By Johnathan Swift
Throughout Book I, there are many nonsensical events. In terms of world, Swift chooses to illustrate a ridiculous world. Although perspective is always objective, I think Gulliver doesn't intend on or try to understand his surroundings. He is supposed to be reasonable and logical, yet he is the complete opposite. (Adrianna)
In this chapter, Gulliver is in Lilliput. He goes into great detail about going to the bathroom in the hut that he is placed in. He tries to justify his actions and retelling of them by insisting that it is merely his honesty. I think though that it is a measure for him to easily displace his politeness. His depictions of the Lilliput people being vastly smaller than him even further makes the reader question his reliability. (Adrianna)
Here, the Lilliputians are having their tight rope dance traditions and they use Gulliver's handkerchief. They use the tradition to determine who will hold place in the court. While Gulliver is intrigued by this, Swift is clearly criticizing the existing government and its absurd policies that allow perhaps the worst kind of people into office. Another absurdity in the chapter exists in the fact that Gulliver is dead set on not leaving Lilliput. He often highlights the size difference between him and the Lilliput throughout the first few chapters. So the question remains why did Gulliver not just up and leave knowing that the Lilliput couldn't do him any serious harm? (Adrianna)
I think Swift alludes to the absurdity of war here. The Tramecksans and the Slamecksans feud because of heel sizes and the Belfuscians feud with the Lilliputians because of the different sides of eggs. Why do such a thing? (Adrianna)
In the text, Swift develops Gulliver's character in no emotional sense. Gulliver is an intelligent but his perception is dull and gullible. He functions in both a realist and non-realist way. He contrasts against other expectations of explorers. Gulliver is dull, not truly interacting with the excitement of traveling which is unusual. Which can be offered as a critiques of traveling and exploitation as it appears in the text.