Here's where we explore Johan de Witt’s absurd life and legacy through irreverent satire.
Meet Johan de Witt—mathematician, lawyer, and politician extraordinaire. For almost 20 years, he effectively ran the Dutch Republic during its Golden Age, juggling naval and economic policies, diplomacy, math, tennis, and violin playing. And then in 1672? He got eaten by a mob.
All the while, he failed to grasp one crucial thing: Why does public opinion matter?
If you’re new to him: Background Info Speedrun
Naval Enthuiast
The Grand Pensionary of Holland decided to personally get involved in naval strategy during the Second Anglo-Dutch War. This meant boarding a ship(while seasick) and pressuring everyone into following his plans—so much that the crew was genuinely scared of him while laughing behind his back[4]. To his credit, it worked. The Dutch won a stunning victory at the Raid on the Medway under Admiral De Ruyter.
Got stabbed, can I take a day off?
On his ten-minute walk home from work, Johan was attacked by assassins and almost died. His reaction? Writing a letter asking for sick leave. He then proceeded to report the events and the coordinates of his wounds, like a crime scene investigator.[2]
Annuity calculations, anyone?
Who pitches cutting-edge probability theory to the States General in 1671[3], one year before total disaster? Johan. Forget the military and threat of French invasion. Johan thought annuities were the perfect financial tool for the government, and he really liked math.
Provincial Atoms
In his pursuit of "True Freedom", Johan took decentralization to an unfortunate extreme, spending two decades meticulously reinforcing an oligarchic system(the Civilization VI equivalent of enabling “Infinite Congress” mode). The House of Orange "represented unity and growth"[5], "True Freedom" represented Holland-centric elitists and regional ego-tripping. Guess which was more popular in 1672.
Why is everyone so offended?
In 1656, Johan tried to simply partition philosophy and theology like they were files on a computer[4]. His "compromise" was basically to say, “Let’s be nice to each other and pretend our beliefs don't matter.” Spoiler: the preachers were not amused.
Walking PR Disaster
In the midst of the 17th-century twitter storm of the Rampjaar(Disaster Year), Orangists(his political enemies) were busy painting him as devil incarnate[1]. Johan de Witt decided the best way to defend himself was to calmly request an official refutation from his political enemy. Predictably, this did not save him.
Now meet The Threatened Swan, an innocent painting-turned-political allegory of Johan de Witt, defending the Dutch Republic against its enemies.
The swan is the perfect metaphor for Johan—haughty and composed on the surface, yet paddling relentlessly underneath. There's also something quite odd about a national leader being depicted as a swan. It's dignified, but at the end of the day, it's a bird.
Johan's "True Freedom"(decentralization and provincial sovereignty) was an "innovation of stadtholderless government"[4], and he made it work for nearly 20 years. The Republic was an economic epicenter and maritime superpower, with a bunch of hidden structural problems lurking around. It took a few bad decisions, factionalism gone out of control, an England-France conspiracy and foreign invasions to bring it down, but down it went...catastrophically.
When the Franco-Dutch war broke out in 1672, Johan's best efforts weren't enough to protect the country from being overwhelmed, or himself from an angry mob. And suddenly the metaphor shifts from big white bird to foie gras.
Why is this 17th-century politician so compellingly weird? Because he defies easy explanations. He doesn't fit into the usual narratives of heroes and villains—just quiet competence and workaholism that somehow ended in the most incomprehensibly dramatic way possible.
What's the final judgement? He didn't engage in the blame-credit game, so everyone else(and history) played it for him.
And now it's your turn.
Is Johan de Witt The INTP Politician?: A popular personality theory might actually explain his strange decisions.
Why Johan de Witt=Tumblr Sexyman: Brooding intellect, tragic demise, idealism, and even swan energy—what more could Tumblr want?
Geddes vs. Veegens: A Meta-roast of Johan de Witt: Two historians go head-to-head in the ultimate battle of witty critiques and historical hot takes.
Myths, Mistakes, and Mobs : Unraveling the mystery—why did he "forget" about the army? What made him the ultimate snack?
[2] https://johandewitt.nl/minuten-johan-de-witt/minuten-johan-de-witt-januari-t-m-maart-1672/
[3] https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Projects/Daxenberger/chapter-5/
[4] John de Witt.Statesman of the True Freedom(Rowen, 1986)
[5] History of the Administration of John De Witt, Grand Pensionary of Holland(Geddes, 1879)