Investigation of the experimental mutational signatures to reveal temozolomide resistance mechanisms and strategies to overcome them
DNA is constantly being damaged by both internal and external factors, which range from free radicals to genotoxic substances. The damage is repaired by multiple pathways. Some repair processes are error-free and result in the original DNA sequence being restored in an error-free manner, while others lead to mutations. By analyzing the mutational patterns in cancer cells, it is possible to deduce the history of the mutagen exposure and the involvement of the DNA repair mechanisms and thus obtain valuable insights into the origin of cancer.
To obtain a mutational signature, the whole genome is sequenced and single nucleotide variants are classified into 96 classes based on the preceding and following bases. In addition, insertions, deletions and large structural variants, such as translocations and inversions, are classified based on their length, sequence context, and boundaries. Extraction of mutational signatures from cancer cell genomes is performed by a computer program and many different signatures can be extracted from the same genome. The origin of some signatures proved to be easy to identify, e.g., tobacco smoking or exposure to aristolochic acid. Others are more mysterious. The cause of a particular mutational pattern in cancer, can be established if a similar pattern can be obtained experimentally by treating a cell line with a known genotoxin or inactivating a certain DNA repair gene. Thus, experimental mutational signatures become a valuable tool in cancer research.
We focus on studying mutational signatures in an isogenic set of human DNA repair mutant cell lines. “Isogenic” means that the lines are identical except for just one gene knocked out. This system greatly facilitates the analysis of the whole genome sequences and the effect of individual genes on the sensitivitiy to genotoxins. In particular, we are interested in temozolomide (TMZ), a methylating agent used in chemotherapy of glioblastomas. Our results show that the wild type cells, which possess the entire arsenal of DNA repair pathways, are very resistant to mutagenesis by the methylating agents. However, cancer cells frequently have some DNA repair genes inactivated, which drives mutagenesis and cancer evolution. To observe the mutational signatures, we inactivate the relevant DNA repair pathways layer by layer, not unlike peeling an onion, and follow the changes of temozolomide-induced mutational signatures. We hope that by combining sensitivity assays with the mutational signature analysis, we can better understand how cancer cells become resistant to temozolomide and design novel approaches to treatment of glioblastomas.