JOIN THE MOVEMENT: “WE THE PEOPLE” RALLY FOR TRUTH & JUSTICE AS WE INITIATE A PRE-DISCOVERY CIVIL RIGHTS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS, CIVIL RIGHTS ISSUES, DISCRIMINATION, AND BREACH OF FEDERAL DEPARTMENT PROTOCOLS.
United States of America — In a historic unification of "The People" across the country who have been adversely affected by ongoing cannabis scheduling, we are initiating a Pre-discovery Civil Rights Class Action Lawsuit against the federal government, including but not limited to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), U.S. Department of Energy,(DOE), Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). This lawsuit addresses their failure to adhere to established federal protocols, which undermines the rights of United States citizens.
It is critical to recognize that the DEA has never held legitimate jurisdiction over cannabis. Nixon's illegal placement of cannabis on the Schedule I Controlled Substances Act (CSA) list ignored expert advice from government officials and agencies, perpetuating lies that keep cannabis out of the reach of those who want energy, food, medicine, freedoms and the whole plant,
We call upon the three branches of the United States government and urge them to recognize and uphold the sovereignty of states and the rights of citizens in our pursuit of cannabis reform, ensuring a separation of powers. The anti-commandeering doctrine prohibits the federal government from compelling states to enforce federal laws, affirming that Congress cannot require state agents to uphold the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) regarding cannabis. This breach of fiduciary duty undermines the principles of federalism and the rightful authority of states to regulate matters within their borders. It is imperative for the legislative branch to enact laws that reflect the public’s will, for the executive branch to support fair and just policies, and for the judicial branch to protect these foundational principles. This unified approach is essential for establishing the necessary checks and balances to facilitate meaningful change in cannabis policy and support the descheduling movement alongside our prediscovery civil rights class action lawsuit.
With over 43,653 comments submitted (making it the most commented on proposal EVER in History on the Federal Register since 1936) for the 2024 DEA marijuana rescheduling proposal, 70% in favor of Descheduling not Rescheduling, and undeniable evidence of deception. We have too much political theater, misdirection, pandering and controlled fraud.
We must confront the significant civil rights violations stemming from the mishandling of marijuana scheduling under the CSA. Historical evidence, including publicly archived recordings of President Nixon who resigned from office after facing an impeachment committee before a formal vote could take place, reveals that marijuana's classification was driven by racism and political motives rather than scientific assessment, contributing to systemic injustices that have affected countless individuals and communities. Despite this, nobody even considered questioning the wrongful and illegal placement of Cannabis on the CSA.
In 1972, despite expert testimony from the AMA, APHA, and NIDA advocating for positive cannabis reform as part of the Shafer Commission, President Nixon illegally ignored their recommendations to decriminalize it. Federal agencies violated their fiduciary duty by dismissing expert testimony misrepresenting the Shafer Commission stance. Nixon's decision to maintain cannabis as a Schedule I drug under the CSA was unconstitutional and once again driven by political concerns, as revealed in the Nixon tapes where he stated: "I was horrified to see these distinguished citizens of District of Columbia come out in favor of the legalization of marijuana... I don’t think marijuana is that bad, but it’s the wrong signal." This disregard for expert findings and public welfare marked a significant abuse of power and violation of the constitution.
How Can I Help?
Join us in our Prediscovery Civil Rights Class Action lawsuit as we rally on December 2, 2024, across from the DEA Museum, 700 Army Navy Dr, Arlington, Virginia, starting at 8 AM, with assembly beginning at 7:30 AM. This rally will coincide with an invitation-only historic cannabis hearing¹ on the proposed rescheduling from Schedule I to Schedule III under the CSA. We are demanding full descheduling, not just rescheduling, given the placement of cannabis on the CSA was illegal in the 1st place and breach of protocol by the FDA. We intend to speak up, exercise our rights, as well as collect testimony, affidavits and evidence for our proposed lawsuit.
