Autobiographies are written as a commentary on the author’s life – so written by them, about themselves. They may be in the form of a book or volume of a set, or a series, perhaps about the author’s earlier life, and may be followed up with later instalments. An exception to this would be the celebrity autobiography or perhaps a sportsperson’s autobiography, which may be ghost written (‘ghosted’) – in other words written by a professional writer, and often based on a series of interviews with the celebrity, combined with general research on their life. Comedic or humorous autobiographies appear as part of this genre by their nature (a slant or take on a writer’s own life) but also help blur lines between literary and nonliterary genres, especially if we stray into considerations of fiction.
When talking about genre conventions as typical or atypical we invariably must think about context, purpose and audience. With this in mind, the following will apply, but are also subject to the form in which they appear. - --
Awareness of audience (especially in autobiography), and the use of the first person – how this relates to the author talking to the perceived or actual audience (including themselves).
Contextual elements and purpose – the presentation or representation of the author or subject and the reasons behind this. In the ‘ghost’ written examples above of autobiographies, there may well be evidence of spoken language features where the subject has been interviewed. Some aspects of what we mean by spoken language features are discussed in the section under digital texts.
Writing in a retrospective manner or as a retrospective account – so usually in the past tense. There may be changes in tense, for example, in the use of retrospective/reported speech, to give more immediacy and thus to engage the audience. Descriptive phrasing and the use of figurative language (including metaphor and simile) for effect.
Characteristics of fiction – especially novels – in the use of a strong narrative line with extended or snapshot descriptions of events, people and locations.
Oblique referencing to a range of contexts, including historical, social, personal, political etc. Use of deixis, in terms of ‘pointing’ outwards from the text to events in the author’s/subject’s life and the lives of others (e.g. family, friends, significant figures).
A personal, often emotional, tone – used to engage the audience, maintain interest, as well as to fulfil expectations of the audience (e.g. in learning something new or previously hidden about the subject).
A linear, though not necessarily chronological, structure.
Chapters or sections that relate to particular dates or episodes in the subject’s life, clearly indicated within the text or forming the overall structure of the work.
CONTEXT
Oscar Wilde is 'the master of paradox' and wrote at a pivotal moment between the Victorian period and modernism. His work is sometimes considered prescient of the postmodern age.
Out of the depths I cry to you, O LORD! O Lord, hear my voice! Let your ears be attentive to the voice of my pleas for mercy! If you, O LORD, should mark iniquities, O Lord, who could stand? But with you there is forgiveness, that you may be feared. I wait for the LORD, my soul waits, and in his word I hope; my soul waits for the Lord more than watchmen for the morning, more than watchmen for the morning. O Israel, hope in the LORD! For with the LORD there is steadfast love, and with him is plentiful redemption. And he will redeem Israel from all his iniquities.
Explore how Wilde creates a sense of voice when discussing his experiences.
You must consider:
• the use of linguistic and literary features
• the influence of audience and purpose
• the contexts of the texts.
https://quizlet.com/gb/584918202/21-de-profundis-by-oscar-wilde-flash-cards/
Create your own revision flash cards for each of the anthology texts!
Genre conventions
Audience
Voice
Purpose
Context
Key Quotes and analysis
How successful is Toibin's Guardian article in promoting Oscar Wilde's De Profundis as 'one of the greatest love letters ever written?
In your presentation you should comment on/ refer to?
Tiobin's audience/ purpose/ mode/voice
Wilde's purpose/ context / audience (refer to notes on Generic Conventions (on this website))
Tiobin's comment on Wilde's literary and linguistic choices (find evidence to support this from 'De Profundis'
CHALLENGE: Draw on Will Self's 'Great Lives' to add to your contextual knowledge and understanding of Wilde.
Your presentation should be videoed and uploaded onto Teams. Everyone must play an equal role in preparation and presentation. You may choose the mode of presentation but please be engaging and creative.
This is a group task aimed at developing your research and communication skills and to help prepare you to be more independent and critical thinkers. Your teacher is not going to give you answers that you can find yourselves.
Good Luck! We look forward to seeing these on Friday.
Maya Angelou Analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pieGCEUXWwo
Use the site to support your comparative writing style:
Both Obama and Angelou present family as the primary source of influence on their developing sense of personal identity, showing how early relationships shape the women they become.
Each writer portrays a family setting that becomes central to the discovery of self, suggesting that identity is first formed within spaces of domestic guidance and care.
Both authors depict maternal figures as powerful role models whose words and actions provide the moral and emotional frameworks that define their identities.
While both writers see family as key to independence, Obama’s experience presents identity as rooted in discipline and achievement, whereas Angelou’s reflects identity as grounded in love and affirmation.
In both extracts, the influence of family leads to a moment of self-realisation, revealing how childhood experiences evolve into lasting elements of adult identity.
Although each writer celebrates the impact of family, their memories differ in emotional tone: Obama’s restrained reflection highlights self-control as identity, while Angelou’s warmth emphasises belonging and joy as identity.
