Embedded Files
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION DOGMA
DR. SHERRI TENPENNY, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
A chilling, consistent pattern exists in the stories told by parents:
“My child was happy, healthy and normal. He was walking, learning to
talk and interacting with his siblings. He was normal in every way until
shortly after his one-year well-baby check up. When the doctor said it
was time for his next round of shots, I never questioned it, and all six
shots were given. Within hours, he started to change and within weeks,
he lost all his language and stopped making eye contact with all of us. He
was later diagnosed with autism.”
The reports vary slightly in content and timing, but the descriptions of tens of
thousands of children who suddenly regress into the isolated world of autism are
eerily the same.
What is dogma?
Webster’s defines dogma as “a doctrine; a positive arrogant assertion of opinion.”
Based on that definition, medical dogmas certainly abound. Many have existed
for decades simply because the claim was never disputed. Over time, the method
or assumption became part of medical jargon and medical practice, simply
presumed to be facts.
An early example of medical dogma within the vaccine industry occurred in 1913
when Dr. Simon Flexner held out that infantile paralysis, the official name for
polio, was caused by a virus that entered the body through the nose and traveled
directly to the brain and then the spinal cord, resulting in paralysis.1 Flexner’s
assertions, although widely believed, were never reproduced. Could have been a
faulty assumption because polio is a gastrointestinal virus, not a respiratory
virus?
Delays in developing a polio vaccine occurred because Flexner heavy-handedly
maintained his second doctrine: that poliovirus would only grow in neurological
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION DOGMA | 2
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION
DOGMA
DR. SHERRI TENPENNY, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
tissue, a culture media that caused life-threatening encephalitis when injected
into experimental animals. Believing this to be true, no one attempted to use
other types of tissue cultures to grow polioviruses. His lone, 1916 paper remained
unquestioned for 25 years until Dr. John Enders found, serendipitously, that the
virus would indeed grow in a variety of different animal tissues and it grew best
in African green monkey kidney cells. When Enders’ revolutionary discovery was
published in Science, January 28, 1949, the entire virology community
immediately accepted the new findings. A polio vaccine was produced within five
years. A scientific dogma, embraced as fact for decades, can vanish almost over
night when challenged by opposing, scientific fact.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM), a group of ostensibly impartial physicians,
scientists and researchers, promotes a present day dogma, that vaccines don’t
cause autism. After performing a meta-analysis of dozens of industry-funded
research papers concluding there is no connection between vaccines and autism,
the IOM similarly concluded there is no connection between vaccines and autism.
How could they come to any other conclusion?
The phrase, “temporal association does not prove causality” means that even
though two events occur in close proximity or even simultaneously, one event
does not cause the other.” An example would be dropping a glass in the bathroom
at the same time the doorbell rings. The shattered glass didn’t cause the bell to
chime. With vaccines and autism, the IOM supports the dogma promoted by the
American Academy of Pediatrics: Since autism occurs chronologically around the
same time as the first year vaccinations, devastated parents need something to
blame. But the vaccines are not the cause of autism.
While parents observed first hand the changes in their child soon after a
“harmless” vaccination, medical officials, public health officials and the
government deny it was the vaccine and instead, blame the defective child. The
following statement was published in the CDC’s publication on infection diseases,
referred to as The Pink Book:
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION DOGMA | 3
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION
DOGMA
DR. SHERRI TENPENNY, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
“There is no distinct syndrome from vaccine administration, and
therefore, many temporally associated adverse events probably
represent background illness rather than illness caused by the vaccine.
The [vaccine] may stimulate or precipitate inevitable symptoms of
underlying CNS disorder, such as seizures, infantile spasms, epilepsy or
SIDS. By chance alone, some of these cases will seem to be temporally
related to [the vaccine].” 2
The vaccine doesn’t cause harm. The child must have been defective if s/he
deteriorated after a shot. Current investigations are searching for genetic causes
for autism. The identification of corrupt genes will give additional ammunition to
public health officials and medical doctors who will then be quick to point an
incriminating finger at defective parents rather than to blame their hallowed
vaccines.
Safety assumptions
The classic example of unquestioned dogma was the long held notion that the sun
rotated around the earth. In 1530, Copernicus challenged the assumption by
demonstrating evidence that the earth rotated on its axis once daily and traveled
around the sun once yearly. A fantastic concept for the times, the new
information was considered heresy. Nearly 100 years later, when Galileo
supported Copernicus' conclusions, he was imprisoned, subjected to a trial by
Holy Inquisitioners. He was forced to withdraw his evidence to save his own life.
Interestingly, the Catholic Church did not reverse the sentence until October 13,
1992.
Similarly, parents are forced into vaccination decisions by modern day medical
inquisitioners. Threats include expulsion from the medical practice and calling
children’s protective services with accusations of medical neglect. Parents are
told vaccines are safe and necessary to keep children healthy. But are they really
safe? Do they really protect against an infection?
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION DOGMA | 4
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION
DOGMA
DR. SHERRI TENPENNY, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
Vaccination is a medical treatment, and, like dogmas, assumptions regarding the
effectiveness of a wide number of medical treatments abound. In fact, a report
published by The Government Accounting Office (GAO) as far back as 1978
concluded:
“Only 10 to 20 percent of all procedures currently used in medical
practice have ever been shown to be efficacious by controlled trials.”