The Problem with Rescheduling and the Need for Descheduling:
Rescheduling cannabis will shift control to prescription from pharmaceutical corporations and the FDA. Harming Mom and Pop shops and local growers just like prop 64 in California while prioritizing corporate interests. This approach creates the illusion of progress but maintains penalties under the CSA. The current scheduling is unconstitutional, rooted in racist policies that perpetuate inequality. Rather than rescheduling, we need to fully deschedule cannabis to prevent pharmaceutical companies from commercializing bioengineered products that exploit cannabinoids. Descheduling of the whole natural one plant would return freedom, choice, and independence.
This movement encompasses a wide range of individuals and communities, including:
Patients seeking alternative treatments for chronic conditions
Parents advocating for safe access
Mom and Pop Shops striving to thrive in a corporate-dominated market
Young adults and seniors looking for apothecary, holistic, and kitchen care
Hemp farmers and home growers wanting to cultivate their crops without federal interference
Minorities
Veterans seeking alternatives for managing PTSD and chronic pain
Non-violent cannabis prisoners
Cannabis Industry Workers
Public opinion is indecently misaligned with Public policy. Repealing and liability
Support for cannabis reform is building across all three branches of government. The executive branch, represented by President Biden and Vice President HarrisBiden, has voiced strong backing. Harris has called for fairness in marijuana laws, while Biden stated, 'No one should be in prison for marijuana. The legislative branch In Congress, composed of House Representatives And Senators have voiced support for full descheduling. Meanwhile, the judicial branch continues to influence reform through key rulings that challenge outdated cannabis laws, creating momentum for change. They stated: "The longer marijuana remains scheduled in the CSA, the longer our communities face senselessly severe penalties and the longer the marijuana laws of the majority of U.S. states remain in conflict with federal law.” (List of Supporters from Congress on page 5.)
Again “We The People” call upon the checks and balances inherent in our government’s three branches to unite in taking immediate action to fully deschedule cannabis. This action would ensure it is treated as a versatile option for medical, therapeutic, and personal use, reflecting its unique role in improving well-being while allowing for responsible adult access without stigma. Unlike alcohol, which is solely for recreational use, cannabis offers a range of benefits from proven medical treatments to holistic wellness applications. Momentum for reform is growing across the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Vice President Kamala Harris and President Biden have both called for fairness in cannabis laws, with Biden stating, 'No one should be in prison for marijuana.' In Congress, bipartisan lawmakers are pushing for full federal legalization and descheduling, while judicial rulings continue to challenge outdated cannabis laws. Key policymakers recognize that descheduling is critical to harmonize state and federal laws, rectify the harms caused by its current classification, and ensure equitable access for all.
THE SCHEDULING OF CANNABIS HAS LED TO NUMEROUS FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION THAT CONTINUE TO AFFECT INDIVIDUALS AND COMMUNITIES, INCLUDING:
Employment, Housing, Healthcare, Legal, Racial, Economic, Educational, Social, Political, Criminal Justice, Food Stamp and Government Assistance, and Child Protective Services Discrimination
LEGAL ARGUMENTS
1st,4th, and 10th Amendment Issues
Civil Rights Violations
Hippocratic Oath Violations
Racism and Discriminatory Motives
Violation of Equal Protection
Lobbying Corruption
Due Process Violations
Potential Violations of International Law
Anti-Commandeering Doctrine
Breach of Fiduciary Obligation
Violation of the Controlled Substances Act
PRE-DISCOVERY CIVIL RIGHTS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
Probable Defendants, Allegedly
PRIVATE SECTORS
Pharmaceutical companies (e.g., Pfizer Purdue Pharma, Johnson & Johnson)
Healthcare professionals who have violated their Hippocratic Oath by perpetuating the stigma on cannabis and its proven medicinal properties, failing to “do no harm.”