Both accounts suggest that family influence extends beyond childhood, shaping not only who they are but also the values and aspirations that continue to guide their adult selves.
You may also use this analysis below (it's not great) to help you add to your annotations - beware of random comments on chickens!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pieGCEUXWwo
This one is much better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGDV94b9XSY
Use the Quizlet to test your knowledge:
https://quizlet.com/gb/549879893/mom-me-mom-maya-angelou-flash-cards/
Audience, purpose and mode
Audience: readers of autobiographies – literary and in general; fans of Angelou or those who have an interest in her as a writer/celebrity.
Purpose: to recount/share the details of her life with a view to publication; to reflect on how her career developed.
Mode: a printed, book-form text.
Points for analysis and discussion
Students should be encouraged to closely analyse, discuss and evaluate the text and consider the effects of literary or linguistic choices. Some points of interest might include:
Contextual elements, such as Angelou’s fame as a media celebrity, as a well-known and popular writer, especially as an African-American author as well as an actress/dancer/singer. In other words, as an internationally recognised artist and campaigner and spokesperson in support of (black) women and related civil rights movements.
References grounded in American culture, lifestyle and linguistic choices/Americanisms, eg ‘mom’, ‘colored’, ‘favorite’, ‘hotdogs’, ‘Pontiac’.
Expected genre conventions of autobiography in structure and in referencing people and places, with descriptive details expounded in a reflective, retrospective use of the past tense. The focus of the piece is on her relationship with her mother with an implied sense of distance (‘once a month at an agreed time’) contrasting with the regularity of her relationship with her grandson (‘twice a week’).
The significance of food within these relationships – from her landlady to mother: ‘mysterious red, white and brown concoction’, ‘fed him peaches and cream ...’, ‘very serious about her delicious meals’.
The following techniques are evident in this text:
Uses economical descriptions in her portrayal of her landlady that are developed and which foreground the description of the relationship with her mother, with clustered use of pre-modifiers, adjectives and adverbs, eg ‘kind and grandmotherly ... a ready babysitter ... ways so tender and personality so sweet ...’
Use of humour in descriptions of landlady’s food (‘disastrous culinary exploits ... unidentifiable piece of meat’), juxtaposition (‘loyal, if often unhappy’) and irony with the use of French expression (‘Chez Jefferson’).
Sensuous semantic fields, with a lexis drawn from pleasure in enjoying food (which contrasts with her attitude toward her landlady’s cooking), eg ‘each grain of red rice is emblazoned ... gluttonous ... greedy ... seduction ... sated my appetite’. The sense of ritual importance in attitudes to the lunch itself, and in the performance her mother gives, that makes it seem a religious rite: ‘She fervently blessed the food and put her left hand on the platter and her right on the bowl.’ Triadic structures throughout for rhetorical effect, eg ‘crispy, dry-roasted capon ... perfect makeup and diamond earrings, and a silver fox scarf ... smoking, drinking, and cursing’.
This text gives opportunities for students to reflect on a variety of terms and concepts. Some examples might include: Generic conventions inherent in a piece of literary writing with a reflective tone.
Descriptive phrasing throughout and especially in her portrayal of her mother’s detachment, eg ‘make-up was perfect and she wore good jewelry’, ‘Vivian Baxter was very serious ...’, ‘this pretty little woman’.
Oblique referencing of the American context and civil rights movements, ‘... admired by most people ... and even some whites liked and respected her.’
Comparisons with significant female public figures that point towards and enhance her mother’s assessment of her daughter’s potential, eg ‘Mrs Eleanor Roosevelt, Dr Mary McLeod Bethune ...’
Use of direct speech when she recalls her mother’s words, eg ‘Baby I’ve been thinking and now ...’
How Angelou is influenced by her mother, as implied in the shift in attitude to herself (‘Suppose she is right?’) which then extends into the final paragraph, indicating that the episode is a turning point in her life and a rejection of her (previous) lifestyle.
Use of a minor sentence structure to demarcate the shift in the importance of what comes next to end on a positive note, reflecting a new future: ‘Imagine ... Someday.’
When discussing the effects of literary or linguistic choices, students might be asked to consider questions such as:
What are the features which characterise this text as an autobiography?
How is the overall tone of the piece achieved?
What is the author’s intention of the text? How do you know? How successful are they in achieving this?
What does the writer intend to tell us about herself? How does she create a sense of her personality in the text? How does she create a sense of other people’s personalities?
What is the context in which this text was written? How has the context influenced the writer?
How has the text been crafted to meet the expectations of the supposed audience?
Read the extract for question 1 on Michelle Obama's autobiography. Compare the ways in which the writers create a sense of voice as they reflect on how their experiences shaped their journey.
In your answer you must consider linguistic and literary features, drawing on your knowledge of genre conventions and context.
Write a 400 word commentary on your autobiography, analysing the techniques you used, why you used them and why/how they would be effective, given the audience.