_Socioeconomic Platform in Movie Format_ Commented Version
Liberal or Conservative?
There is ownership over the economic and social structure that governs our lives... they had certain origins and objectives when created. Built by certain groups with their operating characteristics. Even if passed down through generations, it is a machine built by someone, exploring, appropriating, seeking to perpetuate itself. Is it possible to modify the machine? Not without permission from the owner. Either you get permission, or you build another machine, after all, nothing good will come with violence. In ancient times, they organized the banking system and control structures, when nothing existed. A certain merit may exist, but ultimately it may reveal a human inability to accept a world without so many conflicts and brutal inequalities, perhaps it is part of humanity, with its primitive roots based on kill or be killed. For now, there is not much to be proud of calling ourselves humans.
Solve the bad consequences of automation, considering a low-income country with an already devalued currency, without exposing itself to inflation, without subsidies and exemptions with the potential for debt, solving the problem of the retirement 'pyramid scheme', achieving social justice along the way and without isolating the country so as not to cause scrapping. Do not forget to reserve resources to fight corruption. Security and justice on themselves are already a challenge for any government, much greater if considered as one that wants to take responsibility for all areas (security, education, health, state-owned companies and infrastructure).
So, a movie, which could be rewritten, to turn into a romance, instead of war.
Elections, liberal socialist agreement manages to establish consensus.
It is decided to adopt liberalism. The state becomes minimal: regulation, inspection, safety and justice... health? Public emergencies and triages only. Education? Only public basic education.
Transformation of Federal Universities owned by the Union into Community Universities owned by teachers, students, businesspeople and general public. Hospitals and health centers acquired by the professionals who work on them, clients, businesspeople and general public. [...] Public banks are advised to lend only to businesspeople, with labor hiring criteria. Any non-productive assets are financed only by private banks, including loans to public servants. [...]
All state-owned companies are privatized, with the exception of extractive companies. Subsidies and exemptions are now considered illegal: they consume resources and interfere with the free market. Strict rules against monopolies and cartels are created.
Each people have the right to what belongs to their land. Minimum State, of excellence.
Vouchers funded by extractivists, used to pay for health and education in the private system. Those who do not use it, receive a refund.
Low-value vouchers, complementary to the cost of treatment or education, provided after screening, in the case of the health sector, or after completion of basic education, until the establishment of the new culture based on property and the care that is usually linked to it, parallel to current configuration of the public and private health and education system, until finalized modifications of structures and realistic values with the market in each municipality can be implemented.
Investments in security allow prisoners to live in decent conditions, being able to study and work inside prisons, to cover their expenses and reduce their sentences.
The job market is now governed by the same rules, whether you are a public servant, a private employee, military personnel, or a member of the political class. The only difference is stability for public servants.
The justification for the stability for public servants is to prohibit the political overtake of the public machine, political party affiliation should also not be allowed, as well as a ban on donations to candidates, parties and political party campaigns.
In the political sphere, the electoral fund is extinguished, parties that want contributions to elections must obtain them via spontaneous contributions from their voters. Only contributions from individuals, and within certain limits, are permitted.
Tax on large fortunes and taxation of large luxury personal assets are instituted. The wealth of the very rich becomes concentrated in production and job creation.
Everyone on legal age starts to receive an amount, determined by the cost of living, called Universal Basic Income [UBI]. Due to the immense diversity of municipalities across the country, the minimum wage is now determined by the municipalities.
Not granting aid immediately after birth, an obvious disincentive for reproduction for financial reasons, also encourages medium and long-term planning.
Retirements are extinguished: everyone who is not in the job market, including retirees, starts receiving UBI. Investment funds supplement income. There are no longer any exceptions, everyone has the same [labor, criminal, tax, legal access, etc.] rights.
Retirements transferred to investment funds under the control of the beneficiary or savings, through a realistic calculation with the current public pension situation, to be used to complement Universal Basic Income.
Public banks are advised to lend only to businesspeople, with labor hiring criteria. Any non-productive assets are financed only by private banks, including loans to public servants.
Differentiated rights, besides related to deficiencies, are considered a violation of human rights, and voted illegal by a large majority. A privilege-free society is achieved: social well-being rates never been so high.
Differentiated rights besides related to disabilities are now considered illegal, that is, current differences are modified and are valid for everyone, regardless of gender, race and profession. Example: precautionary measures, currently only allowed to females, are now offered to males, with the necessary corrections regarding the right of all parties to be heard before granting, as well as prior occurrence of physical violence, threats or persecution registered, reiterated and warned. The most correct thing is that they should only be granted in cases of evidenced, registered and repeated physical violence. Otherwise, common litigation is offered through the aforementioned occurrences, with all parties notified after registration.
The borders for international trade are open and there are no tariff barriers, which allows innovation and development, after all: there is access, on the domestic market, to inputs that the country was unable to produce.
Brazil, A Second Nation for the People of the Earth
Then, the war begins.
The neoliberalism of privileges, subsidies and exemptions comes into practice in two foreign powers.
The USA and PRC adopt the neoliberal regime of privileges, subsidies and specific exemptions.
Companies in such countries are subsidized, which causes their public debts to skyrocket. Extreme inequality reigns among its citizens. They do not have access to health, education, security: nothing.
Because they are subsidized, companies from such countries become predatory, destroying the global financial ecosystem and industry.
In Brazil, crisis. How will a liberal country adopt protectionist policies if they are contrary to doctrine? In a desperate measure, Brazil considers creating tariff barriers to protect its companies.
The foundations of the doctrine wins, even in an unfair relationship. The country remains open. Its industries are destroyed, its companies are brought to their knees. State of disaster, unemployment soars.
Large-scale agriculture is nationalized. The country struggles to maintain UBI, using extractive companies profit, for all its citizens. There is nothing more than the bare minimum.
As time passes, and in economic war, the fully militarized USA and PRC total war begins. Half of the planet is reduced to ashes.
Brazil world power.
Liberal Socialist
Get to Know _liberalsocialism.org_