In other words, up to 90 percent of accepted medical practices are assumed to be
safe and effective without any real proof. Vaccination falls generally into this
category.
Contrary to constantly repeated claims by the government, the medical and the
pharmaceutical industry, vaccines have never been proven to be safe by the gold
standard of medical research: A double-blind, placebo controlled investigation.
Webster’s Online Dictionary defines a placebo as “a harmless pill, medicine, or
procedure; a substance that has no therapeutic effect used as a control in testing
new drugs.” In a drug study, the safety of a medication is determined by
comparing it to the effects of a neutral placebo, such as a sugar pill. In a vaccine
study, the vaccine under investigation is not compared to an inert compound
such as an injection of saline water. Instead, the “placebo” is often another
vaccine, or, as in the case of Gardasil, (the vaccine against cervical cancer), the
placebo was an injection of aluminum. If the side effects caused by the
experimental vaccine are found to be similar to the type and number of reactions
caused by the placebo-vaccine, manufacturers declare the new vaccine to be “as
safe as placebo.”
Another trick used by investigators is to discount any part of a study’s data that
suggests a problem. The following excerpt from a clinical trial demonstrates how
a placebo-vaccine is used and how negative data was swept aside. The study was
designed to examine the safety of Comvax, a vaccine combining the Haemophilus
influenza vaccine (HiB) and the hepatitis B vaccine into a single injection.
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION DOGMA | 5
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION
DOGMA
DR. SHERRI TENPENNY, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
“During the study, 17 children (1.9 percent) had an event within 14 days
of vaccination that met one of the defining criteria of a serious adverse
experience. These experiences included seizure, asthma, diarrhea, apnea
(stopped breathing) [and others.] Virtually all of these adverse
experiences were classified as serious because they involved a
hospitalization. None was judged by the study investigators to be causally
related (caused by) Comvax or the placebo. In addition, three deaths
among participants in this study were attributed to sudden infant death
syndrome [SIDS]. The deaths occurred greater than 14 days after
administration of a dose of vaccine (on days 29, 31, and 38, respectively.)
Again, none [of the deaths] was judged by the investigators to be related
to vaccination.”
The HiB vaccine and the hepatitis b vaccine, given as two separate shots, was the
“placebo” used in the Comvax study. Even more alarming is how investigators
simply nullified the serious side effects – hospitalizations and SIDS (death)
- with a stroke of the pen. Comvax was declared to be “safe and well-tolerated.”
Understanding the True Meaning of Effective
The medical community and the general public assume an effective vaccine is one
that protects a person from contracting the infection they have been vaccinated
against. For example, the chickenpox vaccine is considered to be effective by
doctors if, in the case of an outbreak, those vaccinated do not contract
chickenpox.
However, that’s not exactly the same endpoint researchers use to define
“effective.” Researchers declare a vaccine to be effective when an antibody
develops as a result of the injection. The antibody response, called positive
seroconversion, means the vaccine did what it was supposed to do: It was
effective. But does the presence of an antibody equate to protection against an
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION DOGMA | 6
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION
DOGMA
DR. SHERRI TENPENNY, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
infection? That’s the whole reason to vaccinate…but does it hold up under
scrutiny?
Here’s what the CDC said about pertussis antibody:
“The findings of efficacy studies have not demonstrated a direct
correlation between antibody response and protection against pertussis
disease. However, antibody studies are [only] useful to compare immune
responses elicited by a single vaccine under different conditions or in
different studies. Thus, efficacy studies are required to measure clinical
protection conferred by each pertussis vaccine.” (pg 4)
Here’s what the package inserts say about antibody for H. influenza B:
“Antibody generated by HibTITER has been found to have high avidity, a
measure of the antibody to bind to antigen. High-avidity antibody is
more potent than low-avidity antibody in serum bactericidal assays. The
contribution to clinical protection is unknown.”
“Antibody titers to ACTHib of >1.0 mcg/mL following vaccination is
correlated with long-term protection against invasive disease in children
older than 24 months of age. Although the relevance of this lab value to
clinical protection is not known, this level continues to be indicative of
long-term protection.”
Here are links to several cases of full blown tetanus in patients who had been
fully vaccinated with tetanus vaccines….which means, if antibodies from a
tetanus vaccine don’t protect you from tetanus, do any antibodies from any
vaccines keep you from getting sick?
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION DOGMA | 7
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION
DOGMA
DR. SHERRI TENPENNY, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
Tetanus in an immunized patient (here)
Severe tetanus in three immunized patients with high antitetanus titers (here)
Clinical Tetanus Despite a 16x 'Protective' Level of Antibody
(here)
A Case of Clinical Tetanus in Patient with Protective Antibody
Level (here)
The esteemed medical journal, Vaccine, states clearly:
“It is known that, in many instances, antibody titers do not correlate
with protection.”
In fact, many outbreaks have occurred in fully vaccinated populations. In one
measles outbreak, a group of children were more than 99 percent vaccinated.
Outbreaks of chickenpox and mumps have occurred when children were fully
vaccinated.
If the reason to receive a vaccine is to invoke an antibody, and if antibodies do
not provide protection, should the entire philosophy behind vaccination – the
idea that vaccines keep you from getting sick – be revised, perhaps even
eliminated?
