Optimizing PEEP
PEEP & CPAP are functionally the same, but PEEP is used during AC & SIMV where as CPAP is used for NIPPV & PSV
PEEP & CPAP assist LV function by increasing intra-thoracic pressure thereby reducing preload
they also decrease LV afterload somehow by increasing intrathoracic pressure thereby increasing the pleural pressure
PEEP should be used to correct hypoxemia in the setting of airspace consolidation or infiltration (i.e., when the CXR has white stuff)
The major complication of PEEP is overdistention of alveoli, leading to impairment either/or
venous return & hypotension
gas exchange by compressing pulmonary capillary beds (increases dead space)
these usually don't happen w/a PEEP < 10-12
All that said, the major cause of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is not PEEP but excessive tidal volumes leading to volutrauma
The different methods of titrating an optimal PEEP have been compared, and the findings demonstrate only the ARDSNet tables correlate w/the degree of whole-lung recruitability & ARDS severity
other methods were associated w/more hyperexpansion w/out a commensurate benefit in recruitment
For now, the prudent approach is to simply achieve a "good enough" PEEP
ARDSNet Tables
the ARDSNet tables are advantageous for simplicity & titratability to paO2 or SpO2
there are two tables, one with a higher and one w/a lower PEEP strategy
to use the tables
go up or down the table to maintain a paO2 55-80 or SpO2 88-94%
select whichever PEEP strategy appears best for your patient
the ALVEOLI study demonstrated no benefit of one table over the other, so pick a table according the clinical context
consider a lower PEEP strategy for
unstable hemodynamics
PTX
bronchopleural fistula
consider a higher PEEP strategy for
blunt chest trauma
abdominal wall trauma
obesity
Decremental PEEP Trial
A decremental PEEP trial recruits a patient's lungs fully at the lowest possible CPAP
it involves reducing PEEP until a reduction in oxygenation, compliance, or both is apparent
it can be useful for patients w/moderate-to-severe ARDS for finding an appropriate level of PEEP
disadvantages
time required to properly perform
need for deep sedation
possible hemodynamic or respiratory compromise during recruitment maneuver
clinical trials examining decremental PEEP demonstrate improved oxygenation & respiratory compliance but have not proven any survival benefit
a relatively large trial actually demonstrated an increase in 28-day mortality w/such a recruitment maneuver strategy
in other words, it may not be reasonable to perform a decremental PEEP trial on every ventilated patient
the trial is performed at bedside as follows
ensure adequate sedation (neuromuscular blockade not necessary)
set FiO2 to 100%
set CPAP to 40 w/no PS & hold 40 sec ("40 for 40" recruitment maneuver)
change to mode to VCAC (TV of 6 mL/kg PBW) or PCAC (driving pressure of 15)
set PEEP to 20
reduce FiO2 in 10-20% increments until SpO2 is 88-94%
reduce PEEP in increments of 2 until SpO2 < 88% or a notable drop in compliance (this is the level of de-recruitment)
repeat the 40 for 40 recruitment maneuver
set PEEP 2 higher than where de-recruitment occurred