SHANKARA CHETTY

www.covidtruths.co.uk /2022/03/grand-jury-day-3-the-fraudulent-drosden-pcr-test/

Grand Jury Day 3 - The Fraudulent Drosden PCR Test - Covid Truths

3/5/2022

Reiner Fuellmich 3:44:19

Thank you very much. Now for the good news. There is good news in this. Dr. Shankara Chetty will tell us about this because as we have learned, this is an illusion. We’re not dealing with a corona pandemic, but we’re dealing with a PCR test pandemic. And there are ways of treating this virus, which as the numbers tell us is no more dangerous than the common flu. Dr. Chetty, what good news can you tell us?

Dr Shankara Chetty 3:44:52

Thank you, Reiner, and thank you to all my colleagues on this platform. This has been a two year heartwrenching journey, and I think that we’re doing very important work.

I think that an understanding of what I’ve been through in this two years will bring understanding to what the people before me had presented, and understanding to what actually has transpired. And so I think just a narration of my journey and my understanding of this pandemic, can lend a lot to what we are trying to achieve. So for a start, I’d like to start with what transpired before COVID came to South Africa in the first place. I have a background in genetics, in advanced biology, in microbiology, and in biochemistry, besides my general practitioner medical work, and so I’m a very suspicious doctor, I investigate everything. And I make sure that I fall back on the knowledge I’ve gained in those years of tertiary education, and don’t really believe things too easily. So before this pandemic came to South Africa, we were told that there was a virus in Wuhan, and it had spread from person to person. It was a respiratory virus seemed to be highly infectious. And of course, with the new virus, we had no understanding of how it killed, how it caused severe illness and death. But we were told it’s highly contagious, and it could be the start of a new pandemic. The first thing that I found very strange was that the Chinese cordoned off Wuhan and the virus never spread to any other city in their country. Yet their international borders were left open and it’s spread around the globe.

So that was the first thing I found very suspicious, we are dealing with a highly contagious virus, why wasn’t it completely contained? And of course, we weren’t getting very much information from China, which is well what I expected. Now, as a doctor I needed to plan when this virus got to my country, I needed to be ready for it. The first thing I noticed that was problematic was this PCR test. Now they had developed a PCR test to test for the virus itself. Now with my scientific background, I’m well aware that a PCR test is never used as a diagnostic tool. And so I wondered why this became a norm. As well, we started getting reports of asymptomatic spread, never before heard in medical science. So there were these unusual things coming out. And of course, a PCR test has absolutely no bearing on infectiousness, as the previous people that submitted have alluded to, a PCR test just tests fragments of a virus, it does not test for an infectious complete agent, and it does not tell whether someone is actually infected, or infectious. The only thing that tells you that a virus exists is a culture, a cell culture of the virus that proves that the virus can grow, replicate and spread. So I looked at this PCR test with a little bit of suspicion. And then this PCR test was being used to gauge or to determine public health measures. And the public health measures were sanitation. And of course, we were getting reports that this virus was living on surfaces for five days and 10 days and 15 days on different kinds of materials and that made no sense at all. Viruses do not live that period of time, they require a host to replicate and spread. And there is no there is absolutely no scientific evidence of viruses living on any surfaces for that length of time. So I started to view this kind of information with a lot of suspicion. Of course masking came in too and was controversial as well. As a doctor, I know that the masking has a limitation, and the science of it tells you that the mask will never prevent you from getting a respiratory virus. It’s like putting a fence around your house and thinking you protected from mosquitoes. The science doesn’t add up. So I started looking at all this evidence. And then of course, they looked at isolation measures. And they wanted people to be isolated for 14 days. So I looked at that and I thought well, you want people to be isolated for 14 days, but you haven’t really established how long the viral illness actually persists for. It’s an arbitrary measure 14 days. So well, I needed to understand why that came to be 14 days of all that we could choose. So I had these concerns.

As well with my history in genetics, I was aware of the gain of function research being done at the time. I was aware of virology and of course, genetic warfare, manipulation of viruses. I was aware of the research being done in the Wuhan lab with coronaviruses and around spike protein well before COVID actually came to be. So I had this background knowledge that we’re dealing with the Coronavirus, and it seems very strange and suspicious that now we have a pandemic, following research, ongoing research into coronaviruses. So I had a healthy suspicion that this was a lab leak. And of course, taking that a little further, it might have been an engineered virus. So this was something that I had at the back of my mind from the start of this pandemic. And, of course, the unusual things, the PCR test, the asymptomatic spread, the sanitation measures, lockdowns, isolation, all that kind of thing have made no scientific sense to me. Now, I was faced with a population that were terrified, because they were told not to seek medical attention. They were told to stay away from the doctor. And we, as doctors were told not to treat, there’s no treatment for this, and we should just do telemedicine. And if a patient deteriorated, refer them to [a] hospital. I’m not the kind of person to capitulate that easily. So with the knowledge that I had I decided that I’m going to take this on. We needed information about this illness, and without that information about the pathology of this illness we will never solve the problem. Now I knew once the virus got to Italy, that I would get some information about its symptoms. And the things that came out that were unusual, that would allow me to diagnose this without having to use a PCR test, because as doctors we should diagnose illnesses symptomatically. And so the symptoms that are unique to any illness will give you an indication that you’re dealing with that kind of illness. And the symptoms that I found unusual were the loss of smell and taste, which doesn’t routinely occur with respiratory viruses. And of course, the breathlessness that people were presenting with. And this breathlessness was a very sudden onset [and] required ventilation very quickly, so the dyspnea and the loss of smell and taste became my diagnostic tool to confirm whether a patient actually had a coronavirus infection, or not. And I watched. I needed to get myself a toolbox in preparation for this.

So when I looked at this, we are dealing with a respiratory virus, the first drug that came to mind was Hydroxychloroquine. Hydroxychloroquine or Plasmoquine is well known. It’s been used for decades, and it has broad antiviral effect. So if I had to look at something that will curtail the spread of a virus, I would look at that as my mainstay treatment. Now, Hydroxychloroquine has been used for many other illnesses like the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the wrist, so I knew that I’m dealing with a very safe drug that I could ethically give to my patients and assess its efficacy. So I decided on getting stock of Hydroxychloroquine. But very quickly, I noticed that I think it was the Lancet that published an article about the toxicity of Hydroxychloroquine and it’s heart failure cardiac manifestations, and I thought this is nonsense. I’ve been treating patients with Hydroxychloroquine for many years, and in higher doses in some, and I’ve never had a side effect with it. So I’m a doctor that tends to use medication from Noah’s Ark, because I trust the long term efficacy and safety of those medications. So I bought up as much stock of Hydroxychloroquine as I could, and subsequently two days after I did that, the government chair in South Africa pulled it from the shelves. So luckily, I had stock of it and I had prepared for my patients.

Patients came to see me very, very distraught that [I] might close and I might not be available to them, but I reassured all of them that I would brave this out. And I would make sure that I examined every one of them. And I needed to understand what we [are] actually dealing with. So when the first case of coronavirus was reported in South Africa, I decided that I will fall back on my education. I moved out of my home into isolation to protect my family, my home and my practice are on the same premises. I pitched a tent, a proper clinic tent outside my practice in the parking lot because I trust ventilation and sunlight as the best ways to protect myself from this virus. I knew that if I sanitise my hands and kept my hands away from my face, I’d be reasonably well protected, and then I could see every patient. And that was my initial plan for the pandemic.

But with the controversy around Hydroxychloroquine with the PCR test being used as a diagnosis tool with the word that this is symptomatic spread, I had a very healthy suspicion for what I was being told. And the so called experts didn’t seem to question this. There was no proof of all this, yet we have the government experts punting this narrative. So I started to see patients. From the first patient that walked into my practice, I made sure I examined the two things that I wanted to understand, was one, the symptomatology, and of course every patient that came in with a sudden loss of smell and taste, which is unusual, I suspected had a coronavirus infection. So I didn’t want to do this PCR test. I didn’t want to rely on this PCR test. I knew it was going to skew the numbers from the start, and I could see the worldwide pandemonium and fear that was being created. So when patients came to see me, I started to examine symptoms and those that had loss of smell and taste I assumed were coronavirus positive. I took the opportunity to test a few and only those that had loss of smell and taste, and I found them to be positive. So I had confirmed that a loss of smell and taste was a symptom of coronavirus infection. And so I didn’t feel the need to test every patient. If a family member had loss of smell and taste, and I tested him and he was positive and the rest of the family started any illness at around the same time and presented with the same kind of symptoms, I could safely assume that they had picked up the same infection and would treat them in very much the same way.

Now as a doctor, we are expected to come to a diagnosis with examining our patient. I was never taught to use testing as a diagnostic tool. Testing is only used if I have some confusion in my clinical diagnosis. And it is used to clarify, it is never used as a diagnostic tool. So I do not test patients to tell me what’s wrong with them. That’s bad medical practice. We don’t go through years of training in clinical practice to use a swab to tell me what’s wrong with the patient. So I started to see all these patients with COVID infections. The second thing that I was very interested in was the breathlessness. This was the thing that was causing people to die. But the first few patients that came in to see me had a common flu, a respiratory infection that looks like every other respiratory infection I’d seen. They had the body aches and pains and the fever and a bit of a sore throat and of course the loss of smell and taste as the unusual symptoms that drew my attention to it being a coronavirus infection. And so I advised every patient that came in to see me that if they had developed breathlessness in any way or form, I would like them to report back to me immediately, because I needed to understand exactly where this breathlessness came from, and exactly why patients were ending up in hospital. Yes, we knew in hospital that patients were breathless, the oxygen saturations were decreasing, they were being put onto ventilators. And from the information from Italy, we knew that the progression of this breathlessness could be very variable. Some patients had mild breathlessness that didn’t progress and seemed to resolve. Some patients had breathlessness that was a little more severe and lasted a very long time. And then of course there were those that developed breathlessness very suddenly, progressed very quickly, and within a day or two ended up on a ventilator.

And so I noticed that there’s a strange change or difference in the speed of the progression of this breathlessness which I needed to understand, and of course understand how we got to that point in the first place. So within the first I’d say 20 patients that I’d seen, I got the first breathless patient come in, and of course by educating my patients, explaining to them the gravity of what we were seeing, and of course there was enough fear mongering in the world to make sure they presented back to me timelessly, every patient that became breathless came back to me exactly on the day they noticed something’s wrong. And I found a few things very strange in this small subset of patients that came back to me breathless. Remember, majority of patients recovered uneventfully like a normal respiratory infection. They had very few chest symptoms. Most was just a sore throat that resolved in two or three days then they had absolutely no the (inaudible). So when this happened, and patients came back to me breathless, I needed to examine them and understand

PART 2

Dr Shankara Chetty

exactly what was happening. Now I noticed a few very strange things. Quite a few of these patients that presented back to me, were perfectly fine the day before the breathlessness started. They have thought that they had completely recovered from the illness. There were patients that had a sore throat for a day, recovered from that sore throat, spent the rest of the week perfectly fine, engaged in sporting activities, and then developed breathlessness suddenly. So this breathlessness was a very sudden onset, and it seemed to always occur exactly one week after the first symptom. So when a patient came to me on a Monday, I questioned them, and if the sore throat started on that Monday, I documented that as the onset of symptoms. Now, we know that with viral infections, there are some viruses that run a very distinct course. They replicate for a certain number of days, your immunity kicks in, and then you eliminate that virus. So like chickenpox, and measles and those kinds of viruses, they run a specific course, they last for a specific period of time. So when patients came back, and I noticed it was always on the 8th day, exactly one week after the onset of symptoms, I thought, well I’m dealing with a virus that has this timeframe to it. It exactly eight days later starts to do something else. There’s a new symptom presenting here, and it’s not in every patient. It’s in a very small subset of patients.

