Canadian Art Teacher is interested to hear and share perspectives about Art Education from a range of voices and opinions. In order to facilitate this, we offer an inclusive publishing experience with different pathways to support your publishing experience, knowledge and goals. Please choose your pathway prior to submission.
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Canadian Art Teacher works with a double-blind peer review process. Each manuscript is blind and reviewed by at least two reviewers with feedback provided to authors upon completion. If revisions are required, authors will be expected to submit a revised manuscript to address and delineate the revisions and changes.
This process is designed for:
Academic professionals (professors, assistant professors)
Those with extensive publishing experience
If you elect to submit your work for CAT's peer review process, you are requested to prepare your work so that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. Authors need to ensure that their manuscripts are prepared in a way that does not give away their identity.
TITLE PAGE: Submit the Title Page containing the Author's details and Blinded Manuscript with no author details as 2 separate files. This should include the title, authors' names and affiliations, and a complete address for the corresponding author including telephone and e-mail address.
MANUSCRIPT: Besides the obvious need to remove names and affiliations under the title within the manuscript, there are other steps that need to be taken to ensure the manuscript is correctly prepared for double-blind peer review, such as:
Use the third person to refer to work the Authors have previously undertaken, e.g. replace any phrases like “as we have shown before” with “… has been shown before [Anonymous, 2020]” .
Make sure figures do not contain any affiliation-related identifier
Do not eliminate essential self-references or other references but limit self-references only to papers that are relevant for those reviewing the submitted paper.
Cite papers published by the Author in the text as follows: ‘[Anonymous, 2020]’.
For blinding in the reference list: ‘[Anonymous 2020] Details omitted for double-blind reviewing.’
Remove references to funding sources
Do not include acknowledgments
Remove any identifying information, including author names, from file names and ensure document properties are also anonymized.
PEER MENTOR PROCESS
Canadian Art Teacher is committed to creating an inclusive publishing experience. We acknowledge that not all artists, teachers and scholars have experience submitting and publishing their work within national journals. We aim to complicate the current hegemonic publishing practices by offering editing and publishing support via our peer mentor process.
If your work is accepted for publication via the peer mentor process, experienced editors from CAT will work directly with you to give you conceptual feedback on your ideas and intentions, organizational feedback on your writing voice, style, and logistical support to ensure that your work follows academic publication guidelines
This process is designed for:
Those who are inexperienced with the publishing process
Working Undergraduate/Secondary Teachers
Artists
Graduate or Ph.D. students
Undergraduate/Secondary students
Please note, with respect, due to the output of time and care that the CAT editors are taking with your work, if you choose to participate in the mentoring process, it is expected that you will continue with the progress until its completion; publishing your work with CAT.
Bien vouloir nous faire parvenir votre soumission ou questions au courriel suivant: canadianartteacher.cat@gmail.com
Inquiries and submissions may be directed to Canadian Art Teacher canadianartteacher.cat@gmail.com