Click above link to read the reflection I wrote upon completing this course.
We wrote weekly response papers to articles that had a central theme. I enjoyed this opportunity to connect texts and to dialogue with them in my own way. I also experienced the archives from the perspective of a researcher in the reading room and completed the steps to create a mock poster for a poster sessions.
These words of praise from my professor, from my professor, Ms. Dalena Sanderson-Hunter, a Ph. D. candidate studying at UCLA under Anne Gilliland, meant a great deal to me as I had meaningfully connected with that week's reading about creating voices for the voiceless in the archive. While it is a human inclination to right the wrongs of the past, speculating about marginalized individuals' lives based on cursory archival mentions is an overcorrection as it once again takes from a person the right to own their identity and declare it. My response paper can be found here.
Assignment Three asked us to take concrete research, extend it in a logical but fictional fashion and then create a poster for a poster session. I opted to focus on community archives as not just a repository of information but a community center of unity and education. As I explained in my write-up:
Undoubtedly, community archives are flourishing around the world, both physically and digitally. There is a flood of scholarly articles being published about community archives, their identities and their effects. However, many of the articles focus on just one facet of the studied community archive, which is often social activism being realized through the non-traditional repository. The consistently narrowed focus begs the questions: what else do these community archives do to be social activists? How do they see themselves in the community? What are they trying to accomplish?
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four
My final paper was actually inspired by readings from LIS 540 that pointed out community archives are, to a certain extent, doing what was done to them in traditional archives by marginalizing less accepted sects, hiding unpleasant truths or restricting access based on "proof" of membership in a minority culture. I took the stance that, archivists are armed with not just archival skills but also the knowledge that “history is written by the victors,” having witnessed the ways traditional archival practice systematically erased or minimized the existence of certain peoples. In the new world of archival practice, archivist must take on the mantle of activist - become "archtivists" - and help community archive initiatives not just to engage in sound practice but avoid making the same mistakes that rewrote history.
Aided with the excellent second edition of Digital Preservation for Libraries, Archives and Museums by Edward Corrado and Heather Moulaison Sandy, we examined digital assets from front to back and their lifecycle from beginning to end. We performed case studies on existing digital repositories and their current policies. We debated the merits of interoperability between systems; whether or not standardizing metadata would be a useful investment of time and energy; how long term preservation can best be accomplished; and even how the concept of original order fits into the digital landscape of library and information science.