So, why vaccinate?
The mantra that vaccines are safe and effective has become a medical sacred cow,
an icon regarded to be above criticism or attack. Challenges to vaccination have
often been written off as conspiracy theories. Parents have learned through
difficult personal experience what can happen when they challenge their
pediatrician’s dogma regarding vaccination. Nonetheless, many are doing their
own research, trusting their instincts, and learning how to stay healthy and well
without the shots.
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION DOGMA | 8
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION
DOGMA
DR. SHERRI TENPENNY, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
A benchmark in a civilized society is the absence of infectious illnesses, a doctrine
that emerged during the pre-antibiotic era. Public health officials attribute low
infection rates to mass vaccination rather than giving credit to improved personal
hygiene and modern conveniences such as indoor plumbing, electricity,
refrigeration and clean water. In fact, Harvard University researchers, David
Cutler and Grant Miller, from Harvard University, state in their 2004 paper:
“Our results also suggest that clean water was responsible for 3/4 (74%)
of the decline in infant mortality and nearly 2/3 (62%) of the decline in
child mortality. The magnitude of these effects is striking. Clean water
also appears to have led to the near eradication of typhoid fever [and
other] scourges such as pneumonia, tuberculosis, meningitis,
diphtheria/croup. Clean water technologies are likely the most
important public health intervention of the 20th Century.”
We are often told that vaccination is the “most important public health measure
in modern times.” But it appears that it wasn’t mass vaccination after all that has
improved health and extended longevity after all.
It is time for the truth about vaccines to be widely known
Vaccine safety has not been proven.
Vaccines provide false security about protection.
Vaccines can cause serious health consequences, even death.
It is time to dispense with the “safe and effective” dogma before one more person
is harmed.
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION DOGMA | 9
CHALLENGING THE VACCINATION
DOGMA
DR. SHERRI TENPENNY, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
Additional footnotes:
1. Rogers, Naomi. Dirt and Disease, Polio before FDR. (New Brunswick: Rutgers
University Press, 1996), p. 24
2. CDC. Epidemiology and Prevention, The Pink Book, 6th Edition, Chapt 6:
Pertussis. pg 80
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
This content was first published as an article on NewsWithViews.com, July 17, 2007. It has been
edited, updated and expanded for this eBook. All present information, data and material contained,
presented or provided herein is provided for general information purposes only. It reflects the
compiled efforts and opinions of the author. It is not intended to be, nor is it construed to be, legal
advice or specific medical advice.
The information presented reflects the author’s opinions at the time of the presentation. Some
information will change over time, as new research, data and information become available.
Updates and possible corrections will be discussed and relayed through seminars, the website and
other forms of general communication. The author assumes no responsibility for updating
information that may modify any information presented herein.
The decision of whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue. The decision should
be made by the patient or by the parent(s) of a minor in consultation with a health care provider
and one’s own conscience. The decision to vaccinate or not to vaccinate is yours alone, and Dr.
Tenpenny is not responsible for any consequence of those decisions.
Dr. Tenpenny and/or Tenpenny Integrative Medical Center and/or Choonadi, LLC, or any related
Tenpenny Companies or partnerships are not responsible for the health care consequences of any
information or other information produced and distributed herein.
Copyright@ 2017 Dr. Sherri J. Tenpenny. All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or any other style, except for brief quotations embodied in
printed reviews, without the prior written permission of the author.
Aajonus Vonderplanitz was an American nutritionist and activist who was prominent yet controversial in the raw food movement. He is especially known for legal battles and legal workarounds for consumer access to raw milk, and for developing a diet based largely on raw meat, the Primal Diet HE DIED IN SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES! VIRUS TRUTH ~ 2009 RADIO INTERVIEW WITH Dr AAJONUS VONDERPLANITZ https://ia601401.us.archive.org/0/items/virus-truth-2009-radio-interview-with-dr-aajonus-vonderplanitz/VIRUS%20TRUTH%202009%20RADIO%20INTERVIEW%20WITH%20Dr%20AAJONUS%20VONDERPLANITZ.mp3
FYI: Three studies were released in 2020 comparing health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects.
THE THREE STUDIES ARE:
Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination, https://ia601504.us.archive.org/1/items/relative-incidence-of-office-visits-and-cumulative-rates-of-billed-diagnoses-alo/Relative%20Incidence%20of%20Office%20Visits%20and%20Cumulative%20Rates%20of%20Billed%20Diagnoses%20Along%20the%20Axis%20of%20Vaccination.pdf ,
Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children: Developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2050312120925344 and
STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF HEALTH OUTCOMES IN THE UNVACCINATED Full Report by the Control Group Litigation https://cdn.website-editor.net/fbd2f2a8b1b04bdba97a21e6e5d356aa/files/uploaded/Full%2520Report%2520Control%2520Group%2520November%252020%25202020.pdf
The last listed study demonstrates that vaccines are the cause of cancer, arthritis, heart disease, diabetes and asthma.
ALSO SEE: https://informedconsentdefense.org/ https://sites.google.com/site/lennysanchez/home/the-control-group-litigation-court-doc-links AND https://VaccinationGenocide.com )
Dave Hodges - War on the Unvaxxed
August 27, 2021
dees-fema.jpgI hate to be the bearer of so much bad news but we don't have
the luxury of hiding our heads in the sand. The level of complacency is
astounding given the danger we find ourselves in.
