"Never give up on something that you can't go a day without thinking about".
Activity 1. Reading Comprehension - US Bar Admission
Objective: To improve reading comprehension skills, vocabulary related to legal ethics and bar admission, and the ability to extract specific information from a text; to improve critical thinking, analytical writing skills, and the ability to apply ethical principles to a fictional scenario.
Task 1. Answer the questions:
What's the first word or phrase that comes to mind when you hear "legal ethics"?
In your opinion, what's the most important ethical quality a lawyer should possess? Why?
What does "professional responsibility" mean to you as a future lawyer?
Task 2. Read the text and choose the best answer (A-D).
US Bar Admission Requirements
To qualify for admission to a State Bar, most states require that candidates have graduated from college or completed most of the requirements to earn an undergraduate degree. Likewise, most states require candidates to have graduated from a law school approved by the American Bar Association. However, some states provide alternative pathways to admission.
Candidates who meet the educational requirements are eligible to sit for the bar examination. Each state administers the bar exam for eligible candidates, usually conducted by a committee of the state's highest court. Each state has its own procedures, but generally, the exams consist of two parts administered over a two-day period. Traditionally, the first part was the multi-state bar exam developed by the National Conference of Bar Examiners, a uniform test that assesses knowledge of shared common law principles, certain widely adopted model codes, and constitutional law.
The second part is a state-specific exam that tests the candidate's knowledge of the laws and regulations in effect in that state. Most states, however, have now adopted the uniform bar examination, which is a standardized exam testing nationwide legal principles in place of the state law-specific exam. Aspiring attorneys must also pass the multi-state Professional Responsibility exam, which evaluates knowledge and understanding of legal ethics and the professional responsibilities of practicing lawyers.
Some states grant permission to members in good standing of other states without requiring the bar exam if they can demonstrate a specified length of legal practice and other criteria. Before being admitted, aspiring attorneys must undergo a character and fitness evaluation and interview. The candidate must submit personal information regarding their educational and employment history, as well as residential and financial information.
The candidate must also answer questions about academic infractions, disciplinary measures, criminal history, and provide character references. Candidates with criminal histories may still be admitted to practice law, though admission may be denied, especially if the committee finds evidence of a history of dishonesty, such as crimes involving fraud or misappropriation of funds, a current history of untreated mental health-related problems, or ongoing alcohol and substance abuse issues.
Failure to be honest and candid in the character and fitness questionnaire or during the interview is considered grounds for denial of admission. Most states require post-admission continuing legal education for practicing lawyers. To remain a member of the bar in good standing, a lawyer must complete the periodic continuing legal education requirements adopted in the state of admission.
Task 3. Essay - "Suits" Character Analysis: Mike Ross.
1) Watch the video.
Explanatory note:
After Harvey Specter, a closer for one of New York City's top law firms, finally becomes a senior law partner, he must hire an associate from Harvard Law.
At the Chilton Hotel, Harvey is interviewing Harvard graduates for the position as his associate. After the first few, Harvey gets tired of the "Harvard clones" and tells Donna, his trusted assistant, to give the candidates a hard time before sending them in and give him a wink if the say something smart, telling her that he is looking for "another him". She does so to several prospective interviewees, but none of them stand out.
At the same time, Mike in the same hotel performs a drug operation at the request of his friend (Mike urgently needs money for his grandmother's treatment). Mike realises that the clients are fake cops and he runs away from them.
Mike, remembering the Harvard Law interviews sign he had passed, proceeds to the room where the interviews are being held. As Mike runs frantically into the room, Donna calls the name of the next interviewee, Rick Sorkin. When Donna assumes that Mike is Rick, she presses him about being late, to which Mike honestly answers by saying he only wants to get away from the cops chasing him and he does not care for the interview. Thinking this was a smart remark, she winks at Harvey and sends him in. Soon after, the undercover cop following Mike storms into the waiting room, but soon leaves when he does not find him.
Mike decides to go along with the Rick Sorkin persona, but as he approaches Harvey, his briefcase falls open, causing the marijuana packets to fall out in front of him. Mike tells Harvey the story of how he ended up there, and Harvey happily listens.