Industry lobbyists and trade associations opposing cannabis legalization (e.g., National Association of State Controlled Substances Authorities)
AGENCIES
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)
U.S. Department of Energy
USDA
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
Attorney General of the USA
Current/former heads of the DEA & FDA
Members of the National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse
Key legislators, CEOs, executives, or key individuals in organizations and major corporations known for lobbying against cannabis reform
Descheduling: The process of removing/repealing cannabis entirely from the CSA, eliminating any federal regulation/enforcement
Rescheduling: Moving cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III, which still maintains federal oversight and penalties under the CSA
Dual Sovereignty: The authority of states to govern themselves and regulate matters within their own borders without federal interference.
Anti-commandeering Doctrine: A legal principle that prohibits the federal government from requiring states to enforce federal laws.
Fiduciary Obligation: A legal duty to act in the best interest of another party, which, in this context, refers to the responsibility of federal agencies to uphold the rights and well-being of citizens when regulating controlled substances like cannabis.
Civil Rights Violations: Breaches of the basic rights and freedoms to which all individuals are entitled, resulting from discriminatory laws and policies.
Judicial dissolution, informally called the corporate death penalty, is a legal procedure in which a corporation is forced to dissolve or cease to exist.
Systemic Injustices: Deep-rooted social and institutional practices perpetuate inequality and discrimination
Controlled Fraud/Opposition
Key supporters in Congress include:
U.S. Senators: Elizabeth Warren (MA), John Fetterman (PA), Chuck Schumer (NY), Cory Booker (NJ), Jeff Merkley (OR), Bernie Sanders (VT), Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), Ron Wyden (OR), John Hickenlooper (CO), Chris Van Hollen (MD), Alex Padilla (CA), Peter Welch (VT)
U.S. Representatives: Earl Blumenauer (OR), Barbara Lee (CA), Brian J. Mast (FL), David Joyce (OH), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ), Katie Porter (CA), Troy Carter (LA), Nikema Williams (GA), Seth Moulton (MA), Matt Gaetz (FL), Jan Schakowsky (IL), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC), Dina Titus (NV), Jared Huffman (CA), James P. McGovern (MA), Nancy Mace (SC), Cori Bush (MO), Steve Cohen (TN), Salud Carbajal (CA), Mark Pocan (WI), Mike Quigley (IL), Dwight Evans (PA), Marie Newman (IL), J. Luis Correa (CA)
COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF CANNABIS LEGALIZATION EFFORTS IN THE UNITED STATES
MEDICAL CANNABIS
1. CA Proposition 215 (1996)
2. AZ Proposition 200 (1996)
3. FL Amendment 2 (2016)
4. NJ Medical Marijuana Program (2010)
5. IL Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act (2013)
6. PA Medical Marijuana Act (2016)
7. NY Compassionate Care Act (2014)
8. OK State Question 788 (2018)
9. ME Medical Use of Marijuana Act (1999)
10. MI Medical Marihuana Act (2008)
11. NV Medical Marijuana Act (2000)
12. OH Medical Marijuana Control Program (2016)
13. TX Compassionate Use Act (2015)
14. LA Medical Marijuana Program (2019)
15. VA Medical Cannabis Bill (2017)
16. ND Medical Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2016)
17. WV Medical Cannabis Act (2017)
18. SD Initiated Measure 26 (2020)
19. AR Medical Marijuana Amendment (2016)
20. NH Therapeutic Cannabis Act (2013)
21. HI Medical Marijuana Dispensary Program (2015)
22. CT P.A. 12-55 (2012)
23. MN Medical Cannabis Program (2014)
24. RI Medical Marijuana Act (2006)
25. IA Medical Cannabidiol Act (2017)
26. AL Medical Marijuana Program (2021)
27. MO Amendment 2 (2018)
28. NM Medical Cannabis Program (2007)
29. MT Medical Marijuana Act (2004)
30. OR Medical Marijuana Program (1998)
31. VT Medical Marijuana Registry (2004)
32. WA Medical Marijuana Act (1998)
33. SC Compassionate Care Act (2021)
34. GA Medical Cannabis Law (2015)
35. DE Medical Marijuana Act (2011)
36. WY Medical Marijuana Bill (proposed 2023)
37. NY Medical Marijuana Program (2014)
38. NE Medical Marijuana Initiatives (proposed 2023)
