Destination Migrant intervention program implemented in seven district of Tamil Nadu.
Welcome to e-mentor site Prevention Program
Destination Migrant intervention program implemented in seven district of Tamil Nadu.
Migrants fall under NACO’s definition of “risk groups”, i.e. those warranting targeted interventions. Along with truckers, they are bridge populations requiring a specific HIV response. Migrants have two major routes of mobility: from rural to urban areas and between rural areas. The definition of migrants varies widely, hence this document defines migrants and provide guidelines for working with them from the perspective of HIV prevention interventions under NACP III.
Classification of migrants from an HIV vulnerability perspective is based on the following key criteria:
Pattern, degree and duration of mobility and migration
Age
Whether moving singly or with family
Route of migration
Destination of migration
Based on these criteria, the definition of migrants is “single men and all women in the age group of 15-49 years who move between source and destination within the country once or more in a year”. Those who return to their source location at regular intervals are called “circular migrants”.
It is important to invest available resources most strategically by focusing interventions on high-risk migrant men who are partners of high-risk group (HRG) members (FSW, MSM-T). Mapping exercises (see Chapter 2 below) can identify the confluence of migrant men with HRG networks to keep interventions focused on those migrant men who are actually at risk and at the locations where risk occurs.
Women in general have a high degree of sexual health vulnerability for the following reasons:
Because of the high-risk behaviour of their husbands and sexual partners
Many wives of migrant men are illiterate, and because they remain largely within the confines of their homes they are mostly uninformed about STIs and HIV/AIDS.
Caring for their health is generally not a priority for them or for their male family members.
They are often unaware of condoms, and even if they are aware, it is generally the decision of their husband/male partner whether to use them or not during sex.
In the absence of their husbands, they are dependent on the men in the households or on neighbours for help in managing household affairs. This may lead to sexual relationships with other family members or men in the community.
Women are not supposed to go out alone and hence are unable to seek health services.
The success of migrant programmes at destination will be greatly influenced by whether or not migrant spouses/sexual partners are educated about HIV risks and related issues.
In the source state, based on the mapping data from the destination states (shared between the source and destination SACS), the SACS should take responsibility to cover migrant wives/sexual partners, through link workers and as part of broader SACS-supported HIV/AIDS initiatives in the major pockets of high outward migration.
At the destinations, women migrants who are part of transactional sex networks and at risk of HIV are envisaged to be part of the female sex worker intervention.
This is done through a state-level analysis to locate large pockets of migrants, and a risk assessment study to ascertain if there are significant numbers who are at risk for HIV.
Data analysis Analyse data from National Sample Survey (NSS), Census and National Commission of Rural Labour to map major pockets of migrants in the state, where there are 5,000-10,000 single-male circular migrants (as defined in Section 1.1.2 above) living within a radius of 5-10 kilometres. This process should be undertaken by the SACS of the destination states. The review and analysis should be shared with the potential partner agencies to facilitate their understanding and enable them to move on to the next stage.
Risk assessment study Contract an agency (preferably a local one and backed by TSU) to conduct a risk assessment study to decide if these migrants are at risk based on the following criteria (see also Annexure 1, Tool for Risk Assessment):
When no information exists, or it is not available through the state-level analysis of large pockets of migrants, a mapping and situation assessment should be conducted with the following considerations in mind:
Geographic approach to mapping and situation assessments
Need to focus on large “catchment” areas for efficient programming
Mapping focuses on three kinds of intervention sites:
Hotspots (points of sex solicitation)
Prioritized industry/workplace centers
Large residential centers
Preliminary mapping provides a general overview of the entire geographic area and is the basis for the refined methods and tools necessary for a detailed mapping study. Mapping is to be done by ORWs who are given training in the methodology, preferably by TSU and/or by an agency hired by SACS. Preliminary mapping will include a geographic area overview and interviews with key informants to help identify:
Congregation points of high-risk men
Presence of sex workers
Presence of elements such as video parlours, youth clubs/mandals, NGOs, temples, hotels, lodges, bars and movie theatres that could be vantage points for target-efficient field communication
The key informants in each area include shopkeepers, cinema hall employees, slum residents, housing colony residents, slum development officers, municipal corporation officers, private doctors, government hospital doctors, NGOs, industry employers and employees, labour contractors, bar owners and clientele, railway station masters and bus depot in-charges.
Detailed mapping is needed in order to ensure a target-efficient, streamlined intervention among migrant workers. This study will:
Assess the target group size of high-risk migrant men and women
Identify target-efficient hotspots/strategic locations
Determine possible range of communication activities to be conducted at the identified hotspots
Assess the presence of sex workers in the area along with the type of sex work and the typology of the sex workers.
The detailed mapping study will be done by ORWs, preferably trained by the TSU or an agency hired by the SACS, using three primary components:
While conducting mapping at the destination sites, an attempt should be made to identify source states, including the details of village/town/district clusters. This information should be communicated to the SACS of the source state to facilitate outreach to the migrant spouses/sexual partners back home and to returning migrants. See Section 1.2.3 of Chapter 1 for more information.