Dr Shankara Chetty

And of course, I was seeing what I was told was happening in Italy. Some patients presented to me with a mild onset breathlessness on the eighth day, and some more moderate and some very severe. Now part of my toolbox was Hydroxychloroquine, and I reserved it for those patients in that first days that had what I thought was the higher viral load. So those that had severe body aches and pains and high fevers I would give Hydroxychloroquine to, and I saw within a day or two that I’ve managed to break their fever and get them on the way to recovery. Now, every single patient that I have seen in that first phase showed signs of recovery by about the fifth or sixth day. Some within a day or two. But a majority, by the fifth or sixth day had signs of improvement, had their appetite back, were feeling a lot better. But that did not in any way influence what might transpire on that eighth day. So when I noticed this nuance that people were coming back on this vital eighth day with new symptoms, I started to educate my community about this strange nuance I was seeing. So every patient that came to see me got interrogated. I interrogated very carefully the day they noticed that they were feeling unwell. I used that day to predict when their eighth day would be and I would warn them of any new symptoms developing on that eighth day, so that they would come back to me timely.

Dr Shankara Chetty

The second thing I did was, I knew from Italy that we’re dealing with a steroid response appearance. And as a doctor, we know that we shouldn’t be using steroids in an infection, it must be used very cautiously, it will suppress your immunity and prevent you developing a robust immune response to an infection. And if you suppress immunity, you run the risk of allowing that infection to run rampant unchecked. So I needed to choose a specific point in this illness where steroids would become pertinent to apply. And of course, with the eighth day, that was very obvious that a deterioration occurred on that eighth day, and that would be the point where a steroid would become appropriate. And of course, with patient showing signs of recovery before, I was pretty confident that our immunity had somehow managed to get ahold of this illness and get it into check. So I started patients promptly on steroids. Those that returned on the eighth day with breathlessness were started on a course of steroid, and by the third or fourth day of steroids, they all showed good signs of recovery. Now as a doctor, what tells me that something works is speed to recovery. Now I don’t give you a paracetamol tablet for a headache and when it takes five days to go away assume that the paracetamol worked. Speed to recovery gives me an indication of the efficacy of my treatment, and the efficacy of my treatment and the speed to recovery gives me an indication of the underlying mechanism of this disease. So if I’m treating the wrong thing, I won’t have the speed to recovery.

Dr Shankara Chetty

So looking at the patients that I treated from the first four or five that presented with this breathlessness and were put onto steroids. And I noticed this difference in the presentation. That means the speed at which the second phase started. I looked at my understanding of pathology, and tried to understand why we were getting this variability. The first part of the illness had no relation to the second. Whether you were critically ill in the first five days made no difference as to whether you would deteriorate again on the eighth, because I’ve had patients critically ill in the first five days, recovered, and had no sequela. And I’ve had patients with a very mild illness got over it, and on the eighth day presented with very severe illness. So I knew I’m dealing with a nonlinear illness, that was by phasic, and the two phases had no correlation between them. So I was dealing with two pathologies. So to understand the second pathology, I had patients that were diabetic, hypertensive, a lot of comorbidities, and never had the second phase of this illness. And I had patients that were absolutely fit with no comorbidities and had the second phase of this illness. So it didn’t seem to be related to any health predisposition. So when you look at pathology, you got to try and understand what you’re dealing, with the facts that are in front of you, and what makes sense. And the only thing that made sense to me was that these people on the eighth day, were having some sort of allergic reaction to something. And we know with allergic reactions that a majority of people are not allergic to certain things and will have no reaction, like a bee sting, and some will be mildly allergic, and some moderately allergic, and some severely allergic. And so the difference in speed of presentation, and the difference in severity. Of course, if you might be allergic to a bee sting, you will get a bit of an itch on the sting, and within a few days it would be self limiting and seem to sort itself out. However, if you were more moderately allergic, that bee sting might cause a rash throughout your body, and if I do not treat it it will take a long time for that rash to subside, though it may never end up life threatening. And then of course, if you’re very allergic to a bee sting and I don’t treat you, within a day or two you’re gonna end up with severe organ damage and end up in ICU and probably die from that.

Dr Shankara Chetty

So I thought, well if I’m dealing with this kind of pathology, a type one mediated hypersensitivity reaction, then a therapeutic trial is in order. Now a therapeutic trial is something every doctor does with almost every patient. When a patient comes to see me, I have an inclination of a diagnosis. And then I give them some medication, which dependent on that diagnosis which is a therapeutic trial, and if that medication that I give them shows benefit and they improve, then it confirms my diagnosis, and I don’t need to do anything further. I don’t need to go test them to prove I was correct. They recover completely. So my understanding that I’m dealing with a type one hypersensitivity reaction drove me to improve and fine tune the toolbox that I was using. At that point in time, it was just Hydroxychloroquine symptomatic treatment, and of course a steroid from day eight. So the sixth patient that came in to see me was a 40 year old female who had developed breathlessness on that very day, who was like a lot of the others perfectly fine the day before. It was actually her eighth day of illness, and her saturations had dropped to 80 percent in that one day. Yesterday, she was fine. Now she had been diabetic, hypertensive, and obese, I was a bit concerned. But I knew I had to start the steroid, but I’m dealing with a critically ill patient. So I thought, well if this is an allergic reaction, then a few other drugs become pertinent and I need to add them and test them and watch the speed to recovery. So the first thing I added to to her treatment was Promethazine. Now Promethazine is a drug an anti histamine, and old generation anti histamine that is used to treat severe allergic reactions. It is an essential drug World Health Organisation approved that every doctor should have in his emergency kit. So when a patient comes in with a bee sting, a steroid and Promethazine are the drugs of choice, so I added a dose of Promethazine to her treatment. To be cautious I gave her a kiddies dose of 10 milligramme. Usually we use 25 milligrammes three times a day in adults to four times a day, I gave her a 10 milligramme tablet and said take it three times a day. It was just for one day, that particular day that she came in, and I told my staff to please contact her tomorrow and look at speed to recovery. Has it made a difference to her improvement. And the very next day when we contacted her, she was busy washing the dishes and she was perfectly fine. The breathlessness had gone completely, but I had given her a single dose and I expected a rebound. So I advised her to please be cautious because I would expect the breathlessness to resurface if this was an allergy, and we would have to suppress this for a little while. And of course the very next day she was breathless again. And I reinstituted the anti histamine, and she recovered promptly. So it was at that point that I realised that I’m dealing with a severe allergic trigger. And I added now with an allergic reaction, you get the release of certain chemical mediators, histamine, leukotrienes prostaglandins and prostor cyclins and platelet activating factor.

Dr Shankara Chetty

Now the modality when you treat an allergic reaction is to use a high enough dose of steroid to turn off this inappropriate immune tap that has been turned on. The second thing you do is mop up all the mediators that have spilled already. And this is where timeliness is important. The longer you leave it, the more the mediators the more damage, and to mop up those mediators histamine is addressed by antihistamines leukotrienes by Montelukast, platelet activating by either an anticoagulant or aspirin, prostaglandins and prostor cyclamens are dual kind of mediators that are beneficial, and so don’t actually need to be addressed. So I added Montelukast and aspirin to my protocol very early on. And that has been the modality of my treatment, I knew about the inflammation, the cytokine storm, the thrombotic events that were seen in patients. However, I was of the opinion that this was a hypersensitivity trigger by some sort of viral debris on the eighth day, and that hypersensitivity trigger, left unchecked, would lead to hyper inflammation, like we saw in hospital settings. And if that hyper inflammation leading to a cytokine storm was not addressed appropriately, it would lead to thrombosis and so all the clots. And that has been my modality of treatment through the pandemic.

Dr Shankara Chetty

The first thing with this kind of treatment that I found very strange was that the World Health Organisation had put out this recommendation that we should isolate patients for 14 days, that I found to be the most disastrous advice you could give anyone, especially if they were going to have a severe allergic reaction on the eighth day that couldn’t be predicted. They needed to be told about this. And like a bee sting if you had a bee sting and came to me on the eighth day, and I said, Well, there’s nothing I can do about this. You wait at home and see what happens, by the time you realise that you’re critically ill, you will have multi system organ damage. And then you would present yourself to hospital. And when you presented yourself to hospital, the doctor in hospital is unaware you were stung with the bee. And he would have absolutely no idea where to start treating you, he would just be trying to keep you alive. And so I had remarkable recoveries from the start, I’ve had patients present to me with saturations of 70 percent, and on the first dose of treatment had that 70 percent improved to 85 percent within an hour, and an hour and a half. There is no other medication, besides the anti histamine that has shown that speed to recovery. And because I’ve managed to reverse the hypoxia so timelessly in these patients, I didn’t have the need for oxygen in my practice. Now, I’m well aware of the so called experts and peers that are out there dictating what we should do. And it’s the reason I’ve been a controversial doctor all my life. I don’t tend to follow the rules, I tend to follow the science, and that makes me controversial. My staff noticed these remarkable improvements. They were well well aware of the rural population dying at home, and the mortality and morbidity of not getting treatment. We were also well aware of the patients dying in hospital. I was also well aware that Remdesivir was being punted, I knew that Remdesivir was toxic. I knew that it caused kidney failure, it caused cardiac issues. And I saw those things like the presenters before me alluded to. None of my patients got into any kidney problems. None of my patients got into any cardiac problems. And of course on clinical examination of these patients, it was not to Covid pneumonia I was dealing with. It was not progressive. Patients were perfectly fine the day before. When they came to me breathless, they were not acutely ill. They were tired they were breathless, but from afar they were perfectly fine. And when I examined them clinically, they had no repetitions. They had none of the symptoms that you would associate with the pneumonia, but they did have breathlessness. So I was under the impression that I am dealing with a hypersensitivity trigger on the eighth day in a subset of patients that are allergic to something in this virus. And that hypersensitivity was causing a hypersensitivity pneumonitis, which would develop at different speeds, depending on your allergic propensity to the allergen. And so I treated it as such.

Dr Shankara Chetty

And so my staff spoke to me about writing an article and giving this out to other doctors. Now, understanding that I had the suspicion from the start that we’re dealing with a lab made virus, and of course we were told that there’s a bad Coronavirus, that jumps species to human beings. Now, the one thing that would change on a virus that would make a jump species to a different host is its receptor. And spike protein being the receptor on this virus, spike protein was on my radar from the start as the possible allergen because it’s new. We’ve been exposed to Coronavirus previously, and we’ve never seen this kind of pathology allergy. And so when you expose to a new environment, there might be something that you are never exposed to in that new environment that you might be allergic to. So I was suspicious that spike protein free spike protein was the trigger on eighth day causing these problems. So I published this article, hoping to educate doctors. Well I wrote the article hoping to educate doctors and patients and use this knowledge that I have found to save lives. And that is where the trouble started. I shared the article with all the hospitals in my area before it was published. I made sure that every person that could have some impact on this pandemic was aware of what I had discovered. The hospitals were using antivirals. I found that absolutely illogical. Now, I was of the opinion that the virus was gone by the fifth or sixth day. And so I started looking at studies around the world. And there are no studies around the world that have managed to culture this virus past the 7th day. Yes, the PCR test remained positive for a month in some patients. But that’s no indication of a live virus. So I chose carefully what to believe. So I looked at the data and I looked at culture results. And there were a lot of results showing culture positivity in the first seven days. And that tied into what I saw people had a viral infection. But post seven days, there were very few, if any, culture positive results in hospitalised patients. So I knew that the virus had left. And that confirmed clearly to me that we were dealing with a separate pathology post eighth day.

