The Evaluation Cycle:
A Year-Long Process

The following guidelines are designed to help educators and their evaluators implement the Nevada Educator Performance Framework. The evaluation cycle is a year-long process with multiple components (see below).

At the beginning of the school year, the educator receives a complete set of materials that includes the Teacher Instructional Practice Standards (Administrator Instructional Leadership Standards and the Teacher Professional Responsibilities Standards (Administrator Professional Responsibilities Standards rubrics with Standards, Indicators, Performance Levels, and evidence sources, as well as access to the current year’s NEPF Protocols outlining the evaluation process. The educator and evaluator meet to establish expectations and consider goals. They discuss the evaluation process together (including observations/visits, review of the evidence, etc.) and review the NEPF Rubrics that describe the Standards and Indicators. The purpose of this review is to develop and deepen a shared understanding of the Standards and Indicators in practice. The rubric review is also an opportunity to identify specific areas of focus for the upcoming school year. 

While the typical evaluation cycle is presented above, it is important to note that the evaluation cycle is differentiated for educators based on level of experience and/or previous evaluation rating (see the table below).

During the summer of 2020, Department staff worked with representatives from around the State, ranging from district personnel and heads of professional organizations to administrators and teachers, to establish additional guidance around the implementation of the NEPF in-person, hybrid, and distance learning environments. The NEPF In-Person, Hybrid, and Distance Learning Guide was created to support educators and their evaluators as they navigate observation, feedback, coaching, and evaluation in digital or blended education. The purpose is to provide guidance that proves useful in each educator’s individual context across the state of Nevada. The recommendations presented align to the expectations found in the NEPF protocols and NRS 391.650-730. Because of this, it is suggested to utilize this document alongside the standard NEPF Protocols.