The Analysis phase identifies learner needs, organizational goals, and potential challenges that shape the design of Feedback That Fuels. This section documents the foundational research and planning that informed the course, including the Needs Analysis Template, Learner Profiles, Personas, and Risk Mitigation strategies.
Use the collapsible tabs under "Needs Analysis," to explore the artifact and review the accompanying Designer Notes, which explain the rationale behind design decisions.
Scroll below to examine two personas created for this project alongside the designer notes behind the creation.
Rationale for Audience Definition
Because Firefly did not provide demographic details, we assumed a broad manager audience (novice + experienced).
Rationale for Course Duration & Format
Chose 2-4 hours to balance efficiency with meaningful engagement.
Asynchronous delivery (Coursebox AI) allows flexible access for managers working in high-stakes environments.
Rationale for Micro-Credential Design
Micro-credentials offer bite-sized mastery of one skill — in this case, giving feedback that builds trust and drives performance.
This structure fits Firefly’s fast-paced, project-driven culture, where managers cannot commit to long courses.
A badge signals immediate, tangible recognition, motivating completion and reinforcing credibility.
Rationale for Asynchronous Learning
Asynchronous format accommodates managers across diverse schedules and departments.
It ensures accessibility for employees in different time zones, shifts, or field assignments.
Paired with the Coursebox AI tutor, learners can self-pace, revisit content, and explore deeper resources when needed, bridging the novice–expert gap.
In this phase, one of my biggest insights was that goals had to connect not only to learning outcomes but also to business outcomes. Firefly leaders care about—trust, performance, and communication. Embedding analytics in the simulation gave us a way to measure growth authentically, while designing testimonial-driven storytelling allowed us to address cultural change in ways metrics alone could not.
Why OKRs?
Including OKRs demonstrates that we are aligning the course with organizational strategic outcomes, not just isolated training activities. Our aim is for every learning simulation to directly support the broader goals of the organization.
Why Multiple Data Types?
We blended quantitative measures (surveys, scenario scores) with qualitative insights (manager reports, interviews) to capture both hard data and contextual detail. This mixed-method approach provides a more accurate picture of performance in organizational contexts and helps identify potential gaps that might be overlooked with a single data source. By triangulating data across methods, we increase the credibility of our findings and ensure stronger, evidence-based decisions.
Why Baselines Are “Unknown”?
Because this is a conceptual artifact, baseline data does not exist. Listing baselines as “unknown” reflects transparency while also modeling how data would be collected in real implementation. In practice, I would conduct pre-assessments to establish baselines whenever they are missing, ensuring accurate measurement of progress over time.
Why Scenarios Over Lectures?
Scenario-based learning enables learners to apply skills in realistic contexts, bridging the gap between simulation and real-world application. This approach ensures managers can practice decision-making in a safe environment before transferring skills to high-stakes workplace situations.
Why Scaffolded Supports?
Scaffolds ensure both novice and experienced managers can benefit without the course feeling too remedial or too advanced.
Why Cross-Device Optimization?
Managers often balance fieldwork, meetings, and remote collaboration. Ensuring accessibility on laptops, tablets, and mobile devices maximizes usability.
Why Asynchronous?
Firefly operates in a fast-paced, high-pressure environment, where managers’ schedules are unpredictable. A modular, asynchronous course structure empowers learners to self-pace and return to content as needed. From a learning science perspective, retention is strongest when learners can engage at moments of readiness and focus, rather than under rigid schedules.
Why Only Two Objectives?
With a 30–45 minute micro-credential, fewer objectives ensure learners can deeply practice and be assessed on each. More objectives would dilute the experience.
Why “Identify” for LO1?
“Identify” is a lower-order Bloom’s verb that makes sense as a precursor skill to application. Learners must first be able to spot and name the SBI components before applying them.
Why Simulation for LO2?
A branching simulation creates a safe practice space where managers can see the impact of their choices before applying SBI in real 1:1 conversations.
Why 4 of 5 Correct?
This lighter threshold reduces test fatigue in a micro-credential course while still ensuring learners demonstrate solid recall of SBI.
Why Explanatory Feedback?
All assessments include feedback that teaches, not just scores, ensuring both novice and experienced managers gain value.
Why Summative Quiz Instead of Simulation?
The quiz is trackable in the LMS and provides reliable data for badge awarding. The simulation is retained as a learning activity to deepen application without creating LMS reporting barriers.
Why Accessibility Is Front and Center
Ensuring WCAG 2.1 AA compliance not only supports inclusivity but also reflects Firefly’s commitment to ensuring knowledgeable is accessible for all.
Why Connectivity Considerations?
Managers may not always have stable Wi-Fi. By compressing assets and offering offline job aids, we design for rural conditions.
Why Cross-Device Design?
Managers juggle schedules across offices and remote sites. Cross-device usability ensures learning fits seamlessly into their workflow.
Why These SMEs?