Dr Shankara Chetty

So I wrote this article and I shared it freely with our Minister of healthcare in South Africa, with the president of my country, with all the stakeholders that I could think of, with every doctor I knew, but I was very cautious cos I was well aware with the controversy around Hydroxychloroquine with the misinformation that was given to me about sanitation, isolation, PCR testing, masking, asymptomatic spread that there was a bigger plan at play. So I was very cautious about getting involved in the governmental regulatory structures. I didn’t want what I had found to be suppressed. So I thought, well I’ll share it freely, but I’ll share it amongst doctors and patients. And if I could teach doctors to treat COVID and make patients understand when to present, then I don’t need anyone’s permission to save lives. And so that was what I did. I passed it on to every journal I could think of to see who would be willing to publish it. The response from every journal Nature, it was almost every journal in the world. My wife helped me with that submitted to every journal. The response I got from journals was either we need copyrights to your work, or we only publish from our subscribers. And I’m not a subscriber to all the medical journals. So I thought very strange as the custodians of knowledge as journals claimed to be you cherry pick where you take that knowledge from. So immediately, I knew that I’m dealing with some sort of collusion, medical collusion. After all, I had found something that could save us from this pandemic. And no one seemed to want to listen.

Dr Shankara Chetty

I also shared it with my professor and principal at the University I studied at in India, and my colleagues on that group, and I had an immediate response from them. My principal wrote back to me immediately thanking me for my work and so did my colleagues. And so India knew about my discovery very early on in the pandemic. They understood my work with Hydroxychloroquine. They understood the hypersensitivity trigger. I had also tried ivermectin, the reason I used ivermectin was because I was dealing with pulmonary hypersensitivity and ivermectin is used to clear eosinophils from the lungs. And that was the rationale behind me trying it. And it worked. I mentioned that to my colleagues in India and ivermectin became a thing there in the first wave. And so India was the only country that held my hand through the first wave of this pandemic. I was completely ignored by the rest. Then in August that year, Modern Medicine, an academic journal here in South Africa contacted me to publish my article, I had insisted that it gets published unabridged and unedited, because it had some things in there that would be of great impact and influence on the pandemic, seeing that we were dealing with a hypersensitivity reaction that had some grave consequences and some implications for how we manage the pandemic. One, in the first wave, we saw people over 55 dying. Now remember all the death in this pandemic comes from the second part of this illnless, not the first, and the second part is an allergic reaction. So I was of the opinion that people over 55 were actually exposed to some sort of Coronavirus that was very similar to this before, and they had developed the necessary antibodies. Now remember, if you are allergic to something, your first exposure does not cause illness. You need to be sensitised first. So your second exposure onwards creates the problem. So I was of the opinion that people over 55 were sensitised, and so they had a severe allergic reaction of those that were allergic, and that’s the reason we saw deaths above 55 years of age. However, those below 55 would be sensitised in the first wave. And from the second wave on, I expected that people below 55 would die. They would have the allergic reaction, because they are now sensitised, and we would see younger people die. And that was one of the grievous predictions of the article that I wrote.

Dr Shankara Chetty

The second was to understand risk, who is actually at risk in this pandemic, because we had shut off the entire planet indiscriminately. Everyone had to stay home. But if we knew who was at risk, then we could risk stratify more effectively. And to risk stratify, we would now need to find this specific IGE subtype for the allergen and see who is allergic. And those are the people at highest risk of having the second phase, and of course at highest risk of mortality and morbidity. And so my article covered all these different parts to this pandemic. The one thing that made my article very controversial was that I expressed an opinion, saying that if early treatment, like I had seen personally myself, if early treatment could curb all the mortality and morbidity of COVID illness, it would make a vaccine to a mutagenic RNA virus rushed to market, wholly unnecessary. And I think that was all the controversy that my article then cost.

Dr Shankara Chetty

When we got into the second wave, I needed proof of my eighth day, and I needed proof of what was happening. None of the local labs were willing to test patients with COVID. You would only get tertiary service if you were hospitalised. So I had to rely on clinical improvement of my patients to make adjustments to their medication to get them to recover. And I managed to do this. So I contacted the local lab to say, look, I need assistance with this work once it was published in Modern Medicine, an academic journal. And the local lab then offered me their services, willing to give me a research grant to look further into this. But being a commercial lab, they did not have the capacity to develop testing for a specific IGE subtype to see who is most at risk. I mean, we can tell if you’re allergic to milk by the very same test, we can tell if you’re allergic to wheat by the very same test. This is not rocket science. All we need to do is understand what the allergen is, and then see who’s allergic to that particular allergen. So I started to check IGE levels and started to do some blood testing as the second wave came by. But in the first wave, one other thing I need to mention is all the patients that I’ve treated some 800 of them, I never had a single long COVID case, so I was of the opinion that the mild cases resolved spontaneously talking about people allergic and presenting on the eighth day. The moderate cases were not treated, and those were the long COVID cases that were sitting with an untreated moderate long term allergy, and of course, these very severe cases needed quick aggressive treatment, and if not were the ones that were ending up on the ventilator. And of course, the diagnosis of pulmonary hypersensitivity rather than COVID pneumonia may put ventilation into a very poor light. Ventilation is absolutely the wrong way to treat a hypersensitivity pneumonitis. So I was of the opinion that the world had misdiagnosed a pandemic, calling it a COVID pneumonia rather than hypersensitivity pneumonitis. And all the mortality and morbidity resided in the second part caused by an allergen, not the virus itself.

Dr Shankara Chetty

In the second wave, we had the South African variant. Now, just so I’ll reiterate later on, in the first wave, we had mostly black patients present to me, I had not a single Indian patient, not a single coloured patient, and not a single white patient in the first week, it was all black patients. Now, I assumed that that would be because of their inability to isolate. They live in communities in close proximity. And I thought that was the reason I was seeing it spreading in that community. However, in the second wave we had what we’d call the notorious South African variant. And looking at the genetics around that variant, the only thing that had really changed was the spike protein. The mutation caused the change in spike protein, and so when we got the cases coming in, I needed again to look at the symptoms and the presentation to understand what’s going on. And of course, it was very strange that only the spike protein mutated, nothing else in the virus changed and that’s not how natural mutations occur. So it reinforced my understanding that I’m dealing with a lab made virus here. And when you look at genetic manipulation, besides engineering a virus, you can also engineer the mutations that occur every so many cycles, so you can engineer the mutagenicity of a virus.

Dr Shankara Chetty

So in the second wave, we had the South African variant with the new spike protein. Symptomatically, we had a more contagious virus. It spread very quickly in families, in communities, and of course that ties in with the change in spike protein, having a greater affinity for its host. Of course, the symptomatology changed, I was seeing a lot more gastrointestinal symptoms, I wasn’t seeing the respiratory symptoms. Patients were presenting with a very mild sore throat that went away in a day, but they had runny tummies, heartburn, reflux, a lot of gastrointestinal symptoms, and that told me that the change in spike protein had given an affinity for ace receptors in the gut. Again, a change in spike protein, a change in affinity for receptor. And then the eighth day remained the same. Patients, there were a subset of patients who deteriorated on the eighth day, but that deterioration had changed. Now, those patients that deteriorated on the eighth day presented with gastrointestinal symptoms, a reemergence of gastrointestinal symptoms. So I knew that the eighth day was now an allergic reaction again, but not an allergic reaction triggered in your lungs, like the first wave I’ve done, this allergic reaction was triggered in your gut, but with progress would lead to hyper inflammation, would lead to coagulation, and would eventually lead to breathlessness. So I was again seeing breathlessness, but no more on the eighth day, there was a worsening of symptoms gastrointestinal symptoms on the eighth day, but the breathlessness took two or three days to develop. And that is a progression of allergy. I treated those patients in very much the same way, catching them on the eighth day being quick and aggressive to treating them and all of them resolved.

Dr Shankara Chetty

But what the second wave drew to my attention, or confirmed, was my suspicion that spike protein was the culprit. Because on the eighth day, in the second wave, I was seeing far more severe allergic reactions that required far more aggressive intervention to curb it. Now speed to recovery again was the measure of what I needed to do. The dose of steroid that worked in the first wave was taking far longer to curb this in the second wave and needed to be increased. The longer that tap stayed open, the bigger the problem was going to be. And so in the second wave, I used a far higher dose of steroid, but the rest of my treatment remained almost the same. And of course, that implicated spike protein. Now this was at the end of 2020 during the second wave, and it was at the point where vaccines were going to be rolled out to the world. Now, at this point, I had clarified that the primary pathogen of COVID illness was not Coronavirus at all. Coronavirus was a vector. It caused a transient respiratory illness, and our immunity was strong enough to deal with it. But once our immunity dealt with the virus, the debris left behind from this eighth day caused an allergic reaction in those that were sensitive to spike protein. And so people that were allergic to spike protein would have this reaction. So spike protein became the primary pathogen of COVID illness, and spike protein was the reason for all the mortality and all the morbidity. I had not a single patient demise in the first seven days of this illness. So spike protein now clearly was the pathogen I was dealing with. And of course, being a pathogen, it was causing allergy. Now, the vaccines that were being developed at the time, messenger RNA vaccines, were all designed to get your body to make spike protein. Now spike protein being the primary pathogen of COVID illness, that was a dangerous game to be played. We have many other parts of this virus that we could have chosen that were more stable that could have been used to make a vaccine. For some reason spike protein was chosen. So I hopde that my work would draw attention to the danger of using spike protein to make a vaccine. And so I brought this to people’s attention, but again I was ignored. So I knew that there is some ulterior motive at play. And so knowing that the vaccines will not be stopped my research, understanding and push became about looking at spike protein, not being distracted by the virus, and trying to understand what spike protein would do in the human body.

Dr Shankara Chetty

Now remember, when you have a Coronavirus infection and you expose to free spike protein on the eighth day, it is a stat dose of spike protein and it will only harm you if you’re allergic to it, but if you’re not your body will clear it away. But if you are given a vaccine that gets your body to make spike protein, now you will be exposed to spike protein for a prolonged period. And so spike protein does not only now have an allergenic potential, it will now have a biologic effect on your body. To put that into perspective, a drug like penicillin, its biologic effect on your body is that it’s an antibiotic. But for it to have that biologic effect, you need to take the full course. Now if I had to give every person on this planet a single dose of penicillin, it will not have that biologic effect of an antibody, an antibiotic. But if I gave every single person on this planet a single dose of penicillin, and then I denied them medical care for 14 days, every person that was severely allergic to penicillin would die of an allergic reaction. And that’s what happened with COVID infection. People were denied treatment to a simple allergic reaction. But with the vaccine, and being exposed to spike protein for a prolonged period, like being exposed to penicillin for a prolonged period, it starts to act as an antibiotic. So I needed to understand what a prolonged exposure to spike protein would do to the human body. And that has been the focus of my research and understanding ever since spike protein got implicated.

