"Work until you no longer have to introduce yourself".
Activity 1. Introduction to the Family Law
Objective: To improve reading comprehension, vocabulary related to family law, and speaking skills.
Task 1. Answer the questions:
What does "family" mean to you?
What are some of the biggest challenges facing families today?
What spheres of family life does Family Law cover?
Task 2. Read the text.
Family law involves a variety of different things that relate to legal family matters, such as legal separation, divorce, pre-nuptial agreements, civil partnerships, marriages and certain factors that relate to children, like adoption, financial provision from absentee parents, and custody and visitation rights.
Family law also traditionally has to do with matters of personal status—for example, the question of whether a person is to be considered married or single, legitimate or illegitimate—though the incidents and importance of these distinctions often derive from the law of property.
Family law shares an interest in certain social issues with other areas of law, including criminal law. For example, one issue that has received considerable attention since the late 20th century is the very difficult problem of violence within the family, which may take the form of physical violence by one adult member on another or by an adult on a child or some other violent or abusive conduct within a family circle. In serious cases the only real solution may be to terminate cohabitation or to remove an abused child from the family unit into some form of public or foster custody.
Task 3. Answer the questions.
1. Which of the following is NOT typically included in family law?
a) Divorce
b) Adoption
c) Contract Law
d) Child Custody
2. What is "financial provision from absentee parents" also known as?
a) Alimony
b) Child Support
c) Spousal Maintenance
d) Inheritance
3. Historically, family law has dealt with matters of:
a) Criminal Justice
b) Property Rights
c) Personal Status
d) International Relations
4. What social issue does family law share an interest in with criminal law?
a) Drug Trafficking
b) Violence within the family
c) Environmental Pollution
d) Tax Evasion
5. What might be a solution in serious cases of family violence?
a) Increased surveillance
b) Mandatory mediation
c) Terminating cohabitation
d) Imposing stricter financial penalties
6. Removing an abused child from the family unit might involve placing them in:
a) A boarding school
b) A juvenile detention center
c) Public or foster custody
d) A witness protection program
Activity 2. Scandalous Celebrity Divorces
Objective: To improve reading and listening comprehension, vocabulary related to family law, and critical thinking skills by analyzing a video and writing an essay.
Task 1. Answer the questions:
Why do you think people are so interested in celebrity divorces? What makes them so fascinating?
Can you name any famous celebrity divorces that you know about? What do you remember about them?
Do you think celebrities' private lives should be public news? Why/Why not?
Task 2. Read the text.
Depp and Heard started dating in early 2012, after meeting on the set of The Rum Diary a few years earlier. By 2015, they were married.
But just 15 months after they made it official, it was over.
Heard filed for a divorce and a restraining order, appearing in a Los Angeles court with a bruised cheek.
She said her then-husband - 23 years her senior - had "violently" attacked her and thrown a mobile phone at her face with "extreme force". There were other alleged instances of harassment as well - "excessive emotional, verbal and physical abuse", she wrote in court filings, "angry, hostile, humiliating and threatening assaults".
Depp denied the abuse.
A judge granted Heard a temporary restraining order, but hours before a civil trial over the order was to begin, she and the Pirates of the Caribbean star released a joint statement saying they had put their dispute to rest.
"Our relationship was intensely passionate and at times volatile, but always bound by love. Neither party has made false accusations for financial gain. There was never any intent of physical or emotional harm."
Depp gave Heard $7m as part of their divorce settlement, which she pledged to donate to the American Civil Liberties Union - something Depp's team now disputes.
Despite the seemingly amicable resolution, the story didn't end there. The joint statement and settlement only temporarily quelled the storm. In 2018, Heard wrote an op-ed in The Washington Post describing herself as "a public figure representing domestic abuse." While she didn't name Depp directly, the implication was clear, and Depp claimed the article had damaged his reputation and career.
This led to a $50 million defamation lawsuit filed by Depp against Heard in the United States. Heard, in turn, countersued Depp for $100 million, alleging that he orchestrated a smear campaign against her and continued to defame her.
The ensuing trial, held in Fairfax County, Virginia in 2022, became a media circus, broadcast live and followed intensely online. The trial exposed graphic details of their tumultuous relationship, including allegations of drug use, physical violence, and psychological abuse from both sides. Evidence presented included photos, videos, audio recordings, and witness testimonies.
After weeks of testimony, the jury reached a verdict largely in favor of Depp. They found that Heard had defamed Depp in her Washington Post op-ed and awarded him $10.35 million in damages. They also found that Depp's former lawyer, Adam Waldman, had defamed Heard, awarding her $2 million in compensatory damages.
Although Heard initially vowed to appeal the verdict, she ultimately reached a settlement with Depp in December 2022. Under the agreement, Heard paid Depp $1 million, which he stated would be donated to charity. Both parties agreed to a mutual non-disparagement clause, seemingly bringing the long and bitter legal battle to a definitive end.
However, the impact of the case continues to resonate, sparking ongoing debates about domestic abuse, defamation, gender dynamics, and the role of social media in shaping public perception. The trial also significantly impacted both Depp's and Heard's careers and public image, with lasting consequences for their professional lives.
Task 3. Watch the Video: Carefully watch the provided video clip of Camille Vasquez (Johnny Depp's attorney) cross-examining Amber Heard regarding the alleged editing of a video depicting domestic violence. The video will focus specifically on Ms. Vasquez's line of questioning and Ms. Heard's responses.