I would love to be 100% wrong. The situation is demoralizing but we
must affirm the human (Divine) spirit in the face of Organized Evil.
by Dave Hodges
(henrymakow.com)
One of my long-term sources and a colleague met with me in person. They permitted me to view and take notes about documents that are soon going to be codified into administrative law. There is nothing really surprising here. However, it is just shocking that the day of complete tyranny has finally arrived. Here is a partial report on what I have learned.
Homeland security cards indicating vaccine status are coming to America. Although it is not YET injected into your forehead or hand, it is a definitive move towards the Mark of the Beast.
I have learned from unnamed federal government sources (2) that the compliance rate will be 100%. These cards will be used for enforcement following areas:
Scanning the card to your phone to use in a public QR reader will ultimately be the way that vaccinated status is checked and it can double as contact tracing for covid or whatever the variant flavor of the week is.
Boarding an airplane.
Taking any kind of public transportation (mask included).
Buying groceries.
Entering any public or private store.
Going into federal, state and local office for any reason.
HR 1 and SB 1 will be amended to include the right to vote. There will be a grace period for illegals which will allow them to vote in 2022 and 2024.
All participants in day care- through post graduate education will be required to show their papers.
No driver's license will be issued or renewed without proof.
Eventually, public utilities will be made unavailable without your documentation.
No medical service will be available to any resister.
Emergency healthcare will be withheld without the documentation.
Compliance will be a prerequisite to obtaining or refilling prescriptions.
No marriage licenses will be granted unless both people are fully vaccinated.
No business license will be provided to unvaxxed people.
Homeschooling will soon be outlawed.
Third party acquisition of health supplements, prescriptions and groceries will be criminalized.
DUI-style roadblocks will be implemented. Each person in a car must be vaccinated, confirmed by a handheld device, or the owner's car will be impounded and sold at auction in order to cover the enforcement fees. Vaccines will be made available after scanning the passengers and driver. Following refusal, any unvaccinated person will be sent to an isolation camp along with the driver. (Note: These roadblocks were rehearsed in Colorado both on !-70 and I-25 through a joint training exercise with the Colorado State Patrol and DHS. This was during the H1N1 scare in 2009. In the drill men, women and children boarded different busses, presumably to go to different containment facilities).
State-run CPS' will be used to separate families based upon child endangerment statutes. Vaccine status will be the ultimate driver of an action to remove a child from a parent.
Possession of firearms will be equated with being a vaccine resister. Any personal possession, or transport, of firearms will be expressly forbidden. There was nothing in the document regarding outright gun confiscation, but everything else is forbidden.
There are 30 other items, but the reader can clearly see that the ability to buy, sell or trade is blocked. There will be no exemptions, medical or religious. Citizens can arbitrarily be stopped on the street and asked for their proof of taking the jab. Anyone caught in public without the proper permission will be sent for testing and positive tests result in being sent to an isolation camp. Their actions will legally considered to be one step below manslaughter and mandatory sentencing will be demanded for repeat offenders.
In other actions by the government, contained in another document I read, Americans can expect that its citizens will "donate" labor of the government's choosing. It will become part of a "public service requirement" that will be extracted from all citizens. Further, there will be no pay for said service. However, participants' families can apply for aid under the banner of universal basic income {UBI). This is very similar to what is in Obama's Executive Order 13603.
Further, "excessive" storage of critical resources (eg food, medicine) will be outlawed beyond, as of now, an unidentified level.
Home gardeners will be required to obtain a special permit.
When these information sources are transferred to a chip placed in the forehead and/or the hand, we can be certain that we have indeed entered the final days.
I was allowed to read the document and take notes. However, I was not allowed to record in any way. The source was NOT "Wrecker" our frequent TV guest.
This source also told me that it is likely that citizens will be forced to receive biannual vaccinations against variants and new viruses.
FDA "full authorization" of Pfizer covid
vaccine BROKE THE LAW in numerous
ways, agency now complicit in CRIMES
AGAINST HUMANITY
Lance D Johnson ⋮ 6-8 minutes ⋮ 8/26/2021
(Natural News) The vaccine industry’s stranglehold over the US
government has never been more blatant and unashamed. With the
8/27/2021 FDA "full authorization" of Pfizer covid vaccine BROKE THE LAW in numerous ways, agency now complicit in CRIMES AGAINST HUMA…
chrome-extension://ecabifbgmdmgdllomnfinbmaellmclnh/data/reader/index.html?id=83&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.naturalnews.com%2F2021-08-26-… 2/5
“full authorization” and licensure of Pfizer’s experimental series of
mRNA inoculations, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) just
subverted their own federal regulations and gold standards, while
ignoring the vast amount of injuries reported after inoculation.
The FDA is violating multiple principles of medical ethics and is
complicit in crimes against humanity after approving Pfizer and
BioNTech’s new drug, Comirnaty. For eight months, this so-called
vaccine has ravaged the health of the nation, with 3,033 cases of
myocarditis and pericarditis, of which 1,335 came directly from the
Pfizer shot. A shocking 8,396 blood clotting disorders were
reported, of which 3,586 reports were attributed to Pfizer.