Dr Shankara Chetty

In the third wave, we had very much the same happen again. We found that patients presented with symptoms, again gastroenteritis was gone. We’ve had sore patients coming in with sore throats again, the symptoms had changed and of course the spike protein had changed. On the eighth day patients were not breathless. Patients were not having gastroenteritis, but they presented with an overwhelming sudden onset of fatigue. And so I started to advise patients about that symptom on the eighth day. And if it occurred to present timeously. We saw that the allergic reaction in the third wave seemed to affect the vessels more than anything else, and patients were developing clots emboli and that seemed to be the trigger here. So it seemed like we were again having an allergic reaction on the eighth day, but the allergic reaction was focused on the circulatory system. And so again, the same treatment was instituted with the same results. Every patient that came in on the eighth day with an overwhelming sense of fatigue was started on the treatment protocol for a severe allergic reaction. And they all timelessly improved.

Dr Shankara Chetty

And all this got confirmed now that I had access to laboratory findings by measuring interleukin six values, CRPs, and (inaudible). And I could clearly show the exponential rise in these values from the eighth day in those patients who had symptoms. And I could clearly show the turnaround back to normal once I had treated them. And the turnaround was timeliest again. I had every patient of mine almost completely recovered, irrespective of how severely they presented to me post eighth day within a week. I’ve had patients present to me with saturations of 40 percent on oxygen brought to me with an ambulance on a drip. And in a week, I had them on home treatment at 98 percent saturation on room air. And the timeliest reversal of the hypoxia negated the need for any supplementary oxygen. So in the third wave, I realised the change in spike protein changed the system that was being affected by the allergy. And of course, I noticed something else unusual. In the second wave. It was mostly patients of Indian descent that came and saw me. There were no black patients anymore. In the second wave, it was all patients of Indian descent. And then in the third wave, it was very few patients that were black or of Indian descent. And it was mostly the white population and the Muslim population that was affected in that wave. And I thought that to be very strange, because I had assumed that it was the black population in the first wave because of their social circumstance. Then I looked at the world around me, and I found exactly the same happened in America. The first wave affected the African American population more than anyone else. The second wave ravaged India, and I had no Indian patient see me here in South Africa. And then in the third wave, it affected the Caucasian population globally and the Muslim population globally.

Dr Shankara Chetty

So that drew my attention to something far more sinister. I knew that I was dealing with an engineered virus, I assumed that it was a lab leak. But I also had at the back of my mind the understanding that this might have been pre planned. And if you had a virus, the different variants that seemed to affect different systems, a propensity for different systems – respiratory in the first variant, gastrointestinal in the second, and circulatory in the third, and had a propensity for certain ethnicity, that’s a very bad omen because if this was pre planned then it’s a preamble to ethnic cleansing. It’s an understanding of how to affect different systems and how to affect different population groups with the mutations that you engineer into a virus. And so I knew at that point that I’m probably dealing with a bio weapon. And so my research has all been in that direction. I’ve pushed researchers to stop looking at the virus and to start looking at spike protein. And we needed to understand what the spike protein was doing cos I knew that Pfizer and the likes were going to expose the entire planet to this biologic agent called spike protein.

Dr Shankara Chetty

And so we started looking at long COVID. We started looking at vaccine injuries. Now with long COVID, when I started seeing patients with long COVID, I started testing IGE levels to try and prove that I’m dealing with the hypersensitivity, and every single one of them had elevated levels, and that confirmed for me that we’re dealing with hypersensitivity. Subsequently, Kenneth (inaudible) and Marcus Sanchez?? published an article about the lethality of COVID illness, speculating that the fatality was caused by a hypersensitivity pneumonitis, not a COVID pneumonia, and I proved that clinically. Recently, an article was published from China that looked at the use of steroids, but also looked at the specific IGE subtype for spike protein, means what I wanted to do look for those that are allergic to spike protein, and they found a direct correlation between severity of illness and IGE specific to spike protein levels, which proved conclusively that on that eighth day, we were dealing with a hypersensitivity trigger. There was an allergic reaction which was being left unchecked, and it was causing all the death we see, and all the damage we see.

Dr Shankara Chetty

Now from long COVID, and from the understanding of vaccine side effects, researchers have looked into the structure of spike protein and what its long term effect on the human body would be. We know that it causes endothelial injury, and will damage your blood vessels, and if it damages those blood vessels, it would cause clotting in various areas of the body. And those people that are predisposed to vessel damage, like your diabetics, your hypertensives, are most at risk of having this damage become clinically significant. The second thing we noticed is that it causes an immune mediated damage to the myocardium in the heart. And so we’ve seen the myocarditis’ in young children. We’ve seen the clots, we’ve noticed these things with the vaccine. The other thing that was discovered was that the vaccine the spike protein has similarities to other pathogenic proteins that we know of, one of them being the proteins made during HIV illness that actually causes immunosuppression. Now, if the spike protein caused immunosuppression, then we would expect to see a re-emergence of latent infections like epstein barr, like herpes zoster, we’d expect to see a re-emergence of cancers that were in remission, and we would expect to see a waning of immunity over time, and people exposed to spike protein becoming more prone to illness. And we’ve seen that with the vaccines, and we’ve seen that with COVID. We’ve seen people that are vaccinated actually being more prone to developing severe illness.

Dr Shankara Chetty

Now, the claim from the vaccine manufacturers that the vaccines prevent severe illness and death, I find that amazing that they could make that claim. They’ve refused to accept my work on the pathogenesis of COVID illness, I think simply because I have proven that spike protein is the primary pathogen. And if you accept that spike protein is the primary pathogen that shows the vaccines in a very dangerous light. Now, if you don’t accept what causes severe illness and deaths, how can you claim that your product can prevent it, so they have absolutely no pathologic evidence or pathophysiologic evidence of the working of their vaccine. We know that it’s not a vaccine because it doesn’t prevent infection and transmission. Now, it exposes you to spike protein. So clearly, if you’re allergic to spike protein, the vaccine works as a desensitisation tool. So we do desensitisation for patients that are allergic to certain allergens, we expose them to mild doses of those allergens, and then they become more tolerant. So the vaccine is giving people that are prone to severe illness and death by exposure to spike protein, which is the allergen, a little bit of tolerance for a limited period of time. And once that vaccine stops making spike protein, we become intolerant to it again, and it no more has the ability to prevent severe illness and death, and we’ve seen that globally.

Dr Shankara Chetty

Then as well with spike protein, it is a membrane protein. And we’ve seen with the Japanese studies that it circulates throughout the body. Now every tissue that is exposed to spike protein and starts to make spike protein will express it on its surface, it will be recognised as foreign, and that will trigger a host of autoimmune conditions, which we’ve seen as well. We’ve also seen that spike protein crosses the nucleus into the nucleus of the cell. It inhibits the BRCA protein which is used to repair double stranded DNA breaks, and so it will impact on your DNA’s ability to repair itself. And that would cause an explosion in cancers because cells that actually remain viable after DNA damage are most likely to become cancerous. And all this bears out with long COVID, and the vaccine adverse side effects that we’ve seen, the increase in all cause mortality that we’ve noticed globally since the vaccine. And if you look at the trend in that all cause mortality, it is exactly what we predicted the vaccine would do. We are seeing the neuropathies, we are seeing the blood clots, we are seeing the myocarditis, we are seeing the emergence of latent infections, we are seeing the re-emergence of cancers, we are seeing Alzheimer’s, dementia, neuropathies, we are seeing all these things.

Dr Shankara Chetty

Now when we come to Omicron. Omicron started here in South Africa, and immediately everyone shut their borders. I thought that was absolutely unnecessary. It was almost a vaccine that we could use, a mild, attenuated vaccine, but I was also suspicious that Omicron with all the changes we saw in it might be a new engineered virus, cos now suddenly we had 30 new mutations in the spike protein. And like the previous guests have alluded to, that is not natural. So I had at the back of my mind that this might be the Christmas present we all wanted, but there might be a sting in its tail. And so I watched Omicron very carefully. The only system that was not affected by COVID infection was the neurologic system. But we saw the neuropathy in the vaccine side effects. So I knew that spike protein had the potential to injure your nerves. And so I looked at Omicron in that light, and with Omicron it became clearly evident that it was neurotoxic. A lot of the patients that I’ve seen have presented with neuropathy, burning of their hands and feet, strange sensations around their body, migraine like headaches, pain radiating from their neck, it seemed to affect C67 brachial plexus kind of neuropathy. It seemed to affect T10 and 11 in your spine, which affects the diaphragm. And people have strange symptoms.

Dexter L-J. Ryneveldt

Dr Thank you so much for giving all that information and being so elaborative, I’m actually also looking that we still have a few witnesses that still need to give evidence –

Dr Shankara Chetty

Yes, yes. I’m actually done. That was the last, Omicron is where it all ended and where we are.

https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/04/08/covid-19-a-biological-weapon-targeting-ethnicity-and-body-systems/

COVID-19 – A Biological Weapon Targeting Ethnicity and Body Systems

by mattehret27-35 minutes 4/8/2022

By Larry Romanoff [Originally published on Blue Moon of Shanghai]

Much of this essay is based on the testimony of a long list of eminent physicians and scientists to the Grand Jury of the Court of Public Opinion on COVID-19, chaired by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. (1) (2) The content here follows closely on that of my previous essay, A COVID-19 Theory I Cannot Prove. (3)

First, Let’s Think

In one article (Part 4) of a series titled ‘Propaganda and the Media‘ that I wrote for the Saker, I began with this observation:

“If I were a dictator, one of my first dictates would be that every adult must take at least one university-level course in logic. In today’s world, with what is essentially an international criminal element in control, one which effectively manages public perception through their leverage over the mass media, readers would benefit immensely from some exposure to the principles of logic.” (4)

Consider for a moment the “China virus”, the Wuhan lab-leak theory, the myriad other claims of China contaminating the world with COVID-19, some American groups even dramatically filing spurious lawsuits against China. Yet this was always nonsense.

Let’s review something very basic. COVID-19 exploded in Wuhan and began to spread, so the health authorities first isolated Wuhan and then locked down the entire province of Hubei. The pathogen did escape Wuhan, but not Hubei. Almost all the infections and nearly every death were in Wuhan or Hubei. The virus did not escape to infect any other city or province in China. Nearby Shanghai had only a few infections and deaths while a great many cities and provinces had none, and it ended quickly.

But COVID was so determined to distribute its benefits to a greater portion of mankind that it decided to bypass China and attack the US instead, followed by Europe, Africa, the rest of Asia, and so on. Well, how would this work, exactly? If the virus couldn’t escape Hubei to attack China, how – exactly – could it have escaped to attack the US? HOW did COVID make a flying leap out of Wuhan, bypass the Chinese Mainland altogether, and land in the streets of New York, Rome, Hamburg, and Tokyo? If the virus were progressively leaking out of Wuhan – the “dictatorial and draconian prison” – and escaping to infect every other continent and country, how could it avoid contaminating all of China in the process?

It doesn’t matter if COVID was a lab leak in Wuhan because it didn’t escape beyond Wuhan. We have long since had proof that the virus strains in other countries were very different from that in China and thus must have arisen from another source, but the Western conviction remains that this is a “Chinese” virus that spread throughout the world. Almost no one seems to have the clarity of thought to realise this would have been impossible and that the incessant media attacks were merely a psy-op to deflect suspicion and blame the victim. And yet I have no doubt that most reading this will be unable to recognise the logic and will stubbornly continue to believe there must have been some way for the ‘China’ virus to have infected the world. And not only to infect the world, but to have infected nearly half of the countries on the same day. The logical impossibility of that, seems to have no apparent effect on stillborn minds.

