"It's the economy, stupid!" This is a term that US President Bill Clinton put on the map during his US President's crusade in 1992 against Vice President George Bush Senior. He determined Bill Clinton's crusade on local issues, which ultimately resulted in his decision being successful. The Clinton Battle Group dared to wrap the print on a shield during the crusade. The idea behind all this was simple. Whatever distractions the Crusade has to face, you always come back to the first fundamental concern: most voters have had problems. In recent decades, Clinton has taken control.

Gradually, all our rational judgment begins to produce something amazing, and many realize the striking realization that after twenty years of mass attention for obesity, the damage it inflicts on national services, not to mention us, as humans it is developing at an alarming rate. Is it the fact that the entire population of those who expect a better state has the inflexible will or does not yet know the reasons for their problems? Would not we have continued at this point after trying for a long time to cure a plague with a remedy that does not work? If we had long treated bird flu in Asia with an antidote and the infection was still developing in parallel with weight gain, was there no open objection? These screams would not be much more intense if we did not discover that a similar plague was fought for a considerable period by another method that preceded the approach of our new "Fix".

It may sound like a strange correlation, but that's exactly what we tried to do with the wild joke. For a long time, doctors have managed weight by encouraging their patients to avoid white-rooted vegetables and boring foods, usually anything that contains flour, such as bread. However, before giving up calorie in our minds, we can just think of a couple of things about why it is so tempting to trust him. The assertion is that there is no way around the laws of thermodynamics. Countering it is regularly considered as a pretext. History and science, however, show that weight gain goals have nothing to do with thermodynamics. If we do not fall in love with this trap, we will never be able to defeat this dangerous pandemic.

The main thermodynamics that experts rely on is that something can not be produced without something, that something that must evolve must have absorbed vitality elsewhere. For example, our fat can only grow if it is regenerated elsewhere. the calories of the food. Publishing accompanies the simplicity of this statement. It is not indicated why this happens. There is no causal inquiry. The argument is disconcerting if you think carefully about how hard it is to maintain the exact number of calories you need to maintain a healthy weight.

Keep in mind that a pound of fat contains 3500 calories. Thus, you would just eat twenty calories a day (a few slices of toffee delicious) to have 50 pounds more in just 20 years. If this were not the case for a similar reason, we would sneak every day beyond the floor sections if 20 years had passed. Can you claim that you can control your eating habits, in the same way, every day? It's chatting.

So, if calories are pure and calories are not the solution to our weight loss problems, what is it? The change of perspective is so important that the next piece requires your attention. Stress but not. Anyone trying to lose weight is an uplifting new thing. The puzzle is much simpler than anyone thought. The correct answer is sugar, idiot!

Popular dietary habits without carbs have undermined the prospect of greater fitness, but we have often found that our companions in such diets are eating their way through countless hot dogs and steaks while hoping to stay in shape. Bringing something to its limits will not work for incalculable reasons, which we will not discuss here. So, what about the sugars that cause us so much trouble?

Everything goes back to insulin. Is it insulin that prevents our tendency (in the unlikely event that we have it) to increase fat and think about what promotes insulin formation more than anything else? Sugar. It's not so diverse with tobacco. Lung disease affects only one smoker on a smoker, but smoking is the most painful reason for anyone. The equivalent applies to weight. Not all people get fat, but those who do it. The amazing cause will be the abundant use of sugar. We have not made enough progress to adapt to the sugar content we eat, bread and beer being the main culprits.

So the next time you're having trouble with tight pants when you walk around the store, you're looking for the name of the food. Ignore the calories, but focus on the sugar. There is no compelling reason to worry about the fat. The real key is to make sure that the total required sugar content is 5 grams or less in vegetables and 1 gram in meat. Also, be careful not to consume nutrients or types of sugar or starch included in the first five recorded fixations. Regarding sugar, make sure you understand that there may be a correct name under several names. from glucose to corn syrup, so make sure you know what you're going for when you're trying to dodge your forces. It's all but a popular, and never been, popular diet. This is the way to illuminate the true welfare pandemic that the world has never seen. The more this message is broadcast, the faster the scourge will disappear.