This drug company is also responsible for 44 percent of the
126,905 reports of anaphylaxis and over 200 cases of GuillainBarré Syndrome. Pfizer is also responsible for 1,300 cases of Bell’s
palsy. Tens of thousands of people have been sent to the
emergency room because of these injections, with over 17,000
permanently disabled and over 13,000 pronounced dead after
taking the shots. This holocaust is happening in the young and old,
as the spike proteins congregate in vital organs and cause
inflammation in the cardiovascular system.
Pfizer and BioNTech are damaging human
immunity and inflicting widespread pain
and suffering, and the FDA is complicit
All this pain and suffering will continue, and human immunity to
coronaviruses will be permanently damaged because Pfizer’s
“vaccine” protocol wanes within six months. For the past eight
months, the FDA allowed an illegal emergency use authorization
(EUA) to facilitate this holocaust. This EUA is illegal if there is an
alternative treatment that is considered safe, effective and readily
available. Millions of people have recovered using early anti-viral,
immune-modulating treatments like ivermectin, budesonide,
8/27/2021 FDA "full authorization" of Pfizer covid vaccine BROKE THE LAW in numerous ways, agency now complicit in CRIMES AGAINST HUMA…
chrome-extension://ecabifbgmdmgdllomnfinbmaellmclnh/data/reader/index.html?id=83&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.naturalnews.com%2F2021-08-26-… 3/5
hydroxychloroquine, zinc, vitamin D, etc., but the science has been
suppressed. For 18 months, the FDA has refused to evaluate
treatments that worked in the US and abroad, paving the way for
destructive and illegally-authorized injections that have only added
to the pain and suffering in the medical system.
Furthermore, the FDA is in violation of black letter law which
requires a full hearing and disclosure of all data from the full set of
clinical trials. These trials won’t be completed until early 2022, and
a full evaluation on myocarditis and pericarditis won’t be completed
until 2026. Under black letter law, all remaining EUAs for the
Johnson & Johnson and Moderna vaccines are expired. Healthcare
practitioners cannot administer these injections now that Pfizer has
been fully approved, but millions of doses are set to be used
anyway, in violation of federal regulations. (Related: FDA ethically
obligated to pull covid injections off the market, or risk becoming
complicit in crimes against humanity.)
FDA commits multiple crimes with an
illegal authorization of a deadly medical
experiment
First, the FDA approved the vaccine for SARS-CoV-2, even though
no scientist has isolated this causative agent from a human being
or proved its replication in a human cell line. Healthcare
professionals have been coerced and pressured to administer
these new mRNA instructions into people to reproduce lab
engineered spike proteins that have never been clinically proven to
be the actual causative agent for the illnesses that are represented
by the flagship term ‘Covid-19’. It is shocking that the FDA would
not require Pfizer to provide proof of this scientific process, to
determine if the starting points and endpoints are true or fraudulent
across their entire study design.
8/27/2021 FDA "full authorization" of Pfizer covid vaccine BROKE THE LAW in numerous ways, agency now complicit in CRIMES AGAINST HUMA…
chrome-extension://ecabifbgmdmgdllomnfinbmaellmclnh/data/reader/index.html?id=83&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.naturalnews.com%2F2021-08-26-… 4/5
Critical data to support the approval is also missing, including
animal testing and a true placebo. Under black label laws, this
information is required to be in the package insert, but it is not
there. The four phases of clinical research were supposed to come
after pre-clinical animal studies. This was violated, as the FDA
lumped all participants into phase 1, 2 and 3 trials. Pfizer committed
further acts of science fraud by vaccinating the placebo group from
the clinical trials, deleting the control group and forever obscuring
the data.
Moreover, the package insert for this product does not contain any
details about the product’s pharmacokinetics, how the drug
behaves, where it goes, how the body eliminates it, and all the
safety data to support its use. The vaccine is intended for
intramuscular injection, but it is often delivered subcutaneously by
untrained medical professionals, and there is evidence the spike
proteins are traveling past the deltoid muscles, into the
bloodstream. The majority of tables that are included in the
package insert obfuscate the data on the serious adverse events
and downplay the damage the vaccines have caused. The side
effect profile after the second dose is ten times the rate of the first
injection, warranting the product’s withdrawal, not its full approval.
Individuals with a prior history of cardiovascular disease, blood
clots, autoimmune issues, seizures, organ damage, eye disorders,
hematologic damage, skin reactions or neurological issues won’t be
given adequate informed consent because the package insert omits
these contraindications on purpose.
The package insert reveals that there is no safety reassurance for
pregnant women because all available data is “insufficient to inform
vaccine associated risks in pregnancy.” The FDA also says that
they do not know if the spike proteins produced by the vaccine can
be produced in breast milk, harming a newborn. The lipid nanoparticles used to deliver the messenger RNA consist of Distearoylsn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, which is only approved for research
8/27/2021 FDA "full authorization" of Pfizer covid vaccine BROKE THE LAW in numerous ways, agency now complicit in CRIMES AGAINST HUMA…
chrome-extension://ecabifbgmdmgdllomnfinbmaellmclnh/data/reader/index.html?id=83&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.naturalnews.com%2F2021-08-26-… 5/5
purposes and is not for human or veterinary use. This ingredient is
known to irritate mucous membranes and the upper respiratory
tract.