China was unhappy when the US curtailed all flights from China to the US because the flights were from infection-free areas, that action widely seen as merely one more economic-warfare attack on China. And yes, there were some Chinese citizens travelling the world and who produced a positive PCR test (quite possibly a false positive), but these were discovered in foreign cities in ones and twos, hardly sufficient to suddenly inflame a simultaneous worldwide pandemic in 200 countries.

The incredibly rapid spread of COVID-19 should have aroused enormous suspicions around the world because natural pandemics don’t act in this fashion without a lot of help. SARS-Cov-1 touched only 24 countries in 8 months while SARS-Cov-2 hit 196 countries in 1 month, and it is confirmed that not one of those countries has ever found a patient zero. Why doesn’t that set off the alarm bells?

Where Are We Going?

In major international matters such as these, there are no accidents. The eventual outcome, whatever it is and however odd it appears to be, was the planned result. I would refer you to ZIKA, the illness that never was. If you recall, all the media hype quickly turned to massive coverage about microcephaly, proven to be unrelated but used as a psychological weapon in an astonishing push by literally scores of NGOs (all American-financed and almost all Jewish-organised) for removing the abortion legislation in all of Latin America. And that was the result; so far, three nations have rescinded their abortion legislation in what was the last hold-out.

In all major international events, the “official narrative” promulgated by the mass media usually reveal to us the main purpose. With 9-11, it became clear immediately that Iraq was the purpose and the target. With ZIKA, it became immediately clear that the purpose was the removal of abortion restrictions in all of Latin America. With Ukraine, it was obvious almost immediately that the purpose was the re-colonisation of Europe. All of this was evident from the content of the media flood, with literally hundreds of articles every day in the Western and other press, pushing our thinking in those directions.

Much of the fall-out of COVID is yet to come. It will surely be major since most advanced economies took a beating. It seems clear that one of the planned results was the destruction of China’s economy, and perhaps Russia’s as well, but the Western nations weren’t exactly spared either so that suggests something worthy of the cost.

Some people were very concerned that we were headed for an ID-2020 world society where the vaccination passports were to become universal and then morph into an absolute societal control system worldwide. I agree the signs were there, but now suddenly that seems to have been abandoned, with restrictions being removed everywhere in spite of the fact that many countries are still experiencing high new infection rates. That tells us that the objective has already been accomplished, that COVID has served its purpose and can be permitted to quietly die and be replaced once again by the seasonal flu.

In the case of COVID, all of the media push was fear-mongering, toward the extreme lethality of the virus and the absolute necessity of all persons being vaccinated. Anyone offering a contrary or even a cautionary view was crushed, the reputations of even very qualified medical personnel being horribly trashed, and even Facebook and Twitter censoring everyone who spoke out. That tells us this was the main point.

So the question is: WHY did those responsible want everyone vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine that has proven to be largely ineffective, where in many countries nearly all new infections occur in the fully-vaccinated? This naturally raises a suspicion that the vaccine was not meant primarily (or perhaps even secondarily) to control the virus.

Dr. Shankara Chetty

We can begin with Dr. Shankara Chetty, a medical doctor and biological scientist in South Africa who was deeply engaged in treating COVID-19 in his country. His testimony is similar to that of many others in like positions, and is powerful and direct. (5)

Dr. Chetty stated that nearly everything about COVID-19 seemed suspicious to him from the outset. He claimed physicians were being pushed hard to use a PCR test when “this kind of test is never used as a diagnostic tool”. And it worried him that the results of this inappropriate test were being used to determine public health measures. There were two items of special concern to him; one was that the government was telling the people to not go to a doctor but to stay at home and, if they became seriously or critically ill, to go to the hospital. Similarly, doctors were told to not treat patients because there was no treatment. In particular, the government was directing doctors and hospitals against the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin which would normally have been the treatment of choice.

The second concern was that so-called experts advising the government didn’t question any of the items he knew were wrong or suspect, and the government was following their advice. Dr. Chetty said he quickly developed a very healthy suspicion about what he was being told because the government experts “were punting this narrative” when there was no existing proof for any of it and where some of their statements were provably untrue.

Thus, when the virus first reached South Africa, (the first wave), he ignored the PCR tests and diagnosed the illness by its symptoms, the loss of smell and taste, though that was suspicious also because those symptoms didn’t normally occur with a virus. He said what the patients seemed to have was just a common flu, and that most patients recovered quickly with little more than a sore throat.

He said the first treatment drug that came to his mind was hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) because it had been used for decades, was well-known, and had broad antiviral properties. He’d been treating patients with it for 30 years and never had a side effect with it. In preparation, he bought a big stock, all he could find, and two days later the government pulled it from the shelves.

In every case with symptoms of consequence, he treated his patients with HCQ and all fully recovered within a few days or a week at the most. There were no recurrences or secondary infections, meaning that a solid immunity had been established. This is very different from the experience in the Western countries where many had been re-infected, especially those who had received several injections (vaccinations).

But there was a secondary symptom of breathlessness which occurred later “in a small subset” of patients and with potentially serious effects, and which was responsible for the deaths. Some cases were minor, some more severe and lasted longer, but some were serious, occurring very suddenly and progressing very quickly with patients needing a ventilator within a day. The breathlessness seemed to always occur exactly one week after appearance of the first symptoms, the patients having been perfectly fine the day before and completely recovered from the virus. He noted that the same was also happening in Italy, which indicated the two countries were dealing with the same strain.

He said there was no relation between the severity of the initial symptoms (from the virus) and the onset of breathlessness on the 8th day. So he was dealing with a non-linear illness that was bi-phasic with no correlation between the phases, meaning two different pathologies that were unrelated, and which were not influenced by any pre-existing health issues. He concluded that he was dealing with some kind of hypersensitivity, that these people were having some sort of allergic reaction. The pneumonia (from the virus) was gone and he was now dealing with another pathogen.

Dr. Chetty’s grand discovery, and his conclusion, were that the COVID virus was not the pathogen. It did cause an infection but our immune system was strong enough to fight it off. But after that, the debris left behind by the 8th day caused allergic reactions and it was this that was killing people. The spike protein was the primary pathogen and this was responsible for the illness, hospitalisations and deaths. For those who were not allergic to the spike protein, their body would clear it away, but for those who were allergic, and if the allergy were severe, it could kill them. It’s the same as a bee sting; most people have only an itch while a few will obtain a body rash that requires some time to abate. But if your allergy is severe, you will die without immediate treatment. He noted also that a study in China found a very high correlation between allergic markers and the spike protein, confirming that his diagnosis had been correct and that it was not the virus but a severe allergy to the spike protein that was responsible for the injuries and deaths.

He put these patients on steroids and antihistamines, and all fully recovered without need for supplementary oxygen or ventilators. Dr. Chetty said he treated about 10,000 patients, none of whom experienced any injury and with not a single death.

With his suspicion from the start that they were dealing with a lab-made virus, he wrote an article on what he had learned about treating the virus, and “that was where the trouble started”. He said in his article that if people applied the early treatment, then the use of an mRNA vaccine developed hastily and rushed to market would be unnecessary. He shared his findings with everyone who came to mind, beginning with the President of South Africa, various government members, and the country’s health systems. They all ignored him. He sent his findings to all the hospitals and labs, with the same result. He also sent it to every doctor he knew, with somewhat better results.

In an attempt to gain more traction for what he had learned about COVID, Dr. Chetty submitted his paper to “every publication I could find”. All refused to publish it, usually on the grounds that they needed the copyright or they published only from subscribers. He said that when his government and health officials ignored him and the medical journals chose to “cherry-pick” vital scientific health knowledge, he knew he was dealing with a vast “collusion”. And when he considered the political drama with HCQ, the sanitation measures, all the media hype and misinformation, the so-called “medical experts” advising his government, the intense push for vaccines, he knew there was “a bigger plan in play” and that the virus had to have been a deliberately-released lab creation.

Interestingly, Dr. Chetty shared what he had learned with his colleagues in India and experienced a grateful reception. At the time, one province in India was suffering an enormous COVID attack that was apparently suppressed in record time and with few deaths, from following Dr. Chetty’s treatment recommendations. Even more interesting were reports of phone discussions between Biden and Indian President Modi with the word on the street that India would not reveal their methods of treating the coronavirus in return for favors from the US.

But there was much more. South Africa experienced four “waves” of the COVID virus, and all were different. During the first wave, the symptoms were loss of taste and smell, but these disappeared in the second wave, and were replaced by new symptoms. In the second wave, the allergic symptom, the breathlessness, disappeared to be replaced by gastrointestinal problems, and with reactions that were much more severe than in the first wave. So, there was still an allergic reaction on the 8th day but now in the intestinal tract instead of in the lungs.

Dr. Chetty was convinced that the spike protein was the culprit, and it had changed in a way that gave it a new affinity for receptors in the gastrointestinal system, which reinforced his conviction he was dealing with a lab-made virus. He discovered that only the spike protein had mutated, not the rest of the virus, which he said was very strange because that doesn’t happen in nature. Very importantly, Dr. Chetty noted that while engineering a virus in a lab, you can also engineer the mutations it will undergo.

With the third wave, the symptoms on the 8th day were not breathlessness or gastroenteritis, but now the mutated spike protein attacked the cardiovascular (circulatory) system. He said he expected that Omicron, with 50 new mutations in the spike protein, was yet another new engineered virus. It then became clearly evident that Omicron was neuro-toxic, affecting the nervous system. So, South Africa’s four waves presented entirely different initial symptoms and the mutated spike protein attacked four different major body systems: respiratory, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and neural.

There was something even more startling. In the first wave, Dr. Chetty had only black people as patients. In the second wave it was mostly patients of Indian descent who came to him. He said, “No black patients any more, all Indians”. It was the second wave that severely ravaged India, and in Dr. Chetty’s second wave he had mostly Indian patients, presumably the same strain. In the third wave, there were almost no black or Indian patients; instead, they were “all white and Muslim”. You can recall that in the US, the first wave especially affected blacks. With China, COVID was initially 100% Chinese-specific until the virus mutated. This toxicity of the spike protein to a particular body system may be universal. Some countries were exposed to more strains than others, not all with the same number of strains (waves), and in other countries other major body systems were affected, the reproductive system being one. Also, the ethnic-specificity of different waves in different countries may be universal but we don’t have the information because the media control the narrative and these topics are subject to a full news embargo.

Dr. Chetty said these discoveries drew his attention to “something far more sinister”. He said he had always had thoughts in the back of his mind about COVID having been a pre-planned deliberate release, and that he now finally understood that it had to have been done according to a pre-arranged plan. Dr. Chetty said he repeatedly thought about COVID having been engineered, and that if it could affect different systems and different ethnicities, “that is a very bad omen”. He said “This is a preamble to ethnic cleansing. It was a practice lesson in how to affect different systems and different population groups with mutations that you engineer into a virus.” And he knew not only that he was dealing with a bio-weapon, but that Pfizer and others were going to expose the entire planet to the toxic spike protein. “If you demonstrate that the spike protein is the primary pathogen, [and expose this], that shows the vaccines in a very dangerous light.”

