Writing Instructions
Instructions are process descriptions that help users perform a task.
Instructional videos
Can be useful for basic conceptual information, computer-based tasks, and technical tasks.
Especially useful for things that rely on technique or subtle physical movements.
Should be brief (2-3 minutes; no more than 12-15)
Planning
Consider modality. Should it be physical? 1 page? Should it be bound?
Consider context. Reader expectations, abilities, if more than 1 set of instructions is necessary, what languages should be used, possible user anxieties, and the effect of environment.
Planning for Safety
Organization may be liable for putting users at risk if they are hurt
Avoid complicated sentences
Examples show a preference for imperative mood
Signal words:
Danger (for immediate and serious hazards that are likely to be be fatal; sometimes all-caps);
Warning (potential serious injury, death, or damage; sometimes all-caps);
Caution (potential for moderate injury or equipment damage);
Note (tip or suggestion)
Drafting
Titles. How-to (How to Brew using a Cafelat Robot); Gerund (Brewing with the Cafelat Robot)
Introductions. Who should carry out the task? Why? When should it happen? What safety measures or other concerns should the reader understand? What items are needed? How long will the task take?
Steps
Number them.
If they are long and complex, divide into subsets.
May benefit here from task analysis.
Include the right amount of information per step
Use imperative mood
Feedback statements should follow as an additional sentence in a numbered step. It is not its own numbered item.
Include graphics
Include articles (a, an, the) for clarity
Revise
Revisions can be based on usability testing
What about your group's instructions do you find most effective, given the guidelines that Markel and Seller provide? Which do you find less effective? Identify 2-3 elements you think could possibly benefit from additional revision, based on Markel and Selber's guidance.
Graphics can:
Illustrate logical and numerical relationships
Illustrate spatial information
Illustrate steps in a process
Save space
Save translation costs
Graphics should:
Be purposeful
Be simple and uncluttered
Present a manageable amount of information
Meet reader expectations
Be labeled
Be honest:
obtain permission, and cite any borrowed information
include all relevant data
begin axes at zero
make data apparent, do not use visualizations that conceal information
show items as they are. do not manipulate images in ways that misrepresent objects
Integrate graphics and text:
at appropriate locations
introduce graphics in text
explain graphics in text
make the graphic clearly visible
make graphics easy to find
Processes
Plan for Context
what will audiences need or want to know? what knowledges or expectations will they have when they look at graphics
what purposes do you have for the graphic? What do you want to communicate? Under what conditions? Within what time frame? With how much money? With what equipment? And whose expertise will you use?
Producing Graphics by
using existing graphics, especially if you have permissions
modifying existing graphics
creating graphics on a computer
having someone else create the graphics
Revising graphics
Develop an evaluation and ask others for suggestions, revise, and ask more suggestions/feedback
Citing graphics
obtain permissions
include a citation
Color
don’t over do it
use color to emphasize important things
use color to create patterns
use contrast
take advantage of existing symbolic meanings and colors
don’t swallow up text
Choosing Appropriate Graphics
Depends on purpose, such as:
illustrating numerical information
illustrating logical relationships
illustrating processes and instructions
illustrating visual and spatial characteristics
Creating effective graphics for multicultural readers
reading patterns differ
varying cultural attitudes toward instruction
de-emphasize trivial details
avoid culture specific language, symbols, references
portray people carefully
be careful with hand gestures
One of the ways that I saw this reading in a real life example is with science communication. The reading emphasizes that graphics can communicate steps in a process more effectively than words alone, which is especially true in complex biological processes. For example, when I was learning about the stages of cell replication, a bunch of words in my textbook didn’t really help me understand what was happening. When they accompanied the words with a graphic that showed what was happening with the cell membrane and chromosomes in each stage, I could tell the difference between each step. For processes like this, graphics are necessary and words are less effective at demonstrating the complexities.
This reminds me of my econometrics class, where we used coding software for data analysis and to create charts from enormous datasets. In retrospect, there was a lot of care that was taken in the statistics to make sure that the regressions we created were precise and accurate and showed the bigger picture of the relationship between variables. Sometimes we would have to use logarithmic scales to adjust the graph to make it look smoother to accurately show the relationship over the years.
Once again, I see a connection between this reading and the New Media course I took last quarter. We talked about visual rhetoric throughout the whole course but especially in preparation for our infographic project. Both the reading and our discussions in that class emphasized that the way information is communicated will shape the way that users interpret that information. In other words, digital mediums like infographics have the potential to influence the viewer so it’s important to be intentional about the different visual elements that go into an infographic (such as color, text, pictures, data, etc.).
The section “Ethics Note” made me think about the class discussions on ethics. As a technical writer, there is a responsibility to be ethical in the documents we produce. But there are many examples where technical documents that use graphics can be harmful. These are listed under the ethics note, but I found this article about the ways data can be skewed. It talks about how people start the data in “the middle” or manipulate the y or x axis. In the reading, figure 12.13 touches on this by pointing out infographics can have a biased agenda. This reminded me of Katz writing on ethics, specifically their opinion on the instrumentalist view point. The fact that data can be skewed supports Katz's belief that the purposes for communication are always motivated and ethics should be an integral part of technical communication.
As for real world examples I think about the scandal of 2010 regarding FOX news. Fox News misrepresented unemployment statistics by using a bar graph with a skewed y-axis that exaggerated a small increase in unemployment rates. The unethical graphic made a minor rise look like a dramatic jump going against the rule of ethical graphics. Misleading visuals can manipulate public perception. Ethical graphics should accurately represent data without distorting scale or omitting key information.
In my econ class, we had to do a presentation and I created the bar graph to compare data between the US and China on EV price. At first, I made the color of the two yellow and blue because I did not want the color to look boring or as expected. However, my team member changed the color to blue and red referring to US and China so it’s easier for reader to understand them. This relates to the reading how the usage of color should meet audience’s expectation to save time for more important content. This helps to made the graph more simple and easy to understand.
Make a copy of the linked document.
Share your copied document with me.
Fill out the evaluation with your group.
Make recommendations.
Make a copy of the linked document.
Share your copied document with me.
Fill out the evaluation with your group.
Make recommendations.
Revisit the GACTT survey. You may also find the cover sheet helpful.
Select a few variables in the survey. Using Markel and Selber's recommendations for graphics, decide: What types of graphics might you make from the data in this survey?
Other link...
Upcoming...
feedback on presentations
progress report