clinic visits. Some of the very serious side effects include Bells Palsey (1,737), Heart Attacks (2,190), Myocarditis/Pericarditis (1,087), Miscarriages (652) and Severe Allergic Reaction (15,052).
This covid vaccine safety record needs to be compared to the HCQ treatment. It is much worse.
It is also very curious why government agencies push for covid vaccinations for those who have already had the disease. There is NO need for a vaccine for Covid survivors, as they already have the antibodies the vaccine would generate.
In summary there are 3 Covid Treatment Options:
1) CDC/NIH Covid Treatment Guideline (most doctors). Thousands of reported deaths (not including the over-reporting of those that had covid but died from other causes, like George Floyd)
2) Covid Vaccine – Thousands of vaccine related deaths reported in VAERS. Tens of thousand reports of severe side effects.
3) Hydroxychloroquine Cocktail – No deaths when patients treated early with HCQ cocktail and no co-morbidities present in patient.
The HCQ Cocktail is by far the best treatment choice according to the data.
No government lockdowns or mask mandates were ever needed with this safe effective covid treatment. Constitutional Liberties were taken away from citizens for no reason. Except maybe some politicians love to control their subjects (citizens).