Dr. Soňa Peková

Next, we have the testimony of Dr. Soňa Peková, (6) a Molecular Biologist from the Czech Republic, whose observations and conclusions were nearly identical to those of Dr. Chetty. She observed as well that all subsequent waves contained many mutations and were genomically different from each other. They discovered that each “wave” was created by a different strain of the virus, but also that the various strains were not directly inter-related. This meant that a new wave was not a direct descendant, a mutated resurgence, from the prior wave, but the introduction into the population of a completely new strain of the virus.

Dr. Peková noted that in the transition from one “wave” to another, the virus lost many of its mutations from the previous wave, something that is not evolutionarily possible. A virus is not able to erase mutations and return to the original blueprint. A virus cannot “shed” mutations once adopted; it simply continues adding new changes, which again means that each new wave was a new strain of the virus that had been manufactured and then introduced into the population.

It should be noted that it was due only to the very up-to-date tools in this lab that these discoveries could be made. It was possible to do this only by using ‘next-generation’ sequencing; the more common tools would never have discovered this. Dr. Peková’s lab analysed more than 30,000 samples, using this new tool for the full sequencing of the entire genome, of the individual waves and the individual viruses. It was due only to the next-generation sequencing that they could actually identify the genetic diversity among the waves.

Next generation sequencing (NGS), is a DNA sequencing technology which has revolutionised genomic research. Using NGS an entire human genome can be sequenced within a single day. In contrast, the previous Sanger sequencing technology, used to decipher the human genome, required over a decade to deliver the final draft. Although in genome research NGS has mostly superseded conventional Sanger sequencing, it has not yet translated into routine clinical practice.

Dr. Peková said the waves of COVID “smashed through the country” in “an orchestrated way”, to the extent that it was even announced months in advance that it would happen, that a new wave would come. She said it was so strange; her country was clear in the Summer of 2020, there being no virus present at that time, so how could the government know that there would be a rapid and abrupt new wave coming soon? “How were they able to predict there would be another wave coming in September? It was announced ahead of time, and the waves appeared as predicted.” She said further, “to have a respiratory disease starting at the end of August is impossible; we never see this in the warm summer but only later in the year with the cold and rain.”

The wave circulating in Czechia in Nov 2020 was genomically quite different from that in the Spring, but Czechia had closed its borders and it was deemed impossible to experience a new pathogen in a confined population. So their question was “what or where was the source of those new generations”? Dr. Peková stated very firmly that even the mass media admitted “There is no known origin of the Omicron variant”, so “in my eyes it came from a lab, and it was deliberately leaked. All the clues show that it is on purpose.”

Dr. Luc Montagnier

In early 2020, Dr. Luc Montagnier, who was awarded a Nobel Prize for the discovery of the virus that causes AIDS, stated, “We have carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus. We weren’t the first, a group of Indian researchers tried to publish a study showing that the complete genome of this virus has within the sequences of another virus: that of HIV.” [NOTE: the Indian group did publish their discovery but were apparently under intense pressure to withdraw it, the media quickly insinuating the withdrawal was due to inaccuracy but the picture was by no means clear on that, and the pressure appears to have been political rather than scientific.] Dr. Montagnier’s point was that the COVID genome does indeed contain spliced segments of HIV RNA, something that cannot be a coincidence and could have occurred only in a lab. I believe he stated as well that the presence of these HIV segments could not have resulted from any natural evolutionary process. (7)

Epilogue

The waves in different countries were not all the same, and not every country had the same number of waves. Some like South Africa had four while others had as many as six, and it now appears that all the waves were of different viruses with each attacking a different specific body system, and many of them were also specific to one ethnic group or another. When you combine this with the fact that the outbreaks occurred in multiple locations and must have been inflicted with a huge amount of pathogen to create nearly vertical infection patterns and in high numbers, and the fact that no country has ever reported finding a ‘patient zero‘, there is no way to deny that this entire adventure was deliberately inflicted on the people of the world.

COVID-19 indeed appears to have been a biological weapon but it was of much larger scope than merely a US bio-warfare attack on China. This was a bio-warfare attack on all the people of the world. The Americans were heavily complicit, but it wasn’t their plan; they were “just following orders”, almost certainly using their bio-weapons labs as the source and their military bases as the distribution system. There is nothing else that fits the known facts. Admittedly, it would have been technically possible to accomplish this by different means, but that would have been much more difficult and cumbersome. There is no other practical distribution system that would suffice.

In all countries where we have information, “medical experts” were giving incredibly wrong advice to the governments who were unanimously accepting it, over-riding the many and loud objections by their own health staff. It is especially damning that, again in most countries where we have information, the governments instructed the public to not see a doctor if they were ill, but to stay at home and wait, and go to a hospital if they became critical. And doctors in many countries were firmly told to not see or treat COVID patients, and that there was no treatment possible. And yet treatment was available and all those lives could have been saved since it now appears true that hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin are in fact effective treatments. And this was apparently all done for the sake of pushing the spike injections. And we still do not know why.

It should not be ignored that only in China was containing the virus the main task. In all of the West, containment was half-hearted and leaky at best, lockdowns and quarantines intended to fail. If you have a barn with three doors and you want to prevent your horses from running off, you lock all the doors; you don’t leave one wide open. The so-called “restrictions” in the West were meant only to provide a public image of ‘doing something’ while actually doing nothing consequential. And that means the virus was meant to sweep through the Western populations to assist the scare-mongering into injections.

The prospect of the forced injections is especially disturbing because most Western nations have now been conditioned to this, and it will appear again. I recall reading a statement by a Robert Kagan look-alike who said that the only way to get full control of the world’s population would be to “line everyone up and give them a vaccination”. It will happen again. Bill Gates said “Next time, we will do in in 6 months.” It didn’t work perfectly this time, but it may have worked well enough; in many countries a very high percentage of the population were vaccinated with the mRNA vaccines, many of them multiple times, and we still don’t know what was contained in them. My instinct tells me that the vaccination programs contain most of the secret to this.

To actually force people to be vaccinated by threatening publics with fines and prison sentences, refusing them entry to most public facilities, to deny parents access to their own children, just for the sake of the vaccination, means that jabbing everyone was of extreme importance to the plan. And the extreme attacks on the supposed “anti-vaxxers” was not an accident. Anyone speaking against the untested COVID vaccines was derided, attacked, de-platformed, excoriated as scum and a mentally-unbalanced conspiracy theorist. I have seldom seen such vicious attacks on sincere people with genuine concerns.

There are more chapters to this story – all damning – dealing with the PCR test, the treatments and medications, and of course the injections (vaccinations). I will deal with them in subsequent articles. With all the pieces assembled, it seems impossible to avoid the conclusion that COVID-19 was a lab-created virus unleashed upon the world according to some master plan. It also seems impossible to explain why so many governments would have participated in this massive fraud, apparently willingly. Nevertheless, whatever the end purpose or motivation, this does not bode well for the common people, except perhaps in China and Russia and possibly one or two other countries who have not been party to this.

*

Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 32 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chapt. 2 — Dealing with Demons).

His full archive can be seen at

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/

He can be contacted at:

2186604556@qq.com

Notes

(1) https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-3-en-online:7

(2) https://www.grand-jury.net/

(3) https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/a-covid-19-theory-i-cannot-prove/

A COVID-19 Theory I Cannot Prove

(4) http://thesaker.is/propaganda-and-the-media-all-you-have-to-do-is-think-part-4/

Propaganda and the Media: All you have to do is think – Part 4

(5) https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-3-en-online:7

Timeline 3:44:00; Dr. Shankara Chetty

(6) https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-3-en-online:7

Timeline 1:33:00; Dr. Soňa Peková

https://ia601401.us.archive.org/34/items/8-pgs-covid-19-chetty-a-biological-weapon-targeting-ethnicity-and-body-systems-reader-view/8PGS-COVID-19%20%E2%80%93%20CHETTY-A%20Biological%20Weapon%20Targeting%20Ethnicity%20and%20Body%20Systems%20__%20Reader%20View.pdf

https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/covid-19-a-biological-weapon-targeting-ethnicity-and-body-systems/

COVID-19 – A Biological Weapon Targeting Ethnicity and Body Systems

Larry Romanoff • March 20, 2022 • 5,000 Words • 216 Comments • Reply29-36 minutes 3/19/2022

Much of this essay is based on the testimony of a long list of eminent physicians and scientists to the Grand Jury of the Court of Public Opinion on COVID-19, chaired by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich.[1]https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-3-en-...line:7[2]https://www.grand-jury.net/ The content here follows closely on that of my previous essay, A COVID-19 Theory I Cannot Prove.[3]https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/a-covid-19-theory-i-ca...prove/

A COVID-19 Theory I Cannot Prove

First, Let’s Think

In one article (Part 4) of a series titled ‘Propaganda and the Media’ that I wrote for the Saker, I began with this observation:

“If I were a dictator, one of my first dictates would be that every adult must take at least one university-level course in logic. In today’s world, with what is essentially an international criminal element in control, one which effectively manages public perception through their leverage over the mass media, readers would benefit immensely from some exposure to the principles of logic.”[4]http://thesaker.is/propaganda-and-the-media-all-you...art-4/

Propaganda and the Media: All you have to do is think – Part 4

Consider for a moment the “China virus”, the Wuhan lab-leak theory, the myriad other claims of China contaminating the world with COVID-19, some American groups even dramatically filing spurious lawsuits against China. Yet this was always nonsense.

Let’s review something very basic. COVID-19 exploded in Wuhan and began to spread, so the health authorities first isolated Wuhan and then locked down the entire province of Hubei. The pathogen did escape Wuhan, but not Hubei. Almost all the infections and nearly every death were in Wuhan or Hubei. The virus did not escape to infect any other city or province in China. Nearby Shanghai had only a few infections and deaths while a great many cities and provinces had none, and it ended quickly.

But COVID was so determined to distribute its benefits to a greater portion of mankind that it decided to bypass China and attack the US instead, followed by Europe, Africa, the rest of Asia, and so on. Well, how would this work, exactly? If the virus couldn’t escape Hubei to attack China, how – exactly – could it have escaped to attack the US? HOW did COVID make a flying leap out of Wuhan, bypass the Chinese Mainland altogether, and land in the streets of New York, Rome, Hamburg, and Tokyo? If the virus were progressively leaking out of Wuhan – the “dictatorial and draconian prison” – and escaping to infect every other continent and country, how could it avoid contaminating all of China in the process?

It doesn’t matter if COVID was a lab leak in Wuhan because it didn’t escape beyond Wuhan. We have long since had proof that the virus strains in other countries were very different from that in China and thus must have arisen from another source, but the Western conviction remains that this is a “Chinese” virus that spread throughout the world. Almost no one seems to have the clarity of thought to realise this would have been impossible and that the incessant media attacks were merely a psy-op to deflect suspicion and blame the victim. And yet I have no doubt that most reading this will be unable to recognise the logic and will stubbornly continue to believe there must have been some way for the ‘China’ virus to have infected the world. And not only to infect the world, but to have infected nearly half of the countries on the same day. The logical impossibility of that, seems to have no apparent effect on stillborn minds.

China was unhappy when the US curtailed all flights from China to the US because the flights were from infection-free areas, that action widely seen as merely one more economic-warfare attack on China. And yes, there were some Chinese citizens travelling the world and who produced a positive PCR test (quite possibly a false positive), but these were discovered in foreign cities in ones and twos, hardly sufficient to suddenly inflame a simultaneous worldwide pandemic in 200 countries.