The FDA has not disclosed any legal obligations for the vaccine
companies either, as more vaccine injuries are certain to occur.
This means Pfizer and BioNTech are indemnified under the EUA
and are currently working on a deal to exempt themselves from
legal liability under the Comirnaty label.
Watch Dr. Jane Ruby break down the FDA’s illeg
Hi guys,
I’m new here !
I don’t know if i have to introduce myself more in another thread but i will try to post my comment anyway.
Given the fact that i’m french, i apologise in advance for my mild english..
I wish to discuss now because a comment made me react.
‘Jared Magnuson’ tried to guess the motive behind this pandemic event.
So i will add my point of view on this subject :
I think, what is targeted here, is and must be especially children(not only of course) !
See for instance that the new born don’t escape the older vaccination protocol and that now they are targeting the children at the next school start.
The phoenician navy want to find a subtle way to maintain their lineage in power(through their children) without resorting too much on violence and the vaccination protocol is an ideal tool for that.
How do they do that, you may ask ?
By striking the innate potential for creativity, autonomy of the children, so that their child could get an innate(seemingly legal) advantage in school and in all the others aspect of life.
The recurring pattern of poisoning children with vaccine is a way to achieve that by inducing a disconnect between the psyche and the body which result in Autism as a mid-term objective.
The progressive trend of Autism beginning in the 40s(World War2) should tell you that this is exactly what they are seeking.
Here : https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html
It is not beginning from the 40s but it can give you a kind of idea as to how the trend progress.
An autistic child is highly dependant on a lot of commodities and the budget to take care of them is quite the amount.
In here : https://www.liberation.fr/societe/2014/10/09/le-budget-du-plan-autisme-maintenu_1118054/
The french president ‘Francois Hollande’ asked fot their 3rd ‘plan autism’ [205 Million of euros] and 3400 of place available for autistic child.(The article was published in 2014)
Another published study at PubMed says : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25191755/
‘For each additional symptom reported, approximately [$1,400] cost for the family per annum was added.’
Again another article that speak about the estimated annual national cost required in Australia for this matter : https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0106552
I quote : ‘A diagnosis of an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) results in an estimated annual national cost to Australia of [$4.5–7.2 billion] [1] that is borne by the individuals themselves, their families, their community, and by government.’
There are also special store for autism that sell specific product such as sensory tools and toys.
Here : https://www.autismcommunitystore.com/
Well there is a lot of potential profit that can be made on this.
Now, imagine, the parents of the autistic child die because of the vaccine or are highly injured, i may ask you all, what would happened to the autistic child if that was the case(?)
I think the answer is obvious, they will get kind of isolated(it depends) and dependant to the government
Since my comment is quite long, i will explain how and why(in another comment) i think vaccines are made to induce a disconnect between the psyche and the body in mid-term(5-10 years).
The COVID Shot: No Turning Back
The COVID Shot: No Turning Back
Episode Transcript
Episode Transcript
Within the below transcript the bolded text is Hilda Labrada Gore and the regular text is Dr. Larry Palevsky.
We have been told repeatedly that the COVID-19 injections are safe and effective but there is more to this story than we’ve been told. Our guest is Dr. Larry Palevsky. He is an NYS Licensed Pediatrician who utilizes a holistic approach to children’s wellness and illness. Dr. Palevsky is a Diplomat of the American Board of Integrative Holistic Medicine and the past President of the American Holistic Medical Association. Larry challenges what we’ve heard and what we think we know related to the COVID-19 shots. He covers a lot of ground starting with his concerns about the mRNA, the messenger RNA technology. He discusses the problem with instructing the body to fight spike proteins and the damage lipid nanoparticles can do to the body. He talks about the alarming number of deaths associated with these injections documented by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. He explains in no uncertain terms how the injections are DNA-altering gene therapy, which could be leading us down a road from which there is no return. Before we get into the conversation, I want to give a shout-out to our sponsors.
—
Thank you to our sponsor, Earth Runners at EarthRunners.com and use the code WISETRADITIONS for 10% off at checkout.
—
Welcome to the show, Larry.
Thank you, Hilda. It’s a pleasure to be here.
I’ve heard you say that you’re not even sure the COVID-19 vaccine is a vaccine. Can you explain that a little bit?
When we were taught in medical school what makes an injection of vaccine, I went down those specific criteria to associate it with the COVID-19 injection. What I found was that this COVID-19 injection doesn’t fit any of the criteria of what makes an injection a vaccine. We were told as medical students and residents that an injection becomes a vaccine if it gives you antibody immunity to a specific virus or to a specific single bacterium. We are told that it’s a vaccine if you are protected from getting that virus or bacterial infection when you get this injection. We are told that an injection becomes a vaccine if it reduces death from that virus or bacteria, reduces hospitalizations and reduces severe symptoms of you getting that bacterial or viral infection. We’re told an injection is a vaccine if you are not going to carry the germ anymore whether it’s a bacteria or a virus and we’re told that you’re not going to transmit it to others and that those five criteria will make an injection of vaccine.
