Reach B

Developing River Styles

To start off my analysis for this reach of the Diamond Fork River, I first got an overview of the riverscape I am working with by using Google Earth Imagery. I though about questions like: What is the valley setting? What are the sediment inputs that I am seeing? Where is the active and inactive floodplain?

Reach B: Gravel-bed, Partly-Confined Margin-Controlled Reach

2018 Google Imagery

2017 LiDAR DEM Hillshade

Site Length = about 834 meters

Riverscape Width: downstream end = about 13 meters, upstream end = about 20 meters

To calculate slope, I found the elevation at the top of the reach (1677 meters) and the bottom of the reach (1662 meters) using Google Earth. The reach is 834 meters in length along the bankfull channel centerline.

(1677 m - 1662 m)/ 834 m = 0.018 x 100 = 1.80 % slope

To calculate sinuosity, I measured the length of channel centerline (836 m) and the length of the valley bottom centerline (832 m).

836 m/ 832 m= 1.00 sinuosity which means that this reach is straight to very low sinuosity

To calculate confinement, I measured the length of the channel margin (626.5 m) and the length of the channel (834 m).

The length of the confining margin = 61.4 m + 128.3 m + 125.5 m + 311.3 m = 626.5 m

626.5 m/ 834 m = 0.75 x 100 = 75% confined so this reach is considered partly-confined margin-controlled.

To calculate constriction, I measured the length of the constricted channel margin (166.3 m) and the length of the channel (834 m).

The length of the constricted channel margin = 31.8 m + 24.2 m + 29.6 m + 80.7 m = 166.3 m

166.3 m/834m = 0.199 x 100 = 19.9% constricted.

Area of Valley Bottom Margin: 35,182.9 meters squared

Area of Active Channel: 18,346.4 meters squared

Area of Inactive Floodplain: 711.5 meters squared

Area of Active Floodplain: 16,125.0 meters squared

(35,182.9 meters squared - 18,346.4 meters squared - 711.5 meters squared = 16125.0 meters squared)

Instream Geomorphic Units

Geomorphic units are the building blocks of river systems. They are defined by their morphology (shape and geometry), sedimentary composition, bounding surfaces, and position on the valley floor. Erosional or depositional processes, or a range of these, produce these features. Instream geomorphic units are found along a slope-induced energy and textural gradient. The pattern of these instream geomorphic units helps explain the geometry (shape and size) of the channel.

Based on the Google imagery, the fact that the slope is low, and the channel bed is gravel throughout this reach, runs can be seen. This means that water and sediment is being conveyed smoothly and the slope of the channel is low to intermediate.

The Google imagery shows that there is a high likelihood of forced riffles with the presence of gravel and fallen trees in the river. The flow here is characterized by high-energy turbulence over lobate accumulations of course bedload materials and wood.

Potentially there are some pools in this reach. There could be a forced pool from the fallen trees in the river. A forced pool creates an area of tranquil flow within high-energy settings that may accumulate finer grained materials at low-modern flow stages, but they are flushed and possibly scoured during extreme events.

One lateral bar towards the more downstream end is also present. Bar length and width are proportional to the flows in the channel. Bars form by lateral or oblique accretion processes, with some suspended-load materials atop, meaning they typically form in an upward fining depositional sequence.

All of these features are displayed in the images below:

2018 Google Imagery

2018 Google Imagery

Floodplain Geomorphic Units

Floodplains are areas of sediment accumulation made up of alluvial materials between the channel banks and the valley margin. Floodplains accumulate sediment when the sediment supply during overbank flow events exceeds the transport capacity of the flow and sediment is deposited. Floodplains are often poorly drained, acting as stilling basins in which fine-grained suspended-load sediments settle out from over-bank flows.

I concluded the presence of these floodplain geomorphic units based on the Google Imagery and the LiDAR DEM hillshade.

I thought these features were alluvial terraces, however after discussing this site in class, alluvial terraces are not found in the valley bottom margin. Alluvial terraces are initially formed by lateral and vertical accretion processes under prior flow conditions. A change in base level or shifts in sediment-load and discharge regime (linked to climate) prompt downcutting into valley floor deposits, abandoning the former floodplain. Below is what I thought was an alluvial terraces, but instead is probably just an elevated surface. This surface could have been part of an historical active channel.

This feature is displayed in the images below:

2018 Google Imagery and 2017 LiDAR DEM Hillshade