The incredibly rapid spread of COVID-19 should have aroused enormous suspicions around the world because natural pandemics don’t act in this fashion without a lot of help. SARS-Cov-1 touched only 24 countries in 8 months while SARS-Cov-2 hit 196 countries in 1 month, and it is confirmed that not one of those countries has ever found a patient zero. Why doesn’t that set off the alarm bells?

Where Are We Going?

In major international matters such as these, there are no accidents. The eventual outcome, whatever it is and however odd it appears to be, was the planned result. I would refer you to ZIKA, the illness that never was. If you recall, all the media hype quickly turned to massive coverage about microcephaly, proven to be unrelated but used as a psychological weapon in an astonishing push by literally scores of NGOs (all American-financed and almost all Jewish-organised) for removing the abortion legislation in all of Latin America. And that was the result; so far, three nations have rescinded their abortion legislation in what was the last hold-out.

In all major international events, the “official narrative” promulgated by the mass media usually reveal to us the main purpose. With 9-11, it became clear immediately that Iraq was the purpose and the target. With ZIKA, it became immediately clear that the purpose was the removal of abortion restrictions in all of Latin America. With Ukraine, it was obvious almost immediately that the purpose was the re-colonisation of Europe. All of this was evident from the content of the media flood, with literally hundreds of articles every day in the Western and other press, pushing our thinking in those directions.

Much of the fall-out of COVID is yet to come. It will surely be major since most advanced economies took a beating. It seems clear that one of the planned results was the destruction of China’s economy, and perhaps Russia’s as well, but the Western nations weren’t exactly spared either so that suggests something worthy of the cost.

Some people were very concerned that we were headed for an ID-2020 world society where the vaccination passports were to become universal and then morph into an absolute societal control system worldwide. I agree the signs were there, but now suddenly that seems to have been abandoned, with restrictions being removed everywhere in spite of the fact that many countries are still experiencing high new infection rates. That tells us that the objective has already been accomplished, that COVID has served its purpose and can be permitted to quietly die and be replaced once again by the seasonal flu.

In the case of COVID, all of the media push was fear-mongering, toward the extreme lethality of the virus and the absolute necessity of all persons being vaccinated. Anyone offering a contrary or even a cautionary view was crushed, the reputations of even very qualified medical personnel being horribly trashed, and even Facebook and Twitter censoring everyone who spoke out. That tells us this was the main point.

So the question is: WHY did those responsible want everyone vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine that has proven to be largely ineffective, where in many countries nearly all new infections occur in the fully-vaccinated? This naturally raises a suspicion that the vaccine was not meant primarily (or perhaps even secondarily) to control the virus.

COVID-19 as Biological Weapon

Dr. Shankara Chetty

We can begin with Dr. Shankara Chetty, a medical doctor and biological scientist in South Africa who was deeply engaged in treating COVID-19 in his country. His testimony is similar to that of many others in like positions, and is powerful and direct.[5]https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-3-en-...line:7

Timeline 3:44:00; Dr. Shankara Chetty

Dr. Chetty stated that nearly everything about COVID-19 seemed suspicious to him from the outset. He claimed physicians were being pushed hard to use a PCR test when “this kind of test is never used as a diagnostic tool”. And it worried him that the results of this inappropriate test were being used to determine public health measures. There were two items of special concern to him; one was that the government was telling the people to not go to a doctor but to stay at home and, if they became seriously or critically ill, to go to the hospital. Similarly, doctors were told to not treat patients because there was no treatment. In particular, the government was directing doctors and hospitals against the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin which would normally have been the treatment of choice.

The second concern was that so-called experts advising the government didn’t question any of the items he knew were wrong or suspect, and the government was following their advice. Dr. Chetty said he quickly developed a very healthy suspicion about what he was being told because the government experts “were punting this narrative” when there was no existing proof for any of it and where some of their statements were provably untrue.

Thus, when the virus first reached South Africa, (the first wave), he ignored the PCR tests and diagnosed the illness by its symptoms, the loss of smell and taste, though that was suspicious also because those symptoms didn’t normally occur with a virus. He said what the patients seemed to have was just a common flu, and that most patients recovered quickly with little more than a sore throat.

He said the first treatment drug that came to his mind was hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) because it had been used for decades, was well-known, and had broad antiviral properties. He’d been treating patients with it for 30 years and never had a side effect with it. In preparation, he bought a big stock, all he could find, and two days later the government pulled it from the shelves.

In every case with symptoms of consequence, he treated his patients with HCQ and all fully recovered within a few days or a week at the most. There were no recurrences or secondary infections, meaning that a solid immunity had been established. This is very different from the experience in the Western countries where many had been re-infected, especially those who had received several injections (vaccinations).

But there was a secondary symptom of breathlessness which occurred later “in a small subset” of patients and with potentially serious effects, and which was responsible for the deaths. Some cases were minor, some more severe and lasted longer, but some were serious, occurring very suddenly and progressing very quickly with patients needing a ventilator within a day. The breathlessness seemed to always occur exactly one week after appearance of the first symptoms, the patients having been perfectly fine the day before and completely recovered from the virus. He noted that the same was also happening in Italy, which indicated the two countries were dealing with the same strain.

He said there was no relation between the severity of the initial symptoms (from the virus) and the onset of breathlessness on the 8th day. So he was dealing with a non-linear illness that was bi-phasic with no correlation between the phases, meaning two different pathologies that were unrelated, and which were not influenced by any pre-existing health issues. He concluded that he was dealing with some kind of hypersensitivity, that these people were having some sort of allergic reaction. The pneumonia (from the virus) was gone and he was now dealing with another pathogen.

Dr. Chetty’s grand discovery, and his conclusion, were that the COVID virus was not the pathogen. It did cause an infection but our immune system was strong enough to fight it off. But after that, the debris left behind by the 8th day caused allergic reactions and it was this that was killing people. The spike protein was the primary pathogen and this was responsible for the illness, hospitalisations and deaths. For those who were not allergic to the spike protein, their body would clear it away, but for those who were allergic, and if the allergy were severe, it could kill them. It’s the same as a bee sting; most people have only an itch while a few will obtain a body rash that requires some time to abate. But if your allergy is severe, you will die without immediate treatment. He noted also that a study in China found a very high correlation between allergic markers and the spike protein, confirming that his diagnosis had been correct and that it was not the virus but a severe allergy to the spike protein that was responsible for the injuries and deaths.

He put these patients on steroids and antihistamines, and all fully recovered without need for supplementary oxygen or ventilators. Dr. Chetty said he treated about 10,000 patients, none of whom experienced any injury and with not a single death.

With his suspicion from the start that they were dealing with a lab-made virus, he wrote an article on what he had learned about treating the virus, and “that was where the trouble started”. He said in his article that if people applied the early treatment, then the use of an mRNA vaccine developed hastily and rushed to market would be unnecessary. He shared his findings with everyone who came to mind, beginning with the President of South Africa, various government members, and the country’s health systems. They all ignored him. He sent his findings to all the hospitals and labs, with the same result. He also sent it to every doctor he knew, with somewhat better results.

In an attempt to gain more traction for what he had learned about COVID, Dr. Chetty submitted his paper to “every publication I could find”. All refused to publish it, usually on the grounds that they needed the copyright or they published only from subscribers. He said that when his government and health officials ignored him and the medical journals chose to “cherry-pick” vital scientific health knowledge, he knew he was dealing with a vast “collusion”. And when he considered the political drama with HCQ, the sanitation measures, all the media hype and misinformation, the so-called “medical experts” advising his government, the intense push for vaccines, he knew there was “a bigger plan in play” and that the virus had to have been a deliberately-released lab creation.

Interestingly, Dr. Chetty shared what he had learned with his colleagues in India and experienced a grateful reception. At the time, one province in India was suffering an enormous COVID attack that was apparently suppressed in record time and with few deaths, from following Dr. Chetty’s treatment recommendations. Even more interesting were reports of phone discussions between Biden and Indian President Modi with the word on the street that India would not reveal their methods of treating the coronavirus in return for favors from the US.

But there was much more. South Africa experienced four “waves” of the COVID virus, and all were different. During the first wave, the symptoms were loss of taste and smell, but these disappeared in the second wave, and were replaced by new symptoms. In the second wave, the allergic symptom, the breathlessness, disappeared to be replaced by gastrointestinal problems, and with reactions that were much more severe than in the first wave. So, there was still an allergic reaction on the 8th day but now in the intestinal tract instead of in the lungs.

Dr. Chetty was convinced that the spike protein was the culprit, and it had changed in a way that gave it a new affinity for receptors in the gastrointestinal system, which reinforced his conviction he was dealing with a lab-made virus. He discovered that only the spike protein had mutated, not the rest of the virus, which he said was very strange because that doesn’t happen in nature. Very importantly, Dr. Chetty noted that while engineering a virus in a lab, you can also engineer the mutations it will undergo.

With the third wave, the symptoms on the 8th day were not breathlessness or gastroenteritis, but now the mutated spike protein attacked the cardiovascular (circulatory) system. He said he expected that Omicron, with 50 new mutations in the spike protein, was yet another new engineered virus. It then became clearly evident that Omicron was neuro-toxic, affecting the nervous system. So, South Africa’s four waves presented entirely different initial symptoms and the mutated spike protein attacked four different major body systems: respiratory, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and neural.

There was something even more startling. In the first wave, Dr. Chetty had only black people as patients. In the second wave it was mostly patients of Indian descent who came to him. He said, “No black patients any more, all Indians”. It was the second wave that severely ravaged India, and in Dr. Chetty’s second wave he had mostly Indian patients, presumably the same strain. In the third wave, there were almost no black or Indian patients; instead, they were “all white and Muslim”. You can recall that in the US, the first wave especially affected blacks. With China, COVID was initially 100% Chinese-specific until the virus mutated. This toxicity of the spike protein to a particular body system may be universal. Some countries were exposed to more strains than others, not all with the same number of strains (waves), and in other countries other major body systems were affected, the reproductive system being one. Also, the ethnic-specificity of different waves in different countries may be universal but we don’t have the information because the media control the narrative and these topics are subject to a full news embargo.

Dr. Chetty said these discoveries drew his attention to “something far more sinister”. He said he had always had thoughts in the back of his mind about COVID having been a pre-planned deliberate release, and that he now finally understood that it had to have been done according to a pre-arranged plan. Dr. Chetty said he repeatedly thought about COVID having been engineered, and that if it could affect different systems and different ethnicities, “that is a very bad omen”. He said “This is a preamble to ethnic cleansing. It was a practice lesson in how to affect different systems and different population groups with mutations that you engineer into a virus.” And he knew not only that he was dealing with a bio-weapon, but that Pfizer and others were going to expose the entire planet to the toxic spike protein. “If you demonstrate that the spike protein is the primary pathogen, [and expose this], that shows the vaccines in a very dangerous light.”

Dr. Soňa Peková

Next, we have the testimony of Dr. Soňa Peková,[6]https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-3-en-...line:7

Timeline 1:33:00; Dr. Soňa Peková

a Molecular Biologist from the Czech Republic, whose observations and conclusions were nearly identical to those of Dr. Chetty. She observed as well that all subsequent waves contained many mutations and were genomically different from each other. They discovered that each “wave” was created by a different strain of the virus, but also that the various strains were not directly inter-related. This meant that a new wave was not a direct descendant, a mutated resurgence, from the prior wave, but the introduction into the population of a completely new strain of the virus.