When the injection came out, this is what the authorities said, “We don’t know if this injection will give you immunity to SARS-CoV-2 virus and infection.” That makes the first criteria not work. “We don’t know if it will protect you from getting a SARS-CoV-2 viral infection.” That’s the second criteria that don’t fit. “We never tested whether or not this injection will reduce deaths, hospitalizations or severe illness and it may decrease your symptoms from SARS-CoV-2 viral infection.” They weren’t sure but they said may. They said that “We don’t know if it will stop the transmission of the virus from one person to the next.” It didn’t fit any other criteria that make an injection a vaccine.
Some people would say, “It’s just because it was fast-tracked.” They have to call it a vaccine because the public understands what a vaccine is. If they called it an injection, people wouldn’t want it.
You look at the ingredients themselves. Messenger RNA technology and the Pfizer and the Moderna injections have never been used in vaccines before to demonstrate the reduction of an infectious disease outbreak. We have no history that this technology works to reduce infectious diseases. There’s no precedence at all. There’s no understanding of what happens to this technology once it’s injected into the body short-term or long-term. We have no safety data on what it does once it’s injected. They’re using ingredients that are known toxins that can cause major damage to the health of the body and that were not tested for safety or for biological mechanisms in these injections.
I have two questions for you. One, how was this technology used before if not for injections? Number two, what are the ingredients that are so toxic that you’re talking about?
Messenger RNA technology was attempted before with Coronavirus vaccines and it failed in animal studies because when the animals got the injection, they were fine then when they were exposed to the live Coronavirus itself, they all died. The Messenger RNA technology was also used to try to make an RSV vaccine, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and that failed. It was also attempted to be used for a dengue fever vaccine and that failed. The technology itself has never been proven to work to reduce infectious diseases. Animal studies indicate that there’s a downside to using this technology. The other thing is that there are ingredients called polyethylene glycol and something called a lipid nanoparticle which is a vague description. What I did was I looked up in the literature what a lipid nanoparticle is. It is a fatty particle that’s small. Lipid, fat, nanoparticle, small. The features of lipid nanoparticles are that they can travel anywhere in the body through any barrier, that’s their ability.
COVID Shot: Experts are using known toxins in vaccines that can cause major damage to the body and were not tested for safety or biological mechanisms.
I opened up the literature and it says, “Lipid nanoparticles have been shown to cause damage to the following tissues, male and female reproductive systems, brain, lung, liver, kidney and heart.” There’s no safety profile of using this lipid nanoparticle in this injection in humans. After a while, more information came out about this lipid nanoparticle that some people were saying is something called SM-102 which is a chemical that has never been tested for safety, is known to be toxic and can cause cancer and infertility as two of the criteria. How do people thinking that this injection is safe even if you don’t know SM-102? It’s a lipid nanoparticle. The literature is ripe with information about the dangers of bodily exposure to it.
The general public hasn’t taken the time to explore the research to find out more about these lipid nanoparticles. It’s a miracle if they know anything about what is being injected into their arm. What they see on the screens are incentives like free beer, free childcare and lottery entries if you happen to get the shot. This is valuable information there. How did you dive into it? What made you want to do that?
When people hear the authorities say “safe and effective” and they’re living in a panic and a fear that there’s a deadly virus going around and they hear that they will now have the chance to go back to the life that they thought they were living in with such pride and glory, they’re not going to want to know that their authority isn’t doing the right thing by them. They’re just going to trust and falsely idolize and worship the authority to whom they attribute such great altruism and to whom they don’t accept the possibility that they will do anything to harm them. I went to medical school, I graduated in 1987 from NYU School of Medicine. I did a three-year pediatric residency at Mount Sinai in New York and another year of fellowship at NYU School of Medicine Bellevue Hospital in the Outpatient Department.
In those eight years, there was something that was drilled into my head which was think. If somebody shows you a study, tear it apart, look at it, examine it and don’t be afraid to find fault in it. There are times when the evidence is manipulated because of a bias or prejudice. Don’t be afraid to work it through because you may come up with an answer that you don’t like and doesn’t fit the narrative. Back in 1998, a mother came up to me and said, “Dr. Larry, did you know there’s mercury in vaccines?” This is fifteen years after starting medical school. All I said was no. What it said to me was, “Something I didn’t know.” Number one, why didn’t I know it? Number two, why is mercury in there? Number three, what is mercury doing? Number four, what else is under this rock? What else do I need to know that I don’t know? That’s how I was taught as a medical student resident. I was taught to work through a problem, think through, figure out what you don’t know, examine it, test it, ask questions and come to some conclusion. What I quickly found back in the late ‘90s and throughout the years is don’t ask questions.
The opposite of what you have been told early on or trained to do.
I’m vilified for using the skills that I was taught by my mentors to critically think through a problem and come to a conclusion that may or may not be positive or pleasant but at least you’re answering questions. You’re looking through things. I’ve been getting the finger-wag for the better part of twenty years. When this came up, I thought, “Why not apply the same principles?” I also realized that the spike protein was the material in the injection that was supposed to be part of the virus. Only to find that the spike protein is not part of the virus, that it’s a manmade bioweapon and is not specific to any virus. It’s similar to many tissues in your body. If you’re going to make an antibody against spike protein, you’re going to start attacking your own body. I kept going. I was like, “There’s more here.”
This is the conversation we want to have on this show where we’re helping people think, evaluate and ask questions. I have heard about the spike protein but I have understood it quite differently. I’ve understood it as part of the virus that they were injecting into people, like the way vaccines are supposed to work that the body recognizes it and fights it. You’re saying that the spike protein is something that’s a part of many cells in our body. If indeed our body’s going to mount an attack or a defense against that, we could be in big trouble.
