There's a lot on the City's ballot. Before diving into the position, take a minute to refresh yourself on Bonds and the City Charter.
Cities borrow money for large projects and repay it over time, usually with interest. Austin uses different borrowing mechanisms: bonds, certificates of obligation, and revenue bonds.
Bonds: Voters approve general obligation (GO) bonds at an election. The City repays them using its taxing power, including property taxes levied on taxable property in Austin.
Certificates of Obligation: City Council generally issues certificates of obligation (COs) without a bond election. COs are not limited to emergencies. Like GO bonds, COs may be backed by the City’s taxing power and repaid with property taxes. Depending on the specific CO, repayment may also involve pledged revenues.
Revenue Bonds: These are repaid from a specific pledged revenue source, such as airport-system revenue, hotel occupancy taxes, or utility fees. The people or businesses paying those fees or taxes contribute to the revenue stream used for repayment.
These forms of borrowing create obligations the City must repay, so voters should consider the project’s purpose, cost, repayment source, and effect on future budgets.
Cities use different legislative tools to set their governing framework, adopt local laws, and express official decisions or positions.
Charter: Austin’s foundational governing document. It establishes the basic structure and powers of city government, and city ordinances must be consistent with it. Amendments may be proposed by the City Council or by the voters through a ballot initiative. The charter itself can be amended only through a vote of the people.
Ordinance: A local law adopted by City Council under its authority. Ordinances can establish or change rules that apply within the city, but they cannot amend the charter and must comply with it and state law.
Resolution: A formal action or statement by City Council, often used to express the Council’s position, set policy direction, or approve certain actions. Unlike an ordinance, a resolution generally does not create a citywide law enforceable through penalties.
When considering a ballot measure, voters can ask whether the proposed change belongs in the city’s foundational charter, whether it would be better addressed through an ordinance or resolution, and how clearly it defines the City’s responsibilities. A charter amendment is harder to change than an ordinance or resolution, so its scope and long-term effects matter.
WHERE I STAND ON CITY OF AUSTIN PROPOSITIONS
Click on the Prop titles for more information about each ballot item, including more detailed reasons, ballot language, amendment text, and sources.
Summary
Reason for Stance
Parks & Pools Bonds
Adds $453M debt to existing $3.34B debt obligations. Critical projects may be funded with certificates of obligation.
Library Bonds
Adds $61M debt to existing $3.34B debt obligations. Critical projects may be funded with certificates of obligation.
Changes to the Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission Rules
Removes the rule that limits who can talk with the commission outside public hearings. Risks outside influence on redistricting.
Remove Weekly Council Meeting Requirement
Remove the charter’s requirement that the City Council meet at least once a week. The charter would no longer set a minimum number of meetings.
Removes Requirement to Set Council Rules by Ordinance
Removes guardrails from City Council and may make it easier for City Council to change things, like public-comment times, with less public process.
Campaign Contribution Limit Adjustment Timing
For: Sets a predictable contribution limit better aligned with when candidates launch their campaigns, while letting city staff focus on budget decisions in August.
Against: Swaps one arbitrary deadline for another, isolating the contribution cap from major summer campaign milestones.
Even-Numbered Year Elections for Citizen Initiatives
Restricts local initiative votes strictly to even-year November elections, which will delay voter remedies by up to 20 months and gives well-funded special interest groups a unfair advantage over smaller grassroots campaigns.
City Council Appoints City Attorney
For: Increases democratic oversight by having the elected City Council appoint the City Attorney.
Against: Expands Council authority over legal staff, which could pressure the City Attorney to favor political interests.
Efficiency and Affordability Audit Before Tax Rate Election
Placing the requirement for recurring, independent audits into the city charter ensures lasting durability that future city councils cannot easily alter or repeal, guaranteeing fiscal accountability to voters.
[Non-]Substantive Corrections and Changes to Charter Language
Affects 18 sections of the City Charter. Actually reduces home-rule protections by removing three voter protections:
bundles Charter changes.
lets City Council rewrite citizen ballot initiatives.
removes your right to vote on long-term city debt.