Multisensory Lesson Plan
Multisensory Lesson Plan
Assessment Data Performance Summaries
1. CORE Phonics Survey Summary.
- Strengths include automatic recognition of simple phonetic patterns, such as consonant blends and short vowels.
- Areas of need:
- Difficulty with multisyllabic words, more complicated vowel teams (such as /ou/ and /ow/), diphthongs, and affixes.
- Poor decoding of sophisticated phonological structures (e.g., "motion," "engines," "curious," and "introduced").
- Performance:
- Automatic: 50%.
- Identified: 65%
- Total: 60%. Below benchmark
2. Vocabulary Screening Summary.
- Strengths: - Ability to discern meanings in context and popular Tier 1 words.
- Weaknesses include Tier 2 vocabulary and abstract meanings.
- A deeper understanding of word meaning and semantic relationships is required.
- Reading Accuracy: 90%+ on easier passages, decreasing to 60% on higher levels.
- Comprehension:
- Independent: For novels such as *The Surprise* (6/6 questions answered correctly).
- Instructional: For *A Special Birthday for Rosa*, including look-backs (6/8).
- Frustration: No lookbacks (4/8).
- Oral retellings:
- Effective with actual occurrences, but lacks underlying themes or abstract relationships.
- Prioritizes surface recollection above inference.
Strategy Recommendations: Evidence-Based Practices
1. Multisensory Structured Language Education (MSLE)—(Birsh & Carreker, 2018)
- Explicit, sequential phonics instruction.
- Combines the visual, aural, kinesthetic, and tactile senses.
2. Reinforced Vocabulary Instruction—(Beck, McKeown, & Kucan, 2013)
- Tier 2 terms are taught directly and practiced contextually.
- Semantic mapping, categorization, and example creation.
3. Repeated Reading and Scaffolded Comprehension (National Reading Panel, 2000)
- Enhances fluency and meaning-making.
- Includes look-back methods and textual debate.
- Weak phonics decoding in multisyllabic and attached words leads to target phonics/decoding.
- Tier 2 has limited language depth, requiring further vocabulary education.
- Requires support for inferencing and meaning-making, such as comprehension scaffolds.
Template adapted from Birsh & Carreker, p. 700+
Objective:
Students will decode and spell multisyllabic words with vowel teams and affixes (e.g., motion, removed, introduced) with 80% accuracy, as well as define and use two Tier 2 vocabulary words contextually.
Materials:
Word cards, sound boxes, whiteboards/markers, vocabulary graphics, and a reading excerpt entitled *The Surprise*.
Lesson Structure:
Segment Time Activities.
1. Review and Warm-Up 5 min sound drill for vowel teams.
- Examine common affixes (e.g., -ed, -ing, re-).
2. Phonics Instruction: 10 minutes - Syllable division strategies (clap, tap, scoop)
- Practice decoding target words (e.g., engines and deleted).
3. Spelling Practice: 5-Minute Dictation with Multisyllabic Target Words
4. Vocabulary Instruction 10 minutes - Teach Tier 2 vocabulary (e.g., introduced, intrigued) using visuals and phrase frames.
- Activity "my example" with semantic maps.
5. Fluency and Comprehension In 8 minutes, read aloud a passage from *The Surprise* and practice with a partner using look-back questions.
- Identify Tier 2 words. 6. Wrap-up and exit ticket.2 min: Use one Tier 2 word in a sentence.
- Identify one new word pattern that they learned.
. Designing a Tier 2 lesson indicated the need to narrow focus on certain phonological patterns and incorporate repetition across several modalities. Birsh and Carreker's structure enabled a clear integration of phonics, vocabulary, and comprehension.
Students responded positively to sound boxes and tapping syllables—kinesthetic activities obviously aided decoding. More modeling was required for vocabulary examples; the next time, I will employ sentence stems earlier.