Essentially what they were saying was that the spike protein is the part of the virus that enters the cell and that it’s the spike protein itself in the COVID-19 illness that causes the disease. They found that the spike protein crosses the blood-brain barrier, enters the brain and causes neurological damage. It attaches to the heart muscle and causes heart disease. It gets into the lungs and causes lung disease. It gets into the blood and causes clotting and hypoxia. It gets into the liver and causes liver damage. It gets into the male and female reproductive systems and causes those symptoms that we see in the male and female reproductive systems. The spike protein they’re saying is the part of the virus that causes the disease state of COVID-19. Why would you take an injection that causes your body to manufacture spike protein? That’s what the mRNA technology is meant to do. It’s meant to take the genetic instructions of the spike protein and tell your body, “Make spike protein.”
I do want to know why. In other words, is this a big mistake or an intentional thing? You called these spike proteins a bioweapon. You’re seeing it more as the ladder, it’s something intentional.
Nowhere in virology or microbiology does the spike protein exist naturally in nature. It only existed in SARS-CoV-1, MERS and SARS-CoV-2. The Salk Institute did a study that showed that the spike protein alone without Coronavirus attached to it gave you the symptoms of COVID-19. You didn’t need a Coronavirus to make you sick, you just needed the spike protein which then makes you question, “This is not a virus if you don’t need a Coronavirus.” They used a pseudovirus to present the spike protein itself to human tissue and saw that it caused the same damage done to the body as if people were getting natural COVID-19 symptoms.
With the knowledge that you have, why did the doctors, the World Health Organization and others promote this vaccine or technology that is dangerous to our health?
I can’t get into their heads. The answers should come from the whole issue of the EUA which is the Emergency Use Authorization. It was passed so that they could get this injection into the public without FDA approval. What the EUA says is that if there is no successful medical treatment, intervention or prevention that could either treat or prevent COVID-19, they can put in an experimental injection in the hopes that it would prevent the illness or potentially treat it. When COVID-19 happened around the world, you had doctors screaming, “I gave my patients hydroxychloroquine, zinc, ivermectin, vitamin C, vitamin D, glutathione, iodine, hyperbaric oxygen and ozone therapy.” The list went on. The medical community said, “Shut up. Don’t talk about it.” The thing is that Dr. Fauci himself published a study in 2005 indicating that hydroxychloroquine was an effective treatment against SARS-CoV-1.
Somebody once asked me, “How did people know to look for hydroxychloroquine?” They knew because Fauci published a study. When you saw the censorship of medical doctors around the world who also said that putting patients on ventilators was a mistake, you knew that there was a different agenda. The only way to push through an injection like this is if you could show that there were no effective treatments or preventions against SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 illness. When you started to see that all this information was oppressed, the doctors were censored and that the literature indicating their success was wiped out, you knew that this was not about protecting people against infection. This was against mandating an intervention that when you uncovered the rock, you realize that all the literature about mRNA technology and even the EUA requests from the manufacturers are that this was a gene therapy and a transgene insertion. In other words, we’re going to alter your human DNA permanently with this messenger RNA technology.
People are not aware that if you open up the textbooks and the actual material that’s published by the manufacturers whether it’s in the patents or in their EUA requests, it doesn’t say that it’s a vaccine. It says that it’s gene therapy and transgene insertion. “We’re putting in genes to alter your chromosomes.” You hear the experts say, “It’s not going to alter your human DNA.” Where’s the study that shows that? There’s no science but there is precedence to show in the literature that this mRNA technology is used to alter your own genes.
COVID Shot: Nowhere in virology or microbiology does the spike protein exist naturally in nature.
You’ve given us enough information to realize that we should at least pause before proceeding to get this injection. Yet there is so much pressure all around us, even pressure that we should do it for other people. What’s the logic behind that?
There’s a longstanding belief, I say belief because it’s not a fact, that when enough people are vaccinated against a disease, that germ that causes the disease is no longer able to circulate in society. Therefore, you will see a reduction of the disease from that germ but that’s a hypothesis and a theory. No one has ever studied that if you give enough people the measles vaccine, for example, that the measles virus is going to suddenly no longer be in existence to circulate in society. This is why we say, “You got to give the COVID-19 injection to everybody to take care of everyone else,” who may be can’t because there’s that underlying belief that when you give injections that you categorize as a vaccine, you are stopping the circulation of the organism in society. I will say this very confidently, that has never been proven to be true that the germ that you vaccinate against if you vaccinate enough percentages of people that that germ suddenly no longer circulates in society. That is false 100%.
Because we use it as a narrative and we suck on it like it’s mother’s milk, it’s not true but we don’t think it through. I once asked the pediatrician, “What happens to the measles virus when we give the injection?” The pediatrician is like, “What do you mean? It stops the spread.” I said, “How does the measles vaccine make the measles virus disappear from the body of people who get the vaccine?” She said, “I don’t understand.” I said, “You’re putting the live measles virus into the body when you give the vaccine. How do you stop the spread of that from person to person and make it no longer circulate if you’re putting the live measles virus into the body?” She said to me, “Let’s talk about something else.”
—
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse