Working Papers
Greenback? Sustainable Investing and the International Transmission of Monetary Policy Submitted!
Job Market Paper
[Paper]
[Bluesky thread][Twitter thread]
Abstract: This paper studies how US monetary policy shocks affect foreign firms depending on their carbon emissions. Combining high-frequency monetary surprises with firm-level data for about 5,000 non-US firms across 38 countries, I show that US monetary tightening disproportionately impacts higher ("brown") relative to lower ("green") emitters: investment, debt, and equity prices decline more sharply, while bond spreads rise more for firms with higher carbon intensity. To rationalize these findings, I develop a model featuring a global sustainable investor with (i) limited risk-bearing capacity for transition-risky assets and (ii) with preferences for holding green securities. Both channels imply that tighter US monetary policy widens the return differential between brown and green assets, and thus disproportionately decreases capital and investment for brown firms, in line with my empirical evidence. As both channels operate in the same direction, this leads to an identification challenge, which I overcome by matching granular investor-firm data for US global funds' holdings and the universe of syndicated lending to non-US borrowers. I identify the risk-bearing channel by estimating US spillovers holding investors' preferences constant while exploiting variation in firms' carbon intensity; and vice versa for the preferences channel. Through this strategy, I find support for both channels. My findings suggest that emission-dependent monetary spillovers can make greener countries more resilient to US spillovers, while browner ones, commonly emerging economies, are penalised.
Presentations: Bank of England, University of Oxford.
Sanctions and Currencies in Global Credit, with Giovanni Rosso and Roger Vicquery.
[Paper] [Oxford Discussion Paper]
[Bluesky thread][Twitter thread]
Abstract: This paper studies the effect of financial sanctions on the dominance of the US dollar in global credit markets. In the aftermath of the invasion of Crimea in 2014, sanctions imposed by both the US and the EU restricted the provision of financial services to Russian firms. We document how, between 2014 and 2021, the share of global cross-border credit to Russia denominated in US dollars declined from 65% to 25%, while the share denominated in euros rose from 20% to 45%. Relying on confidential bank-level data covering the universe of global banks located in the UK, we show that this shift was driven by banks previously lending to Russia in US dollars, and that banks shifted to euro lending to Russia regardless of whether their ultimate owner was based in a sanctioning jurisdiction or not. We argue that this euroisation relates to an increase in the relative “settlement risk” of US dollar claims, in the context of US extra-territorial sanctions targeting the dollar payment system. We rationalise our findings in a three-country model with financial intermediaries, where sanctions are introduced as both jurisdiction and currency-circuit specific frictions.
Presentations: Bank of England, University of Oxford, Transatlantic Doctoral Conference - London Business School [London, June 2025], 9th Annual Research Conference "Economic and Financial Integration in a Stormy and Fragmenting World" [Kyiv, June 2025], Kiel-CEPR Research Seminar [Berlin, Oct 2025], Stabilization Policy Amid Shifting Global Relations - BdF & EUI [Paris, November 2025].
Dominant Currency Pricing Transition, with Giovanni Rosso and Roger Vicquery.
[Paper] [Bank of England Working Paper] [Oxford Discussion Paper] [Centre for Macroeconomics Discussion Paper] [Slides]
[VoxEU] [Bank Underground] [Twitter thread] [Coverage: FT, Alternatives Economiques]
Abstract: We explore an episode of aggregate transition to dominant currency pricing in a large developed economy, relying on transaction-level data on the universe of UK trade between 2010 and 2022. Until 2016, the majority of UK non-EU exports were invoiced in British pounds, the ”producer” currency. However, in the aftermath of the June 2016 Brexit referendum and the subsequent depreciation of the pound, the share of non-EU UK exports invoiced in pounds started to sharply decrease – by more than 20 percentage points. This was mirrored by an increase of similar magnitude in the share of US dollar invoicing, which by 2019 overtook the pound as the main non-EU export invoicing currency. Using shift-share and event-study identification strategies, we show that large foreign-exchange movements can generate a transition in invoicing choices for firms with low levels of operational hedging, that is whose exports are not denominated in the same currency as their import. We find that that this currency-mismatch valuation channel accounts for most of the transition away from producer currency pricing, above and beyond effects from strategic complementarities and market power. Finally, we show that this shift in export pricing paradigm has important aggregate consequences for export pass-through and the allocative effects of price rigidities. Exports exhibit significantly higher elasticity to USD exchange-rate movements after the Brexit referendum: a USD dollar appreciation depresses demand for exports by twice as much than before this ‘dominant currency pricing transition’.
Presentations: Bank of England, University of Oxford, Joint BIS, BoE, ECB and IMF Spillover Conference [Basel, April 2024], LSE-Oxford Workshop in International Macroeconomics and Finance [London, May 2024], Eighth Annual Workshop ESCB Research Cluster 2 International Macroeconomics, Fiscal Policy, Labour Economics, Competitiveness and EMU Governance [Rome, October 2024], 10th BdF-BoE-BdI international macroeconomics workshop: "Structural factors in the global economy" [Paris, October 2024], 10th Annual West Coast Workshop in International Finance [Santa Clara, April 2025], "10 years of Brexit: economic impacts and lessons learned" workshop [London, May 2025]
Deep Integration and Trade: UK Firms in the Wake of Brexit, with Rebecca Freeman, Enrico Longoni, Rebecca Mari, Kalina Manova, Thomas Prayer, Thomas Sampson. Submitted!
[CEP Discussion Paper] [Oxford Discussion Paper] [CEPR Discussion Paper]
[VoxEU] [Blog - UKICE] [Coverage: The Economist, FT, Times, City AM, Politico, Guardian, BBC, nu.nl]
Abstract: How does dismantling deep integration affect international trade? This paper provides new evidence on the consequences of disintegration by estimating the impact of Brexit on goods trade by UK firms. The UK's exit from the EU's single market and customs union in January 2021 led to an immediate, sharp drop in both exports and imports with the EU for the average firm. In addition, many exporters and importers stopped trading with the EU entirely. However, heterogeneous firm-level responses to the implementation of trade barriers mitigated Brexit's impact on aggregate trade. The decline in exports was concentrated among smaller firms, but insignificant for the largest firms. Our estimates imply that, in the short run, leaving the EU reduced worldwide UK exports by 6.4% and worldwide imports by 3.1%. The fall in imports was driven by lower imports from the EU, which importers offset by sourcing more from the rest of the world.
Presentations: NIESR [London, November 2023], ASSA session "De-Globalisation and Reconfiguration of Trade Flows" [San Antonio, January 2024], LSE-CEP Trade Policy Workshop [London, May 2024],"New economic perspectives on trade costs" workshop, [Paris, May 2025], "International Trade and Industrial Policy in a Changing World" [Paris, May 2025], "10 years of Brexit: economic impacts and lessons learned" workshop [London, May 2025], European Trade Study Group (ETSG) [Milan, Sept 2025].
Granular Monetary Policy
[Paper]
Abstract: This paper introduces the novel “granularity” channel of monetary policy. Firms targeted by corporate bonds purchases, deployed in the US for the first time in 2020 in response to the economic fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic, increase their investment more than comparable un-targeted firms, and tend to account for most capital in the economy. This means that these types of monetary policy shocks are granular fluctuations: businesses with more capital drive the change in aggregate capital following these shocks. In contrast, firms’ capital levels are not systematically related to the change in their investment following interest rate policies, government bonds purchases and forward guidance — tools more commonly employed by the Federal Reserve than corporate bonds purchases over the past decades. A simple two-sector model of heterogeneous financial intermediaries and firms with financial frictions is able to match both the stronger capital accumulation responses to corporate bonds purchases, and the high concentration of aggregate capital in the US economy into targeted firms. Through counterfactual analysis, my model reveals a sizeable role played by the “monetary granular residual”, a novel term reflecting the stronger investment responsiveness to corporate bonds purchases of firms with larger capital stocks. This residual accounts for a tenth of the overall peak impact on aggregate capital following new corporate bonds purchases by the central bank, and about 0.5% of steady-state output.
Presentations: Bank of England, University of Oxford, OFCE workshop on Empirical Monetary Economics [Paris, December 2023]
Work in progress
The International Spillovers of Central Banks' Corporate Bond Purchases, with Philipp Poyntner.
Draft coming soon!
Abstract: This paper investigates the international economic spillovers of domestic corporate bond purchases conducted by the US Federal Reserve for the first time in response to the 2020 Covid crisis. We document two novel facts. First, investigating US mutual funds' holdings reveals that investors selling domestic bonds eligible for purchases by the Fed reallocated their demand also towards similar, although ineligible, USD-denominated foreign bonds. Second, we empirically estimate the positive effect of these spillovers on firm-level investment: foreign firms issuing USD-denominated bonds with similar features to the domestic ones purchased by the Fed exhibited more resilient investment than comparable peers. We rationalise these new findings through the lens of a novel two-country model with international intermediaries and heterogeneous firms: Fed's purchases of eligible domestic bonds relax the leverage constraint of financial intermediaries, which replenish their holdings with similar foreign USD bonds. As a result, foreign firms issuing these bonds have looser investment constraints than other non-US firms. Finally, we use our model to construct two scenarios. On the one hand, should the share of USD-denominated bonds issued outside of the US keep increasing to match the size of the US bond market, the Fed would not be able to stabilise the global USD bond market solely through domestic purchases, as done during the Covid pandemic. On the other hand, a more fragmented world with lower USD dominance in international debt market would lead to substantially smaller international spillovers of Fed's corporate bonds purchases. Both scenarios point to substantial risks to the global stabilisation powers of the Fed's monetary policy.
Presentations: University of Oxford, Bank of England workshop on Credit Market Interventions [London, May 2025], SCEUS Young Scholars Workshop [Salzburg, May 2025], CEBRA at the Boston Fed/Harvard Business School [Boston, August 2025].
Climate Tariffs, Firm Heterogeneity, and Productivity, with Martin Bodenstein, Federico Di Pace, Aydan Dogan and Sarah Duffy.
Presentations: Theories and Methods in Macro (T2M) 2025 [Paris, May 2025]
Spin-off of policy work
Structural Change, Global R* and the Missing-Investment Puzzle, with Andrew Bailey, Ambrogio Cesa-Bianchi, Richard Harrison, Nick McLaren, Sophie Piton and Rana Sajedi.
[Bank of England Staff Working Paper No. 997]
[Coverage: Hutchins Roundup - Brookings]
Abstract: The world has undergone substantial structural change over recent decades, with profound implications for the long-run policy landscape. We focus on two key trends. First, the secular decline in risk-free interest rates, suggesting a fall in the long-run global equilibrium interest rate, Global R*. Using a structural model, we find that declining productivity growth and increasing longevity played the largest roles in explaining this fall. The second trend is the recorded weakness in investment, despite an increasing wedge between the return on capital and the risk-free rate. We use industry-level data for the United Kingdom to investigate the potential structural factors behind this ‘missing-investment puzzle’, and find a strong role for intangible capital.
Presentations: Supporting paper for speech by Andrew Bailey at the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum [London, July 2022].