SMEs reflect Firefly’s organizational ecosystem:
L&D IDs ensure instructional alignment
HR Leadership Development ensures cultural/HR consistency
Engineering Team Leads provide technical/managerial authenticity
Senior L&D Specialists validate assessment integrity
Why Placeholder Dates?
Using placeholder dates shows a realistic pacing flow (week-by-week sign-off checkpoints). Demonstrates project management foresight even in a fictional context.
Why Diverse Assets?
The mix of scripts, infographics, scenarios, and quizzes highlights multiple instructional design skills while showing Firefly the range of deliverables possible in 3 weeks.
Why Status Transparency?
Sign-off statuses (“Pending,” “In Review”) illustrate a collaborative, iterative design process rather than “one and done.” This builds credibility in how we would manage a live project.
Why Align Risks to Constraints?
Each risk was directly tied to the constraints we identified earlier (accessibility, connectivity, device compatibility). This shows continuity and foresight in the design process.
Why Add Learner Engagement?
Firefly’s rubric emphasizes learner-centered design. Addressing learner engagement as a risk demonstrates we’re anticipating motivational and knowledge-level challenges, not just technical ones.
Why Detailed Mitigation Plans?
Instead of generic fixes, each mitigation plan shows specific strategies (QA cycles, offline job aids, scaffolds). This signals a proactive project management approach.
When planning Feedback That Fuels, I realized that a clear marketing strategy was necessary to position the course as more than just “another training.” Internally, I partnered with HR to embed the course into the Firefly Manager Microcredential Program, making completion a visible step on the leadership development pathway. We also launched a dedicated Slack channel where managers could share reflections, support each other, and celebrate earning badges. Framing the course as career development rather than compliance proved critical for motivating participation.
Externally, I worked with Marketing to align the course with Firefly’s employer brand. We adopted a conversational marketing approach, leveraging short, authentic testimonial-style videos that mirrored the style of TikTok reels. These clips highlighted how Firefly managers were using SBI in their roles, sending a message to potential hires that Firefly invests in its people and culture.
The key insight from this phase was that authenticity sells. Real voices—whether through testimonials, Slack discussions, or social media reels—drove more engagement than polished, corporate-style campaigns. Marketing became a design decision in its own right, ensuring the course was visible, relevant, and embraced as part of Firefly’s continuous learning culture.
While a full Agile communication framework was not formally applied in this project, if scaled, I would adopt a lightweight Agile approach to structure communication with key stakeholders. Using a RACI chart, I identified who would be included on the Agile team and clarified their roles: HR and Marketing (consulted on messaging), employees (informed through testimonial participation), and L&D (responsible/accountable for delivery). Communication would follow a lean cadence—ad-hoc updates during design and weekly check-ins during deployment preparation—to keep messaging aligned and the rollout smooth.
Why Create an Novice Manager Persona?
Firefly’s new managers may arrive with varying levels of leadership experience. Creating a persona like Gillian ensures we design with empathy for first-time leaders who may lack confidence but are eager to grow.
Why These Goals & Challenges?
Goals (confidence, trust, structured feedback) align directly with the course objectives.
Challenges (fear of damaging trust, lack of formal frameworks) highlight why scaffolds such as infographics and safe scenario practice are essential.
How This Persona Informs Design
The course integrates step-by-step guidance (SBI framework) and job aids to support managers like Gillian.
Scenario-based simulations give her a safe practice space before applying feedback skills on the job.
Badging and recognition serve as motivators for learners who value external validation while building credibility.
Why Create an Experienced Manager Persona?
Firefly’s management population won’t be uniform. Including Sebastian ensures we design for seasoned leaders who bring existing habits and expertise but must adapt to a new organizational culture.
Why These Goals & Challenges?
Goals (adapting to Firefly, strengthening relationships, refining feedback style) emphasize alignment with organizational culture and cross-functional collaboration.
Challenges (blunt communication, balancing urgency with trust) directly informed the decision to include scenario comparisons that let learners evaluate feedback approaches.
Why Highlight Motivation?
Unlike the novice persona, Sebastian’s motivation is intrinsic—he values strong employee relationships, a healthy culture, and learning from his peers. This distinction drives the course to include reflective prompts and advanced evaluation tasks that engage experienced learners.
How This Persona Informs Design
The course incorporates reflective decision points (mini-scenarios) so experienced managers can compare methods without feeling “talked down to.”
Job aids are provided as optional resources to avoid redundancy for seasoned learners while still supporting novices.
Self-directed, modular learning supports Sebastian’s busy schedule and preference for flexibility.
Sharing employee experiences so advance learners like Sebatian stay motivated because their employees are applying this.
This table summarizes the software used throughout the design and development of Feedback That Fuels. Tools are organized by their primary function—Project Management, Design, Development, and Evaluation—and reflect the project’s emphasis on rapid prototyping. Each tool was selected for its ability to support quick iteration, flexibility, and alignment with both organizational needs and learner-centered design.
This artifact was created by Dr. Aurelia Isabel O'Neil
aurelia.isabel.oneil@gmail.com