Dr. Peková noted that in the transition from one “wave” to another, the virus lost many of its mutations from the previous wave, something that is not evolutionarily possible. A virus is not able to erase mutations and return to the original blueprint. A virus cannot “shed” mutations once adopted; it simply continues adding new changes, which again means that each new wave was a new strain of the virus that had been manufactured and then introduced into the population.

It should be noted that it was due only to the very up-to-date tools in this lab that these discoveries could be made. It was possible to do this only by using ‘next-generation’ sequencing; the more common tools would never have discovered this. Dr. Peková’s lab analysed more than 30,000 samples, using this new tool for the full sequencing of the entire genome, of the individual waves and the individual viruses. It was due only to the next-generation sequencing that they could actually identify the genetic diversity among the waves.

Next generation sequencing (NGS), is a DNA sequencing technology which has revolutionised genomic research. Using NGS an entire human genome can be sequenced within a single day. In contrast, the previous Sanger sequencing technology, used to decipher the human genome, required over a decade to deliver the final draft. Although in genome research NGS has mostly superseded conventional Sanger sequencing, it has not yet translated into routine clinical practice.

Dr. Peková said the waves of COVID “smashed through the country” in “an orchestrated way”, to the extent that it was even announced months in advance that it would happen, that a new wave would come. She said it was so strange; her country was clear in the Summer of 2020, there being no virus present at that time, so how could the government know that there would be a rapid and abrupt new wave coming soon? “How were they able to predict there would be another wave coming in September? It was announced ahead of time, and the waves appeared as predicted.” She said further, “to have a respiratory disease starting at the end of August is impossible; we never see this in the warm summer but only later in the year with the cold and rain.”

The wave circulating in Czechia in Nov 2020 was genomically quite different from that in the Spring, but Czechia had closed its borders and it was deemed impossible to experience a new pathogen in a confined population. So their question was “what or where was the source of those new generations”? Dr. Peková stated very firmly that even the mass media admitted “There is no known origin of the Omicron variant”, so “in my eyes it came from a lab, and it was deliberately leaked. All the clues show that it is on purpose.”

Dr. Luc Montagnier

In early 2020, Dr. Luc Montagnier, who was awarded a Nobel Prize for the discovery of the virus that causes AIDS, stated, “We have carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus. We weren’t the first, a group of Indian researchers tried to publish a study showing that the complete genome of this virus has within the sequences of another virus: that of HIV.” [NOTE: the Indian group did publish their discovery but were apparently under intense pressure to withdraw it, the media quickly insinuating the withdrawal was due to inaccuracy but the picture was by no means clear on that, and the pressure appears to have been political rather than scientific.] Dr. Montagnier’s point was that the COVID genome does indeed contain spliced segments of HIV RNA, something that cannot be a coincidence and could have occurred only in a lab. I believe he stated as well that the presence of these HIV segments could not have resulted from any natural evolutionary process.[7]https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/04/30/bi...icine/

Big Pharma Beware: Dr. Montagnier Shines New Light on COVID-19 and The Future of Medicine

Epilogue

The waves in different countries were not all the same, and not every country had the same number of waves. Some like South Africa had four while others had as many as six, and it now appears that all the waves were of different viruses with each attacking a different specific body system, and many of them were also specific to one ethnic group or another. When you combine this with the fact that the outbreaks occurred in multiple locations and must have been inflicted with a huge amount of pathogen to create nearly vertical infection patterns and in high numbers, and the fact that no country has ever reported finding a ‘patient zero’, there is no way to deny that this entire adventure was deliberately inflicted on the people of the world.

COVID-19 indeed appears to have been a biological weapon but it was of much larger scope than merely a US bio-warfare attack on China. This was a bio-warfare attack on all the people of the world. The Americans were heavily complicit, but it wasn’t their plan; they were “just following orders”, almost certainly using their bio-weapons labs as the source and their military bases as the distribution system. There is nothing else that fits the known facts. Admittedly, it would have been technically possible to accomplish this by different means, but that would have been much more difficult and cumbersome. There is no other practical distribution system that would suffice.

And this, based on circumstantial evidence alone, had to have been a Jewish program. The most damning evidence is the one that is most obvious – the mass media which worldwide is almost entirely controlled by Jews. The entire Western media and also in much of the rest of the world, were all onside, pushing precisely the same agenda, with the same daily floods of doomsday news, of magnificent falsehoods, tales of death and depression everywhere, with intense psychological manipulation for which these people are famous, and the intense push to manipulate everyone to accept the spike injections. There is no Gentile organisation anywhere with the power to assemble and energise the Jewish media as a group to do anything, and certainly nothing of this scale. Logic alone tells us this had to be a Jewish agenda. There is no other possibility that fits all the facts. And of course, Pfizer and Moderna, both Jewish companies, were in the forefront of the injection schemes. Gilead is another, with its Remdesivir.

In all countries where we have information, “medical experts” were giving incredibly wrong advice to the governments who were unanimously accepting it, over-riding the many and loud objections by their own health staff. It is especially damning that, again in most countries where we have information, the governments instructed the public to not see a doctor if they were ill, but to stay at home and wait, and go to a hospital if they became critical. And doctors in many countries were firmly told to not see or treat COVID patients, and that there was no treatment possible. And yet treatment was available and all those lives could have been saved since it now appears true that hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin are in fact effective treatments. And this was apparently all done for the sake of pushing the spike injections. And we still do not know why.

It should not be ignored that only in China was containing the virus the main task. In all of the West, containment was half-hearted and leaky at best, lockdowns and quarantines intended to fail. If you have a barn with three doors and you want to prevent your horses from running off, you lock all the doors; you don’t leave one wide open. The so-called “restrictions” in the West were meant only to provide a public image of ‘doing something’ while actually doing nothing consequential. And that means the virus was meant to sweep through the Western populations to assist the scare-mongering into injections.

The prospect of the forced injections is especially disturbing because most Western nations have now been conditioned to this, and it will appear again. I recall reading a statement by a Robert Kagan look-alike who said that the only way to get full control of the world’s population would be to “line everyone up and give them a vaccination”. It will happen again. Bill Gates said “Next time, we will do in in 6 months.” It didn’t work perfectly this time, but it may have worked well enough; in many countries a very high percentage of the population were vaccinated with the mRNA vaccines, many of them multiple times, and we still don’t know what was contained in them. My instinct tells me that the vaccination programs contain most of the secret to this.

To actually force people to be vaccinated by threatening publics with fines and prison sentences, refusing them entry to most public facilities, to deny parents access to their own children, just for the sake of the vaccination, means that jabbing everyone was of extreme importance to the plan. And the extreme attacks on the supposed “anti-vaxxers” was not an accident. Anyone speaking against the untested COVID vaccines was derided, attacked, de-platformed, excoriated as scum and a mentally-unbalanced conspiracy theorist. I have seldom seen such vicious attacks on sincere people with genuine concerns.

There are more chapters to this story – all damning – dealing with the PCR test, the treatments and medications, and of course the injections (vaccinations). I will deal with them in subsequent articles. With all the pieces assembled, it seems impossible to avoid the conclusion that COVID-19 was a lab-created virus unleashed upon the world according to some master plan. It also seems impossible to explain why so many governments would have participated in this massive fraud, apparently willingly. Nevertheless, whatever the end purpose or motivation, this does not bode well for the common people, except perhaps in China and Russia and possibly one or two other countries who have not been party to this.

Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 32 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chapt. 2 — Dealing with Demons). http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/2187/

His full archive can be seen at https://www.moonofshanghai.com/ and http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/

He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com

Notes

[1] https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-3-en-online:7

[2] https://www.grand-jury.net/

[3] https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/a-covid-19-theory-i-cannot-prove/

A COVID-19 Theory I Cannot Prove

[4] http://thesaker.is/propaganda-and-the-media-all-you-have-to-do-is-think-part-4/

Propaganda and the Media: All you have to do is think – Part 4

[5] https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-3-en-online:7

Timeline 3:44:00; Dr. Shankara Chetty

[6] https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-3-en-online:7

Timeline 1:33:00; Dr. Soňa Peková

[7] https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/04/30/big-pharma-beware-dr-montagnier-shines-new-light-on-covid-19-and-the-future-of-medicine/

https://uncensored.co.nz/2022/02/20/nz-parliaments-arrogance/

The knowledge of those who have successfully treated Omicron is being ignored in this country, which is why the experience of people like Dr Shankara Chetty of South Africa, who holds qualifications in medicine, surgery, genetics, biochemistry and microbiology, is so important.

Having treated almost 8,000 Covid patients in his rural practice, including many who arrived critically ill by ambulance, he reports that none have died, been hospitalised, or needed oxygen. As a result, Dr Chetty is now recognised as a world authority on Covid treatment, but you won’t read about him in our mainstream media.

Once he understood that if Covid patients were going to become seriously unwell, that change occurred on Day 8, he realised it is a biphasic illness. The first phase is a self-limiting viral illness, and the second phase only occurs in the minority of patients who are hypersensitive to Covid’s spike protein. In those people, it triggers a severe allergic reaction in the lungs, which, if left untreated, can spiral into a life-threatening cycle of hyper-inflammation and hyper-coagulation.

Dr Chetty treats the first phase as any cold or flu, according to the symptoms. But for those patients developing the second phase – a hypersensitivity pneumonitis – a toolbox of treatments is needed, which includes antihistamines to suppress the allergic response and steroids to reduce the swelling.

In an interview not to be missed – see HERE – Dr Chetty discusses Omicron: “There is little to fear from Omicron, as it is a mild variant, and there is no reason to panic. In South Africa, there is no increase in hospital and ICU admissions, despite the increase in cases.”

When asked how to differentiate between Delta and Omicron, he explains, “The symptoms are very different. With Delta we are seeing the respiratory symptoms. We are noticing the deterioration on the 8th day which can be severe. With the Omicron variant we are noticing that patients don’t have respiratory symptoms per se. They have a sore throat on the first day which by the second or third day resolves completely. But the overriding symptom they present with is fatigue, headaches.”

He explains that few people infected with Omicron develop the Day 8 allergic response, but if they do, and are treated with antihistamines and steroids, there should be a full recovery. He also mentions that in some countries, because every hospital admission is tested for Omicron, if patients are infected – even though they have been admitted for other medical reasons – they are counted as hospitalised Omicron cases, misrepresenting the variant as far more dangerous than it really is.

And when it comes to fearmongering – using the threat of Omicron to force people to get booster shots – Dr Chetty has some strong words: “I think it’s absolutely nonsensical… The only thing vaccines have shown some benefit in, is to prevent severe disease and death. Omicron does not cause severe disease or death; it causes mild illness… I don’t see the point to mass vaccinate the population to prevent severe disease and death from a variant that does not cause severe disease and death. And of course, notwithstanding that the vaccine can have severe side effects… The risk of the variant does not warrant taking such a risk as a mass vaccination campaign. It’s nonsensical.”

Dr Chetty believes it will be virtually impossible for anyone to avoid being infected with Omicron and he suggests that the lasting natural immunity it confers – which is far superior to that acquired from vaccination – will provide important herd immunity protection if more deadly variants emerge in the future.

That’s why governments around the world are moving to lift mandates and all other Covid restrictions once Omicron has displaced the far more dangerous Delta as the dominant strain.