2) Analyze the ethical implications of Harvey Specter's decision to hire Mike Ross, given Mike's lack of a law degree and history of fraudulent behavior. Write the Essay (500-700 words). In your essay, address the following:
Why is Mike not an appropriate candidate for a position as an associate at a reputable law firm?
What potential ethical violations does Harvey commit by hiring him?
Despite these issues, why does Harvey ultimately decide to take Mike on? What justifications might Harvey offer for his decision?
Do you agree with Harvey's decision? Why or why not? Support your arguments with specific examples from the episode and relevant ethical principles.
Assessment Criteria:
Understanding of Ethical Principles (20%): Demonstrating knowledge of relevant ethical rules and principles (e.g., competence, honesty, candor towards the tribunal).
Critical Analysis (20%): Providing a thorough and nuanced analysis of the characters' motivations and actions.
Use of Evidence (20%): Supporting arguments with specific examples from the "Suits" episode.
Clarity and Organization (20%): Writing a well-organized essay with a clear thesis statement and supporting paragraphs.
Grammar and Mechanics (20%): Using correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
Scaling system in the "Modules" section.
Activity 2. Video Analysis - Professional Misconduct
Objective: To improve listening comprehension, vocabulary related to professional misconduct, and the ability to identify examples of misconduct in hypothetical scenarios; to improve analytical skills, collaboration, and the ability to apply ethical rules to specific situations presented in a popular legal drama.
Task 1. Watch the video and answer open-ended questions based on the video content:
1) What is the goal of legal ethics and the rules of professional responsibility?
2) What is considered professional misconduct, and what are the consequences?
3) What is a lawyer's obligation regarding reporting professional misconduct by other lawyers?
4) How do jurisdictions determine when the obligation to report professional misconduct applies?
5) What types of actions, beyond just violations of formal rules, can be considered professional misconduct?
6) What specific types of harassment or discrimination are considered professional misconduct?
7) Why is it important for lawyers to avoid professional misconduct?
Task 2. Discussion: "Suits" Episode Analysis - Identifying Misconduct.
(Students are assigned to Breakout Rooms).
Watch the video and discuss the following in pairs:
Identify at least three specific instances of potentially unethical behavior in the episodes you watched.
For each instance, explain which ethical rules or principles were potentially violated.
What are the potential consequences for the lawyer who engaged in the unethical behavior?
Do you think the show portrays the ethics of lawyers in an accurate way?
Assessment Criteria:
Identification of Ethical Issues (25%): Accurately identifying examples of potentially unethical behavior in the episodes.
Application of Ethical Rules (25%): Correctly applying relevant ethical rules and principles.
Analysis (25%): Providing a thoughtful analysis of the ethical implications of the characters' actions.
Collaboration (25%): Participating actively and respectfully in the paired discussion.
Scaling system in the "Modules" section.
Activity 3. Digital Storytelling - Russian Legal Ethics
Objective: To improve research skills, presentation skills, and the ability to communicate complex legal concepts in a clear and engaging way.
Task 1. Create a short digital story (video, audio, or written narrative with visuals) about Russian Legal Ethics and Responsibility. Do the following:
1. Research: research the rules of legal ethics and professional responsibility in Russia.
2. Create Digital Story: create a digital story (2-3 minutes in length) that explains one or more key aspects of Russian legal ethics. The story should be:
Accurate and informative.
Clear and concise.
Engaging and visually appealing.
Well-organized and structured.
Original and creative.
3. Submit your pre-recorded digital story.
Resources:
Research Resources: Official sources on Russian legal ethics (e.g., the Advocate's Code of Professional Ethics, decisions of the Bar Association).
Digital Storytelling Tools:
PowerPoint or Google Slides with audio narration
Video editing software (e.g., iMovie, Windows Movie Maker)
Animation software (e.g., Animaker, Powtoon)
Storytelling platforms (e.g., Storybird)
Assessment Criteria:
Accuracy (20%): Accurate and truthful depiction of the Russian Legal Ethics.
Content (20%): Clear explanation of the rules and why they exist.
Creativity (20%): Originality and engagement.
Technical Quality (20%): Audio and video quality.
Clarity (20%): The message of the story is clear.
Scaling system in the "Modules" section.
Feedback
How do you feel after the lesson? Choose a number.