Taught by: A/P Lo Mun Ho
Content (Structure/Organization): 5
The course is generally well-structured, and comprises both theoretical and more "applied" segments. In the theoretical segments - more frequently so in the first four weeks - Prof Lo guides us through readings about nostalgia as a general concept. For example, nostalgia was initially conceived as a more pathological term that referred to a literal medical condition of "homesickness," but over time, it has become more psychological.
In the "applied" segments, we analyse Singaporean works of art - broadly defined and ranges from short stories to films - and their use of nostalgia, using frameworks from the theoretical readings.
In terms of topics, while the course is definitely squarely focused on nostalgia, it also explores fascinating related concepts that one might not immediately associate with nostalgia. These concepts include conservatism and progressivism, postmodernism and historicity, and heritage.
Manageability of Workload: 3
The weekly reading load can be a little heavy. Typically, the readings would comprise either two theoretical readings, or a film, or a few smaller texts (e.g. several poems and a short story). At the same time, Prof also doesn't always cover all the content he had initially planned for a seminar, so he often carries it over to the next seminar, which means you don't always have to complete the assigned readings for that seminar.
In terms of assignments, the workload is rather spread out across the semester. There are two major papers - the first is 1000-1500 words and due in Week 6, while the second is 3000-4000 words due in Week 13. Aside from that, there are also two blog posts (300-500 words) and one short 5-min presentation. So I would say the workload is still manageable.
Ease/Difficulty of Attaining Grades:
Prof Lo has very specific requirements that he expects of you - although he will always clearly explain these, both verbally in class and in the assignment instructions (our Paper 1 instruction sheet was two full pages). This also means that he can be a strict instructor, although he is also very willing to give detailed feedback for improvement. Being proactive in asking Prof Lo for feedback about your ideas will thus be useful.
Learning Value/Recommendation: 4
I found the course rather useful, in terms of shaping and clearly expressing my own arguments, and interesting in terms of content covered - it was more than just "Singapore" and "nostalgia."
About the Instructor:
Prof Lo is very knowledgeable about the content and the texts covered. For example, he often cites further academic sources in his slides, beyond what is already in the readings, to further enhance our understanding of the material.
In terms of class management, Prof Lo is a good class facilitator who often asks questions to invite the class to participate in discussions. While some (not all) of his questions may come across as leading or have a certain answer in mind, it is part of his efforts to keep the class discussion structured, which I appreciate because it makes the discussion focused.
Beyond that, Prof Lo is also extremely clear in his communication. He is effective in breaking down concepts into simple terms and unpacking arguments in the readings - some might even find it slightly excessive - but I find that it helps ensure that everyone is on the same page.
Additional Comments:
I highly recommend this course!