Task 4. Analyze the Video: After watching the video, write an analytical essay (800-1000 words) addressing the following points:
1) Camille Vasquez's Tactics:
Identify at least three specific questioning techniques used by Camille Vasquez (e.g., leading questions, closed-ended questions, rapid-fire questioning, challenging inconsistencies, emphasizing contradictions). Provide examples from the video to illustrate each technique.
What was the apparent purpose of each of these questioning techniques? What was Ms. Vasquez trying to achieve with each strategy?
How effective were Ms. Vasquez's questioning techniques in eliciting information or challenging Amber Heard's testimony? Did she appear to be successful in discrediting the witness?
2) Amber Heard's Demeanor:
Describe Amber Heard's demeanor during the cross-examination. How did she respond to Ms. Vasquez's questions (e.g., tone of voice, body language, facial expressions)?
Did her demeanor appear credible and sincere, or did it suggest evasiveness or deception? Provide specific examples from the video to support your observations.
How might a jury (or an observer) interpret Amber Heard's demeanor in this particular exchange?
3) Ethical Considerations:
Did Camille Vasquez's questioning techniques appear ethical and professional? Did she cross the line into harassment or undue pressure?
What are the ethical considerations for attorneys when cross-examining witnesses, particularly in sensitive cases involving allegations of domestic violence?
3) Overall Impression:
Based on your analysis of the video clip, what is your overall impression of the effectiveness of Camille Vasquez's cross-examination and Amber Heard's testimony?
What did you learn about legal strategy and witness behavior from this exercise?
4) Support Your Analysis: Use specific examples from the video to support your claims and observations. Refer to relevant legal concepts and principles where applicable.
Assessment Criteria:
Identification of Legal Tactics (30%): Accurate identification and explanation of the specific questioning techniques used by Camille Vasquez, supported by clear examples from the video.
Analysis of Witness Demeanor (30%): Detailed and insightful analysis of Amber Heard's demeanor, providing specific examples and justifying interpretations.
Ethical Considerations (20%): Thoughtful consideration of the ethical implications of the questioning techniques and witness behavior, demonstrating awareness of professional responsibilities.
Clarity and Organization (20%): Clear, concise, and well-organized writing, with proper grammar and citation style.
Scaling system in the "Modules" section.
Activity 3. Celebrity Divorce: A Legal and Ethical Minefield
Objective: To analyze the legal, ethical, and social implications of a high-profile celebrity divorce, applying relevant legal concepts and principles.
Task 1. Case study.
Instructions:
1. Case Selection: Choose one of the following scandalous celebrity divorce cases (or another similar case):
• Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie
• Kim Kardashian and Kanye West
• Madonna and Guy Ritchie
2. Research: Conduct thorough research on the selected case, using reliable sources (e.g., legal documents, reputable news articles, academic analyses). Focus on the following aspects:
Grounds for Divorce: What were the officially cited reasons for the divorce? Were there allegations of infidelity, abuse, or other misconduct?
Prenuptial Agreement (if any): Did a prenuptial agreement exist? If so, what were its key provisions? How was it challenged or upheld?
Division of Assets: How were the couple's assets divided? What were the major points of contention?
Child Custody: If children were involved, what were the custody arrangements? What factors influenced the custody decision?
Legal Battles and Defamation: Were there any lawsuits for defamation or other legal claims arising from the divorce? What were the outcomes?
Media Coverage: How did the media portray the divorce proceedings? Was there evidence of bias or sensationalism?
3. Analysis: Prepare an analysis addressing the following questions:
Legal Issues:
What key legal principles of family law were involved in this case (e.g., community property, separate property, best interests of the child)?
Were there any unique legal challenges presented by the celebrity status of the parties involved (e.g., protection of privacy, reputation management)?
Did the legal outcomes appear fair and equitable, considering the facts of the case? Justify your answer.
Ethical Issues:
What ethical obligations did the lawyers representing each party have? Did they uphold these obligations?
Did the parties themselves act ethically throughout the divorce proceedings?
How did the media coverage impact the privacy and well-being of the individuals involved, especially any children?
Social Impact:
How did this celebrity divorce influence public opinion about marriage, divorce, or domestic violence?
Did the case raise any important social or legal issues that deserve further attention?
What lessons can be learned from this case about the complexities of divorce and the challenges faced by high-profile individuals?
4. Presentation: Be prepared to present your findings in class, summarizing the key aspects of your case and engaging in a discussion with your peers.
Resources:
• AI sources - LexisNexis or Westlaw (for accessing legal documents and case law)
• Reputable news sources (e.g., The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal)
Assessment Criteria:
Accuracy of Information (30%): Accurate and thorough presentation of the facts of the case, supported by reliable sources.
Legal Analysis (30%): Sound application of relevant legal principles, insightful analysis of legal issues, and well-reasoned arguments.
Ethical Analysis (20%): Thoughtful consideration of ethical obligations and dilemmas, well-supported judgments about ethical conduct.
Social Impact Analysis (10%): Insightful discussion of the social implications of the case and its impact on public opinion.
Clarity and Organization (10%): Clear, concise, and well-organized speech, with proper grammar and citation style.
Scaling system in the "Modules" section.
Feedback
How do you feel after the lesson? Choose a number.